Exploring the spatial relationship of e-bike and motorcycle crashes: Implications for risk reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Electric bicycles, or e-bikes, have become very popular over the past decade. In order to reduce the risk of crashes, it is necessary to understand the contributing factors. While several researchers have examined these elements, few have considered the spatial heterogeneity between crashes and environmental variables, such as Points of Interest (POI). In addition, there is a scarcity of studies comparing the crash-related factors of e-bikes and motorcycles. Despite their differing speed and range capabilities, different POIs also tend to impact area/bandwidths differently because e-bikes cannot cover the same range that motorcycles can. METHOD: In this study, we compared e-bike and motorcycle crashes at 11 different types of POIs in Taipei from 2016 to 2020. Since crashes are sparse events and easily affected by the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP), Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) was employed to transform crash points (count data) to crash risk surfaces (continuous data). Additionally, an advanced variant of Geographical Weighted Regression (GWR), Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) utilized to predict crash risk because each predictor is allowed to have a different bandwidth. RESULTS: The results showed: (a) For e-bike crashes, the MGWR model outperformed the GWR and OLS models in terms of AIC values, while the MGWR and GWR performed similarly with regard to motorcycle crashes; (b) The analysis revealed e-bike and motorcycle crash risk to be associated with various types of POIs. E-bike crashes tended to occur more frequently in areas with more schools, supermarkets, intersections, and elderly people. Meanwhile, motorcycle crashes were more likely to occur in areas with a high number of restaurants and intersections. The search bandwidths of e-bikes are inconsistent and narrower than those of motorcycles.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on O-D flow and airport networks in the origin country and in Northeast Asia.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has posed a global threat to human health. In order to prevent the spread of this virus, many countries have imposed travel restrictions. This difficult situation has dramatically affected the airline industry by reducing the passenger volume, number of flights, airline flow patterns, and even has changed the entire airport network, especially in Northeast Asia (because it includes the original disease seed). However, although most scholars have used conventional statistical analysis to describe the changes in passenger volume before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, very few of them have applied statistical assessment or time series analysis, and have not even examined how the impact may be different from place to place. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the impact of COVID-19 on the airline industry and affected areas (including the origin-destination flow and the airport network). First, a Clustering Large Applications (CLARA) algorithm was used to group numerous origin-destination (O-D) flow patterns based on their characteristics and to determine if these characteristics have changed the severity of the impact of each cluster during the COVID-19 outbreak. Second, two statistical tests (the paired t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were utilized to determine if the entire airport network and the top 30 hub airports changed during COVID-19. Four centrality measurement indices (degree, closeness, eigenvector, and betweenness centrality) of the airports were used to assess the entire network and ranking of individual hub airports. The study data, provided by The Official Aviation Guide (OAG) from December 2019 to April 2020, indicated that during the COVID-19 outbreak, there was a decrease in passenger volume (60%-98.4%) as well as the number of flights (1.5%-82.6%). However, there were no such significant changes regarding the popularity ranking of most airports during the outbreak. Before this occurred (December 2019), most hub airports were in China (April 2020), and this trend remain similar during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the values of the centrality measurement decreased significantly for most hub airports due to travel restrictions issued by the government.