Management of Perforated Sigmoid Colon Cancer in an Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Using a Combined Abdominal and Inguinal Approach.

The ideal management of perforated colorectal cancer in the hernia sac remains a challenge for general surgeons. We report such a case requiring a combined-incision surgical approach and two-stage operation. A male patient in his 80s presented with fatigue and a bulge in his left groin. Contrast-enhanced CT scan revealed a sigmoid colon perforation within the left inguinal hernia sac. A combination of midline abdominal and inguinal incisions was performed for the iliopubic tract repair and Hartmann procedure. Six months later, the recurrent inguinal hernia was repaired using the Kugel mesh. The treatment strategy for colonic perforation into the inguinal hernia remains nonstandardized, compared to those for nonperforated cases. Combined inguinal and midline abdominal incisions might be necessary for infected lesion removal and colon mesentery resection; using mesh to repair hernia is a rare option. Hernia repair using mesh can be performed in two stages when recurrence occurs.

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for grade II or III acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Severe adhesions and fibrosis between the posterior wall of the gallbladder and liver bed often render total cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) difficult, leading to high open conversion rates. Since the publication of Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18), our policy has shifted from open conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) when total laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult cases of cholecystitis is not feasible. Recently, SC has been frequently applied as bailout surgery for complicated cholecystitis. Nonetheless, the efficacy and validity of laparoscopic SC after PTGBD remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic SC after PTGBD for grade II or III acute cholecystitis (AC) by comparing two periods of altered surgical strategies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2013 and December 2020. A total of 44 eligible patients with grade II or III AC were divided according to the time of cholecystitis onset into the pre-TG18 group (2013-2017, n = 17) and post-TG18 group (2018-2020, n = 27). Patients' background demographics, surgical method, surgical results, and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: The interval between PTGBD and surgery was significantly longer in the post-TG18 group than in the pre-TG18 group (15 [interquartile range: 9-42] days vs. 8 [4-11] days; P = 0.010). The frequency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly increased from 52.9% in the pre-TG18 group to 88.9% in the post-TG18 group (P = 0.007), whereas the frequency of SC was 23.5% and 40.7%, respectively, which showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.241). However, the rate of laparoscopic SC significantly increased from 0 to 90.9% among 15 SC cases, whereas the rate of open SC significantly plummeted from 100 to 9.1% (P = 0.001). Significant differences in the operative time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, and incidence of postoperative complications (wound infection and subhepatic abscess) were not observed. Mortality, bile leakage, and bile duct injury did not occur in either group. CONCLUSIONS: For grade II or III AC after PTGBD, aggressive adoption of SC increased the completion rate of laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic SC is a safe and feasible treatment option.