Nondisordered Cannabis Use Among US Adolescents.

Importance: Cannabis use is increasingly viewed by adolescents as not harmful. Youths with cannabis use disorder (CUD) are recognized by clinicians as being at risk for adverse outcomes, yet little is known about the associations between subclinical cannabis use (ie, nondisordered cannabis use [NDCU]) and adverse psychosocial events. Objective: To describe the prevalence and demographics of NDCU and to compare associations of cannabis use with adverse psychosocial events among adolescents with no cannabis use, NDCU, and CUD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a nationally representative sample derived from the 2015 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Participants were adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, separated into 3 distinct groups: nonuse (no recent cannabis use), NDCU (recent cannabis use below diagnostic threshold), and CUD. Analysis was conducted from January to May 2022. Exposures: CUD, NDCU, or cannabis nonuse. NDCU was defined as endorsing recent cannabis use but not meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) CUD criteria. CUD was defined using DSM-5 criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were prevalence of adolescents meeting criteria for NDCU and associations between adverse psychosocial events and NDCU, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results: The 68 263 respondents (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [1.7] years; 34 773 [50.9%] males) included in the analysis represented an estimated yearly mean of 25 million US adolescents during 2015 to 2019. Among respondents, 1675 adolescents (2.5%) had CUD, 6971 adolescents (10.2%) had NDCU, and 59 617 adolescents (87.3%) reported nonuse. Compared with nonusers, individuals with NDCU had approximately 2 to 4 times greater odds of all adverse psychosocial events examined, including major depression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.67-2.08), suicidal ideation (aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.88-2.29), slower thoughts (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58-1.96), difficulty concentrating (aOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.65-2.00), truancy (aOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.67-2.16), low grade point average (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.62-2.00), arrest (aOR, 4.15; 95% CI, 3.17-5.43), fighting (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.80-2.31), and aggression (aOR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.79-2.62). Prevalence of adverse psychosocial events was greatest for adolescents with CUD (range, 12.6% to 41.9%), followed by NDCU (range, 5.2% to 30.4%), then nonuse (range, 0.8% to 17.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US adolescents, past-year NDCU was approximately 4 times as prevalent as past-year CUD. A stepwise gradient association was observed for odds of adverse psychosocial events between adolescent NDCU and CUD. In the context of US normalization of cannabis use, prospective research into NDCU is necessary.

Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Adverse Behaviors and Comorbidity.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: There is growing evidence that adolescents with ADHD develop long-term impairments and adverse outcomes, yet less is known about their adverse behaviors. To quantify rates of mental health comorbidities in adolescents with ADHD and compare the risks of adverse behaviors among adolescents with and without ADHD. METHODS: We performed a cohort analysis of 6,483 youth from the National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), a nationally representative in-person structured diagnostic interview of adolescents aged 14-18 years focusing on mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders. MAIN OUTCOMES: (1) Percentages with comorbid anxiety, mood, disruptive behavior, and substance use disorders. (2) Strength of associations of ADHD with several adverse behaviors, including suicidal symptoms, aggression, behavior regulation, life events, education, and substance use. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Among the sample of 6,483 adolescents, overall, 9.5% met the criteria for ADHD. Most (69.5%) of adolescents with ADHD had at least one comorbid mental health condition. As compared to adolescents without ADHD, those with ADHD were significantly more likely to have had a suicide attempt (aOR 2.9, 95% CI = 1.3-6.6) and to have had perpetrated physical aggression (aOR 2.3, 95% CI = 1.7-3.2). Adolescents with ADHD were also more likely to have been expelled from school or fired from a job (aOR 3.3, 95% CI = 1.7-6.5) and to have had problems related to drinking alcohol (95% CI = 1.2-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: ADHD in adolescents is a complicated disorder with elevated risks for a wide range of adverse behaviors.

Antipsychotic Treatment Among Youths With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Importance: Significant concern exists over treating youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with antipsychotic medications, yet little is known about the factors associated with antipsychotic treatment. Objectives: To describe the percentage of youths who fill antipsychotic prescriptions in the year following a new diagnosis of ADHD and characterize the clinical and demographic factors associated with antipsychotic initiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective longitudinal cohort analysis of antipsychotic treatment was performed in 187 563 youths, aged 3 to 24 years, with a new diagnosis of ADHD (without recent diagnosis of any US Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-indicated conditions for antipsychotic treatment). The sample was derived from the 2010 to 2015 MarketScan Commercial Database, with the analysis completed between November 1, 2018, and May 30, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The percentage of youths prescribed an antipsychotic in the first year following a new diagnosis of ADHD. Among those prescribed antipsychotic medications, the percentage who received a diagnosis of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or a disorder for which 1 or more antipsychotic medication has received an indication for use in youths from the FDA (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Tourette disorder) and the percentage that filled an antipsychotic prescription before filling a stimulant prescription (methylphenidate or amphetamine derivative). Results: Of the 187 563 youths included in the study, 114 305 (60.9%) were male with a mean (SD) age of 13.74 (5.61) years. In the year following a new ADHD diagnosis, 4869 youths (2.6%; 95% CI, 2.5%-2.7%) with ADHD were prescribed an antipsychotic. Youths treated with antipsychotics with ADHD were more likely than their peers who were not receiving an antipsychotic to have recently received diagnoses of self-harm and/or suicidal ideation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.5; 95% CI, 5.9-9.6), oppositional defiant disorder (aOR, 4.4; 95% CI, 3.9-4.9), and substance use disorder (aOR, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.6-4.5). The youths who received antipsychotics were also more likely to have received inpatient treatment (aOR, 7.9; 95% CI, 6.7-9.3). During the year following the new ADHD diagnosis, 52.7% (95% CI, 51.3%-54.1%) of youths treated with antipsychotics received a diagnosis for which antipsychotics have either an FDA or evidence-supported indication for their use. Among youths who initiated antipsychotic medications, 47.9% (95% CI, 46.5%-49.3%) did not receive a stimulant prescription between their ADHD diagnosis and antipsychotic initiation. Antipsychotic prescribing was proportionally highest for preschool-aged children (4.3%) and associated with neurodevelopmental disorders (aOR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.3-11.2) and recent inpatient mental health treatment (aOR, 8.9; 95% CI, 1.7-45.8). Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately half of youths with a new ADHD diagnosis may have an evidence-supported indication for an antipsychotic medication. Less than half of these youths received a stimulant; the evidence-supported first line treatment for ADHD, before the antipsychotic was initiated. Use of antipsychotic prescribing appears to be associated with high levels of psychiatric comorbidity.

E-cigarette Use Among Young Adults in the U.S.

INTRODUCTION: Use of e-cigarettes is increasing among young adults in the U.S. Whether e-cigarette use serves as an aid to smoking reduction or cessation among young adults remains a matter of contention. This analysis examines patterns of e-cigarette use in relation to cigarette smoking in a nationally representative sample of U.S. young adults. METHODS: Data were analyzed from nationally representative U.S. adults, aged 18 to 35years (N=12,415), in the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. Logistic regression assessed associations between e-cigarette use and smoking intensity, continuity, and reduction while controlling for several potential confounding factors. Data were analyzed in 2018. RESULTS: Among cigarette smokers, e-cigarette use was associated with higher odds of tobacco use disorder (AOR=2.58, 95% CI=1.73, 3.83) and daily cigarette smoking (AOR=1.67, 95% CI=1.73, 3.83). Among adults aged 26-35years, e-cigarette use was also associated with heavy cigarette smoking (AOR=2.01, 95% CI=1.09, 3.74). Among lifetime smokers, e-cigarette use was associated with lower odds of stopping smoking (AOR=0.14, 95% CI=0.08, 0.23) and lower odds of a 50% reduction in cigarettes smoked per day (AOR=0.63, 95% CI=0.43, 0.93). Only 13.1% of young adults who ever used e-cigarettes reported using them to help stop or quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Use of e-cigarettes by U.S. young adults, most of which is not intended to help reduce smoking, is related to more rather than less frequent and intensive cigarette smoking.

What's in a Name? Moving to Neuroscience-Based Nomenclature in Pediatric Psychopharmacology.

Our traditional names for psychotropic medication classes lead to unnecessary confusion. As clinicians, we have grown comfortable with idiosyncratic names of psychotropic medications and have forgotten how unclear and misleading they can be. For example, evidence shows that serotonin reuptake inhibitors help in pediatric anxiety disorders, but a parent with an anxious child might ask, "If you diagnosed my son with separation anxiety, why are you giving him an antidepressant?" Another parent might object to the use of a "stimulant" medication, "My daughter never slows down, the last thing she needs is a stimulant!" Similarly, an "antipsychotic" can be prescribed on-label to youth with mania, bipolar depression, tics, or irritability in autism but families and patients might be confused by or object to the implied label of being "psychotic." Furthermore, patients or family members may not feel comfortable asking clarifying questions and simply do not return for follow up-concluding that the provider does not understand their child.

National Patterns of Commonly Prescribed Psychotropic Medications to Young People.

OBJECTIVE: To describe national annual prescribing patterns of stimulant, antidepressant, and antipsychotic medications to young people. METHODS: Prescriptions for three commonly prescribed psychotropic classes (stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics) to young people aged 3-24 years were analyzed from the IMS LifeLink LRx National Longitudinal Prescription database (n = 6,351,482). Denominators were adjusted to generalize estimates to the U.S. POPULATION: Comparisons are presented of percentages filling ≥1 prescription of each medication class during the study year stratified by patient sex, age, and prescriber specialty. RESULTS: The total annual percentage of prescriptions filled by youth for any of the three medication classes was by age 3-5 years (0.8%), 6-12 years (5.4%), 13-18 years (7.7%), and 19-24 years (6.0%). Stimulant use was highest for older children (age 11 = 5.7%). Antidepressant use tended to increase with age and was highest for young adults (age 24 = 4.8%). Annual antipsychotic prescription percentages were lower than antidepressant or stimulant percentages for all age groups, with a peak in adolescence (age 16 = 1.3%). Annual stimulant and antipsychotic percentages for males were higher than corresponding percentages for females, but converged for young adults. Psychiatrists and child psychiatrists accounted for most of the prescriptions of antidepressants (22.2%-53.2%) and antipsychotics (51.7%-70%), but fewer of the stimulant prescriptions (30.4%-36.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The age and sex distribution of stimulants and antidepressants among young people is broadly consistent with known epidemiologic patterns of their established indications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depression. The pattern of antipsychotics may reflect the heterogeneity of disorders and conditions treated with this medication class.

Evaluating the Effect of the Changes in FDA Guidelines for Clozapine Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Concerns exist that clozapine is underutilized in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Although a 2015 change in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) monitoring recommendations lowered the threshold of the absolute neutrophil count for treatment interruption from 1,500/µL to 1,000/µL and removed white blood cell count thresholds from the monitoring algorithm, the implications of this policy change on clozapine interruptions remain unknown. METHODS: We analyzed outpatient prescribing records for antipsychotic medications in the Veterans Integrated Service Network 7 (VISN 7) database between 1999 and 2012 to assess the potential impact of the recent changes in FDA neutropenia monitoring recommendations on clozapine treatment discontinuation. We evaluated results of complete blood count monitoring to compare percentages of patients who developed or would have developed ≥ 1 hematologic event under the previous and current FDA guidelines in the first year following initiation of clozapine. RESULTS: From a cohort of 14,620 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-9-295.x), 246 patients received clozapine treatment (1.7%). No agranulocytosis was observed during the study period. Under the former recommendations, 5 patients in the clozapine initiation cohort (n = 160, 3.1%; 95% CI, 0.43-5.83) qualified for treatment interruption during the first year of clozapine treatment, while only 1 patient (0.6%) qualified under the current recommendations. Under the former recommendations, hematologic events occurred at a similar rate for individuals taking and not taking clozapine. CONCLUSIONS: While clozapine remains an underused medication, the new FDA monitoring guidelines are likely to substantially reduce the percentage of patients who meet criteria for clozapine-associated hematologic events requiring treatment interruption. This decrease may reduce the clinical burden of managing patients on clozapine and therefore increase the number of individuals treated with this uniquely effective medication. However, prospective studies of individuals treated under the new guidelines are needed to fully assess safety of the FDA's change.