Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 38(2): 429-452, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37165942

ABSTRACT

Objective: Older adults often spontaneously engage in compensatory strategies (CS) to support everyday task completion, but factors that influence success of chosen CS remain unclear. This study examines whether real-world prospective memory (PM) task completion is better predicted by CS count or a CS quality rating. Method: Seventy mid-life and older adult participants were presented four novel, real-world PM tasks via remote assessment and encouraged to use their typical CS. The examiner captured detailed information about planned CS at task presentation (T1) and utilized CS at follow-up testing (T2). From this information, count (CS Count; quantity of CS) and quality (CS Quality; rating of CS thoroughness and utility) scores were coded separately for the planned and utilized CS. PM task performance accuracy was also coded (PM Accuracy). Results: Hierarchical regressions revealed planned CS Count and Quality did not predict PM Accuracy. In contrast, the utilized CS Quality predicted a significant amount of PM Accuracy variance over and above CS Count, global cognition, and age (R2 = .47, ΔR2 = .24, ΔF = 29.36, p < .001, f2 = .45). Furthermore, utilized CS Quality accounted for a similar amount of variance in PM Accuracy when utilized CS Count was removed from the model. Conclusions: This study's CS coding system can capture and quantify the quality of strategies, which uniquely predicts real-world PM performance. This coding system may provide researchers with a nuanced CS measure and lead to improved CS interventions designed to support everyday PM performance, such as targeted CS trainings.


Subject(s)
Independent Living , Memory, Episodic , Humans , Aged , Aging , Neuropsychological Tests , Cognition
2.
J Clin Psychol ; 79(9): 2101-2123, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200511

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Communities of color in the United States systematically experience inequities in physical and mental health care compared to individuals who identify as non-Hispanic White. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated these structural drivers of inequity to disproportionate and devastating effects for persons of color. In addition to managing the direct effects of COVID-19 risk, persons of color were also navigating increased racial prejudice and discrimination. For mental health professionals and trainees of color, the effects of COVID-19 racial health disparities and the increase in acts of racism may have been compounded by their work responsibilities. The current study used an embedded mixed-methods approach to examine the differential impact of COVID-19 on health service psychology (HSP) students of color as compared to their non-Hispanic White peers. METHOD: Using quantitative and qualitative data from the Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory, measures of perceived support and of discrimination, and open-ended questions about students' experiences with racism and microaggressions, we examined the extent to which different racial/ethnic HSP student groups experienced COVID-19-related discrimination, the impacts of COVID-19 felt by students of color, and how these experiences differed from those of their non-Hispanic White peers. RESULTS: HSP students of color endorsed greater impacts of the pandemic on both self and others in the home, perceived themselves as less supported by others, and reported more experiences of racial discrimination than non-Hispanic White HSP students. CONCLUSION: Throughout the graduate experience, HSP students of color and their experiences of discrimination need to be addressed. We provided recommendations to HSP training program directors and students both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Racism , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Pandemics , Racism/psychology , Racial Groups/psychology , Students/psychology
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33829947

ABSTRACT

Our study examined age-related differences across the adult lifespan using a recently developed test assessing memory for "who, when, and where" in addition to associations among these elements. Young (ages 18-25), middle-aged (ages 40-55), and older adults (ages 60+) were asked to remember a sequence of pictures of different faces paired with different places and place the pairs in the correct sequence. Young adults remembered significantly mores face-place pairs in the correct sequence than middle-aged (p < .05) and older adults (p < .05), but there were no significant differences between middle-aged and older adults. Furthermore, young adults remembered significantly more face-place pairs irrespective of sequence than older adults (p < .05). However, there were no other significant differences among the groups.Using a rapidly administered test that integrates aspects of everyday episodic memory, we found evidence for age-related differences in test performance beginning in middle age.


Subject(s)
Association Learning , Memory, Episodic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aging/psychology , Humans , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 85(1): 73-90, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34776442

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Compensatory aids can help mitigate the impact of progressive cognitive impairment on daily living. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate whether the learning and sustained use of an Electronic Memory and Management Aid (EMMA) application can be augmented through a partnership with real-time, activity-aware transition-based prompting delivered by a smart home. METHODS: Thirty-two adults who met criteria for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) were randomized to learn to use the EMMA app on its own (N = 17) or when partnered with smart home prompting (N = 15). The four-week, five-session manualized EMMA training was conducted individually in participant homes by trained clinicians. Monthly questionnaires were completed by phone with trained personnel blind to study hypotheses. EMMA data metrics were collected continuously for four months. For the partnered condition, activity-aware prompting was on during training and post-training months 1 and 3, and off during post-training month 2. RESULTS: The analyzed aMCI sample included 15 EMMA-only and 14 partnered. Compared to the EMMA-only condition, by week four of training, participants in the partnered condition were engaging with EMMA more times daily and using more basic and advanced features. These advantages were maintained throughout the post-training phase with less loss of EMMA app use over time. There was little differential impact of the intervention on self-report primary (everyday functioning, quality of life) and secondary (coping, satisfaction with life) outcomes. CONCLUSION: Activity-aware prompting technology enhanced acquisition, habit formation and long-term use of a digital device by individuals with aMCI. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03453554).


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Reminder Systems , Supervised Machine Learning , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Female , Humans , Independent Living , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pilot Projects , Self Efficacy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology Assessment, Biomedical
5.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 36(7): 1307-1315, 2021 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33621315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) are at risk for increased medication mismanagement, which can lead to worse clinical outcomes. However, the nature of the errors (i.e., undertaking or overtaking medications) contributing to mismanagement and their relationship to cognition in PD is unknown. Therefore, this study sought to examine errors committed on the Medication Management Ability Assessment (MMAA) between PD participants with normal cognition (PD-NC) or mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) relative to healthy adults (HA). METHOD: HA (n = 74), PD-NC (n = 102), and PD-MCI (n = 45) participants were administered the MMAA to assess undertaking, overtaking, and overall errors as well as overall performance (total score). Additionally, participants were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery from which cognitive composites of Attention, Learning, Memory, Language, Visuospatial, and Executive Functioning were derived. RESULTS: Separate negative binomial regression analyses indicated the PD-MCI group performed significantly worse overall on the MMAA (total score) and committed more undertaking and overall errors relative to HA and PD-NC. In the PD-MCI group, poorer MMAA performance was associated with worse delayed memory performance, whereas cognitive performance was not related to MMAA in HA or PC-NC. CONCLUSION: Compared to PD and healthy adults with normal cognition, PD-MCI patients exhibited greater difficulty with medication management, particularly with undertaking medications. Poorer medication management in PD-MCI was associated with worse delayed recall. Thus, PD-MCI patients experiencing memory problems may require additional assistance with their medications. Findings have clinical relevance suggesting that objective measures of medication errors may assist clinicians in identifying PD patients needing adherence strategies.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Parkinson Disease , Adult , Cognitive Dysfunction/chemically induced , Executive Function , Humans , Medication Therapy Management , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy
6.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 34(4): 678-699, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32189568

ABSTRACT

Objective: In the real-world environment, multiple and interacting state-dependent factors (e.g., fatigue, distractions) can cause cognitive failures and negatively impact everyday activities. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and a n-back task to examine the relationship between fluctuating levels of cognition measured in the real-world environment and self-report and performance-based measures of functional status.Method: Thirty-five community-dwelling older adults (M age = 71.80) completed a brief battery of objective and self-report measures of cognitive and functional status. After completing 100, 45-second trials to reach stable performance on a n-back task, EMA data collection began. Four times daily for one week, participants received prompts on a tablet to complete a n-back task and a brief survey. From the EMA n-back trials, measures of EMA average performance and intra-individual variability (IIV) across performances were created.Results: For the EMA n-back, the correlation between IIV and EMA average was weak and non-significant. IIV associated with self-report measures, and EMA average with the objective, performance-based functional status composite. Hierarchical regressions further revealed that IIV was a significant predictor of self-reported functional status and cognitive failures over and above EMA average performance and global cognitive status. In contrast, for the objective, functional status composite, IIV did not explain additional variance.Conclusions: The findings suggest that IIV and self-report measures of functional status and cognitive failures may capture a real-world cognitive capacity that fluctuates over time and with context; one that may not easily be captured by objective, performance-based measures designed to assess optimal function.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Ecological Momentary Assessment/standards , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Self Report
7.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 34(3): 290-300, 2019 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29912269

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Difficulties managing medications, particularly among older adults experiencing cognitive deficits, is an important contributing factor to medication nonadherence that may have significant negative financial and health outcomes. The current study examined the performance of healthy older adults' (HOA) and individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) on the medication management abilities assessment's (MMAA, a performance-based measure of medication management) original scoring criteria and derived error process measures, assessing medication overtaking and undertaking magnitude. Exploratory correlations between performances on the MMAA and self-reported confidence in medication management skills and cognitive abilities were also examined. METHOD: A sample of 25 HOAs with aMCI and 25 age- and education-matched HOAs completed the MMAA, a self-reported medication management confidence rating and a battery of neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: HOAs performed significantly better on the MMAA score and committed significantly less process errors than individuals with aMCI. Despite these differences in MMAA performance, the HOA and aMCI groups rated similar high levels of confidence in their ability to manage a new medication routine. Notably, while the HOA group's performance on all of the MMAA measures did not relate to cognitive measures, the aMCI group's performance on the MMAA score was significantly related to memory and executive functioning and a new process error score for overtaking was related to processing speed. CONCLUSIONS: Although these results present promising potential for the MMAA as a measure of medication management in a clinical setting, further studies need to examine the validity of the MMAA against real-world adherence measures.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/drug therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Self Care/psychology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Executive Function , Female , Humans , Male , Memory , Neuropsychological Tests , Self Concept , Self Report
8.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 34(7): 1121-1126, 2019 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30517595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although medication management is a necessary daily activity for individuals with Huntington's disease (HD), medication management abilities and their relation to cognitive functioning have not been evaluated. METHOD: Twenty individuals with HD and 20 healthy adults (HA) completed the Medication Management Abilities Assessment (MMAA). Individuals with HD also completed a self-report medication management measure and neuropsychological tests assessing executive function, retrospective memory, and prospective memory. RESULTS: Individuals with HD performed significantly poorer and made more undertaking errors on the MMAA as compared to HA. No group differences were found in overtaking errors. In the HD group, significant associations were found between undertaking errors and perceived medication management ability as well as between MMAA task performance and measures assessing prospective memory and executive functions. CONCLUSIONS: Medication management capacity was negatively affected in individuals with HD and may be associated with difficulty remembering to take medications in the future.


Subject(s)
Executive Function , Huntington Disease/psychology , Medication Adherence/psychology , Memory , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Retrospective Studies , Self Report
9.
Learn Mem ; 23(1): 38-41, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670185

ABSTRACT

Our study examined age-related differences on a new memory test assessing memory for "who," "when," and "where," and associations among these elements. Participants were required to remember a sequence of pictures of different faces paired with different places. Older adults remembered significantly fewer correct face-place pairs in the correct sequence compared with young adults. Correlation analyses with standardized neuropsychological tests provide preliminary evidence for construct validity. Our results offer insight into age-related changes in the ability to remember associations between people and places at different points in time using a portable test that can be administered rapidly in various settings.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Association Learning/physiology , Memory/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Front Aging Neurosci ; 7: 28, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25852544

ABSTRACT

Age-related changes in temporal order memory have been well documented in older adults; however, little is known about this ability during middle age. We tested healthy young, middle-aged, and older adults on a previously published visuospatial temporal order memory test involving high and low interference conditions. When interference was low, young and middle-aged adults did not differ, but both groups significantly outperformed older adults. However, when interference was high, significant differences were found among all three age groups. The data provide evidence that temporal order memory may begin to decline in middle age, particularly when temporal interference is high.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...