Efficacy and Safety of LX9211 for Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (RELIEF-DPN 1): Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of LX9211 in reducing pain related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this double-blind, multicenter, proof-of-concept trial, 319 individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were randomized (1:1:1) to LX9211 10 mg (n = 106), LX9211 20 mg (n = 106), or matching placebo (n = 107), administered once daily for 6 weeks. DPNP was rated daily with an 11-point numerical rating scale. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 6 in the average daily pain score. The difference between each LX9211 group and placebo was evaluated with mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: For those on low-dose LX9211 the primary efficacy end point was achieved: -1.39 vs. -0.72 points for placebo, least squares mean (SE) difference -0.67 (0.249), 95% CI -1.16 to -0.18, P = 0.007; results for high-dose LX9211 demonstrated improvement in pain severity versus placebo (-1.27 vs. -0.72 points, respectively), but the between-group LS mean difference did not reach the prespecified statistical significance (-0.55 [0.254], 95% CI -1.06 to -0.05, P = 0.030). Treatment benefit was observed beginning at week 1 and maintained thereafter. Results for LX9211 also demonstrated improvement in several patient-reported secondary outcomes. Most common adverse events (AEs) were dizziness, nausea, and headache. More participants treated with LX9211 (20 mg, n = 28 [26.4%]; 10 mg, 17 [16.0%]) than placebo (3 [2.8%]) discontinued study drug prematurely due to AEs; serious AEs were uncommon (2 [1.9%], 0, and 1 [0.9%], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings of improvement in DPNP with LX9211 support further investigation in larger trials.

Effect of Sotagliflozin on Early Mortality and Heart Failure-Related Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of SOLOIST-WHF.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of patients admitted to hospitals for worsening heart failure (WHF) are readmitted within 30 days. OBJECTIVES: The authors conducted a post hoc analysis of the SOLOIST-WHF (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Post-WHF) trial to evaluate the efficacy of sotagliflozin versus placebo to decrease mortality and HF-related events among patients who began study treatment on or before discharge from their index hospitalization. METHODS: The main endpoint of interest was cardiovascular death or HF-related event (HF hospitalization or urgent care visit) occurring within 90 and 30 days after discharge for the index WHF hospitalization. Treatment comparisons were by proportional hazards models, generating HRs, 95% CIs, and P values. RESULTS: Of 1,222 randomized patients, 596 received study drug on or before their date of discharge. Sotagliflozin reduced the main endpoint at 90 days after discharge (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.35-0.82]; P = 0.004) and at 30 days (HR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.27-0.91]; P = 0.023) and all-cause mortality at 90 days (HR: 0.39 [95% CI: 0.17-0.88]; P = 0.024). In subgroup analyses, sotagliflozin reduced the 90-day main endpoint regardless of sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction, or mineralocorticoid receptor agonist use. Sotagliflozin was well-tolerated but with slightly higher rates of diarrhea and volume-related events than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Starting sotagliflozin before discharge in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for WHF significantly decreased cardiovascular deaths and HF events through 30 and 90 days after discharge, emphasizing the importance of beginning sodium glucose cotransporter treatment before discharge.

Do patient characteristics predict responsiveness to treatment of overactive bladder with antimuscarinic agents?

OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical and demographic characteristics associated with antimuscarinic treatment response using a regression model. METHODS: Adults with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms for >3 months and ≥ 1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode and ≥ 8 micturitions per 24 hours at baseline were randomized to fesoterodine (8 mg), tolterodine extended-release (4 mg), or placebo in two 12-week, double-blind, head-to-head studies. Fesoterodine-treated patients received 4 mg/d during the first week and 8 mg/d thereafter. Patients completed 3-day bladder diaries and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire at baseline and week 12. Pooled data for changes from baseline to week 12 in winsorized UUI episodes, micturitions, and urgency episodes per 24 hours and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life scores were analyzed posthoc using a regression model that selects outcome predictors from baseline values and patient characteristics while retaining baseline values and treatment, with stepwise inclusion of significant covariates and assessment of treatment interactions. Logistic regression was used for analysis of diary-dry rates. RESULTS: Younger age, lack of previous antimuscarinic treatment, shorter duration of OAB diagnosis, and female gender were common predictors of larger changes in outcomes from baseline to week 12. Baseline measures often interacted with treatment, such that poorer baseline outcomes were predictive of larger treatment differences. Longer duration since OAB diagnosis predicted greater treatment differences for UUI episodes and in diary-dry rate, and increased age predicted greater treatment differences for micturitions. CONCLUSION: Symptom severity and duration, age, gender, and previous antimuscarinic pharmacotherapy impact the response to antimuscarinic treatment.

Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg vs 4 mg in reducing urgency urinary incontinence episodes in patients with overactive bladder: results of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled EIGHT trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg vs 4 mg for improvement in urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes and other diary variables, diary-dry rate (proportion of patients with >0 UUI episodes on baseline diary and 0 UUI episodes on post-baseline diary), and improvements in measures of symptom bother, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial of men and women aged ≥18 years with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms including UUI (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01302067). Patients were randomised (2:2:1) to receive fesoterodine 8 mg, fesoterodine 4 mg, or placebo once daily; those randomised to fesoterodine 8 mg started with fesoterodine 4 mg once daily for 1 week, then 8 mg once daily for the remaining 11 weeks. Patients completed bladder diaries at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 and the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at baseline and week 12. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes per 24 h. RESULTS: At week 12, patients receiving fesoterodine 8 mg (779 patients) had significantly greater reductions from baseline in UUI episodes, micturitions, and urgency episodes than patients receiving fesoterodine 4 mg (790) or placebo (386); diary-dry rate was significantly higher in the fesoterodine 8-mg group vs the fesoterodine 4-mg and placebo groups (all P < 0.05). At week 12, patients receiving fesoterodine 8 mg also had significantly greater improvements in scores on the PPBC, UPS, and all OAB-q scales and domains than patients receiving fesoterodine 4 mg or placebo (all P < 0.01). Patients receiving fesoterodine 4 mg had significantly greater improvements in UUI episodes, urgency episodes, and micturitions; significantly higher diary-dry rates; and significantly greater improvement in PPBC scores and OAB-q scores than patients receiving placebo (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth was the most commonly reported adverse event (AE) in the fesoterodine groups (placebo group, 3.4%; fesoterodine 4-mg group, 12.9%; fesoterodine 8-mg group, 26.1%); most cases were mild or moderate in all treatment groups. Rates of serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were low in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a 12-week, prospectively designed, superiority trial, fesoterodine 8 mg showed statistically significantly superior efficacy vs fesoterodine 4 mg and placebo, as measured by reductions in UUI episodes and other diary variables, diary-dry dry rate, and improvements in measures of symptom bother, HRQL, and other PROs; clear evidence of dose-dependent efficacy is unique to fesoterodine among antimuscarinics and other oral agents for the treatment of OAB. Fesoterodine 4 mg was significantly more effective than placebo on all outcomes except for improvements in UPS scores. These data support the benefit of having two doses of fesoterodine in clinical practice, with the recommended starting dose of 4 mg for all patients and the fesoterodine 8-mg dose available for patients who require a higher dose to achieve optimal symptom relief.

A comparison of nonparametric and parametric methods to adjust for baseline measures.

When analyzing the randomized controlled trial, we may employ various statistical methods to adjust for baseline measures. Depending on the method chosen to adjust for baseline measures, inferential results can vary. We investigate the Type 1 error and statistical power of tests comparing treatment outcomes based on parametric and nonparametic methods. We also explore the increasing levels of correlation between baseline and changes from the baseline, with or without underlying normality. These methods are illustrated and compared via simulations.

Effect of fesoterodine in vulnerable elderly subjects with urgency incontinence: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of flexible dose fesoterodine in medically complex vulnerable elderly subjects with urgency urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, flexible dose, placebo controlled trial, subjects were community dwelling men and women 65 years old or older. Subjects had scores of 3 or more on the VES-13 (Vulnerable Elders Survey) and 20 or more on the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), and 2 to 15 urgency urinary incontinence episodes and 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours on 3-day baseline diaries. Subjects randomized to fesoterodine received 4 mg once daily for 4 weeks and could then increase to 8 mg based on discussion with the investigator. Subjects receiving 8 mg could decrease the dose to 4 mg at any time (sham escalation and de-escalation for placebo). The primary outcome measure was change in daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes. Secondary outcomes included changes in other diary variables and patient reported quality of life measures. Safety evaluations included self-reported symptoms and post-void residual volume. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients were randomized (mean age 75 years, 50.4% age 75 years or greater). Subjects had high rates of comorbidities, polypharmacy and functional impairment. At week 12 the fesoterodine group had significantly greater improvements in urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours (-2.84 vs -2.20, p = 0.002) and most other diary variables and quality of life, as well as a higher diary dry rate (50.8% vs 36.0%, p = 0.002). Adverse effects were generally similar to those of younger populations including risk of urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first antimuscarinic study in a community based, significantly older, medically complex elderly population with urgency urinary incontinence. Flexible dose fesoterodine significantly improved urgency urinary incontinence episodes and other outcomes vs placebo, and was generally well tolerated.

The effect of elective sham dose escalation on the placebo response during an antimuscarinic trial for overactive bladder symptoms.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the effects of baseline symptom severity and placebo response magnitude on the decision to dose escalate in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, flexible dose antimuscarinic trial of subjects with overactive bladder symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the placebo arm of the trial were used for this post hoc analysis. Subjects could elect dose escalation at week 2. Those in the placebo arm received sham escalation. RESULTS: Most placebo treated subjects who continued to week 2 elected dose escalation (75% or 325 of 435). Overactive bladder symptoms at baseline were similar between placebo escalators and nonescalators. Nonescalators showed a significantly larger placebo response than escalators, as measured by improvements in bladder diary end points and patient reported outcomes, and by the incidence rate of adverse events before and after sham escalation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the decision to dose escalate among placebo treated subjects is independent of baseline symptom severity but may be influenced by the placebo response magnitude for efficacy assessment and adverse events. Placebo nonescalators showed a rapid, large placebo response while placebo escalators showed a smaller placebo response even after sham escalation. These observations may have important implications for the design and interpretation of flexible dose trials using a placebo control.

Add-on fesoterodine for residual storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men receiving α-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms.

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Male lower urinary tract symptoms are often attributed to bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and treated with drugs targeting the prostate. However, many men with storage lower urinary tract symptoms may not respond adequately to these agents. Antimuscarinics, with or without an α-blocker, may be effective for the treatment of the storage symptoms of overactive bladder in some men. Flexible-dose fesoterodine as an add-on treatment significantly improved urinary frequency and symptom bother, but not urgency episodes (primary endpoint), versus add-on placebo and was well tolerated in men with persistent overactive bladder symptoms despite receiving α-blocker. OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate flexible-dose fesoterodine vs placebo in men with persistent overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms despite receiving α-blocker treatment SUBJECTS AND METHODS: • This was a double-blind, 12-week, flexible-dose trial. • Men with persistent storage symptoms (≥ 8 micturitions and ≥ 3 urgency episodes per 24 h) after receiving an α-blocker for ≥ 6 weeks were randomized to add-on fesoterodine 4 mg or placebo, with optional dose escalation to 8 mg at week 4 and reduction back to 4 mg at week 8 (or matching placebo adjustments). • Subjects completed 3-day diaries, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS: • A total of 943 men were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment (fesoterodine, n= 471; placebo, n= 472). • Among these, 251 (53%) in the fesoterodine group and 300 (64%) in the placebo group requested dose escalation at week 4 and 35 (7%) and 15 (3%) requested dose reduction at week 8. Changes from baseline to week 12 in urgency episodes (primary endpoint) in the fesoterodine (-3.2) and placebo (-2.9) groups were not significantly different (P= 0.196), but improvements in micturitions (P= 0.009) and OAB-q symptom bother score (P= 0.007) were significantly greater with fesoterodine. • At week 4, significantly greater improvements in micturitions (P= 0.006), severe urgency episodes (P= 0.006), IPSS storage score (P= 0.022), OAB-q symptom bother score (P= 0.004), and OAB-q health-related quality of life (P= 0.041), but not urgency episodes (P= 0.062), were observed with add-on fesoterodine. • Dry mouth (fesoterodine, 21%; placebo, 6%) and constipation (fesoterodine, 6%; placebo, 2%) were the most common adverse events. Dysuria and urinary retention were reported by 3% and 2% of subjects, respectively, in the fesoterodine add-on group vs 1% and <1% of subjects, respectively in the placebo add-on group. One subject in each group had acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: • Flexible-dose fesoterodine was well tolerated as an add-on treatment in men with persistent storage symptoms. • Changes in urgency episodes at week 12 (primary endpoint) and many secondary endpoints were not significantly different between fesoterodine and placebo add-on treatment; however, improvements in frequency and symptom bother were significantly greater with fesoterodine. • These data suggest that there remains a limited understanding of the optimal evaluation and treatment of men with LUTS.

Effects of voluntary dose escalation in a placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trial of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder.

AIMS: To characterize the response to fesoterodine treatment for overactive bladder (OAB) in subjects who did or did not choose to dose escalate in a flexible-dose study. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to fesoterodine 4 mg or placebo. At week 2, subjects could remain on 4 mg (non-escalators) or choose to increase to 8 mg (escalators) for the remaining 10 weeks (sham escalation for placebo). Subjects completed 3-day bladder diaries at baseline, week 2 and week 12 noting micturitions, urgency episodes, and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes. RESULTS: Sixty-three per cent of 438 subjects randomized to fesoterodine and 73% of 445 randomized to placebo dose escalated. At baseline, fesoterodine escalators had significantly more micturitions and urgency episodes than fesoterodine non-escalators (P < 0.001); at week 2, before dose escalation, diary-dry rate and improvement in micturitions and urgency episodes were significantly greater among fesoterodine non-escalators versus escalators (P < 0.001); and by week 12, after dose escalation, diary-dry rate and improvements in micturitions and UUI episodes were similar between fesoterodine non-escalators and escalators (P > 0.05). The placebo escalator group did not demonstrate a similar response over placebo non-escalators following the dose escalation decision point. CONCLUSION: A rapid and robust response to fesoterodine 4 mg was demonstrated in non-escalators. Subjects who chose to dose escalate to fesoterodine 8 mg at week 2 showed significant improvement by week 12 versus baseline and week 2 (prior to escalation), as well as versus placebo. Dose escalation to 8 mg fesoterodine provided subjects with efficacy and tolerability similar to those who were satisfied with the 4-mg dose.

Effects of combined behavioral intervention and tolterodine on patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of tolterodine extended release (ER) plus behavioral intervention on urgency and other patient-reported outcomes in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) who were previously dissatisfied with antimuscarinic treatment. METHODS: In this 16-week, multicenter, open-label study, eligible adults (aged > or = 18 y) reported dissatisfaction with their most recent antimuscarinic OAB medication; > or = 8 micturitions and > or = 2 urgency episodes per 24 hours and > or = 1 UUI episode in 5 day bladder diaries; and OAB symptoms for > or = 3 months. Subjects received tolterodine ER plus a behavioral educational handout with verbal reinforcement of behavioral intervention content for 8 weeks. Those satisfied with treatment at week 8 continued with this therapy; those dissatisfied received tolterodine ER plus individualized behavioral intervention (pelvic floor muscle training, tailored behavioral techniques) for 8 weeks. Endpoints were changes from baseline in daytime and nocturnal micturition-related urgency episodes and frequency-urgency sum (a measure of urgency severity and frequency) reported in 5 day bladder diaries at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16; Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) scores at weeks 8 and 16. RESULTS: Daytime and nocturnal urgency episodes and frequency-urgency sum were significantly reduced at all time points (all p < 0.0001). Significant improvements were also observed in PPBC, OAB-q Symptom Bother and Health-Related Quality of Life, and UPS scores at weeks 8 and 16 (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OAB who are dissatisfied with antimuscarinic therapy may experience improved treatment outcomes by adding a self-administered behavioral intervention to their drug regimen.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of flexible-dose fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of flexible-dose fesoterodine vs placebo in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: In a 12-week double-blind trial, subjects were randomized to fesoterodine 4 mg or placebo once daily, taken within 4 hours of bedtime. At week 2, subjects could increase the fesoterodine dose to 8 mg (sham escalation for placebo). Subjects completed 3-day bladder diaries, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition, and Urgency Perception Scale at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 12 as well as OAB Questionnaire at baseline and week 12. RESULTS: Of 883 subjects, 63% and 73% of the fesoterodine (n = 438) and placebo (n = 445) groups, respectively, opted for dose escalation. Week 12 improvements from baseline in total micturitions, urgency episodes, urgency urinary incontinence episodes, frequency-urgency sum, and all OAB Questionnaire scales and domains, but not nocturnal micturitions or nocturnal urgency episodes, were significantly greater with fesoterodine than placebo (all P <.05). Treatment differences in micturitions and frequency-urgency sum were significant by week 2 and in urgency urinary incontinence and urgency episodes by week 6. Significantly greater percentages of subjects taking fesoterodine had improved Patient Perception of Bladder Condition and Urgency Perception Scale scores at weeks 2, 6, and 12 (P <.05). Dry mouth (fesoterodine, 26%; placebo, 8%) and constipation (fesoterodine, 11%; placebo, 6%) were the most common adverse events. In both groups, 87% of the subjects completed the trial; 8% and 5% of the fesoterodine and placebo groups, respectively, discontinued because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible-dose fesoterodine was efficacious and generally well tolerated for treatment of OAB symptoms.

Effects of tolterodine ER on patient-reported outcomes in sexually active women with overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of tolterodine extended release (ER) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in sexually active women with overactive bladder (OAB) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled trial included 411 women aged > or =18 years reporting OAB symptoms for > or =3 months; > or =8 micturitions per 24 hours (including > or =0.6 UUI episodes and > or =3 OAB micturitions) in 5-day bladder diaries at baseline, and being in a sexually active relationship for > or =6 months. Subjects randomized to placebo or tolterodine ER completed validated OAB- or incontinence-specific questionnaires, including the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) at baseline and week 12, as well as the Perception of Treatment Benefit and Treatment Satisfaction questions at week 12. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.Gov (identifier: NCT00143481). RESULTS: The mean age of enrolled women was approximately 48 years. Compared with placebo, the tolterodine ER group reported significant baseline to week 12 improvements in PPBC responses (p = 0.0048); OAB-q Symptom Bother, total Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL), and HRQL domain scores (all p < 0.05); IIQ Emotional Health domain scores (p < 0.05); proportions of subjects reporting treatment benefit (79 vs. 54%; p < 0.0001) and satisfaction (78 vs. 59%; p < 0.0001). Improvements on the UPS were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Tolterodine ER treatment was associated with improvements in multiple OAB- and incontinence-specific PROs in a sexually active, relatively young, and racially diverse population of women. The findings provide clinicians with new insights into the impact of OAB and its treatment on HRQL in this population, which has been underrepresented in previous OAB studies. Study limitations include a potential underestimation of the impact of OAB symptoms resulting from the exclusion of women who may not be sexually active because of their urinary symptoms.

Combined effects of behavioral intervention and tolterodine in patients dissatisfied with overactive bladder medication.

PURPOSE: We assessed the effect of tolterodine extended release plus behavioral intervention on treatment satisfaction and bladder diary variables in patients with overactive bladder who had been previously treated and were dissatisfied with tolterodine or other antimuscarinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 16-week, multicenter, open label study included eligible patients 18 years old or older who reported overactive bladder symptoms 3 months or greater in duration, 8 or greater micturitions and 2 or greater urgency related micturitions per 24 hours, and 1 or greater urgency urinary incontinence episodes in a 5-day bladder diary at baseline as well as dissatisfaction with prior antimuscarinic medication. Patients received tolterodine extended release plus self-administered behavioral intervention, consisting of an educational pamphlet with verbal reinforcement, for 8 weeks. Satisfied patients continued with this therapy and dissatisfied patients received tolterodine extended release plus individualized behavioral intervention, consisting of in-depth interaction with a clinician to refine behavioral techniques, for 8 weeks thereafter. Patients rated treatment satisfaction at weeks 8 and 16, and completed a 5-day bladder diary at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16, respectively. RESULTS: At weeks 8 and 16, 346 and 357 patients or 91% of the total cohort reported being at least a little satisfied with tolterodine extended release plus behavioral intervention, including 201 (53%) and 252 (64%), respectively, who were very satisfied. Of the 33 patients who were dissatisfied at week 8, 25 (76%) reported treatment satisfaction at week 16 after individualized behavioral intervention. Compared with baseline all bladder diary variables were significantly improved by week 4 (p <0.0001). Patients who were dissatisfied with prior tolterodine or other antimuscarinic treatment reported similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Tolterodine extended release plus behavioral intervention resulted in high treatment satisfaction and improved bladder diary variables in patients who had previously been treated and were dissatisfied with tolterodine or other antimuscarinics.

Continued symptom improvement in sexually active women with overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence treated with tolterodine ER for 6 months.

Improvements in overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were assessed during a 24-week study of tolterodine extended release (TOL ER) in sexually active women with OAB and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). A 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was followed by a 12-week open-label phase. Sexually active women reported symptoms for >or=3 months. Subjects completed bladder diaries and HRQL measures at baseline and weeks 12 and 24. One hundred sixty-one women received TOL ER for 24 weeks. Women reported significant improvements in all end points at week 12 that were maintained or improved at 24 weeks. At week 24, 70% of subjects reported no UUI episodes. TOL ER resulted in improvements in OAB symptoms and HRQL that were maintained or greater with 6 months of use. Long-term compliance with OAB pharmacotherapy may be important for optimal treatment outcomes.

Tolterodine treatment improves storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men treated with alpha-blockers.

BACKGROUND: Some men receiving alpha-blocker therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms report persistent storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder (OAB). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tolterodine extended release (ER) in men on alpha-blocker therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind trial included men aged > or = 40 yr with frequency, urgency, and at least moderate problems reported on the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), despite being on a stable dose of alpha-blocker for > or = 1 mo. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to tolterodine ER 4 mg per day or placebo for 12 wk while continuing their prescribed alpha-blocker therapy. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline and week 12, subjects completed the PPBC, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), and 5-d bladder diaries using the five-point Urinary Sensation Scale (USS). Frequency-urgency sum was defined as the sum of USS ratings for all micturitions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PPBC improvement from baseline to week 12 was reported by 63.6% and 61.6% of subjects receiving tolterodine ER plus alpha-blocker and placebo plus alpha-blocker, respectively; this treatment difference, which was the primary end point, was not statistically significant (p>0.6699). At week 12, subjects receiving tolterodine ER plus alpha-blocker had significantly greater improvements versus placebo plus alpha-blocker in 24-h micturitions (-1.8 vs -1.2; p=0.0079) and daytime micturitions (-1.3 vs -0.8; p=0.0123); 24-h urgency episodes (-2.9 vs -1.8; p=0.0010), daytime urgency episodes (-2.2 vs -1.4; p=0.0017), and nocturnal urgency episodes (-0.5 vs -0.3; p=0.0378); frequency-urgency sum (-7.8 vs -5.1; p=0.0065); IPSS storage subscale (-2.6 vs -2.1; p=0.0370); and OAB-q symptom bother scale (-17.9 vs -14.4; p=0.0086) and coping domain (15.4 vs 12.4; p=0.0491). Acute urinary retention requiring catheterization occurred in < 1% of either group. There were no clinically meaningful changes in postvoid residual volume or maximum urinary flow rate. CONCLUSIONS: Men with bothersome OAB symptoms despite continued alpha-blocker therapy showed significantly greater improvements in diary variables, IPSS Storage scores, and symptom bother when receiving additional tolterodine ER versus placebo plus alpha-blocker.

Efficacy of tolterodine on overactive bladder symptoms and sexual and emotional quality of life in sexually active women.

We evaluated overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and sexual and emotional health in sexually active women with OAB/urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) treated with tolterodine extended release (ER). Sexually active women with OAB symptoms were randomized to placebo or tolterodine ER. Five-day bladder diaries, Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire-Female (SQOL-F), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) were completed at baseline and week 12. Tolterodine ER (n = 201; mean +/- SD age, 49 +/- 12 years) reduced UUI episodes (P = 0.0029), total (P = 0.0006) and OAB (P < 0.0001) micturitions, and pad use per 24 h (P = 0.0024), and was associated with improvements in SQOL-F (P = 0.004), PISQ total (P = 0.009), and HAD Anxiety (P = 0.03) scores versus placebo (n = 210; mean +/- SD age, 47 +/- 12 years). OAB symptoms improved with tolterodine ER as did the scores of sexual health and anxiety measures in sexually active women with OAB.

Quality of erections in men treated with flexible-dose sildenafil for erectile dysfunction: multicenter trial with a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase and an open-label phase.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) impacts erection hardness and compromises quality of life. AIM: Assess erection hardness and its correlation with sexual function, emotional well-being, and satisfaction (erection quality, intercourse, sex life, sexual relationship, and treatment). METHODS: Men with ED were randomized to double-blind, flexible-dose sildenafil (25, 50, or 100 mg) or placebo (6 weeks) with open-label extension (6 weeks). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire, and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS). RESULTS: A total of 307 men (mean [range] age, 45 [18-55] years) were randomized to sildenafil (N = 154) or placebo (N = 153). At the end of double-blind treatment, occasions with EHS 3 (hard enough for penetration but not completely hard) or 4 (completely hard) had increased by 40% +/- 3% for sildenafil vs. 11% +/- 3% for placebo (least squares mean +/- standard error; P < 0.0001); the estimated percentage of occasions with EHS 4 was 58% (95% CI, 52-65%) vs. 14% (95% CI, 10-19%) (odds ratio, 8.5; P < 0.0001). There was greater improvement in mean QEQ, IIEF, and SEAR scores (P < 0.0001), and more men were satisfied with sildenafil treatment (EDITS Index score >50: 90% vs. 49%). QEQ, IIEF, SEAR, and EDITS outcomes correlated positively with EHS 3 or 4, and with EHS 4 alone and were highest (no overlap of 95% CI vs. other EHS subgroups) in the subgroup with most frequent EHS of 4. CONCLUSIONS: In the group of men with ED treated with sildenafil, it was estimated that completely hard erections were achieved on 58% (95% CI, 52-65%) of occasions. Improvement in function, emotional well-being, and satisfaction was greatest in men with completely hard erections and correlated positively with other measures of hardness.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamic interaction of coadministered amlodipine and atorvastatin in 1660 patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia: the respond trial.

Guidelines stress the importance of the simultaneous management of multiple cardiovascular risk factors. This can in part be achieved by coadministration of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive treatments. Potential pharmacodynamic interaction between drugs should be investigated as part of developing single-pill combinations. The Respond trial assessed whether combining amlodipine to treat hypertension and atorvastatin to treat dyslipidemia affected the action of either monotherapy. A total of 1660 hypertensive patients with dyslipidemia received 1 of 15 combinations of amlodipine (placebo, 5, or 10 mg) and atorvastatin (placebo, 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg) in a 3 x 5 factorial randomized, placebo-controlled design. At 8 weeks, combination-treated patients experienced dose-related and statistically significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and Framingham risk score. Overall, coadministered atorvastatin and amlodipine was well tolerated and without adverse pharmacodynamic interaction; combination treatment did not affect the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, or the systolic blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of amlodipine.

Single-pill therapy in the treatment of concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia (the amlodipine/atorvastatin gemini study).

The Gemini Study was a 14-week, open-label, non-comparative, office-based, multicenter trial to evaluate single-pill therapy in the treatment of concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia. In addition to recommending lifestyle modifications, eight dosage strengths of amlodipine/atorvastatin single pill (5/10, 5/20, 5/40, 5/80, 10/10, 10/20, 10/40, and 10/80 mg) were electively titrated to improve blood pressure and lipid control. A total of 1220 patients with uncontrolled hypertension at baseline received study medication. At baseline, mean blood pressure was 146.6/87.9 mm Hg and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration was 152.9 mg/dL. At study end, 57.7% of patients had achieved both their blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals (51.9% of patients with uncontrolled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline). The mean dose of study medication at end point was amlodipine component 7.1 mg and atorvastatin component 26.2 mg. Fifty-eight patients (4.8%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Single-pill therapy is effective in reducing both blood pressure and lipid levels and in helping patients achieve goals for both hypertension and dyslipidemia.