Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 72(1): 76-80, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23796310

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the root canal transportation with the PathFile-ProTaper recommended protocol, PathFile-ProTaper modified protocol and stainless steel K-flexofiles. METHODS: Forty-five ISO 15, 0.02 taper S-shaped Endo Training Blocks were divided randomly into three groups of 15 each and prepared as follows: PathFile-Protaper recommended protocol, Pathfile-Protaper modified protocol and manual preparation with K-Flexofiles. The amount of transportation was assessed by scanning the blocks before and after preparation and superimposing the images. The cutting effects of the instruments from the inner and outer aspects of the root canals were measured and statistically analyzed with the One-way Anova test and Tukey HSD test. RESULTS: Manual preparation caused significantly more transportation than both PathFile-Protaper systems. There was no significant difference regarding transportation between the two Pathfile-Protaper protocols. CONCLUSION: The modified Pathfile-Protaper protocol transported the canal similar to the recommended Pathfile-Protaper protocol. It may be suggested that, while working safety remains unchanged, the shaping procedure and consequently working time can be shortened with fewer instruments. The results of this study can help clinicians to reduce the preparation time with the PathFile-ProTaper rotary system while the preparation quality remains the same.


Subject(s)
Dental Instruments , Nickel , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Titanium , Humans
2.
J Endod ; 39(12): 1646-8, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24238465

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acid etching on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate-based cements. METHODS: One gram of each corresponding powder of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN), MTA Angelus (Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil), and CEM cement (BioniqueDent, Tehran, Iran) and a 0.33-g aliquot of liquid were placed in a plastic mixing capsule that was then mechanically mixed for 30 seconds at 4500 rpm in an amalgamator. For the preparation of Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fossés, France), the liquid provided was added to the powder within the plastic capsule supplied by the manufacturer and then mechanically mixed for 30 seconds at 4500 rpm using the amalgamator. The resulting slurries were then placed incrementally into 40 cylindrical molds to give a total of 160 specimens that were incubated at 37°C for a week. Twenty specimens of each material were then subjected to the acid etch procedure. The compressive strength of the samples was then calculated in megapascals using a universal testing machine. The results were then subjected to 2-way analysis of variance analysis of variance followed by the Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: The application of acid etch significantly reduced (P < .0001) the compressive strength of Angelus MTA and CEM cement; however, it did not reduce the compressive strength of ProRoot MTA or Biodentine. Regardless of the acid etch application, Biodentine showed significantly higher compressive strength values than the other materials (P < .0001), whereas CEM cement had the lowest compressive strength values. There was no significant difference between CEM cement and MTA Angelus. The compressive strength of ProRoot MTA was significantly lower (P < .0001) than Biodentine but significantly higher (P < .0001) than MTA Angelus and CEM cement in both the test and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: When the application of acid etchants is required, Biodentine and ProRoot MTA seem to be better options than MTA Angelus or CEM cement.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Calcium Compounds/chemistry , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Silicate Cement/chemistry , Silicates/chemistry , Aluminum Compounds/chemistry , Bismuth/chemistry , Compressive Strength , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Drug Combinations , Humans , Materials Testing , Oxides/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors
3.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 21(4): 351-7, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24037075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxic effects of endodontic cements on human tooth germ stem cells (hTGSCs). MTA Fillapex, a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based, salicylate resin containing root canal sealer, was compared with iRoot SP, a bioceramic sealer, and AH Plus Jet, an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate cytotoxicity, all materials were packed into Teflon rings (4 mmµ3 mm) and co-cultured with hTGSCs with the aid of 24-well Transwell permeable supports, which had a pore size of 0.4 µm. Coverslips were coated with MTA Fillapex, iRoot SP and AH Plus Jet and each coverslip was placed onto the bottom of one well of a six-well plate for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Before the cytotoxicity and SEM analysis, all samples were stored at 37ºC and at 95% humidity and 5% CO2 for 24 hours to set. The cellular viability was analyzed using MTS test (3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxy-methoxy-phenyl)-2-(4-sulfo-phenyl)-2H-tetrazolium). The cytotoxic effects and SEM visualization of the tested materials were analyzed at 24-hour, 72-hour, one-week and two-week periods. RESULTS: On the 1st day, only MTA Fillapex caused cytotoxicity compared to negative control (NC) group (p<0.008). No significant difference was observed between the other tested materials at this period (p>0.05). After 14 days of incubation with the test materials, MTA Fillapex exhibited significantly higher cytotoxicity compared with iRoot SP, AH Plus Jet and the NC group (P<0.008). In the SEM analysis, the highest levels of cell attachment were observed for iRoot SP and the control group. After 24 hours, MTA Fillapex reduced the number of cells attached to the surface. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, sealers exerted different cytotoxic effects on hTGSCs. Although all materials have exerted cellular toxicity, iRoot SP and AH Plus Jet may promote better attachment to hTGSCs.


Subject(s)
Calcium Compounds/toxicity , Dental Cements/toxicity , Silicates/toxicity , Stem Cells/drug effects , Tooth Germ/cytology , Aluminum Compounds/toxicity , Biocompatible Materials/toxicity , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Drug Combinations , Epoxy Resins/toxicity , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Oxides/toxicity , Root Canal Filling Materials/toxicity , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Properties/drug effects , Time Factors
4.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 71(3-4): 733-9, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22905970

ABSTRACT

AIM: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the general incidence of post-operative pain and flare-ups in patients who were endodontically treated by two endodontics specialists using rotary instruments (Hero 642, Micro Mega, France) with the same treatment protocol. METHODS: Records of 382 teeth belonging to 268 patients treated by two endodontics specialists during a 6-month period were kept and evaluated. Post-operative pain between treatment visits was categorized using a pre-established scoring system. Ninety-five patients were males, whereas 173 were females. RESULTS: Pulpal necrosis without periapical pathosis was determined as the most common indication for endodontic treatment (21.7%) followed by irreversible pulpitis and re-treatment without periapical lesions (18.3%, 18.3%, respectively). The general prevalence of post-operative pain and flare-ups was determined as 8.1%, whereas cases that could be classified as real flare-ups which were severe and required an unscheduled visit (scores 2 and 3) comprised 3.4% of the cases. No statistically significant correlation was determined between gender and post-operative pain and flare-up (p = 0.05). There was a significant correlation between number of appointments and the presence of pain and flare-ups. Teeth undergoing multiple visits had a higher risk of developing post-operative pain and flare-ups compared to those with single appointments with a statistical significance (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Teeth with pre-operative pain were more prone to developing post-operative pain and discomfort with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.02). While no significant correlation was determined between tooth vitality and pain and flare-ups (p = 0.5), a statistically significant relationship existed between the presence of a periapical pathosis and post-operative pain and flare-ups. Cases with a periapical lesion had a higher risk of developing pain and flare-ups compared to those with no periapical involvement (p = 0.0001). Future studies may focus on the influence of rotary instrumentation systems in more specific groups of cases. Meanwhile; microbiological as well as psychological aspects of flare-ups are topics that warrant further investigation.


Subject(s)
Dental Instruments , Endodontics , Pain, Postoperative , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male
5.
Int Endod J ; 43(9): 725-37, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20796048

ABSTRACT

This consensus statement from the European Society of Endodontology (ESE) sets out the minimum criteria for training Specialists in Endodontology within Europe. The case is made for recognizing Endodontology as a distinctive dental discipline throughout Europe. Guidelines are presented on the requirements of a specialist and of a specialist training programme in Endodontology. The aims, objectives and curriculum content of a specialist training pathway are outlined, with guidelines on trainee appraisal, and the expectations of faculty and institutional commitment. In publishing these guidelines, the ESE is responding to a public and professional need for consistently high standards of training and specialist clinical service within Europe.


Subject(s)
Accreditation , Education, Dental, Graduate/standards , Endodontics/education , Accreditation/standards , Consensus , Curriculum , Dental Research/education , Education, Dental/standards , Education, Dental, Continuing/standards , Educational Measurement , Endodontics/standards , Europe , Faculty, Dental , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team , Primary Health Care , Quality Control , Referral and Consultation , Schools, Dental/organization & administration , Science/education , Specialties, Dental/education , Specialties, Dental/standards
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20610303

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the gap between the post restoration and the remaining root canal filling had an impact on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth in a Turkish subpopulation. STUDY DESIGN: Digital panoramic radiographs, evaluated for this cross-sectional study, were randomly selected from files of patients who attended to Yeditepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, between June 2007 and December 2008. The total number of teeth with endodontic posts and crowns was 407. Two observers assessed the radiographs and evaluated the quality of root canal filling and the gap between the root canal filling and the post restoration. Periapical status of the teeth was assessed by the Periapical Index (PAI) scores. Only the teeth with a minimum of 5 mm apical root canal filling that was classified as "good endodontic treatment" were included in the study. Teeth that had no root canal filling, poor endodontic treatment, or less than 5 mm remaining root canal filling beyond post restoration were not assessed. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis and significance level was established at 5%. RESULTS: In cases with good endodontic treatment, there were 207 teeth that had no gap between the remaining root canal filling and the post restoration. In this group, 135 (65%) teeth had healthy periapex and 72 (35%) teeth showed signs of apical periodontitis. There were 81 teeth that had a gap between the remaining root canal filling and the post restoration. Of these teeth, 69 (85%) had periapical pathosis; however, only 12 (15%) teeth had healthy periapex. CONCLUSION: Statistical analysis revealed that the success rate of good endodontic treatment was significantly affected by the gap between the post restoration and remaining root canal filling (P < .001).


Subject(s)
Dental Marginal Adaptation , Periapical Diseases/classification , Post and Core Technique , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Tooth, Nonvital/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Periapical Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Periapical Periodontitis/classification , Periapical Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Periapical Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Radiography, Panoramic , Root Canal Filling Materials/therapeutic use , Root Canal Therapy/classification , Surface Properties , Tooth, Nonvital/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Turkey
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20417137

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of Resilon + Epiphany, EndoRez, Activ GP, and conventional AH Plus + gutta-percha technique using the glucose filtration model. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred twenty maxillary incisors were divided into 5 experimental and 2 control groups. After root canal shaping, the experimental groups were filled with AH Plus + gutta-percha (lateral compaction), Resilon + Epiphany (lateral compaction), AH Plus + Protaper's proprietory cone, EndoRez + sealer, or Activ GP + sealer). The specimens were mounted on a glucose model and samples were taken for 3 weeks for leakage measurement. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the leakage of all groups at the 3 testing periods (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The filling materials with the monoblock concept do not seem to be superior to the conventional AH Plus + gutta-percha system regarding microleakage.


Subject(s)
Dental Leakage/prevention & control , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Root Canal Obturation/methods , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis/methods , Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Gutta-Percha/chemistry , Humans , Incisor , Materials Testing/methods , Maxilla
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...