Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Glob Infect Dis ; 15(4): 156-165, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38292694

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Encephalitis is a major public health problem worldwide that causes huge emotional and economic loss to humanity. Encephalitis, being a serious illness, affects people of all ages. The aim is to describe the sociodemographic, clinical, etiological, and neuroimaging profile among 101 acute encephalitis syndrome (AES) patients visiting a tertiary neuro-specialty care hospital in India. Methods: Record review of medical records of all patients attending neurology emergency and outpatient services at NIMHANS Hospital, diagnosed with AES in 2019, was conducted. Data were collected using standardized data collection forms for all cases in the study. Descriptive analyses (mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables) were conducted. The Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test was used for the comparison of independent groups for categorical variables, and t-test for comparing means for continuous variables. Results: About 42.6% of AES patients had viral etiology, while in 57.4%, etiology was not ascertained. Common presenting symptoms were fever (96%), altered sensorium (64.4%), seizures (70.3%), headache (42.6%), and vomiting (27.7%). Herpes simplex was the most common (21.8%) identified viral encephalitis, followed by chikungunya (5%), arboviruses (chikungunya and dengue) (4%), Japanese encephalitis (4%), rabies (3%), dengue (1%), and varicella virus (1%). About 40% of AES patients showed cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis (44%), increased protein (39.6%), abnormal computed tomography brain (44.6%), and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities (41.6%). Conclusion: The study highlights the need to ascertain etiology and importance of evidence-based management of AES patients. A better understanding of opportunities and limitations in the management and implementation of standard laboratory and diagnostic algorithms can favor better diagnosis and management of AES.

2.
Indian J Community Med ; 48(6): 852-860, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38249712

ABSTRACT

Background: Youth are consideren to be most vulnerable to health and lifestyle issues (HLS) in India. The current study aims to investigate the factors that contribute to health and lifestyle issues among youth attending mental health promotion clinics (YMHP) in Karnataka. Method: Three-year first-visit data from beneficiaries (aged 15-35 years) attending YMHP clinics in Karnataka between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis included beneficiaries reporting any HLS issue as the outcome and a host of 57 hypothesized variables as exposures. Results: Overall, 2,615 (25%) beneficiaries reported HLS issues. Years of schooling (AOR 5-7 years = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.60-1.31), (AOR 8-10 years = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.46-0.91), (AOR >10 years = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.49-0.93)], unemployed youth (AOR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.45-0.61) business and salaried workers (AOR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.33-2.13), and other occupations (AOR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.73-2.56), junk food consumption (AOR = 0.76;95% CI = 0.68-0.84), having issues related to relationships with parents (AOR = 3.01; 95% CI = 2.47-3.68) and intergenerational issues (AOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.19-2.45), self-development issues (AOR low-self-awareness = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.33-1.85), (AOR low-self-esteem = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.062-1.57), (AOR emotional issues = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.31-1.89), education and academics (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.09-1.39), safety issues (AOR = 4.11; 95% CI = 3.07-5.50), gender sex and sexuality issues (AOR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.43-4.15), suicidal ideation (AOR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.44-2.54), substance use (AOR tobacco chewing = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.09-1.93), (AOR tobacco-smoking = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.18-2.32), (AOR smoking = 4.94; 95% CI = 3.52-6.93) and experiencing emotions (AOR feel anxious = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.41-1.88), (AOR forgetfulness = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.41-1.98), (AOR difficulty in concentration = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.035-1.81), (AOR anger = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.25-2.07), (AOR feel worthless = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.71-2.86) were associated with HLS issues among beneficiaries. Conclusion: This analysis addresses an important but neglected component of HLS issues among youth highlighting the importance of early intervention among youth to prevent the development of diseases later in life. The study has important implications for youth health promotion in India and countries such as India. Health and Lifestyle Issues Among Youth: A record analysis of contributing factors among beneficiaries attending Youth Mental Health promotion clinics (Yuva Spandana Kendras) in Karnataka, India.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...