Determine the impact of a structured pharmacist-led medication review - a controlled intervention study to optimise medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities.

BACKGROUND: Medication reviews contribute to protecting long-term care (LTC) residents from drug related problems (DRPs). However, few controlled studies have examined the impact on patient-relevant outcomes so far. OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of a one-time, pharmacist-led medication review on medication changes (primary endpoint) including discontinued medication, the number of chronic medications, hospital admissions, falls, and deaths (secondary endpoints). METHODS: A prospective, controlled intervention study was performed in three LTC facilities. In the intervention group (IG), after performing a medication review, a pharmacist gave recommendations for resolving DRPs to physicians, nurses and community pharmacists. The control group (CG) received usual care without a medication review. (i) We assessed the number of medication changes and the secondary endpoints in both groups before (t0) and after (t1, t2) the intervention. (ii) Additionally, the medication review was evaluated in the IG with regard to identified DRPs, the healthcare professional's feedback on the forwarded pharmacist recommendations and whether DRPs were finally resolved. RESULTS: 107 (IG) and 104 (CG) residents were enrolled. (i) More medication changes were identified in the IG than in the CG at t1 (p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was identified at t2 (p = 0.680). Mainly, medication was discontinued in those medication changes. Chronic medications increased in the CG (p = 0.005) at t2 while hospital admissions, falls, and deaths showed no differences. (ii) Overall, 1252 DRPs (median: 10; minimum-maximum: 2-39) were identified. Recommendations for 82% of relevant DRPs were forwarded to healthcare professionals, of which 61% were accepted or clarified. 22% were not accepted, 12% required further review and 6% remained without feedback. 51% of forwarded DRPs were finally resolved. CONCLUSIONS: We found more medication changes in the IG compared to controls. Mostly, medication was discontinued. This suggests that our intervention was successful in discontinuing unnecessary medication. Other clinical outcomes such as falls, hospitalisations, and deaths were not improved due to the one-time intervention. The medication review further identified a high prevalence of DRPs in the IG, half of which were finally resolved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00026120 ( www.drks.de , retrospectively registered 07/09/2021).

[Discharge medication - what do patients know about their medication on discharge?]. / Entlassungsmedikation - Was weiß der Patient bei Entlassung über seine Arzneimittel?

BACKGROUND: Patients' lack of knowledge about their discharge medication can endanger patients' safety after their hospital stay. This is especially the case with regard to medications that were newly prescribed during the hospital stay and are intended to be used after discharge or medications with an increased risk for adverse drug reactions (high-risk drugs). The aim of this study was to analyse the patients' level of knowledge about their discharge medication and to identify influence factors. METHODS: In a bicentric survey patients were interviewed prior to their discharge from an acute and a geriatric rehabilitation hospital. They were asked about their discharge medication in a structured interview. Influence factors were statistically analysed by Tobit regression. RESULTS: In total, 179 patients were interviewed. On average, patients named 48% of their discharge medication correctly (95% CI: 46-50%). Influence factors for knowledge deficits were the lack of a medication plan, an older age, the hospitalization in a rehabilitation hospital and a long hospitalization. 81% of the patients had at least one drug in their discharge medication, which was newly prescribed during the hospital stay. 11% of those drugs were named correctly, the potency was named correctly in 6%, the indication in 8%. For almost two-thirds of the patients at least one high-risk drug was recommended in the discharge letter, among them most frequently oral anticoagulants and opioid analgesics. 38% of these high-risk drugs were named correctly. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate an urgent need to train patients about their discharge medication, especially if medications are included that were newly prescribed during the hospital stay and recommended for further use after discharge or medications with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Particularly older patients and patients of a rehabilitation hospital after long hospitalization should be intensively counselled and obtain a medication plan upon discharge.

[Evidence-based recommendations on primary diagnostics of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in geriatric patients]. / Evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zur Basisdiagnostik der peripheren arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit bei geriatrischen Patienten.

The prevalence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is high in elderly patients and its clinical manifestation is often atypical. Comorbidity and morbidity as a consequence of PAOD are significant. Therefore, standardized primary diagnostics are required among geriatric patients. Drawn from a search of the literature, evidence-based recommendations are provided. Pulse palpation and the evaluation of a patient's medical history are obligatory components of primary diagnostics, even in the absence of typical symptoms. In the case of pathological and ambiguous findings, measuring Doppler ankle pressures is suggested as the next diagnostic step. Further measures depend on the following factors: the presence of lesions on the leg with disturbed blood flow, predominantly in the foot and lower leg areas, degree of PAOD-related ailments, and, finally, intended surgery of the affected leg for other medical reasons.

[Nosocomial epidemiology and transmission of Clostridium difficile infection]. / Nosokomiale Epidemiologie und Transmission der Clostridium-difficile-Infektion.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is of growing importance as a hospital-acquired pathogen. Pseudomembraneous colitis is the main clinical disease. Transmission and epidemiological features are not yet fully understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stool samples from 1164 individuals (571 women and 593 men) attending were examined for the presence of C. difficile. Follow-up examinations and molecular typing methods were used for the detection nosocomial transmissions. Additionally, hospital-borne environmental samples as well as staff samples were tested. RESULTS: Incidence of C. difficile infection was 8.4%. Nearly all patients (92.9%) had antibiotics given. Using molecular typing nosocomial transmission was evident. Though, environmental samples in general had a low positivity, toilet chairs were contaminated in 15.4% and may be a potential source of transmission. Staff was positive in only one case. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of infections with C. difficile becomes to be a major threat for the clinical and hygienic management.