Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surg Technol Int ; 412022 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35738572

ABSTRACT

This review summarizes the evidence-based recommendations for how to approach and laparoscopically treat adnexal masses during pregnancy. We conducted a comprehensive review of studies related to the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Selected studies were independently reviewed by two authors. The overall incidence of ovarian tumors in pregnancy ranges between 0.05% and 5.7%, of which less than 5% are malignant. Diagnosis is based mainly on routine transvaginal ultrasound. More than 64% of simple cysts, less than 6 cm in diameter, will spontaneously resolve in less than 16 weeks. However, for persistent and complex tumors, the risk of acute complications can reach up to 9%. Surgical indications are similar to those in the non-gravidic setting, and include acute complications (torsion, rupture, hemorrhage), suspected malignancy and large (over 6 cm) persistent masses. Surgery must be scheduled between 16 and 20 weeks to allow for the spontaneous resolution of functional cysts. Furthermore, within that period, pregnancy becomes independent of the corpus luteum and enlargement of the uterus gives sufficient exposure for the surgery to be performed safely. A recent meta-analysis found that, compared to open surgery, laparoscopy is associated with significantly less preterm labor, blood loss and hospital stay, without differences in pregnancy loss or preterm birth rate. Since the main concerns about maternal-fetal safety are related to increased intraperitoneal pressure and the effects of hypercarbia (maternal hypertensive complications, fetal acidosis), a lower CO2 pressure (10 to 12 mmHg) and reduced operative times (less than 30 minutes) are recommended.

2.
BMC Womens Health ; 22(1): 250, 2022 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35739506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to assess the rate and causes for Essure® micro-insert system removal and patients' long term satisfaction rate with the procedure. METHODS: All patients who underwent Essure® hysteroscopic sterilization at our tertiary centre between years 2007 and 2018 were included in this follow-up study. A questionnaire was sent to all patients per standard mail. Patients who did not respond to questionnaires per mail, were called by phone. The satisfaction with the Essure® sterilization, as well as any additional procedures after the insertion or insertion-related complications were analysed. RESULTS: From the year 2007 to 2018, we performed 427 Essure® hysteroscopic sterilizations and of these, 329 patients responded to the questionnaire (response rate 77%). Ten patients (3%) had Essure® removal, two of them due to pain (0.6%). Patients were very satisfied with the procedure (9.5 on scale 0-10). Most patients (95.3%) would recommend the procedure to their friend. CONCLUSIONS: Essure® hysteroscopic sterilization is a procedure with a very high satisfaction rate and a very low removal rate due to sterilization-related complications. Trial registration Institutional review board of University medical centre Maribor approved the study, approval number UKC-MB-KME-73/19.


Subject(s)
Sterilization, Tubal , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hysteroscopy/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Sterilization , Sterilization, Tubal/methods
3.
J Ultrason ; 21(85): e139-e146, 2021 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34258039

ABSTRACT

Pelvic entrapment neuropathies represent a group of chronic pain syndromes that significantly impede the quality of life. Peripheral nerve entrapment occurs at specific anatomic locations. There are several causes of pelvic entrapment neuropathies, such as intrinsic nerve abnormality or inflammation with scarring of surrounding tissues, and surgical interventions in the abdomen, pelvis and the lower limbs. Entrapment neuropathies in the pelvic region are not widely recognized, and still tend to be underdiagnosed due to numerous differential diagnoses with overlapping symptoms. However, it is important that entrapment neuropathies are correctly diagnosed, as they can be successfully treated. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, ischiadic nerve, genitofemoral nerve, pudendal nerve, ilioinguinal nerve and obturator nerve are the nerves most frequently causing entrapment neuropathies in the pelvic region. Understanding the anatomy as well as nerve motor and sensory functions is essential in recognizing and locating nerve entrapment. The cornerstone of the diagnostic work-up is careful physical examination. Different imaging modalities play an important role in the diagnostic process. Ultrasound is a key modality in the diagnostic work-up of pelvic entraptment neuropathies, and its use has become increasingly widespread in therapeutic procedures. In the article, the authors describe the background of pelvic entrapment neuropathies with special focus on ultrasound-guided injections.

4.
Int Urogynecol J ; 31(10): 2081-2088, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32494959

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anterior colporrhaphy (AC) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse treatment; however, there are only few data in the literature regarding its long-term outcomes. Our aim was to assess the long-term efficacy and satisfaction rate after AC. METHODS: Patients who underwent AC at our institution from 2011 to 2014 were invited to this follow-up study, which took place in January-February 2019. Medical history and gynaecological examination with POP-Q assessment were performed. Patients filled out validated questionnaires UIQ-7, CRAIQ-7, POPIQ-7, PFIQ-7, POPDI-6, CRADI-8, and UDI-6 and evaluated their satisfaction with the procedure. Objective success was defined as anterior wall prolapse stage 0 or 1 assessed by the POP-Q system. Subjective success was defined as the absence of bulging sensation or a sense of falling out that can be felt or seen in the vaginal area. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Seventy out of 137 (51.1%) patients attended the follow-up. Mean follow-up period up was 74.1 ± 12.6 months. Two patients were excluded from the analysis because they had another surgical procedure due to central compartment prolapse. Of the remaining patients, 50 had AC and 18 had AC and posterior colporrhaphy (PC). Objective success rate was 13.2% and subjective success rate was 68.7%. Almost all patients (98.5%) were satisfied with the procedure. In the group of patients with objective recurrence, 66.1% had no prolapse symptoms. CONCLUSION: Despite having a low objective success rate, patients' satisfaction with AC is very high.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Mesh , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...