Long-Term Outcomes of Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT) showed a greater benefit with respect to mortality at 5 years among patients who received cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) than among those who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, the effect of CRT on long-term survival is not known. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less, and an intrinsic QRS duration of 120 msec or more (or a paced QRS duration of 200 msec or more) to receive either an ICD alone or a CRT defibrillator (CRT-D). We assessed long-term outcomes among patients at the eight highest-enrolling participating sites. The primary outcome was death from any cause; the secondary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, heart transplantation, or implantation of a ventricular assist device. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 1798 patients, of whom 1050 were included in the long-term survival trial; the median duration of follow-up for the 1050 patients was 7.7 years (interquartile range, 3.9 to 12.8), and the median duration of follow-up for those who survived was 13.9 years (interquartile range, 12.8 to 15.7). Death occurred in 405 of 530 patients (76.4%) assigned to the ICD group and in 370 of 520 patients (71.2%) assigned to the CRT-D group. The time until death appeared to be longer for those assigned to receive a CRT-D than for those assigned to receive an ICD (acceleration factor, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.92; P = 0.002). A secondary-outcome event occurred in 412 patients (77.7%) in the ICD group and in 392 (75.4%) in the CRT-D group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a reduced ejection fraction, a widened QRS complex, and NYHA class II or III heart failure, the survival benefit associated with receipt of a CRT-D as compared with ICD appeared to be sustained during a median of nearly 14 years of follow-up. (RAFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00251251.).

Economic evaluation in cardiac electrophysiology: Determining the value of emerging technologies.

Cardiac electrophysiology is a constantly evolving speciality that has benefited from technological innovation and refinements over the past several decades. Despite the potential of these technologies to reshape patient care, their upfront costs pose a challenge to health policymakers who are responsible for the assessment of the novel technology in the context of increasingly limited resources. In this context, it is critical for new therapies or technologies to demonstrate that the measured improvement in patients' outcomes for the cost of achieving that improvement is within conventional benchmarks for acceptable health care value. The field of Health Economics, specifically economic evaluation methods, facilitates this assessment of value in health care. In this review, we provide an overview of the basic principles of economic evaluation and provide historical applications within the field of cardiac electrophysiology. Specifically, the cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation for both atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia, novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF, left atrial appendage occlusion devices, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy will be reviewed.

Ambulatory Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring Reduces Costs and Improves Outcomes in Symptomatic Heart Failure: A Single-Centre Canadian Experience.

Background: Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations (HFHs) and improves quality of life in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III HF. We evaluated the impact of PAP monitoring on outcomes and health spending in a Canadian ambulatory HF cohort. Methods: Twenty NYHA III HF patients underwent wireless PAP implantation at Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta. Baseline, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month assessments of laboratory parameters, hemodynamics, 6-minute walk text and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores were collected. Healthcare costs 1 year pre- and post-implantation were collected from administrative databases. Results: Mean age was 70.6 years; 45% were female. Results were as follows: an 88% reduction in emergency room visits (P = 0.0009); an 87% reduction in HFHs (P < 0.0003); a 29% reduction in heart function clinic visits (P = 0.033), and a 178% increase in nurse calls (P < 0.0002). Questionnaire and 6-minute walk test scores at baseline vs last follow-up were 45.4 vs 48.4 (P = 0.48) and 364.4 vs 402.8 m (P = 0.58), respectively. Mean PAP at baseline vs follow-up was 31.5 vs 24.8 mm Hg (P = 0.005). NYHA class improved by at least one class in 85% of patients. Mean measurable HF-related spending preimplantation was CAD$29,814 per patient per year and postimplantation was CAD$25,642 per patient per year (including device cost). Conclusions: PAP monitoring demonstrated reductions in HFHs, and emergency room and heart function clinic visits, with improvements in NYHA class. Although further economic evaluation is needed, these results support the use of PAP monitoring as an effective and cost-neutral tool in HF management in appropriately selected patients in a publicly funded healthcare system.

Contexte: La surveillance de la pression artérielle pulmonaire (PAP) réduit les hospitalisations liées à l'insuffisance cardiaque (HIC) et améliore la qualité de vie des patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque (IC) de classe III de la New York Heart Association (NYHA). Nous avons évalué l'effet de la surveillance de la PAP sur les résultats et les dépenses en santé dans une cohorte de patients ambulatoires atteints d'IC au Canada. Méthodologie: Vingt patients atteints d'IC de classe III de la NYHA se sont fait implanter un dispositif sans fil de surveillance de la PAP au Foothills Medical Centre, à Calgary, en Alberta. Nous avons évalué les patients au départ et aux mois 3, 6, 9 et 12 en fonction des paramètres de laboratoire, de l'hémodynamique, des scores au test de marche de 6 minutes et au questionnaire de cardiomyopathie de Kansas City. Les coûts liés aux soins de santé un an avant et après l'implantation du dispositif ont été extraits de bases de données administratives. Résultats: L'âge moyen des patients est de 70,6 ans et 45 % sont des femmes. Les résultats vont comme suit : une réduction de 88 % des visites à l'urgence (p = 0,0009); une réduction de 87 % des HIC (p < 0,0003); une réduction de 29 % des visites à une clinique de fonction cardiaque (p = 0,033) et une augmentation de 178 % des appels du personnel infirmier (p < 0,0002). Les scores initiaux au questionnaire et au test de marche de 6 minutes par rapport à ceux du dernier suivi sont respectivement de 45,4 contre 48,4 (p = 0,48) et de 364,4 contre 402,8 m (p = 0,58). La PAP moyenne au départ par rapport au suivi est de 31,5 contre 24,8 mmHg (p = 0,005). La classe de l'IC selon la NYHA s'est améliorée d'au moins une position chez 85 % des patients. Les dépenses mesurables moyennes liées à l'IC avant l'implantation sont de 29 814 $ CA par patient par année et de 25 642 $ CA par patient par année après l'implantation (incluent le coût du dispositif). Conclusions: La surveillance de la PAP entraîne une réduction des HIC ainsi que des visites à l'urgence et à la clinique de fonction cardiaque, et une amélioration de la classe de l'IC selon la NYHA. Bien qu'une évaluation économique plus approfondie soit nécessaire, ces résultats militent en faveur de la surveillance de la PAP comme outil de prise en charge de l'IC sans incidence sur les coûts chez les patients adéquatement choisis dans un système de soins de santé financé par les fonds publics.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated With Remote Monitoring for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite expert recommendations advocating use of remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices, implementation in routine clinical practice remains modest due to inconsistent funding policies across health systems and uncertainty regarding the efficacy of RM to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients with de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D), using administrative health data in Alberta, Canada, from 2010 to 2016. We assessed RM status as a predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization using Cox proportional hazards modelling, and direct health costs by generalized linear models. From this real-world data, we then constructed a decision-analytic Markov model to estimate the projected costs and benefits associated with RM compared with in-clinic visit follow-up alone. RESULTS: Among 2799 ICD and CRT-D patients, 1830 (63.4%) were followed by RM for a mean follow-up of 50.3 months. After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities, RM was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.52; P < 0.001) and CV hospitalization (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91; P = 0.002). In the economic model, cost savings were observed over 5 years with an estimated savings of $12,195 per person (95% CI -$21,818 to -$4,790). The model estimated a cost-savings associated with RM strategy in 99% of simulations. CONCLUSIONS: These population data support more widespread implementation of RM technology to facilitate better patient outcomes and improve health system efficiency.

A Novel High-Resolution Surface Electrocardiographic Method to Identify and Characterize Myocardial Scar: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

BACKGROUND: The placement of the left ventricular (LV) lead in an area free of myocardial scar is an important determinant of cardiac resynchronization therapy response. We sought to develop and validate a simple, practical, and novel electrocardiographic (ECG)-based approach to intraoperatively identify the presence of LV scar. We hypothesized that there would be a reduction in the measured amplitude of the LV pacing stimulus on the skin surface using a high-resolution (HR) ECG when pacing from LV regions with scar compared with regions without scar. We term this the ECG Amplitude Signal Evaluation (EASE) method. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischemic LV systolic dysfunction and standard criteria for de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation were prospectively enrolled. All underwent a preimplant contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance study to assess for scar. The average amplitude of the LV pacing impulse was sampled on HR surface ECG intraprocedurally and then compared with the cardiac magnetic resonance results. RESULTS: A total of 38 LV pacing sites were assessed among 13 recipients. The median voltage measured on the surface HR ECG in regions with scar was reduced by 41% (interquartile range, 17% to 63%), whereas there was no measurable change in voltage (interquartile range, 0 to 0%) in regions without scar compared with the maximal amplitude (Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The EASE method appears to be of potential value as a novel intraoperative tool to guide LV lead placement to regions free of scar. Future work is required to validate the utility of this method in a larger patient cohort.

CONTEXTE: La mise en place de la sonde ventriculaire gauche dans une zone exempte de cicatrice myocardique est un facteur déterminant de la réponse au traitement de resynchronisation cardiaque. Nous avons cherché à développer et à valider une approche électrocardiographique (ECG) simple, concrète et novatrice afin de repérer de manière peropératoire la présence de tissu cicatriciel au ventricule gauche (VG). Nous avons émis l'hypothèse qu'il y aurait une diminution de l'amplitude du rythme de stimulation du ventricule gauche mesurée à la surface de la peau à l'ECG haute résolution (HR) lors de la stimulation de régions du VG présentant du tissu cicatriciel comparativement aux régions exemptes de cicatrices. Il s'agit de ce que nous appelons la méthode EASE ( E CG A mplitude S ignal E valuation). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des patients vus de manière consécutive qui présentaient une dysfonction systolique ischémique du VG et répondaient aux critères standard pour l'implantation de novo d'un dispositif de resynchronisation cardiaque ont été recrutés de manière prospective. Tous ont fait l'objet d'une résonance magnétique cardiaque améliorée par injection d'un produit de contraste avant l'implantation pour évaluer la présence de tissu cicatriciel. L'amplitude moyenne de l'impulsion de stimulation du VG a été échantillonnée sur l'ECG de surface HR réalisé pendant l'intervention, puis comparée aux résultats de la résonance magnétique cardiaque. RÉSULTATS: En tout, 38 points de stimulation du VG ont été évalués chez 13 receveurs. Le voltage médian mesuré sur l'ECG de surface HR dans les régions présentant du tissu cicatriciel était réduit de 41 % (intervalle interquartile : 17 % à 63 %), tandis qu'il n'y avait pas de changement mesurable du voltage (intervalle interquartile : 0 à 0 %) dans les régions exemptes de cicatrices par rapport à l'amplitude maximale (test de Wilcoxon, p < 0,0001). CONCLUSION: La méthode EASE semble avoir une utilité potentielle en tant que nouvel outil peropératoire pour guider la mise en place de la sonde ventriculaire gauche dans les régions exemptes de cicatrices. Il faudra réaliser d'autres travaux pour valider l'utilité de cette méthode dans une cohorte de patients plus importante.

Optimizing Physician Payment Models to Address Health System Priorities: Perspectives from Specialist Physicians.

OBJECTIVE: Despite well-documented data on the mixed impact of physician payment models, there is limited evidence on how to enhance existing payment model designs. This study examines the approaches to optimizing payment models from the perspective of specialist physicians to better support patient and physician experience and other health system objectives. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 specialist physicians across Alberta, Canada. Data from the interviews were analyzed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Respondents emphasized the need to incentivize physicians with the right blend of financial and non-financial incentives, including physician wellness. Respondents also highlighted the need for physician involvement and accountability to optimize the value of physician payment models. CONCLUSION: To optimize physician payment models, it may be useful to include a blend of financial and non-financial incentives with clear accountability measures as this may better align physician practice with health system priorities.

Ventricular electrical storm after Micra™ leadless pacemaker implant.

Peri- and post-procedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a rare complication after leadless pacemaker implantation and requires an individualized approach. In this case report we describe the management of VT in a patient with subendocardial scarring due to prior coronary artery disease who presented with monomorphic VT the day after implant. The etiology was found to be related to the novel ventricular activation wavefront by ventricular pacing which induced a reentrant circuit dependent on pre-existing myocardial substrate. Invasive electrophysiologic study and ablation is a safe and successful treatment strategy in selected patients with evidence of myocardial scarring.

Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study.

Most physicians across the world are paid through fee-for-service. However, there is increased interest in alternative payment models such as salary, capitation, episode-based payment, pay-for-performance, and strategic blends of these models. Such models may be more aligned with broad health policy goals such as fiscal sustainability, delivery of high-quality care, and physician and patient well-being. Despite this, there is limited research on physicians' preferences for different models and a disproportionate focus on differences in income over other issues such as physician autonomy and purpose. Using qualitative interviews with 32 specialist physicians in Alberta, Canada, we examined factors that influence preferences for fee-for-service (FFS) and salary-based payment models. Our findings suggest that a series of factors relating to (1) physician characteristics, (2) payment model characteristics, and (3) professional interests influence preferences. Within these themes, flexibility, autonomy, and compatibility with academic roles were highlighted. To encourage physicians to select a specific payment model, the model must appeal to them in terms of income potential as well as non-monetary values. These findings can support constructive discussions about the merits of different payment models and can assist policy makers in considering the impact of payment reform.

Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: insights from the BRUISE CONTROL trials.

AIMS: Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion is associated with patient dissatisfaction, emotional distress, and emergency department visits. We sought to identify factors associated with post-operative pain and develop a prediction score for post-operative pain. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients from the BRUISE CONTROL-1 and 2 trials were included in this analysis. A validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of pain related to CIED implant procedures. Patients were asked to grade the most severe post-operative pain, average post-operative pain, and pain on the day of the first post-operative clinic. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of significant post-operative pain and to develop a pain-prediction score. A total of 1308 patients were included. Multivariable regression analysis found that the presence of post-operative clinically significant haematoma {CSH; P value < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 3.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37-6.16]}, de novo CIED implantation [P value < 0.001; OR 1.90 (95% CI: 1.47-2.46)], female sex [P value < 0.001; OR 1.61 (95% CI: 1.22-2.12)], younger age [<65 years; P value < 0.001; OR 1.54 (95% CI: 1.14-2.10)], and lower body mass index [<20 kg/m2; P value < 0.05; OR 2.05 (95% CI: 0.98-4.28)] demonstrated strong and independent associations with increased post-operative pain. An 11-point post-operative pain prediction score was developed using the data. CONCLUSION: Our study has identified multiple predictors of post-operative pain after CIED insertion. We have developed a prediction score for post-operative pain that can be used to identify individuals at risk of experiencing significant post-operative pain.

Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Warfarin, and Antiplatelet Agents on Risk of Device Pocket Hematoma: Combined Analysis of BRUISE CONTROL 1 and 2.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant use is common among patients undergoing pacemaker or defibrillator surgery. BRUISE CONTROL (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT00800137) demonstrated that perioperative warfarin continuation reduced clinically significant hematomas (CSH) by 80% compared with heparin bridging (3.5% versus 16%). BRUISE-CONTROL-2 (NCT01675076) observed a similarly low risk of CSH when comparing continued versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulant (2.1% in both groups). Using patient level data from both trials, the current study aims to: (1) evaluate the effect of concomitant antiplatelet therapy on CSH, and (2) understand the relative risk of CSH in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin. METHODS: We analyzed 1343 patients included in BRUISE-CONTROL-1 and BRUISE-CONTROL-2. The primary outcome for both trials was CSH. There were 408 patients identified as having continued either a single or dual antiplatelet agent at the time of device surgery. RESULTS: Antiplatelet use (versus nonuse) was associated with CSH in 9.8% versus 4.3% of patients (P<0.001), and remained a strong independent predictor after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio, 1.965; 95% CI, 1.202-3.213; P=0.0071). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for antiplatelet use, there was no significant difference in CSH observed between direct oral anticoagulant use compared with continued warfarin (odds ratio, 0.858; 95% CI, 0.375-1.963; P=0.717). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant antiplatelet therapy doubled the risk of CSH during device surgery. No difference in CSH was found between direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin. In anticoagulated patients undergoing elective or semi-urgent device surgery, the patient specific benefit/risk of holding an antiplatelet should be carefully considered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00800137, NCT01675076.

Continued vs. interrupted direct oral anticoagulants at the time of device surgery, in patients with moderate to high risk of arterial thrombo-embolic events (BRUISE CONTROL-2).

Aims: Guidelines recommend warfarin continuation rather than heparin bridging for pacemaker and defibrillator surgery, after the BRUISE CONTROL trial demonstrated an 80% reduction in device pocket haematoma with this approach. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now used to treat the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation. We sought to understand the best strategy to manage the DOACs at the time of device surgery and specifically hypothesized that performing device surgery without DOAC interruption would result in a reduced haematoma rate. Methods and results: We randomly assigned patients with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, to continued vs. interrupted DOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban). The primary outcome was blindly evaluated, clinically significant device pocket haematoma: resulting in re-operation, interruption of anticoagulation, or prolonging hospital stay. In the continued arm, the median time between pre- and post-operative DOAC doses was 12 h; in the interrupted arm the median time was 72 h. Clinically significant haematoma occurred in of 7 of 328 (2.1%; 95% CI 0.9-4.3) patients in the continued DOAC arm and 7 of 334 (2.1%; 95% CI 0.9-4.3) patients in the interrupted DOAC arm (P = 0.97). Complications were uncommon, and included one stroke and one symptomatic pericardial effusion in each arm. Conclusions: These results suggest that, dependent on the clinical scenario, either management strategy (continued DOAC or interrupted DOAC) might be reasonable, at least for patients similar to those enrolled in our trial.

Assessing physician knowledge regarding indications for a primary prevention implantable defibrillator and potential barriers for referral.

BACKGROUND: Although there is clear evidence to demonstrate that primary prevention implantable defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in high-risk patients, ICDs are underutilized. Limited data exist assessing referring physicians' knowledge about guideline indications and attitudes towards ICDs, which may influence decision for referral. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Arrhythmia Working Group from the Alberta Cardiovascular and Stroke Strategic Clinical Network developed a web-based survey consisting of case scenarios regarding primary prevention ICD indications and a list of barriers for referral to aid in the design of a complex device care pathway. We invited referring physicians to participate in the survey including internists and cardiologists and cardiology residents. The survey was completed by 109 of 799 (response rate = 14%) of physicians. Of those, 55% were internists, 32% cardiologists, and 13% cardiology residents. The majority of physicians were male (62%), practicing in a university hospital (66%). Overall, complete guideline-concordant answers were provided by 34% of physicians. In multivariable analysis, predictors of complete guideline concordance were being a cardiologist (odd ratio [OR] 5.9, confidence interval [CI] 2.1-16.4, P = 0.001) and cardiology resident (OR 6.7, CI 1.7-27.3, P = 0.007). The most common barrier for referral for internists was lack of confidence in knowledge of guideline recommendations; while cardiologists reported concerns about cost-effectiveness and cardiology residents were most concerned with inappropriate shocks. CONCLUSION: Knowledge regarding indications for primary prevention ICD is limited and varies significantly among referring physicians. The barriers for referral differ among physician groups and addressing these identified barriers may help to improve appropriate ICD utilization.

Sudden cardiac death.

Sudden death accounts for 300,000-400,000 deaths annually in the United States. Most sudden deaths are cardiac, and most sudden cardiac deaths are related to arrhythmias secondary to structural heart disease or primary electrical abnormalities of the heart. The most common structural disease leading to sudden death is ischemic heart disease. Nonischemic cardiomyopathy and other structural abnormalities such as arrhythmogenic ventricular dysplasia and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may also be causative. Patients without structural disease have a primary electrical abnormality, such as long-QT syndrome or Brugada syndrome. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction is the main marker for sudden death in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. In other conditions, other markers for structural heart disease and electrical abnormalities need to be considered. It is seen that ß-blocker therapy is associated with a reduction in sudden cardiac death across a broad range of disorders. Nevertheless, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator remains the most effective treatment strategy in selected patients.

Impact of programming strategies aimed at reducing nonessential implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients who receive implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies are at higher risk of death versus those who do not. Programmed settings to reduce nonessential implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies (therapy reduction programming) have been developed but may have adverse effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the relationship between therapy reduction programming with the risks of death from any cause, implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks, and syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Those that followed patients for ≥6 months and reported mortality were included. Six met the inclusion criteria; 4 randomized (Comparison of Empiric to Physician-Tailored Programming of ICDs [EMPIRIC], Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy [MADIT-RIT], Avoid Delivering Therapies for Non-sustained Arrhythmias in ICD Patients III [ADVANCE III], and Programming Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients with Primary Prevention Indication to Prolong Time to First Shock [PROVIDE]) and 2 prospective studies (Role of Long Detection Window Programming in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Non-ischemic Etiology in Primary Prevention Treated with a Biventricular ICD [RELEVANT] and Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation [PREPARE]). These 6 studies included 7687 (3598 conventional and 4089 therapy reduction programming) patients. Most (77%) participants were men, had a history of ischemic heart disease (56%), and were prescribed ß-blockers (84%). Therapy reduction programming was associated with a 30% relative reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval, 16%-41%; P<0.001). No significant heterogeneity among studies was observed (P=0.6). A similar 26% reduction in mortality was observed when only the 4 randomized trials were included (95% confidence interval, 11%-40%; P=0.002). These results were not significantly altered after adjustment for baseline characteristics. No significant difference in the risk of syncope was observed with conventional versus therapy reduction programming (P=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy reduction programming results in a large, significant, and consistent reduction in mortality, with no apparent increase in the risk of syncope.

Alternative surgical approach to repair of the ascending aorta.

We describe a case of complete endovascular repair of the ascending aorta using a transfemoral approach. A 59-year-old man with a history of two previous sternotomies experienced an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm arising from the graft-to-graft anastomosis of a previous DeBakey type I aortic dissection repair. A custom-made Zenith TX2 (William Cook Europe ApS, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) thoracic aortic aneurysm endovascular graft, designed specifically for the ascending aorta, was introduced through the left femoral artery and deployed under a rapid ventricular pacing protocol to achieve precise placement between the sinotubular junction and the aortic arch.