CXCL5 impedes CD8+ T cell immunity by upregulating PD-L1 expression in lung cancer via PXN/AKT signaling phosphorylation and neutrophil chemotaxis.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent cancer types worldwide, with a high mortality rate. Upregulation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) may represent a key mechanism for evading immune surveillance. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) antibodies against PD-1 or PD-L1 are therefore widely used to treat patients with lung cancer. However, the mechanisms by which lung cancer and neutrophils in the microenvironment sustain PD-L1 expression and impart stronger inhibition of CD8+ T cell function remain unclear. METHODS: We investigated the role and underlying mechanism by which PD-L1+ lung cancer and PD-L1+ neutrophils impede the function of CD8+ T cells through magnetic bead cell sorting, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, confocal immunofluorescence, gene silencing, flow cytometry, etc. In vivo efficacy and safety studies were conducted using (Non-obeseDiabetes/severe combined immune deficiency) SCID/NOD mice. Additionally, we collected clinical and prognostic data from 208 patients who underwent curative lung cancer resection between 2017 and 2018. RESULTS: We demonstrated that C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CXCL5) is markedly overexpressed in lung cancer cells and is positively correlated with a poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer. Mechanistically, CXCL5 activates the phosphorylation of the Paxillin/AKT signaling cascade, leading to upregulation of PD-L1 expression and the formation of a positive feedback loop. Moreover, CXCL5 attracts neutrophils, compromising CD8+ T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. These PD-L1+ neutrophils aggravate CD8+ T cell exhaustion following lung cancer domestication. Combined treatment with anti-CXCL5 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies significantly inhibits tumor growth in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings collectively demonstrate that CXCL5 promotes immune escape through PD-L1 upregulation in lung cancer and neutrophils chemotaxis through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. CXCL5 may serve as a potential therapeutic target in synergy with ICBs in lung cancer immunotherapy.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in ARID1A-mutant solid tumors: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially those targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have introduced a new treatment landscape for many types of tumors. However, they only achieve a limited therapeutic response. Hence, identifying patients who may benefit from ICIs is currently a challenge. METHODS: 47 tumor patients harboring ARID1A mutations were retrospectively studied. The genomic profiling data through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and relevant clinical information were collected and analyzed. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis of the expression of immune checkpoints and immune cell infiltration levels was conducted in ARID1A-mutant gastric cancer (GC). RESULTS: ARID1A mutations frequently co-occur with mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR)-associated genes. Among the 35 ARID1A-mutant patients who received immunotherapy, 27 were evaluable., with the objective response rate (ORR) was 48.15% (13/27), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 92.59% (25/27). Moreover, survival assays revealed that ARID1A-mutant patients had longer median overall survival (mOS) after immunotherapy. In ARID1A-mutated GC patients, receiving ICIs treatment indicated longer progressive-free survival (PFS). Additionally, the incidence of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) and Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) infection was elevated. Bioinformatic analysis showed significant enrichment of immune response and T cell activation pathway within differentially expressed genes in ARID1A-mutant GC group. Finally, ARID1A mutations status was considered to be highly correlated with the level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and high expression of immune checkpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumors harboring ARID1A mutations may achieve better clinical outcomes from immunotherapy, especially in GC. ARID1A mutations can lead to genomic instability and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), which can be used as a biomarker for immunotherapy.

Targeting MDM2 in malignancies is a promising strategy for overcoming resistance to anticancer immunotherapy.

MDM2 has been established as a biomarker indicating poor prognosis for individuals undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for different malignancies by various pancancer studies. Specifically, patients who have MDM2 amplification are vulnerable to the development of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) following anticancer immunotherapy, resulting in marked deleterious effects on survival rates. The mechanism of MDM2 involves its role as an oncogene during the development of malignancy, and MDM2 can promote both metastasis and tumor cell proliferation, which indirectly leads to disease progression. Moreover, MDM2 is vitally involved in modifying the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) as well as in influencing immune cells, eventually facilitating immune evasion and tolerance. Encouragingly, various MDM2 inhibitors have exhibited efficacy in relieving the TIME suppression caused by MDM2. These results demonstrate the prospects for breakthroughs in combination therapy using MDM2 inhibitors and anticancer immunotherapy.

MET fusions are targetable genomic variants in the treatment of advanced malignancies.

Targeted therapy for malignancies has developed rapidly in recent years, benefiting patients harboring genetic mutations sensitive to relevant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of targeted sequencing techniques, an increasing number of detectable genomic alterations in malignancies, including MET fusions, have been revealed. MET fusions, although rare among malignancies, might be functional driver genes that participate in activating downstream signaling pathways and promoting cell proliferation. Therefore, it is believed that MET fusions could be targetable genomic variants of MET, and inhibition of MET is considered an optionable therapeutic choice for patients harboring MET fusions. According to the summary presented in this review, we recommend MET-TKIs as suitable treatment agents for patients harboring primary MET fusions. For patients harboring acquired MET fusions after the development of resistance to TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as sensitive EGFR mutations, treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as EGFR-TKIs, is hypothesized to be a reasonable option for salvage treatment. In summary, MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be taken into consideration when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Role of YES1 signaling in tumor therapy resistance.

YES proto-oncogene 1 (YES1) is an SRC family kinase (SFK) that plays a key role in cancer cell proliferation, adhesion, invasion, survival, and angiogenesis during tumorigenesis and tumor development. Reports suggest that YES1 amplification is associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in human malignancies. However, the mechanisms of drug resistance have not been fully elucidated. In this article, we review the literature on YES1 and discuss the implications of YES1 signaling for targeted therapy and chemotherapy resistance in malignancies. Moreover, recent advances in targeted therapy for YES1-amplified malignancies are summarized. Finally, we conclude that targeting YES1 may reverse drug resistance and serve as a valuable tumor treatment strategy.

The stage-dependent prognostic role of ARID1A in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Although novel treatment currently achieves a better response, the majority of HCC patients develop resistance and cannot benefit. Hence, novel biomarkers for guiding therapy and predicting the prognosis are needed. Methods: Tissue microarrays of 206 HCC patients were used, and ARID1A expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Databases were used for the verification and expansion of our results. The "rms" package of R software was used for the construction of the nomogram. Results: ARID family alterations were associated with disease-free survival (P=0.0325) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.0076). Subgroup analysis confirmed the prognostic effect of ARID1A, ARID1B, and ARID2 alterations. In addition, ARID family genomic alterations, especially ARID1A, were closely related to poor progression-free survival (ARID: P=0.0011; ARID1A: P=0.0082) and OS (ARID: P=0.0161; ARID1A: P=0.0220) after sorafenib treatment. ARID1A expression was found to display a stage-dependent effect on the prognosis, serving as a risk factor in stage I-II patients (P<0.0001) and a protective factor in stage III-IV patients (P=0.0180). Conclusions: ARID1A has dual roles in HCC in a tumor stage-dependent manner, and further study is required to uncover the complex function of ARID1A in HCC development, disease progression, and therapy.

ARID1A deficiency associated with MMR deficiency and a high abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicts a good prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: ARID1A alterations have been detected in 40% of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) and are associated with loss of its expression. The role of ARID1A in tumorigenesis and development is complex, and the prognostic role in EC remains controversial. Hence, it is of great significance to confirm the role of ARID1A in EC. METHODS: A total of 549 EC patients (cohort A) from TCGA were evaluated to explore the prognostic role of ARID1A. NGS was performed for 13 EC patients (cohort B), and expression of ARID1A, CD3, CD8 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in 52 patients (cohort C) from our center was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival analyses. RESULTS: ARID1A alterations were detected in 32% of EC patients and correlated with good disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.0353). ARID1A alterations were found to co-occur with MMR-related gene mutations and correlated with higher PD-L1 expression. Patients concomitantly harboring ARID1A alterations and MMR-related gene mutations had the best prognosis (DFS: P = 0.0488; OS: P = 0.0024). A cohort from our center showed that ARID1A deficiency was an independent prognostic factor and predicted longer recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0476). ARID1A loss was associated with a tendency toward MSI-H (P = 0.0060). ARID1A alterations and expression loss were associated with a higher abundance of CD3+ (P = 0.0406) and CD8+ (P = 0.0387) T cells. CONCLUSION: ARID1A alterations and expression loss are tightly associated with MMR deficiency and a high abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which might contribute to the good prognosis of EC.

Multiomics analysis revealed the mechanisms related to the enhancement of proliferation, metastasis and EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant LUAD with ARID1A deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Dysregulated ARID1A expression is frequently detected in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and mediates significant changes in cancer behaviors and a poor prognosis. ARID1A deficiency in LUAD enhances proliferation and metastasis, which could be induced by activation of the Akt signaling pathway. However, no further exploration of the mechanisms has been performed. METHODS: Lentivirus was used for the establishment of the ARID1A knockdown (ARID1A-KD) cell line. MTS and migration/invasion assays were used to examine changes in cell behaviors. RNA-seq and proteomics methods were applied. ARID1A expression in tissue samples was determined by IHC. R software was used to construct a nomogram. RESULTS: ARID1A KD significantly promoted the cell cycle and accelerated cell division. In addition, ARID1A KD increased the phosphorylation level of a series of oncogenic proteins, such as EGFR, ErbB2 and RAF1, activated the corresponding pathways and resulted in disease progression. In addition, the bypass activation of the ErbB pathway, the activation of the VEGF pathway and the expression level changes in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation biomarkers induced by ARID1A KD contributed to the insensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. The relationship between ARID1A and the sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs was also determined using tissue samples from LUAD patients. CONCLUSION: Loss of ARID1A expression influences the cell cycle, accelerates cell division, and promotes metastasis. EGFR-mutant LUAD patients with low ARID1A expression had poor overall survival. In addition, low ARID1A expression was associated with a poor prognosis in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. Video abstract.

Identification of MET fusions as novel therapeutic targets sensitive to MET inhibitors in lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in the MET gene, including amplifications and exon 14 skipping mutations, have been identified as actionable oncogenic alterations. However, MET fusions are rarely detected in lung cancer, and their sensitivity to therapeutics has not been systematically analyzed. METHODS: The data from 30876 lung cancer patients from the LAVA database and 7966 patients from cBioPortal database were screened. Basic demographic and clinical information for the patients harboring MET fusions were collected. A lung squamous cell cancer patient harboring a novel EML4-MET fusion was treated with crizotinib. Additionally, a literature review was performed to summarize the cases of patients harboring MET fusions and their treatment information. RESULTS: MET fusions were found in only 0.2% to 0.3% of lung cancer patients and appeared in almost all exons of the MET gene. Intragenic MET fusions were found in 52.6% (41/78) of the included patients. Crizotinib was effective for MET fusions, including a novel identified EML4-MET fusion, even after the failure of multiple lines of treatment. This result suggested that acquired MET fusions become more regionally selective, as they usually occurred in exons encoding the extracellular region. Interestingly, the MET-fused genes in primary MET fusions or acquired MET fusions were very different, which indicated the different functions and influences of the disease. CONCLUSION: MET fusions are rare, and half of the fusion types were intragenic fusions. Lung cancer patients harboring primary or acquired MET fusions could benefit from crizotinib. In addition, EML4-MET was first reported in this study as a novel MET fusion type.

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, single-arm, phase I study in China.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resectable disease have presented promising results. This is a phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II-IIIB) received two to four cycles of toripalimab (240 mg, intravenously, q3w) combined with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Surgical operation was performed approximately 4 weeks after the last cycle. The primary end point was safety. The efficacy endpoints included radiographic and pathological response rates, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and molecular targets. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled, consisting of 2 patients (18%) with adenocarcinoma and 9 patients (82%) with squamous cell carcinoma. All patients received two to four cycles of toripalimab plus chemotherapy and underwent radical resection. Regarding safety, 5 of 11 patients (45%) had neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events, and 1 patient (9%) experienced grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. Radiographic partial response was achieved in 10 patients, with an objective response rate of 91%. Among 11 patients, 6 (55%) achieved pathological complete response, including 1 PD-L1-negative patient. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy was tolerable and induced a pathological complete response in 55% of resectable NSCLC patients.

ARID1A deficiency reverses the response to anti-PD(L)1 therapy in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma by enhancing autophagy-inhibited type I interferon production.

INTRODUCTION: EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with a poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and only 20% of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations benefit from immunotherapy. Novel biomarkers or therapeutics are needed to predict NSCLC prognosis and enhance the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, especially lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, who account for approximately 40-50% of all NSCLC cases. METHODS: An ARID1A-knockdown (ARID1A-KD) EGFR-mutant LUAD cell line was constructed using lentivirus. RNA-seq and mass spectrometry were performed. Western blotting and IHC were used for protein expression evaluation. Effects of 3-MA and rapamycin on cells were explored. Immunofluorescence assays were used for immune cell infiltration examination. RESULTS: ARID1A expression was negatively associated with immune cell infiltration and immune scores for ICIs in LUAD with EGFR mutations. In vitro experiments suggested that ARID1A-KD activates the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and inhibits autophagy, which attenuates the inhibition of Rig-I-like receptor pathway activity and type I interferon production in EGFR-mutant LUAD cells. In addition, 3-MA upregulated production of type I interferon in EGFR-mutant LUAD cells, with an similar effect to ARID1A-KD. On the other hand, rapamycin attenuated the enhanced production of type I interferon in ARID1A-KD EGFR-mutant LUAD cells. ARID1A function appears to influence the tumor immune microenvironment and response to ICIs. CONCLUSION: ARID1A deficiency reverses response to ICIs in EGFR-mutant LUAD by enhancing autophagy-inhibited type I interferon production. Video Abstract.

Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification.

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs.

Next-generation sequencing identifies potential novel therapeutic targets in Chinese HGSOC patients.

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy, especially the use of poly (adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), has improved the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer. However, most high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients have wild-type BRCA1/2, and it is necessary to disclose more potential novel targets for other available targeted drugs. So, detection of genetic alterations beyond BRCA1/2 is critical to screen HGSOC patients for personalized therapy. In this study, a broad, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay was used to identify actionable genetic alterations from HGSOC cancer tissues. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with HGSOC were enrolled, including 6 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, 15 stage II, 37 stage III and 10 stage IV patients. All patients signed informed consent forms. Potentially actionable genetic alterations, including base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, and gene fusions, were identified using targeted NGS. RESULTS: In our study, 14.7% (10/68) of the tumors harbored actionable genetic alterations in patients with BRCA1. A total of 25.0% (17/68) of patients without BRCA1 mutations harbored other actionable genetic alterations, such as homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway-related genes (ATM, CDK12, FANCA, and FANCD2), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes (NF1, FBXW7, PIK3CA, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2), and some other genes (ARID1A, FGFR1, KRAS, and NRAS). Furthermore, some patients harboring ARID1A or NF1 actionable genetic alterations showed good clinical efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and everolimus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates that 39.7% (27/68) of patients with HGSOC harbored at least one actionable genetic alteration. 25.0% (17/68) of patients had somatic mutations or copy number variations beyond BRCA1 mutations and might be treated with off-label therapy or to be allocated into clinical trial. NGS assays of HGSOC patients are necessary to screen actionable genetic alterations to guide personalized and precise treatment.

PD-L1 blockade by immune checkpoint inhibitors impairs sensitivity to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells.

In the previous studies, it was shown that osimertinib plus durvalumab did not achieve satisfactory efficacy, even inferior to osimertinib alone. We found that PD-L1 blockade impaired the efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells despite the presence of the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, durvalumab has no synergistic effect on osimertinib, and combination therapy will not enhance the efficacy of osimertinib.

ARID1A serves as a receivable biomarker for the resistance to EGFR-TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer.

ARID1A is a key component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes which is important for the maintaining of biological processes of cells. Recent studies had uncovered the potential role of ARID1A alterations or expression loss in the therapeutic sensitivity of cancers, but the studies in this field requires to be further summarized and discussed. Therefore, we proposed a series of mechanisms related to the resistance to EGFR-TKIs induced by ARID1A alterations or expression loss and the potential therapeutic strategies to overcome the resistance based on published studies. It suggested that ARID1A alterations or expression loss might be the regulators in PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling pathways which are strongly associated with the resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. Besides, ARID1A alterations or expression loss could lead to the resistance to EGFR-TKIs via a variety of processes during the tumorigenesis and development of cancers, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis and the inhibition of apoptosis. Based on the potential mechanisms related to ARID1A, we summarized that the small molecular inhibitors targeting ARID1A or PI3K/Akt pathway, the anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors could be used for the supplementary treatment for EGFR-TKIs among NSCLC patients harboring the concomitant alterations of sensitive EGFR mutations and ARID1A.

Loss of ARID1A expression promotes lung adenocarcinoma metastasis and predicts a poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: ARID1A is an essential subunit of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes. ARID1A gene mutations and loss of ARID1A expression have been observed in a variety of cancers, and to be correlated with invasion, immune escape and synthetic lethality. As yet, however, the biological effect of ARID1A expression and its role in the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients have remained unclear. In this study we aimed to further elucidate the role of ARID1A expression in LUAD in vitro and in vivo and to assess its effect on the clinical prognosis of LUAD patients. METHODS: ARID1A expression was detected by IHC in tissue samples from LUAD patients. After regular culturing of LUAD cell lines and constructing stable ARID1A knockdown lines, wound healing and Transwell assays were used to assess the role of ARID1A in cell migration and invasion. The effect of ARID1A knockdown on metastasis was verified in vivo. Western blotting was used to examine the expression of target proteins. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess survival and to provide variables for nomogram construction. In addition, we used the "rms" package to construct a prognostic nomogram based on a Cox regression model. RESULTS: We found that ARID1A expression serves as an effective prognostic marker for LUAD patients. Loss of ARID1A expression correlated with a poor prognosis, as verified with a nomogram based on a Cox regression model. In addition, we found that ARID1A knockdown promoted LUAD cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and enhanced LUAD metastasis in vivo by activating the Akt signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that loss of ARID1A expression promotes LUAD metastasis and predicts a poor prognosis in LUAD patients.

ALK rearrangements as mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR sensitive mutations may benefit from treatment with EGFR TKIs. Osimertinib, which is an irreversible third-generation EGFR TKI, has demonstrated a convincing efficacy, irrespective of whether it is used in first- or second-line treatment. The acquired resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are highly complicated, and a variety of potential molecular mechanisms have been discovered, including C797S. Here, we determined that ALK rearrangement might be an underlying mechanism contributing to acquired resistance to osimertinib. In our report, a 60-year-old female patient with lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR mutation was administered multiple treatments, including first-line gefitinib and second-line osimertinib. According to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay after osimertinib failure, the emergence of an ALK rearrangement was considered to be a potentially acquired resistance mechanism to osimertinib. The combination of osimertinib and crizotinib then maintained a six-month stable disease. VEGFA amplification was identified after osimertinib plus crizotinib treatment, and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab achieved a continuous stable disease over 21 months. In this study, we also summarized previously reported cases and concluded that ALK rearrangement is a rare but critical resistance mechanism to osimertinib. After failure of combined treatment with osimertinib plus crizotinib, comprehensive molecular profiling should be performed, and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab might be an optimal treatment especially for patients harboring VEGFA amplification.

Case Report: Primary and Acquired Resistance Mechanisms of Nimotuzumab in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Revealed by Targeted Sequencing.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a deadly disease with a low 5-year survival rate. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy has been widely used in the treatment of malignancies, and chemotherapy regimens that include nimotuzumab have been confirmed to have satisfactory efficacy among esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients. However, a subpopulation of patients may develop resistance to nimotuzumab. Here, we report an advanced ESCC patient who experienced hyperprogressive disease induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors and was then treated with a chemotherapy regimen containing nimotuzumab. NGS examination of this patient demonstrated that PIK3CA mutation and a RICTOR amplification might participate in primary and acquired resistance to nimotuzumab, respectively, via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.

Nivolumab induced hyperprogressive disease in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable safety for advanced malignancies. However, a proportion of patients who had received immunotherapy may experience hyperprogressive disease and a resultant poor prognosis. Here, we report a patient with advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma who developed hyperprogressive disease shortly after immunotherapy. This patient received nivolumab after multiple lines of treatment, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and antiangiogenic therapy. Through the comprehensive analysis of NGS results, we concluded that the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway might be associated with hyperprogressive disease after immunotherapy. Additionally, potential mechanisms underlying hyperprogressive disease after immunotherapy reported in other malignant tumors were also summarized.

Advancement in research and therapy of NF1 mutant malignant tumors.

The NF1 gene encodes neurofibromin, which is one of the primary negative regulatory factors of the Ras protein. Neurofibromin stimulates the GTPase activity of Ras to convert it from an active GTP-bound form to its inactive GDP-bound form through its GTPase activating protein-related domain (GRD). Therefore, neurofibromin serves as a shutdown signal for all vertebrate RAS GTPases. NF1 mutations cause a resultant decrease in neurofibromin expression, which has been detected in many human malignancies, including NSCLC, breast cancer and so on. NF1 mutations are associated with the underlying mechanisms of treatment resistance discovered in multiple malignancies. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms of NF1 mutation-induced therapeutic resistance to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted therapy in malignancies. Then, we further discuss advancements in targeted therapy for NF1-mutated malignant tumors. In addition, therapies targeting the downstream molecules of NF1 might be potential novel strategies for the treatment of advanced malignancies.