Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has posed numerous health and socioeconomic challenges. This study compared whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo would be the best treatment regime to improve the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores at 1 week. METHODS: This was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial including adult patients with acute LBP and sciatica in three emergency departments in Hong Kong. Patients were randomized to the receive tramadol 50 mg, tizanidine 2 mg, or placebo every 6 hours for 2 weeks in a 1:1:1 ratio. The RMDQ and other secondary outcomes were measured at baseline, Day 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Data were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Crude and adjusted mean differences in the changes of RMDQ and NRS scores from baseline to Day 7 between tizanidine/tramadol and placebo were determined with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-one patients were analyzed with the mean age of 47.4 years and 57.7% were male. The primary outcome of mean difference in RMDQs on Day 7 (compared with baseline) was non-significant for tizanidine compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.56, 95% CI -2.48 to 1.37) and tramadol compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.85, 95% CI -2.80 to 1.10). Only 23.7% were fully compliant to the treatment allocated. Complier Average Causal Effect analysis also showed no difference in the primary outcome for the tizanidine and tramadol versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Among patients with acute LBP and sciatica presenting to the ED, adding tramadol or tizanidine to diclofenac did not improve functional recovery.

Safety for cervical corpectomy and diskectomy: univariate and multivariate analysis on predictors for prolonged ICU stay after anterior spinal fusion.

AIM: Cervical anterior spinal fusion (ASF) with corpectomy has risks of catastrophic acute complications such as airway obstruction requiring re-intubation. Our team has adopted a management plan for all cervical corpectomy patients to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after the operations for overnight observation. Some of these patients were kept intubated after the operations and transferred to the ICU. This study aims to review the outcome of this practice and to identify independent predictors associated with a prolonged ICU stay. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive patients with cervical ASF from January 2010 to June 2018. The primary outcome was the ICU length of stay. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors associated with a prolonged ICU stay. In total, 103 patients had ASF during the study period. ICU length of stay for elective ASF was 1.01 day (SD 0.373 days) and was significantly shorter than that for emergency ASF (13.29 days, SD 12.57 days) (p < 0.001). 79.6% (82/103) of the ASF patients were extubated in the operating theatre after surgery. Significantly more corpectomy patients (33.3%) versus ACDF patients (15.1%) were kept intubated to the ICU after the operation (p = 0.037). None required reintubation in the ICU. 90.9% (80/88) of the elective ASF can be discharged from the ICU within 24 hours and only 3.41% (3/88) of the elective ASF had prolonged post-operative stay in the ICU (≥48 hours). RESULTS: For prolonged postoperative ICU stay (≥48 hours), ICU admission airway status of ASF patients who were either extubated in the OT or kept intubated to ICU had no significant association (p = 0.903). Univariate and multivariate analysis had identified emergency admissions (p = 0.043) and the presence of postoperative neurological deficits (p = 0.031) as independent predictors associated with a prolonged postoperative ICU stay. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cervical corpectomy and ASF were safe with minimal acute complications.

Phase I-II Clinical Trial Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cell Transplant Therapy of Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury.

Umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cell (UCB-MNC) transplants improve recovery in animal spinal cord injury (SCI) models. We transplanted UCB-MNCs into 28 patients with chronic complete SCI in Hong Kong (HK) and Kunming (KM). Stemcyte Inc. donated UCB-MNCs isolated from human leukocyte antigen (HLA ≥4:6)-matched UCB units. In HK, four patients received four 4-µl injections (1.6 million cells) into dorsal entry zones above and below the injury site, and another four received 8-µl injections (3.2 million cells). The eight patients were an average of 13 years after C5-T10 SCI. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging of five patients showed white matter gaps at the injury site before treatment. Two patients had fiber bundles growing across the injury site by 12 months, and the rest had narrower white matter gaps. Motor, walking index of SCI (WISCI), and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) scores did not change. In KM, five groups of four patients received four 4-µl (1.6 million cells), 8-µl (3.2 million cells), 16-µl injections (6.4 million cells), 6.4 million cells plus 30 mg/kg methylprednisolone (MP), or 6.4 million cells plus MP and a 6-week course of oral lithium carbonate (750 mg/day). KM patients averaged 7 years after C3-T11 SCI and received 3-6 months of intensive locomotor training. Before surgery, only two patients walked 10 m with assistance and did not need assistance for bladder or bowel management before surgery. The rest could not walk or do their bladder and bowel management without assistance. At about a year (41-87 weeks), WISCI and SCIM scores improved: 15/20 patients walked 10 m ( p = 0.001) and 12/20 did not need assistance for bladder management ( p = 0.001) or bowel management ( p = 0.002). Five patients converted from complete to incomplete (two sensory, three motor; p = 0.038) SCI. We conclude that UCB-MNC transplants and locomotor training improved WISCI and SCIM scores. We propose further clinical trials.

Ischemic events after carotid interventions in relationship to baseline cerebrovascular reactivity.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether baseline cerebrovascular reactivity could predict subsequent ischemic event after intervention and identify the patient group for more aggressive medical and interventional management paradigms. METHODS: Patients with more than 70% cervical carotid stenosis (from ultrasonography) were reviewed. Patients, who had baseline cerebrovascular reactivity test before intervention and had either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) performed, were recruited for analysis. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was used to examine the reactivity of the middle cerebral artery in response to 5% carbon dioxide in oxygen. The mean follow up period was 66 months. FINDINGS: Twenty-six patients had symptomatic carotid stenosis and ten patients had asymptomatic carotid stenosis. There were four subsequent ischemic events during follow up. None of the nine patients with impaired baseline ipsilateral cerebrovascular reactivity had subsequent ischemic event. CONCLUSIONS: In this current study, impaired baseline cerebrovascular reactivity did not predict the subsequent stroke risk after carotid intervention. Cerebrovascular reactivity testing may not serve as an indicator for aggressive medical and surgical treatments.

Non-accidental subdural haemorrhage in Hong Kong: incidence, clinical features, management and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify the incidence and the characteristics of non-accidental subdural haemorrhage in Hong Kong in children under the age of 5 years. METHOD: Eighteen children aged below 5 years presented with subdural haemorrhage without a history of significant trauma were studied. Clinical features and the work-up process for probable child abuse were analysed. RESULTS: Sixteen combined case conferences were held, and eleven cases were concluded to be genuine child abuse cases of non-accidental head injury (incidence=1.5 per 100,000 children <5 years old per year). Among these cases, the most common presentation in the younger age group (age<1 year) was seizure (5/7), whilst that in the older age group (age 1-4 years) was coma (4/4, two of these patients also had seizure). One patient in the younger age group and three (3/4) of the older age group were found to have multiple unexplained bruises, suggesting that, in older children, direct impact injury played an important role. Five (5/7) children in the younger age group and all four children in the older age group had retinal haemorrhage. Coma on admission was associated with an unfavourable outcome (6/7 vs 0/4, p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-one percent of childhood subdural haemorrhage (11/18) without a history of significant trauma were genuine child abuse cases and should all be investigated for probable "non-accidental injury". An organised protocol involving a multi-disciplinary team is mandatory.

Anaplastic oligodendroglioma with drop metastasis to the spinal cord.

Although cerebrospinal fluid spread by malignant brain tumors is well recognised, cases of drop metastasis to spinal cord by intracranial oligodendroglial tumors have only been rarely described. We described a 61-year-old man who developed diffuse spinal metastases and cord compression 20 months after resection of a frontal lobe anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. To our knowledge, this represents the eighth recorded case in the literature.