The co-occurrence of psychiatric and substance use diagnoses in adolescents in different service systems: frequency, recognition, cost, and outcomes.

The frequency, severity, recognition, cost, and outcomes of adolescent substance use comorbidity were analyzed in the Fort Bragg Demonstration Project. Comorbidity was defined as the co-occurrence of substance use disorder (SUD) with other psychiatric diagnosis. The sample consisted of 428 adolescent clients whose providers' diagnoses were compared with research diagnoses. The project identified 59 clients (13.8%) with SUD, all with additional psychiatric diagnoses. Providers recognized only 21 of these 59 comorbid cases. The frequency and severity of comorbidity did not differ between service system samples, although recognition did. Comorbid clients had more behavior problems and more functioning impairment, and their average treatment cost ($29,057) was more than twice as high as that of noncomorbid clients ($13,067). Mental health outcomes were not influenced by type of service system, comorbid diagnosis, or treatment. Screening for and prevention of SUD are discussed as a potential cost-savings opportunity in mental health services.

Long-term effects of a system of care on children and adolescents.

This study evaluates an exemplary system of care designed to provide comprehensive mental health services to children and adolescents. It was believed that the system would lead to more improvement in the functioning and symptoms of clients compared to those receiving care as usual. The project employed a randomized experimental five-wave longitudinal design with 350 families. While access to care, type of care, and the amount of care were better in the system of care, there were no differences in clinical outcomes compared to care received outside the system. In addition, children who did not receive any services, regardless of experimental condition, improved at the same rate as treated children. Similar to the Fort Bragg results, the effects of systems of care are primarily limited to system-level outcomes but do not appear to affect individual outcomes such as functioning and symptomatology.

Rejoinder to Mordock's critique of the Fort Bragg Evaluation Project: the sample is generalizable and the outcomes are clear.

The Fort Bragg Evaluation Project (FBEP) showed that children in a well implemented and expensive continuum of care had no better clinical outcomes than those experiencing more traditional and fragmented services. In an article published in this journal that was critical of the evaluation, Mordock argued that the FBEP results be viewed with skepticism because of what he perceived to be methodological, design, measurement, and analytic failures of this study. We think it is important to respond to Mordock's critique since it contributes to the great reluctance to seriously consider the study's findings and their implications.

Comparative outcomes of emotionally disturbed children and adolescents in a system of services and usual care.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared six-month functional and symptom outcomes of children and adolescents with serious emotional disturbance who received services in an exemplary system of care with outcomes of children who received traditional care. The system of care offers a comprehensive and coordinated network of mental health and other necessary services. METHODS: The study used a randomized longitudinal experimental design. Baseline data on symptoms, functioning, and family characteristics were collected from 350 families selected from among those who sought services for children from community agencies in Stark County, Ohio. The families were randomly assigned to either the experimental group, which received services from the system of care, or the control group, which received usual care in the community. Six-month outcome measures of children's symptoms and functioning were compared for the two groups. RESULTS: Although access to care and the amount of care received increased under the system of care, no differences in clinical or functional outcomes were found between the group served in the system of care and the group who received usual care. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of systems of care are primarily limited to system-level outcomes such as access to and cost of care and do not appear to affect clinical outcomes such as functioning and symptoms.

The quality of services in a children's mental health managed care demonstration.

The Fort Bragg Demonstration and evaluation was designed to test the cost-effectiveness of a continuum of care model of service delivery for children and adolescents. A crucial aspect of the evaluation was the measurement of the quality of services provided in the Demonstration. Two key service components were examined: intake assessment and case management. It was concluded that these key components of the continuum of care were implemented with sufficient quality to have the theoretically predicted effects on mental health.

The costs of mental health services under the Fort Bragg Demonstration.

This article examines the costs of treatment under the Fort Bragg Demonstration. It focuses on the direct costs of mental health services and suggests that expenditures on those services were much higher at the Demonstration. Increased access and greater "doses" of services provided at the Demonstration are identified as the proximal causes of the system-level cost difference. Consideration is given to whether these differences in costs and in service use can be attributed to the continuum of care per se or to differences in the financial arrangements under which care was provided. Supplemental analyses suggest that these expenditures were not offset by cost savings elsewhere. Implications for mental health policy are discussed.

Mental health services utilization in a children's mental health managed care demonstration.

Service delivery under two systems of care--a traditional Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS) reimbursement system and an innovative continuum of care--was examined along six dimensions: access, type, mix, volume, timing, and continuity of services received by children and adolescents. It was found that the Demonstration served over three times as many children as the Comparison. In addition to serving more children, the Demonstration also provided more and different types of services to each child treated. Finally, the Demonstration appears to have delivered services in a more timely fashion and made a considerable effort to match children's and families' needs with services.