Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 24(7): 1466-76, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24816931

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader or concurrent reader in helping radiologists who are moderately experienced in computed tomographic colonography (CTC) to detect colorectal polyps. METHODS: Seventy CTC datasets (34 patients: 66 polyps ≥6 mm; 36 patients: no abnormalities) were retrospectively reviewed by seven radiologists with moderate CTC experience. After primary unassisted evaluation, a CAD second read and, after a time interval of ≥4 weeks, a CAD concurrent read were performed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), along with per-segment, per-polyp and per-patient sensitivities, and also reading times, were calculated for each reader with and without CAD. RESULTS: Of seven readers, 86% and 71% achieved a higher accuracy (segment-level AUC) when using CAD as second and concurrent reader respectively. Average segment-level AUCs with second and concurrent CAD (0.853 and 0.864) were significantly greater (p < 0.0001) than average AUC in the unaided evaluation (0.781). Per-segment, per-polyp, and per-patient sensitivities for polyps ≥6 mm were significantly higher in both CAD reading paradigms compared with unaided evaluation. Second-read CAD reduced readers' average segment and patient specificity by 0.007 and 0.036 (p = 0.005 and 0.011), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CAD significantly improves the sensitivities of radiologists moderately experienced in CTC for polyp detection, both as second reader and concurrent reader. KEY POINTS: • CAD helps radiologists with moderate CTC experience to detect polyps ≥6 mm. • Second and concurrent read CAD increase the radiologist's sensitivity for detecting polyps ≥6 mm. • Second read CAD slightly decreases specificity compared with an unassisted read. • Concurrent read CAD is significantly more time-efficient than second read CAD.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonography, Computed Tomographic/methods , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Radiology , Aged , Algorithms , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Workforce
2.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 37(1): 161-89, viii, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18313545

ABSTRACT

CT colonography (CTC) is an innovative technology that entails CT examination of the entire colon and computerized processing of the raw data after colon cleansing and colonic distention. CTC could potentially increase the screening rate for colon cancer because of its relative safety, relatively low expense, and greater patient acceptance, but its role in mass colon cancer screening is controversial because of its highly variable sensitivity, the inability to sample polyps for histologic analysis, and lack of therapeutic capabilities. This article reviews the CTC literature, including imaging and adjunctive techniques, radiologic interpretation, procedure indications, contraindications, risks, sensitivity, interpretation pitfalls, and controversies.


Subject(s)
Colonography, Computed Tomographic/trends , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Europe , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , United States
3.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 15(2): 231-42, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15722237

ABSTRACT

Radiologic studies can be helpful when evaluating patients who are suspected of having esophageal motility disorders. Performing studies of the highest technical quality yields the most definitive results. The esophagus should be assessed for anatomic and functional abnormalities that may account for presenting symptoms. Motility disorders such as achalasia and scleroderma have specific radiographic findings that are described in this article; however, some motility disorders of the esophagus have nonspecific radiographic findings. In those cases, it is imperative that clinical and manometric information be combined with radiographic findings to provide accurate diagnoses. The radiographic examinations that are most commonly used include barium esophagography and nuclear medicine examinations. This article emphasizes the use of barium examinations to assess esophageal motility.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Motility Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Esophagus/anatomy & histology , Esophagus/physiology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Manometry/methods , Radiography , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...