ABSTRACT
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the role of screening computed tomography (CT) of the thorax in cardiac surgery by analysing the presence of CT aortic calcifications in association with changes in operative strategy and postoperative stroke, and the CT features of emphysema with development of pneumonia. Methods: All patients who underwent cardiac surgery from January 2013 to October 2017 by a single surgeon were retrospectively studied. Patients who underwent screening CT thorax before cardiac surgery (CT group) were compared to those who did not (no CT group). Multivariate subgroup analyses were performed to determine significant association with postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 392 patients were included, of which 156 patients underwent preoperative screening CT thorax. Patients in the CT group were older (63.9 vs. 59.0 years, P = 0.001), had fewer recent myocardial infarctions preoperatively (41% vs. 56.4%, P = 0.003) and had better ejection fraction (>30%; P = 0.02). Operative strategy was changed in 4.3% of patients, and 4.9% of patients suffered stroke postoperatively. The presence of CT aortic calcifications was significantly associated with change in operative strategy (P = 0.016) but not with postoperative stroke (P = 0.33). Age was an independent risk factor for change in operative strategy among patients with CT thorax (P = 0.02). Multivariate age-adjusted analysis showed only palpable plaque to be significantly associated with change in operative strategy (P < 0.001). None of the patients with CT emphysema features developed pneumonia. Conclusion: The results of this study do not support routine use of preoperative screening CT thorax. Contrasted CT may be advisable in older patients and for other operative planning purposes.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has attracted increasing attention, with institutions increasingly adopting this approach over conventional median sternotomy (MS). This study aimed to describe the outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in our institution as the only centre with an established MICS programme in Singapore. Methods: Patients who had undergone cardiac procedures such as heart valve replacement or repair, coronary artery bypass grafting or atrial septal defect repair were included in the study. We analysed 4063 patients who had undergone MS and 390 patients who had undergone MICS between January 2009 and February 2020. Results: Over the years, the number of MICS procedures performed increased, along with an increase in MICS operations with two or more concomitant cardiac procedures and a decrease in postoperative length of stay. Compared with patients who underwent MS, those who underwent MICS had shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who underwent MICS had lower rates of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.021), reoperation (P = 0.028) and prolonged ventilation (P < 0.001). However, the rates of other postoperative complications were comparable between patients who underwent MICS and those who underwent MS. Conclusion: In our institution, MICS is a safe, reproducible and efficacious technique that yields superior outcomes compared with conventional MS procedures, in some aspects. The results of this study provide further evidence and support towards adopting the minimally invasive approach to cardiac surgery in a carefully selected group of cardiac patients in Singapore.
