ABSTRACT
Background/Aims: Endoscopic biliary drainage using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for malignant biliary strictures occasionally induces acute cholecystitis (AC). This study evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic gallbladder stents (GBS) during SEMS placement. Methods: Among 158 patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures between January 2018 and March 2023, 30 patients who attempted to undergo prophylactic GBS placement before SEMS placement were included. Results: Technical success was achieved in 21 cases (70.0%). The mean diameter of the cystic duct was more significant in the successful cases (6.5 mm vs. 3.7 mm, p<0.05). Adverse events occurred for 7 patients (23.3%: acute pancreatitis in 7; non-obstructive cholangitis in 1; perforation of the cystic duct in 1 with an overlap), all of which improved with conservative treatment. No patients developed AC when the GBS placement was successful, whereas 25 of the 128 patients (19.5%) without a prophylactic GBS developed AC during the median follow-up period of 357 days (p=0.043). In the multivariable analysis, GBS placement was a significant factor in preventing AC (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.99; p=0.045). Conclusions: GBS may contribute to the prevention of AC after SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Surgery is recommended for large pedunculated gallbladder polyps (PGPs), which measure 10 mm or more in size, because they tend to be neoplastic polyps (NPs), such as adenomas and adenocarcinomas. However, after resection, they are often found to be non-neoplastic polyps (non-NPs). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of plain CT in distinguishing NPs from non-NPs. METHODS: Of the 80 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for PGPs ( 10 mm between January 2008 and February 2021, 46 who underwent plain and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) before resection were included in this study. We retrospectively assessed the polyp detection rate (PDR) using CT and calculated the difference in the CT values between PGPs and the surrounding bile. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had NPs (12 adenomas, 5 carcinomas in adenoma, and 4 adenocarcinomas). The others were non-NPs (24 cholesterol polyps and one hyperplastic polyp). The PDR using plain CT was significantly higher in the NP group than in the non-NP group (38% (8/21) vs. 0% (0/25), p <0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of NPs were 38%, 100%, 100%, 66%, and 72%, respectively. The difference in the CT values between PGPs and the surrounding bile was significantly larger in the NP group than in the non-NP group (14.12 ± 11.38 HU, 5.04 ± 6.15 HU, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PGPs detected using plain CT had a high probability of being NPs. Plain CT is therefore considered to be useful for differentiating NPs from non-NPs.
