Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Water Environ Res ; 89(4): 369-377, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28377006

ABSTRACT

Identification of nitrogen (N) sources is important in water quality control and management. Nitrogen pollution can lead to eutrophication of waterbodies and high concentrations of nitrate in drinking water can pose potential health problems. The 15N isotope and nitrogen fluxes budget approach is useful for determining the source of to surface waters. In this study, mass balance and 15N isotope approaches and nitrogen flux budgets were applied to identify total nitrogen (TN) sources and nitrogen transformation processes in the Menlou Reservoir (MR), Jiaodong Peninsula, China. The different fractions of nitrogen and their 15N isotope signatures were analyzed in the reservoir water, river water, groundwater, soil, and atmospheric precipitation. The results indicate that surface runoff pollution (e.g., fertilizer and animal manure) is the main source of in MR. High concentrations of TN in MR are caused by low nitrogen self-purification (denitrification) rate, low sediment adsorption capacity, and the influx of rich groundwater.


Subject(s)
Nitrogen/analysis , Water Pollution/analysis , Water Supply/statistics & numerical data , China , Nitrogen Isotopes/analysis
2.
Water Sci Technol ; 74(2): 359-66, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27438240

ABSTRACT

Sulfide is an important pollutant in aqueous systems. Sulfide removal from polluted waters is required prior to discharge. Red mud (RM) is a solid waste of bauxite processing that is rich in reactive iron oxides and consequently has the potential to be used to remove sulfide from aqueous systems. A series of experiments was undertaken using raw and sintered RM to remove sulfide from waters. RM was highly efficient at sulfide removal (average 75% sulfide removal at initial concentration of ∼5 mg L(-1), with 500 mg L(-1) RM addition) due to both physical adsorption (high specific area) and chemical reaction (with amorphous Fe). Sintered RM, which has a lower surface area and lower mineral reactivity, was much less efficient at removing sulfide (∼20% removal under equivalent experimental conditions). Furthermore, concomitant metal release from raw RM was lower than for sintered RM during the sulfide removal process. The results showed that raw RM is a potentially suitable material for sulfide removal from polluted waters and consequently could be used as a low cost alternative treatment in certain engineering applications.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Sulfides/chemistry , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Adsorption , Metals/chemistry , Waste Disposal, Fluid/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...