ABSTRACT
Human Arginase 1 (hArg1) is a metalloenzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine to L-ornithine and urea, and modulates T-cell-mediated immune response. Arginase-targeted therapies have been pursued across several disease areas including immunology, oncology, nervous system dysfunction, and cardiovascular dysfunction and diseases. Currently, all published hArg1 inhibitors are small molecules usually less than 350 Da in size. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structures of potent and inhibitory anti-hArg antibodies bound to hArg1 which form distinct macromolecular complexes that are greater than 650 kDa. With local resolutions of 3.5 Å or better we unambiguously mapped epitopes and paratopes for all five antibodies and determined that the antibodies act through orthosteric and allosteric mechanisms. These hArg1:antibody complexes present an alternative mechanism to inhibit hArg1 activity and highlight the ability to utilize antibodies as probes in the discovery and development of peptide and small molecule inhibitors for enzymes in general.
Subject(s)
Arginase/genetics , Arginase/metabolism , Arginine/chemistry , Binding Sites , Cryoelectron Microscopy , Ornithine/chemistry , Protein Binding , Substrate SpecificityABSTRACT
Myc, a transcription factor with oncogenic activity, is upregulated by amplification, translocation, and mutation of the cellular pathways that regulate its stability. Inhibition of the Myc oncogene by various modalities has had limited success. One Myc inhibitor, Omomyc, has limited cellular and in vivo activity. Here, we report a mini-protein, referred to as Mad, which is derived from the cellular Myc antagonist Mxd1. Mad localizes to the nucleus in cells and is 10-fold more potent than Omomyc in inhibiting Myc-driven cell proliferation. Similar to Mxd1, Mad also interacts with Max, the binding partner of Myc, and with the nucleolar upstream binding factor. Mad binds to E-Box DNA in the promoters of Myc target genes and represses Myc-mediated transcription to a greater extent than Omomyc. Overall, Mad appears to be more potent than Omomyc both in vitro and in cells.
Subject(s)
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors/chemistry , Peptide Fragments/chemistry , Peptide Fragments/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/antagonists & inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/chemistry , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Amino Acid Sequence , Basic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors/metabolism , Cell Line , Cell Nucleolus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Humans , Peptide Fragments/isolation & purification , Pol1 Transcription Initiation Complex Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/geneticsABSTRACT
The MYC oncogene is upregulated in human cancers by translocation, amplification, and mutation of cellular pathways that regulate Myc. Myc/Max heterodimers bind to E box sequences in the promoter regions of genes and activate transcription. The MYC inhibitor Omomyc can reduce the ability of MYC to bind specific box sequences in promoters of MYC target genes by binding directly to E box sequences as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP). Here, we demonstrate by both a proximity ligation assay (PLA) and double chromatin immunoprecipitation (ReCHIP) that Omomyc preferentially binds to Max, not Myc, to mediate inhibition of MYC-mediated transcription by replacing MYC/MAX heterodimers with Omomyc/MAX heterodimers. The formation of Myc/Max and Omomyc/Max heterodimers occurs cotranslationally; Myc, Max, and Omomyc can interact with ribosomes and Max RNA under conditions in which ribosomes are intact. Taken together, our data suggest that the mechanism of action of Omomyc is to bind DNA as either a homodimer or a heterodimer with Max that is formed cotranslationally, revealing a novel mechanism to inhibit the MYC oncogene. We find that in vivo, Omomyc distributes quickly to kidneys and liver and has a short effective half-life in plasma, which could limit its use in vivo.
