Planning, implementation, and evaluation of AIDS education programs for dentists.

Because many dentists were trained before HIV disease was recognized and its implications for dentistry understood, there is a need for effective continuing education programs about the disease for health professionals. Unfortunately, much of the continuing professional education about AIDS in the last few years has been poorly evaluated and the value of continuing education itself has increasingly been called into question. In order to clarify how continuing educational efforts can be designed and evaluated, we report on our continuing educational projects and research which culminated in research on a nationwide educational intervention about AIDS for dentists. We outline and evaluate the steps taken in designing both the intervention and the research. The strengths and weaknesses of the design are discussed and suggestions made about how the design could be improved.

Public perception of risk of AIDS in health care settings.

Our nationwide telephone survey conducted in 1988 (n = 2,000) reveals that the public perceives a considerable risk of contracting AIDS during routine transactions in health care settings. In addition to previously noted public concerns about getting infected with the AIDS virus through blood transfusions and blood donations, respondents also think that AIDS can be transmitted through contact with HIV-infected health care workers during routine treatment in medical or dental offices and in hospital emergency rooms. Effective education programs must be developed to address these public concerns.

The impact of who you know and where you live on opinions about AIDS and health care.

We hypothesized that public attitudes towards AIDS and the safety of health care in the era of HIV would be more positive for people who knew someone with AIDS. We believed, moreover, that living in areas with high AIDS prevalence would result in more favorable attitudes. To test these hypotheses, we conducted telephone interviews with a random sample of 2000 U.S. adults (response rate = 75%) in summer 1988. Overall 19.5% of respondents said that they knew someone with AIDS or the AIDS virus. Thirteen percent of people who lived in low prevalences areas reported knowing someone with AIDS, compared with 27% of those in areas of high prevalence. Of the total sample, 38% reported knowing someone they believed was at risk. People who knew someone with AIDS were less likely to say they would change physicians or dentists if their provider was HIV infected or was known to be treating people who were infected. Knowing someone with AIDS was also associated with greater tolerance for those with AIDS to continue to work if they were able and with lower perception of risk of transmission in health care settings. Multivariate regression analyses indicated that personal contact was related to more positive attitudes. Counter to our hypothesis, living in a high prevalence area had no independent effect on attitudes. This surprising finding suggests that, after controlling for personal contact with someone with AIDS, where one lives does not influence attitudes. Because bringing people with AIDS into contact with others may have positive outcomes, we suggest implementation of interventions using this strategy.

Are nurse practitioners prepared for the AIDS epidemic?

Treatment of HIV-infected individuals will become a regular part of mainstream medical practice because of the increasing numbers of infected persons, the geographical dispersion of the disease, and the routine nature of much of the care required by seropositive patients. Nurse practitioners, like other health care professionals, need to be willing and able to provide such primary care. One hundred sixty-five NPs constituted an opportunity sample that was surveyed using an instrument that had been adapted from one used successfully in studies of other health professionals. The instrument consisted of 80 forced-answer and six open-ended questions. The response rate was 63 percent. It was found that nurse practitioners believed there was moderate risk of occupational contraction of HIV. NPs were more likely to agree on activities they believed to be of low risk than about the danger of perceived higher-risk activities. The respondents judged themselves as fairly competent in their ability to provide counseling and information to patients about HIV and risk-reduction. Half believed that their lack of knowledge was the biggest barrier to providing care to HIV-infected persons. Eighty-five percent thought courses on the medical aspects of AIDS were necessary, and 78 percent wanted courses in the social, ethical and legal implications of the disease. This study shows that there is a widely perceived need for continuing education on both medical and social aspects of AIDS in order to enable nurse practitioners to play a greater role in primary care provision for persons with AIDS.

Dental care experience of HIV-positive patients.

Three studies were conducted to assess the experiences of persons with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or risk factors for the disease in seeking dental care in Los Angeles; San Francisco; Seattle; and Tacoma, WA. Given previous reports from surveys of dentists that they would be reluctant to provide care to people from these groups, widespread denial of care was expected. Our two surveys conducted in San Francisco, however, showed that only 1.3% and 10.8% had been denied care by a dentist. These data suggest that dentist reactions to people with AIDS are more favorable than has previously been suggested, although denial of care is still a problem to some extent.