Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
2.
Arch Virol ; 163(12): 3235-3242, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30128612

ABSTRACT

Wild waterfowl are maintenance hosts of most influenza A virus (IAV) subtypes and are often the subjects of IAV surveillance and transmission models. While maternal antibodies have been detected in yolks and in nestlings for a variety of wild bird species and pathogens, the persistence of maternal antibodies to IAVs in mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos) has not been previously investigated. Nonetheless, this information is important for a full understanding of IAV transmission dynamics because ducklings protected by maternal antibodies may not be susceptible to infection. In this study, we examined the transfer of IAV-specific maternal antibodies to ducklings. Blood samples were collected approximately every five days from ducklings hatched from hens previously infected with an H6 strain of IAV. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to IAV by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median persistence of maternal antibodies in ducklings was 12.5 days (range: 4-33 days) post-hatch. The majority of ducklings (71%) had detectable maternal antibodies from 4 to 17 days post-hatch, while a small subset of individuals (29%) had detectable maternal antibodies for up to 21-33 days post-hatch. Antibody concentrations in hens near the time of egg laying were correlated with maternal antibody concentrations in the initial blood sample collected from ducklings (0-4 days post-hatch). Knowledge of the duration of maternal antibodies in ducklings will aid in the interpretation of IAV serological surveillance results and in the modeling of IAV transmission dynamics in waterfowl.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , Animals, Wild/immunology , Animals, Wild/virology , Ducks , Female , Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza in Birds/blood , Male , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Pregnancy
3.
Arch Virol ; 162(11): 3381-3388, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28770344

ABSTRACT

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) have been reported in wild lagomorphs in environments where they share resources with waterfowl. Recent studies have conclusively shown that a North American lagomorph, cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus sp.), become infected following exposure to IAVs and can shed significant quantities of virus. However, the minimum infectious dose and the efficiency of various routes of infection have not been evaluated. Thirty-six cottontail rabbits were used in a dose response study assessing both the oral and nasal routes of infection. The nasal route of infection proved to be the most efficient, as all cottontail rabbits shed viral RNA following inoculation with doses as low as 102 EID50. The oral route of infection was less efficient, but still produced infection rates of ≥ 50% at relatively low doses (i.e., 103 and 104 EID50). These results suggest that cottontail rabbits are highly susceptible to IAVs at low exposure doses that have been routinely observed in environments contaminated by waterfowl. Furthermore, this study supports earlier observations that cottontail rabbits may pose a biosecurity risk to poultry operations, as a virus-contaminated water source or contaminated environment, even at low viral titers, could be sufficient to initiate viral replication in cottontail rabbits.


Subject(s)
Influenza A virus/physiology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Rabbits/virology , Animals , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Virus Shedding/physiology
4.
Sci Rep ; 6: 36237, 2016 11 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27812044

ABSTRACT

In November 2014, a Eurasian strain H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus was detected in poultry in Canada. Introduced viruses were soon detected in the United States and within six months had spread to 21 states with more than 48 million poultry affected. In an effort to study potential mechanisms of spread of the Eurasian H5 virus, the United States Department of Agriculture coordinated several epidemiologic investigations at poultry farms. As part of those efforts, we sampled synanthropic birds and mammals at five infected and five uninfected poultry farms in northwest Iowa for exposure to avian influenza viruses. Across all farms, we collected 2,627 samples from 648 individual birds and mammals. House mice were the most common mammal species captured while house sparrows, European starlings, rock pigeons, swallows, and American robins were the most commonly captured birds. A single European starling was positive for Eurasian H5 viral RNA and seropositive for antibodies reactive to the Eurasian H5 virus. Two American robins were also seropositive. No mammal species showed evidence of infection. These results indicate synanthropic species merit further scrutiny to better understand potential biosecurity risks. We propose a set of management practices aimed at reducing wildlife incursions.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild/virology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Birds/virology , Canada/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Female , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N8 Subtype/genetics , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Influenza in Birds/virology , Male , Mammals/virology , Mice , Poultry Diseases/virology , United States/epidemiology
5.
J Virol Methods ; 228: 130-4, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26645952

ABSTRACT

The availability of a validated commercial assay is an asset for any wildlife investigation. However, commercial products are often developed for use in livestock and are not optimized for wildlife. Consequently, it is incumbent upon researchers and managers to apply commercial products appropriately to optimize program outcomes. We tested more than 800 serum samples from mallards for antibodies to influenza A virus with the IDEXX AI MultiS-Screen Ab test to evaluate assay performance. Applying the test per manufacturer's recommendations resulted in good performance with 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity. However, performance was improved to 98% sensitivity and 98% specificity by increasing the recommended cut-off. Using this alternative threshold for identifying positive and negative samples would greatly improve sample classification, especially for field samples collected months after infection when antibody titers have waned from the initial primary immune response. Furthermore, a threshold that balances sensitivity and specificity reduces estimation bias in seroprevalence estimates.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Ducks , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , Animals, Wild/virology , Ducks/immunology , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seroepidemiologic Studies
6.
Arch Virol ; 161(3): 715-20, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26687583

ABSTRACT

Following a 2008 outbreak of North American low-pathogenic H5N8 influenza A virus at an upland gamebird farm, we sero-sampled rock doves (pigeons, Columba livia) at the outbreak site and conducted experimental inoculations of wild-caught pigeons using the H5N8 virus and another low-pathogenic virus (H4N6). While 13% of pigeons at the outbreak site were seropositive, none were positive for exposure to H5, and one was positive for N8. Challenged pigeons exhibited low susceptibility and limited viral RNA excretion for both viruses tested, but at least one individual had RNA loads indicative of the potential for viral transmission to other birds.


Subject(s)
Columbidae/virology , Influenza A virus/growth & development , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Disease Outbreaks , Disease Susceptibility , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies
7.
Sci Rep ; 5: 14354, 2015 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26400374

ABSTRACT

The potential role of wild mammals in avian influenza A virus (IAV) transmission cycles has received some attention in recent years and cases where birds have transmitted IAV to mammals have been documented. However, the contrasting cycle, wherein a mammal could transmit an avian IAV to birds, has been largely overlooked. We experimentally tested the abilities of two mammalian species to transmit avian IAV to mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in simulated natural environments. Results suggested that striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) can successfully transmit avian IAV to mallards through indirect contact with shared resources, as transmission was noted in 1 of 4 of the mallards tested. Cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus sp.) exhibited a similar pattern, as one of five cottontail rabbits successfully transmitted IAV to a mallard, likely through environmental contamination. For each mammalian species tested, the mallards that became infected were those paired with the individual mammals with the lowest shedding levels but were anecdotally observed to be the most active animals. Mammals associated with and around poultry rearing facilities should be taken into consideration in biosecurity plans.


Subject(s)
Feathers , Hair , Influenza A virus/physiology , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animals , Birds , Mammals , Mephitidae/virology , Rabbits , Virus Shedding
8.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e102964, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25127468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wild raccoons have been shown to be naturally exposed to avian influenza viruses (AIV). However, the mechanisms associated with these natural exposures are not well-understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We experimentally tested three alternative routes (water, eggs, and scavenged waterfowl carcasses) of AIV transmission that may explain how raccoons in the wild are exposed to AIV. Raccoons were exposed to 1) water and 2) eggs spiked with an AIV (H4N6), as well as 3) mallard carcasses experimentally inoculated with the same virus. Three of four raccoons exposed to the high dose water treatment yielded apparent nasal shedding of >10(2.0) PCR EID50 equivalent/mL. Little to no shedding was observed from the fecal route. The only animals yielding evidence of serologic activity during the study period were three animals associated with the high dose water treatment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, our results indicate that virus-laden water could provide a natural exposure route of AIV for raccoons and possibly other mammals associated with aquatic environments. However, this association appears to be related to AIV concentration in the water, which would constitute an infective dose. In addition, strong evidence of infection was only detected in three of four animals exposed to a high dose (e.g., 10(5.0) EID50/mL) of AIV in water. As such, water-borne transmission to raccoons may require repeated exposures to water with high concentrations of virus.


Subject(s)
Food Chain , Influenza A virus , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/transmission , Raccoons/virology , Animals
9.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e102513, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25111780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cottontails (Sylvilagus spp.) are common mammals throughout much of the U.S. and are often found in peridomestic settings, potentially interacting with livestock and poultry operations. If these animals are susceptible to avian influenza virus (AIV) infections and shed the virus in sufficient quantities they may pose a risk for movement of avian influenza viruses between wildlife and domestic animals in certain situations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To assess the viral shedding potential of AIV in cottontails, we nasally inoculated fourteen cottontails with a low pathogenic AIV (H4N6). All inoculated cottontails shed relatively large quantities of viral RNA both nasally (≤ 10(6.94) PCR EID50 equivalents/mL) and orally (≤ 10(5.09) PCR EID50 equivalents/mL). However, oral shedding tended to decline more quickly than did nasal shedding. No animals showed any obvious signs of disease throughout the study. Evidence of a serological response was found in all infected rabbits at 22 days post infection in convalescent sera. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: To our knowledge, cottontails have not been previously assessed for AIV shedding. However, it was obvious that they shed AIV RNA extensively via the nasal and oral routes. This is significant, as cottontails are widely distributed throughout the U.S. and elsewhere. These mammals are often found in highly peridomestic situations, such as farms, parks, and suburban neighborhoods, often becoming habituated to human activities. Thus, if infected these mammals could easily transport AIVs short distances.


Subject(s)
Influenza A virus/physiology , Lagomorpha/virology , Virus Shedding , Animals , Influenza A virus/genetics , Organ Specificity , RNA, Viral/analysis , Serologic Tests
10.
PLoS One ; 9(1): e70639, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24489638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) are susceptible to infection with some influenza A viruses. However, the viral shedding capability of this peri-domestic mammal and its potential role in influenza A virus ecology are largely undetermined. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Striped skunks were experimentally infected with a low pathogenic (LP) H4N6 avian influenza virus (AIV) and monitored for 20 days post infection (DPI). All of the skunks exposed to H4N6 AIV shed large quantities of viral RNA, as detected by real-time RT-PCR and confirmed for live virus with virus isolation, from nasal washes and oral swabs (maximum ≤ 10(6.02) PCR EID50 equivalent/mL and ≤ 10(5.19) PCR EID50 equivalent/mL, respectively). Some evidence of potential fecal shedding was also noted. Following necropsy on 20 DPI, viral RNA was detected in the nasal turbinates of one individual. All treatment animals yielded evidence of a serological response by 20 DPI. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that striped skunks have the potential to shed large quantities of viral RNA through the oral and nasal routes following exposure to a LP AIV. Considering the peri-domestic nature of these animals, along with the duration of shedding observed in this species, their presence on poultry and waterfowl operations could influence influenza A virus epidemiology. For example, this species could introduce a virus to a naive poultry flock or act as a trafficking mechanism of AIV to and from an infected poultry flock to naive flocks or wild bird populations.


Subject(s)
Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Influenza A virus/physiology , Mephitidae/virology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , RNA, Viral/physiology , Virus Shedding/physiology , Animals , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Birds/virology , Disease Reservoirs/virology , Feces/virology , Female , Male , Nasal Cavity/virology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/drug therapy , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/transmission , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Viral Load/drug effects
11.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 13(6): 394-400, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23621372

ABSTRACT

Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A/H5N1 has been reported in 11 African countries. Migratory waterbirds have the potential of introducing A/H5N1 into east Africa through the Rift Valley of Kenya. We present the results of a wild bird surveillance system for A/H5N1 and other avian influenza viruses based on avian fecal sampling in Kenya. We collected 2630 fecal samples in 2008. Viral RNA was extracted from pools of 3-5 fecal samples and analyzed for presence of avian influenza virus RNA by real-time RT-PCR. Twelve (2.3%) of the 516 sample pools were positive for avian influenza virus RNA, 2 of which were subtyped as H4N6 viruses. This is the first report of avian influenza virus in wild birds in Kenya. This study demonstrates the success of this approach in detecting avian influenza virus in wild birds and represents an efficient surveillance system for avian influenza virus in regions with limited resources.


Subject(s)
Feces/virology , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Wild , Birds , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A virus/classification , Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza in Birds/virology , Kenya/epidemiology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary
12.
PLoS One ; 7(6): e39206, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22720076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Avian influenza viruses are known to productively infect a number of mammal species, several of which are commonly found on or near poultry and gamebird farms. While control of rodent species is often used to limit avian influenza virus transmission within and among outbreak sites, few studies have investigated the potential role of these species in outbreak dynamics. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We trapped and sampled synanthropic mammals on a gamebird farm in Idaho, USA that had recently experienced a low pathogenic avian influenza outbreak. Six of six house mice (Mus musculus) caught on the outbreak farm were presumptively positive for antibodies to type A influenza. Consequently, we experimentally infected groups of naïve wild-caught house mice with five different low pathogenic avian influenza viruses that included three viruses derived from wild birds and two viruses derived from chickens. Virus replication was efficient in house mice inoculated with viruses derived from wild birds and more moderate for chicken-derived viruses. Mean titers (EID(50) equivalents/mL) across all lung samples from seven days of sampling (three mice/day) ranged from 10(3.89) (H3N6) to 10(5.06) (H4N6) for the wild bird viruses and 10(2.08) (H6N2) to 10(2.85) (H4N8) for the chicken-derived viruses. Interestingly, multiple regression models indicated differential replication between sexes, with significantly (p<0.05) higher concentrations of avian influenza RNA found in females compared with males. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Avian influenza viruses replicated efficiently in wild-caught house mice without adaptation, indicating mice may be a risk pathway for movement of avian influenza viruses on poultry and gamebird farms. Differential virus replication between males and females warrants further investigation to determine the generality of this result in avian influenza disease dynamics.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Mice/virology , Animals , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/physiology , Male , Pregnancy , Virulence , Virus Replication
13.
PLoS One ; 5(9): e12851, 2010 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20877466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wild mallards (Anas platyrhychos) are considered one of the primary reservoir species for avian influenza viruses (AIV). Because AIV circulating in wild birds pose an indirect threat to agriculture and human health, understanding the ecology of AIV and developing risk assessments and surveillance systems for prevention of disease is critical. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, mallards were experimentally infected with an H4N6 subtype of AIV by oral inoculation or contact with an H4N6 contaminated water source. Cloacal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, fecal samples, and water samples were collected daily and tested by real-time RT-PCR (RRT-PCR) for estimation of viral shedding. Fecal samples had significantly higher virus concentrations than oropharyngeal or cloacal swabs and 6 month old ducks shed significantly more viral RNA than 3 month old ducks regardless of sample type. Use of a water source contaminated by AIV infected mallards, was sufficient to transmit virus to naïve mallards, which shed AIV at higher or similar levels as orally-inoculated ducks. CONCLUSIONS: Bodies of water could serve as a transmission pathway for AIV in waterfowl. For AIV surveillance purposes, water samples and fecal samples appear to be excellent alternatives or additions to cloacal and oropharyngeal swabbing. Furthermore, duck age (even within hatch-year birds) may be important when interpreting viral shedding results from experimental infections or surveillance. Differential shedding among hatch-year mallards could affect prevalence estimates, modeling of AIV spread, and subsequent risk assessments.


Subject(s)
Ducks/virology , Influenza A virus/physiology , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Animals , Feces/virology , Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/virology , Virus Shedding , Water/analysis
14.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 10(8): 821-3, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20370429

ABSTRACT

An investigation was performed to describe the responses of naturally acquired antibodies to influenza A virus in raccoons (Procyon lotor) over time. Seven wild raccoons, some of which had been exposed to multiple subtypes of influenza A virus, were held in captivity for 279 days, and serum samples were collected on 10 occasions during this interval. Serum samples from 9 of 10 bleeding occasions were tested using an epitope-blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the presence of antibodies to influenza A virus. Although titer declines were noted in most animals over time, all animals maintained detectable antibodies for the duration of the study. These data indicate that naturally acquired antibodies to influenza A virus can remain detectable in raccoons for many months, with the actual duration presumably being much longer because all animals had been exposed to influenza A virus before this study commenced. This information is important to surveillance programs because the duration of naturally acquired antibodies to influenza A virus in wildlife populations is largely unknown.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Influenza A virus/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Raccoons/blood , Animals , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology
15.
J Virol Methods ; 161(1): 141-6, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19523985

ABSTRACT

An epitope-blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) was developed for the detection of antibodies to influenza A virus in taxonomically diverse domestic and wild vertebrate species. In contrast to the bELISAs published previously that require reagent production, manipulation by the end-user, or have not been evaluated for use with both mammalian and avian species, this assay is performed using commercially available recombinant nucleoprotein antigen and corresponding nucleoprotein-specific monoclonal antibody and has been shown to work with multiple avian and mammalian species. The efficacy of the bELISA as a serum screening assay was compared to the agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) assay using 251 serum samples obtained from experimentally infected mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and raccoons (Procyon lotor). The concordance between the AGID assay and bELISA was 94.1% (95% CI=89.9, 98.3) for raccoons, and 71.2% (95% CI=63.5, 78.9) for mallards and 82.8% (95% CI=78.2, 87.3) overall. The bELISA was more sensitive than the AGID assay as demonstrated by the detection of antibodies to influenza A virus at earlier time points in experimental infection studies and at higher serial dilutions. The efficacy of the bELISA to monitor natural influenza A virus exposure was also compared to the AGID assay using an additional 745 serum samples from six avian species and six mammalian species. This bELISA provides a rapid, reliable, and inexpensive technique for large-scale surveillance of influenza A virus exposure in taxonomically diverse vertebrate species.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza in Birds/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology , Animals , Birds , Mammals , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Mamm Rev ; 39(3): 167-177, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32367904

ABSTRACT

1Avian influenza (AI) viruses primarily circulate in wild waterfowl populations and are occasionally transmitted to domestic poultry flocks. However, the possible roles of other wildlife species, such as wild mammals, in AI virus ecology have not been adequately addressed.2Due to their habitat and behaviour, many wild mammals may be capable of transmitting pathogens among wild and domestic populations. Exposure to AI viruses has been reported in an array of wild and domestic animals. The presence of wild mammals on farms has been identified as a risk factor for at least one poultry AI outbreak in North America. These reports suggest the need for seroprevalence studies examining the exposure of wild mammals to AI viruses.3Serological tests are routinely used to assess domestic poultry, domestic swine and human exposure to influenza A viruses, but these tests have not been validated for use in wild mammals. As such, some of these protocols may require adjustments or may be inappropriate for use in serology testing of wild mammals. Herein, we review these serological techniques and evaluate their potential usefulness in AI surveillance of wild mammals. We call for care to be taken when applying serological tests outside their original area of validation, and for continued assay verification for multiple species and virus strains.

17.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 89(11): 2041-7, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18996231

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether acute exercise, using a body-weight-supported treadmill, improves performance on subsequent cognitive tests or an upper-extremity task in people with stroke. DESIGN: The study was a within-subject, cross-over design in which 21 subjects received, randomly, 2 different testing sequences separated by an interval of 7 to 10 days. SETTING: Outpatient department of a rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Of 72 potential participants in the convenience sample, 21 people with chronic stroke completed the study. They were 0.5 to 5 years after only 1 documented stroke, were able to walk with or without a cane, were able to grasp with the affected hand, and scored more than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination. INTERVENTIONS: One session of body-weight-supported treadmill walking for 20 minutes at 70% of estimated heart rate reserve or level 13 on the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale. The control condition consisted of a 20-minute review of a home exercise program with a physiotherapist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive tests included Trail Making Tests Parts A and B, Symbol Digit Substitution Test, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) measured hemiplegic upper-extremity motor skill. RESULTS: Treadmill exercise improved movement of the hemiplegic upper extremity (P=.04) but not cognitive performance. The improvement in the ARAT occurred without a change in strength (measured by grip strength) and was negatively correlated with maximum treadmill speed (R(2)=.20; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that acute treadmill exercise improves subsequent skilled movement of the hemiplegic upper extremity that seems unrelated to attention, visuomotor processing, or strength. The etiology and duration of this enhancing effect are worth further study. The existence of an exercise-cognition relationship in people with stroke is an intriguing area of future research.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy , Hemiplegia/rehabilitation , Stroke Rehabilitation , Upper Extremity , Adult , Aged , Cognition , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Hemiplegia/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Skills , Stroke/complications
18.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 76(4): 782-4, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17426187

ABSTRACT

Tree squirrels (Sciurus spp.) have been recently shown to be commonly exposed to West Nile virus (WNV). Many characteristics of WNV infections in tree squirrels are unknown. To better understand WNV associations in fox squirrels (S. niger), we conducted mark-recapture sampling (N = 72) and radio telemetry to study the longitudinal seroprevalence, seroconversions, and ectoparasites of these animals during 2005-2006 in northern Colorado. Five seroconversions were documented during this study. The majority of seroconversions occurred during the late summer/fall months. However, one seroconversion was documented over the time period of February to late March 2005. Fleas (Orchopeas howardi) were tested for WNV RNA using real-time PCR techniques. No WNV RNA positive fleas (N = 33) were detected. In addition, urine samples (N = 17) opportunistically collected from fox squirrels were negative for WNV RNA. Results indicate that seroconversions can be observed in fox squirrels during low WNV transmission years.


Subject(s)
Rodent Diseases/epidemiology , Sciuridae/virology , West Nile Fever/veterinary , West Nile virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Female , Male , Rodent Diseases/blood , Sciuridae/blood , Seroepidemiologic Studies , West Nile Fever/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...