ABSTRACT
Objectives: To investigate the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in naïve patients receiving biotech drugs. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Onco-hematology, Hepato-gastroenterology, Rheumatology, Dermatology, and Neurology Units in Campania Region (Italy). Participants: 775 patients (53.81% female) with mean age 56.0 (SD 15.2). The mean follow-up/patient was 3.48 (95% confidence interval 3.13-3.84). Main outcome measures: We collected all AEs associated to biotech drugs, including serious infections and malignancies. Serious AEs were defined according to the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting E2A guideline. Results: The majority of the study population was enrolled in Onco-hematology and Rheumatology Units and the most common diagnosis were hematological malignancies, followed by rheumatoid arthritis, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and psoriatic arthritis. The most commonly prescribed biotech drugs were rituximab, bevacizumab, infliximab, trastuzumab, adalimumab, and cetuximab. Out of 775 patients, 320 experienced at least one AE. Most of patients experienced AEs to cetuximab therapy, rituximab and trastuzumab. Comparing female and male population, our findings highlighted a statistically significant difference in terms of AEs for adalimumab (35.90% vs. 7.41%, p < 0.001) and etanercept (27.59% vs. 10.00%, p = 0.023). Considering all biotech drugs, we observed a peak for all AEs occurrence at follow-up 91-180 days category. Bevacizumab, brentuximab, rituximab, trastuzumab and cetuximab were more commonly associated to serious adverse events; most of these were possibly related to biotech drugs, according to causality assessment. Three cases of serious infections occurred. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrated that the majority of AEs were not serious and expected. Few cases of serious infections occurred, while no case of malignancy did. Overall, the safety profile of biotech drugs used in our population was similar to those observed in pivotal trials. Notwithstanding the positive results of our study, some safety concerns still remain unresolved. In order to collect more effectiveness and safety data on biotech drugs, the collection and analysis of real world data should be endorsed as well as the management of post-authorization studies.
ABSTRACT
According to World Health Organization, medication adherence refers not only to pharmacological treatment, but also extends to all behaviors which guarantee patient's health. Poor medication adherence is the main cause of low efficacy of pharmacological therapy and it is more common in chronic diseases. For example, among hypothyroid patients, it was estimated that after 5 years of levothyroxine therapy 21.5% of patients still have a TSH level >5.0 mU/L due to poor medication adherence. Moreover, it was found that almost 40% of pediatric patients had at least one episode of non-compliance following thyroidectomia. Several strategies can be adopted in order to improve medication adherence. These include self-monitoring drug therapy and self-management programs, simplified dosing regimens, directly involving pharmacists in drug therapy management, use of pharmaceutical formulations more attractive to the patient and through the therapeutic drug monitoring. The effects mediated by the thyroid gland, the clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism and the main characteristics of levothyroxine therapy have been discussed. In order to give an overview of interactions with food and drinks, pharmacokinetic characteristics, efficacy/safety profile, as well as the impact on medication adherence of levothyroxine in oral solution and soft gel capsule formulations, a literature search was performed. The results of 21 clinical studies were reviewed. Levothyroxine oral solution and soft gel capsule formulations showed irrelevant interactions with food and drinks, with a dissolution profile minimally influenced by pH variations. According to pharmacokinetic study results, bioequivalence between these formulations and levothyroxine tablets was confirmed. Regarding the efficacy/safety profile, while some studies did not detect any difference between levothyroxine formulations, other studies suggested that oral solution and soft gel capsule were associated to a higher efficacy compared to levothyroxine tablet. It was also demonstrated that removing the demand for fasting, patients would prefer to take the medication at breakfast. Therefore, most of the patients treated with levothyroxine oral solution preferred to continue this therapy instead of treatment with tablets. An increase in patient's compliance was observed. All the characteristics of new levothyroxine oral liquid formulations allow to administer the drug also in patients with gastrointestinal comorbidities or patients who are already treated with other drugs. The availability of different dosages let the clinician to adapt the treatment for each individual patient. These benefits contribute to a better medication adherence and to the maintenance of normal TSH levels. In conclusion, the use of different pharmaceutical formulations represents a therapeutic approach innovative, effective and inexpensive in the treatment of the hypothyroid patient.
