Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 66: 198-204, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27362971

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Aim of the study was to compare various outcomes of dementia patients with elderly patients without dementia by conducting a systematic review of previous population-based studies. METHODS: The relevant studies were retrieved from search of electronic databases. RESULTS: The pooled data from included 11 studies consisted of outcomes of 1,044,131 dementia patients compared to 9,639,027 elderly patients without dementia. Meta-analysis showed that the mortality in dementia patients was 15.3% as compared to 8.7% in non-dementia cases (RR 1.70, CI 95%, 1.27-2.28, p 0.0004). However, there was significant heterogeneity between the studies (p<0.00001). Dementia patients had significantly increased overall readmission rate (OR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29, p<0.001). They had higher complication rates for urinary tract infections (RR 2.88; 95% CI, 2.45-3.40, p<0.0001), pressure ulcers (RR 184; 95% CI, 1.31-1.46, p<0.0001), pneumonia (RR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.36-2.02, p<0.0001), delirium (RR 3.10; 95% CI, 2.31-4.15, p<0.0001), and, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance (RR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.55-2.25, p<0.0001). Dementia patients had more acute cardiac events (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28, p 0.002), while fewer revascularization procedures (HR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20, p<0.001). Patients with dementia had lesser use of ITU (reduction by 7.5%; 95% CI, 6.9-8.1), ventilation (reduction by 5.4%; 95% CI, 5.0-5.9), and dialysis (reduction by 0.5%; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8). DISCUSSION: Compared to older adult population, patients with dementia had poorer outcome. Despite higher mortality rate and readmission rate, they underwent fewer interventions and procedures.


Subject(s)
Dementia/mortality , Disease Management , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Databases, Factual , Dementia/therapy , Global Health , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Patient Readmission/trends , Prognosis , Survival Rate/trends
2.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 25(4): 289-298, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27121795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are often prescribed in the treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD), however, their use has been discouraged in light of clinical trials suggesting that they cause an increased risk of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to assess relative risk of CVA in dementia patients prescribed SGA rather than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), through meta-analysis of population-based studies. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using several relevant databases. Five studies were included in the review and data were pooled to conduct meta-analysis using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: A total of 79,910 patients were treated with SGAs and 1287 cases of CVA were reported. Of 48,135 patients treated with FGAs, a total of 511 cases of CVA were reported. The relative risk of CVA was 1.02 (95% CI 0.56-1.84) for the SGA group. There was no significant difference in the risk of stroke (p = 0.96) between groups, but significant heterogeneity was found among the results of included studies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of population-based data suggested that the use of SGAs as opposed to FGAs to control BPSD is not associated with significantly increased risk of CVA. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Dementia/drug therapy , Stroke/chemically induced , Dementia/epidemiology , Humans , Stroke/epidemiology
3.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 22(1): 63-71, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26503012

ABSTRACT

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has been a controversial area of debate and the outcome profile of the technique has been thoroughly investigated. Scepticism regarding the reported outcomes and the conduct of the randomized trials comparing this technique with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has been widely voiced, and the technique of off-pump surgery remains as an infrequently adopted approach to myocardial revascularization worldwide. Criticisms of the technique are related to lower rates of complete revascularization and its unknown long-term consequences, the significant detrimental effects on mortality and major adverse events when emergency conversion is required, and the significant lack of long-term survival and morbidity data. The hybrid technique of myocardial revascularization on the beating heart with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass may theoretically provide the beneficial effects of off-pump surgery in terms of myocardial protection and organ protection, while providing the safety and stability of on-pump surgery to allow complete revascularization. Large randomized comparison to support evidence-based choices is currently lacking. In this article, we have meta-analysed the outcomes of on-pump beating heart surgery in comparison with off-pump surgery focusing on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) including mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction and the degree of revascularization and number of bypass grafts performed. It was demonstrated that the beating heart on-pump technique allows a significantly higher number of bypass grafts to be performed, resulting in significantly higher degree of revascularization. We have also demonstrated a slightly higher rate of 30-day mortality and MACCE with the technique although not at a statistically significant level. These results should be considered alongside the population risk profile, where a significantly higher risk cohort had undergone the beating heart on-pump technique. Long-term survival and morbidity figures are required to assess the impact of these findings in the coronary surgery patient population.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/methods , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Observational Studies as Topic , Humans
4.
Ann Surg ; 261(6): 1079-84, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26291954

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether distractions in the operating room (OR) are associated with higher mental workload and stress, and poorer teamwork among OR personnel. BACKGROUND: Engaging in multiple tasks can affect performance. There is little research on the effect of distractions on surgical team members' behavior and cognitive processes. METHODS: Ninety general surgery cases were observed in real time. Cases were assessed by a surgeon and a behavioral scientist using 4 validated tools: OR Distractions Assessment Form, the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery tool, NASA-Task Load Index, and short form of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Analysis of variance was performed to evaluate significant differences between teamwork, workload, and stress level among team members. Correlations (Pearson r) were computed to evaluate associations between variables. RESULTS: The most prevalent distractions were those initiated by external staff, followed by case-irrelevant conversations. Case-irrelevant conversations were associated with poorer team performance. Irrelevant conversations initiated by surgeons were associated with lower teamwork in surgeons (across team skills: r = -0.44 to -0.58, P < 0.05 to 0.01) and anesthesiologists (r = -0.38 and r = -0.40, for coordination and leadership; P < 0.05). Equipment-related distractions correlated with higher stress (r = 0.48, P < 0.05) and lower teamwork (across team skills: r = -0.42 to -0.50, P < 0.05) in nurses. Acoustic distractions correlated with higher stress in surgeons (r = 0.32, P < 0.05) and higher workload in anesthesiologists (r = 0.30, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although some distractions may be inevitable in the OR, they can also be detrimental to the team. A deeper understanding of the effect of distractions on teams and their outcomes can lead to targeted quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Attention , Health Personnel/psychology , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Operating Rooms/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/psychology , Clinical Competence , Communication , Cooperative Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Prospective Studies , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Task Performance and Analysis , Workload/psychology
5.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 12(11): 1327-35, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25319147

ABSTRACT

On-pump coronary artery surgery remains the gold standard treatment for multi-vessel disease. The technique of off-pump surgery has evolved since its first use; however, currently less than 20% of all cases worldwide are performed this way. This poor uptake has been both the cause and the effect of widespread scepticism regarding the validity of the data on the technique, as well as criticism regarding the conversion-related adverse outcomes, graft patency and completeness of revascularisation. Consequently, there has been focus on patient selection from subgroups most likely to benefit from the technique. Re-operative patients, by virtue of their advanced age, complex co-morbidities and the technical challenges of re-operation, fall into this category. In this review, the authors will discuss the outcomes of off-pump surgery in comparison to on-pump, explore the potential beneficial effects of off-pump in re-operative surgery and formulate a decision-making strategy in patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery surgery.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Reoperation , Transplants , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/methods , Humans , Patient Selection , Treatment Outcome
6.
Int J Surg ; 11(1): 6-11, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23195770

ABSTRACT

It is increasingly recognised that leadership skills are a key requirement in being successful in surgery, regardless of speciality and at all levels of experience and seniority. Where the emphasis was previously on technical ability, knowledge and diagnostic acumen, we now know that non-technical skills such as communication and leadership contribute significantly to patient safety, experience and outcomes, and should be valued. The operating theatre is a unique micro-environment which is often busier, noisier, more stressful and more physically demanding than the clinic or ward setting. As a result surgeons and their trainers, who are striving to develop leadership skills require an in-depth awareness of the challenges in this environment and the opportunities that arise from them to develop leadership effectively. This article outlines why leadership learning is so beneficial in the operating theatre, both for the team and the patient as well as what elements of daily routine activity such as the WHO checklist use, list-planning and audit can be exploited to transform the average busy operating theatre into a rich, learning environment for future leaders in surgery.


Subject(s)
Communication , Leadership , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Physicians/organization & administration , Surgical Procedures, Operative/education , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Computer Simulation , Humans , Operating Rooms/standards , Patient Care Team , Physicians/standards
7.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 54(7): 870-5, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21654255

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional anorectal pain occurs in the absence of any clinical abnormality. It is common and disabling; it has previously been reported in only a few studies involving small patient numbers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes for patients with functional anorectal pain. SETTINGS AND PATIENTS: Patient demographics, clinical history, and tests results for all referrals for anorectal physiological testing between 1997 and 2009 were prospectively recorded. For patients with functional anorectal pain, further information was gained from clinical notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical history, anorectal physiology, and radiological imaging data were recorded for all patients; treatment outcome was noted for patients treated and followed up at the present unit. RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients, 99 female, with a median age of 48 years (range, 18-86), were studied. Patients were classified as having chronic proctalgia (pain duration ≥20 min, 158 patients) or proctalgia fugax (pain duration <20 min, 12 patients). The pain was most commonly located in the anal canal (90%) and aggravated by defecation or sitting (66%). A third of patients had a history of psychological disturbance. Internal anal sphincter thickness correlated with resting anal pressures. Patients with proctalgia fugax had a higher internal anal sphincter thickness and resting pressure than patients with chronic proctalgia, whereas patients with a family history of similar symptoms were more likely to have proctalgia fugax and higher resting pressures and internal anal sphincter thickness compared with those without a family history of these symptoms. Patients referred for treatment underwent a range of interventions including biofeedback (29 patients, 17 improved), tricyclic antidepressants (26 patients, 10 improved), Botox injection (9 patients, 5 improved), and sacral nerve stimulation (3 patients, 2 improved). Biofeedback had the greatest treatment effect, especially in patients with defecatory dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback is beneficial in the subset of patients with functional anorectal pain and difficulty with defecation. Tricyclic antidepressants, Botox, and sacral nerve stimulation may also have a role.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Anus Diseases/complications , Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anus Diseases/diagnosis , Anus Diseases/therapy , Defecation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections , Lumbosacral Plexus , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 5: 4, 2010 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20109211

ABSTRACT

Acute type A aortic dissection can be complicated by visceral malperfusion and is associated with a significant surgical morbidity and mortality. We describe a case of successful management of a complex acute type A dissection with mesenteric and lower limb ischemia treated with endovascular thoracic stenting and femoro-femoral crossover bypass grafting followed by aortic arch repair. To accomplish this, we applied a staged therapeutic approach using serial lactate measurements to assess the adequacy of peripheral perfusion and metabolic status prior to surgical repair of the proximal dissection.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Femoral Artery/surgery , Aortic Dissection/complications , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Biomarkers/blood , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/etiology , Lactic Acid/blood , Leg/blood supply , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Stents , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...