Determining optimal air leak resolution criteria when using digital pleural drainage device after lung resection.

Objective: There is limited clinical evidence to support any specific parenchymal air leak resolution criteria when using digital pleural drainage devices following lung resection. The aim of this study is to determine an optimal air leak resolution criteria, where duration of chest tube drainage is minimized while avoiding complications from premature chest tube removal. Methods: Airflow data averaged at 10-minute intervals was collected prospectively using a digital pleural drainage device (Thopaz; Medela) in 400 patients from 2015 to 2019. All permutations of air leak resolution criteria from <10 to 100 mL/minute for 4 to 12 hours were applied retrospectively to the pleural drainage data to determine air leak duration, and air leak recurrence frequency and volume. Air leak recurrence indicates potential for rather than occurrence of adverse events. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the optimal criteria based on patient safety (low frequency and volume of air leak recurrences), and efficiency (shortest initial air leak duration). Results: The majority of the 400 patients underwent lobectomy (57% [227 out of 400]), wedge resections (29% [115 out of 400]), or segmentectomies (8% [32 out of 400]) for lung cancer (90% [360 out of 400]). An airflow threshold <50 mL/minute resulted in longer air leak duration before meeting the criteria for air leak resolution (P < .0001). Air leak recurrence frequency and volume were greater in patients with a monitoring period <8 consecutive hours (P < .0001). Conclusions: When using a digital pleural drainage device, a postoperative air leak resolution criteria <50 mL/minute for 8 consecutive hours was associated with the best safety and efficiency profile.

A 20-Year Update on the Practice of Thoracic Surgery in Canada: A Survey of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons.

Background: This study provides an update to a landmark 2004 report describing demographics, training, and trends in adherence to thoracic surgery practice standards in Canada. Methods: An updated questionnaire was administered to all members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons via email (n=142, compared to n=68 in 2004). Our report incorporates internal data from Ontario Health and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. Results: Forty-eight surgeons completed the survey (male, 70.8%; mean±standard deviation age, 50.3±9.3 years). This represents a 33.8% response rate, compared to 64.7% in 2004. Most surgeons (69%) served a patient population of over 1 million per center; 32%-34% reported an on-call ratio of 1:4-1:5 days, and the average weekly hours worked was 56.4±11.9. Greater access to dedicated geographic units per center (73% in 2021 vs. 53% in 2004) has improved thoracic-associated services and house staff, notably endoscopy units (100% vs. 91%), with 73% of respondents having access to both endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound. Access to thoracic radiology has also improved, particularly regarding positron emission tomography scanners per center (76.9% vs. 13%). Annual case volumes for lung (255 vs. 128), esophageal (41 vs. 19), and mediastinal resections (30 vs. 13), along with hiatal hernia repair (45 vs. 20), have increased substantially despite reports of operating room availability and radiology as rate-limiting steps. Conclusion: This survey characterizes compliance with current practice standards, addressing the needs of thoracic surgeons across Canada. Over 85% of respondents were aware of the 2004 compliance paper, and 35% had applied for resources and equipment in response.

A Case Report of an Isolated Cardiac Metastasis in a Patient with Esophageal Carcinoma.

A 76-year-old Caucasian male presented with syncope, intermittent melena, anemia, and unexplained weight loss. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a friable non-obstructing esophageal tumor that appeared thickened on computed tomography (CT). Biopsies confirmed a poorly differentiated carcinoma. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (F-18 FDG PET/CT) showed intense FDG avidity with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 23. Although CT did not identify any lymphadenopathy or distant metastases, a mildly enhancing lobulated circumscribed mass with no internal calcification was incidentally identified in the left atrium. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) favored myxoma over thrombus given the signal characteristics and mild enhancement; however, F-18 FDG PET/CT showed an SUVmax of 18, more consistent with a metastasis. The cardiac mass was resected and shown to be a metastatic focus of poorly differentiated carcinoma, histologically identical to the esophageal mass. He received a single 8 Gray (Gy) fraction of urgent hemostatic radiotherapy for his primary tumor followed by palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin, capecitabine, and pembrolizumab. He was readmitted for transfusion due to recurrent bleeding from his primary tumor and given a second urgent hemostatic fraction of 8 Gy for stabilization. Systemic therapy was eventually discontinued due to declining performance status. He received consolidative palliative radiotherapy (20Gy in five fractions) but continued to deteriorate over the next three months and died in hospice, ten months from the time of his initial presentation.

Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?

OBJECTIVES: The prominence of "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) protocols being adopted in thoracic surgery requires a re-evaluation of mechanical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines. The goal of this study was to assess the role of sequential compression devices (SCD) in the prevention of VTEs such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE) in thoracic surgical patients. METHODS: We identified 200 patients who underwent elective oncological thoracic surgery between December 2018 and December 2020 in 2 cohorts-1 with SCDs and 1 without (i.e. non-SCD). All patients followed a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. The quality of care provided by SCDs was evaluated by the incidence and severity of postoperative and follow-up VTEs. Cohorts were compared by the Caprini score (CS) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with a two one-sided t-test analysis. Secondary outcomes include perioperative characteristics and follow-up data. RESULTS: Only 2 patients within the SCD group developed a PE with average CS and CCI metrics, both after hospital discharge and treated with anticoagulants, raising concern over the prophylactic nature of SCDs. The CS (6.9 ± 1.3 and 6.9 ± 1.5; P = 0.96) and the CCI (3.8 ± 2.0 and 4.1 ± 2.6; P = 0.33) for non-SCD and SCD, respectively, did not differ. The two one-sided t-test analysis for CS (P < 0.001) and CCI (P < 0.001) demonstrated equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger studies are required to confirm these results, routine SCD use may not be required when implementing ERAS protocols because clinically significant VTE rates were minimal.

Leveraging financial incentives and behavioural economics to engage physicians in achieving quality-improvement process measures.

BACKGROUND: Dedicated quality-improvement (QI) initiatives within health care systems are of clear benefit, and physicians respond to financial incentivization. The Canadian health care system often lacks this lever, and many financially incentivized QI programs rely on traditional economic principles. We describe our evaluation of financial incentivization for the implementation of QI process metrics in a department of surgery at a Canadian academic hospital system and its impact over a 4-year period. METHODS: Quality-improvement processes informed by extant QI incentivization literature and guided by the principles of behavioural economics were implemented within our institution's Department of Surgery. Disbursement of supplemental government funding was modified to be contingent on the ability of divisions within the department to meet predefined QI metrics, including regular multidisciplinary meetings, morbidity and mortality rounds with documented feedback of systemic issues to division members, reviews of adverse events, and implementation of annual patient experience projects. We evaluated the effect of the QI processes from 2015/16 to 2018/19. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of divisions that satisfied all the QI metrics over the study period, from 2 (28%) in 2015/16, to 5 (71%) in 2016/17, to 7 (100.0%) in 2017/18 and 2018/19 (p < 0.01). The application of behavioural economics principles, such as reward versus penalty payoff, loss aversion, payment separation, aligning of values, and relative social ranking, was important to the outcome of the study. CONCLUSION: Incentivizing QI activities in the Canadian health care system is possible and led to improvement in QI processes as a whole in our department. This paper lays out a method of financial reimbursement to facilitate engagement of physicians and establishment of a foundation of important QI processes and measures within a department.

The longitudinal impact of division-wide implementation of an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme.

OBJECTIVES: Data regarding enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) are sparse and inconsistent. This study aims to evaluate the effects of implementing an enhanced ERATS programme on postoperative outcomes, patient experience and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study evaluating 9 months before (pre-ERATS) and 9 months after (post-ERATS) a 3-month implementation of an ERATS programme in a single academic tertiary care centre. All patients undergoing major thoracic surgeries were included. The primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), adverse events (AEs), 6-min walk test scores at 4 weeks, 30-day emergency room visits (without admission) and 30-day readmissions. The process-of-care outcomes included time to 'out-of-bed', independent ambulation, successful fluid intake, last chest tube removal and removal of urinary catheter. Perioperative anaesthesia-related outcomes were examined as well as patient experience and QOL scores. RESULTS: The pre-ERATS group (n = 352 patients) and post-ERATS group (n = 352) demonstrated no differences in demographics. Post-ERATS patients had improved LOS (4.7 vs 6.2 days, P < 0.02), 6-min walk test scores (402 vs 371 m, P < 0.05) and 30-day emergency room visits (13.7% vs 21.6%, P = 0.03) with no differences in AEs and 30-day readmissions. Patients experienced shorter mean time to 'out-of-bed', independent ambulation, successful fluid intake, last chest tube removal and urinary catheter removal. There were no differences in postoperative analgesia administration, patient satisfaction and QOL scores. CONCLUSIONS: ERATS implementation was associated with improved LOS, expedited feeding, ambulation and chest tube removal, without increasing AEs or readmissions, while maintaining a high level of patient satisfaction and QOL.

Prophylaxis for patients at Risk to Eliminate Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (PREP-AF trial): a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent adverse event after thoracic surgery with associated morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. It has been shown to be preventable with prophylactic amiodarone, which is only recommended in high-risk individuals due to the potential associated side effects. Risk factors for POAF have been identified and incorporated into a prediction model to identify high-risk patients. Further evaluation in the form of a multicenter clinical trial is required to assess the effectiveness of prophylaxis specifically in this high-risk population. The feasibility of such a trial first needs to be assessed. METHODS: The PREP-AF trial is a double-blind randomized controlled feasibility trial. Individuals undergoing major thoracic surgery who are identified to be high-risk by the POAF prediction model will be randomized 1:1 to receive a short course of amiodarone vs. placebo in the immediate postoperative period. The primary outcome is feasibility, which will be measured by the number of eligible patients identified, consented, and randomized; intervention adherence; and measurement of future outcomes of a full trial. DISCUSSION: This study will determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic amiodarone, in high-risk patients undergoing major thoracic surgery. This will inform the development of a multi-center trial to establish if prophylactic amiodarone is safe and effective at reducing the incidence of POAF. Preventing this adverse event will not only improve outcomes for patients but also reduce the associated health resource utilization and costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04392921 . Registered on 19 May 2020.

Variation in management of post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: New-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent adverse event following major thoracic surgery and is associated with increased risk of perioperative morbidity, length of stay and stroke. It is managed initially with rate and rhythm control therapy; however, optimal duration and the need for anticoagulation are poorly understood. This study aims to assess practice variation regarding POAF management and duration. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients who underwent major thoracic surgery and developed POAF between 2008 and 2017, managed with rate and rhythm control therapy alone. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables/outcomes, POAF management, and incidence of POAF recurrence in the 30-day post-operative period were collected. Chi-square and T-tests determined significance. RESULTS: Of 2054 patients undergoing thoracic surgery, 155 (75%) patients developed POAF. Different rate and rhythm control agents were used, most commonly metoprolol. 107 (69%) continued rate and rhythm control therapy upon hospital discharge for a mean of 56 days. Among the 48 patients with discontinuation of rate and rhythm control therapy on discharge, none demonstrated recurrence of POAF; in contrast to 3 of 107 patients who continued on therapy. Among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, 15% were prescribed anticoagulation on discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Use of rate and rhythm control therapy and anticoagulation for POAF is significantly varied in practice. Many patients are not continued on rate and rhythm control after hospital discharge, which does not appear to impact risk of POAF recurrence. Further research to inform guidelines for POAF management, including therapy duration and indications for anticoagulation is warranted.

Correction to: Postoperative Adverse Events are Associated with Oncologic Recurrence Following Curative­intent Resection for Lung Cancer.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in author names. The given and family names of all the authors was transposed. The author names are corrected with this correction. The original article has been corrected.

Postoperative Adverse Events are Associated with Oncologic Recurrence Following Curative-intent Resection for Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients suffer short-term postoperative adverse events (AEs) and metastatic recurrence in the long-term following curative-intent lung cancer resection. The association between AEs, particularly infectious in nature, and disease recurrence is controversial. We sought to evaluate the association of postoperative AEs on risk of developing recurrence and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following curative-intent lung resection surgery. METHODS: All lung cancer resections at a single institution (January 2008-July 2015) were included, with prospective collection of AEs using the Thoracic Morbidity & Mortality System. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of AEs on recurrence, with results presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). An a priori, clinically driven approach to predictor variable selection was used. Kaplan-Meier curves were used examine the relationship between AE and RFS. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 892 patients underwent curative-intent resection. 342 (38.3%) patients experienced an AE; 69 (7.7%) patients developed infectious AEs. 17.6% (n = 157) of patients had disease recurrence after mean follow-up of 26.5 months. Severe (Grade IV) AEs were associated with increased risk of recurrence (3.40; 95% CI 1.56-7.41) and a trend to decreased RFS. Major infectious AEs were associated with increased risk of recurrence (HR 1.71; CI 1.05-2.8) and earlier time to recurrence (no infectious AE 66 months, minor infectious 41 months, major infectious 54 months; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing curative-intent lung cancer resection, postoperative AEs associated with critical illness or major infection were associated with increased risk of oncologic recurrence.

External validity of a model to predict postoperative atrial fibrillation after thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: A prediction model developed by Passman et al. stratifies patients' risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after major non-cardiac thoracic surgery using 3 simple factors (sex, age and preoperative resting heart rate). The model has neither undergone external validation nor proven to be relevant in current thoracic surgery practice. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre analysis of all patients who underwent major non-cardiac thoracic surgery (2008-2017) with prospective documentation of incidence and severity of POAF was used for external validation of Passman's derivation sample (published in 2005 with 856 patients). The model calibration was assessed by evaluating the incidence of POAF and patients' risk scores (0-6). RESULTS: A total of 2054 patients were included. Among them, POAF occurred in 164 (7.9%), compared to 147 (17.2%) in Passman's study. Differences in our sample compared to Passman's sample included mean heart rate (75.7 vs 73.7 bpm, P < 0.001), proportion of patients with hypertension (46.1 vs 29.4%, P < 0.001), proportion of extensive lung resections, particularly pneumonectomy (6.1 vs 21%, P < 0.001) and proportion of minimally invasive surgeries (56.6% vs 0%). The model demonstrated a positive correlation between risk scores and POAF incidence (risk score 1.2% vs 6.16%). CONCLUSIONS: The POAF model demonstrated good calibration in our population, despite a lower overall incidence of POAF compared to the derivation study. POAF rates were higher among patients with a higher risk score and undergoing procedures with greater intrathoracic dissection. This tool may be useful in identifying patients who are at risk of POAF when undergoing major thoracic surgery and may, therefore, benefit from targeted prophylactic therapy.

Early Identification of Patients Who Will Meet 24-Hour Fluid Output Threshold for Chest Tube Removal After Lung Resection.

Improving evidence-based chest tube removal may reduce the length of stay following surgery. Presently, most chest tube removal protocols include a fluid output threshold based on a 24-hour observation period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if, within a 24-hour time period, fluid output measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours could predict if the total 24-hour fluid output would comply with a predetermined volume threshold considered acceptable for safe chest tube removal. Following lung resection, pleural fluid output data were prospectively recorded by a digital drainage system and analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-four-hour fluid output was calculated from every available 6-, 8-, and 12-hour measurement and compared to set 24-hour output criteria for chest tube removal (ie, 400 mL, 250 mL, and 20% of whole-body lymphatic flow). Performance of interim fluid outputs in predicting whether 24-hour fluid output criteria were satisfied was measured. From 2015 to 2018, 150 patients had digital pleural fluid drainage data suitable for analysis. Performance of interim fluid output data in identifying which patients would satisfy 24-hour output criteria ranged from 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83-86) to 94% (95% CI = 93-94) for specificity, 75% (95% CI = 73-76) to 92% (95% CI = 90-93) for positive predictive value, and 6% (95% CI = 6-7) to 15% (95% CI = 14-17) for false-positive rate. Potential time saved in duration of drainage using interim fluid output data ranged from 10 to 16 hours. Pleural fluid output measured for 6-, 8-, and 12-hour durations can accurately identify patients who will meet 24-hour fluid output threshold for safe chest tube removal.

Forecasting pulmonary air leak duration following lung surgery using transpleural airflow data from a digital pleural drainage device.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak (PAL) is often the limiting factor for hospital discharge after lung surgery. Our goal was to develop a statistical model that reliably predicts pulmonary air leak resolution by applying statistical time series modeling and forecasting techniques to digital drainage data. METHODS: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) modeling was used to forecast air leak flow from transplural air flow data. The results from ARIMA were retrospectively internally validated with a group of 100 patients who underwent lung resection between December 2012 and March 2017, for whom digital pleural drainage data was available for analysis and a persistent air leak was the limiting factor for chest tube removal. RESULTS: The ARIMA model correctly identified 82% (82/100) of patients as to whether or not the last chest tube removal was appropriate. The performance characteristics of the model in properly identifying patients whose air leak would resolve and who would therefore be candidates for safe chest tube removal were: sensitivity 80% (95% CI, 69-88%), specificity 88% (95% CI, 68-97%), positive predictive value 95% (95% CI, 86-99%), and negative predictive value 59% (95% CI, 42-79%). The false positive and false negative rate was 12% (95% CI, 12-31%) and 20% (95% CI, 12-31%). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to validate a statistical model that that reliably predicted resolution of pulmonary air leak resolution over a 24-hour period. This information may improve the care of patients with chest tube by optimizing duration of pleural drainage.

A review and analysis of strategies for prediction, prevention and management of post-operative atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac thoracic surgery.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia after non-cardiac thoracic surgery and is associated with a significant increase in perioperative morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality. Practical guidance is needed to assist clinicians in managing this critical issue and direct further research. Here we aim to provide a synoptic review and analysis of the literature to distil practical recommendations for prediction, prevention and management of post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) suitable for clinical application and further evaluation. To predict POAF, risk factors including age, gender, elevated pre-operative heart rate and extent of surgical resection have been reproducibly identified and integrated into scoring systems. To prevent POAF, prophylactic therapy with beta-blockers, amiodarone, or magnesium have demonstrated to be effective, but need further trials in high-risk populations. To manage unstable POAF that precipitates hypotension and hypoperfusion, although rare, requires immediate electrocardioversion to restore cardiac output and adequate oxygen delivery. For hemodynamically stable patients, rate control and prevention of adverse events are the objectives. We propose an individualized approach aimed at rate control using initial incremental low dose beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy with close monitoring of a patient's response, and continuation of the drug that they respond to, along with simultaneous identification and reduction of triggers of AF, in order for spontaneous return to sinus rhythm. For patients who persistently fail to respond to rate control therapy, rhythm control may be considered using an agent selected based on the patient's comorbidities and the medications' side effect profile. While controversial and requiring further study, anticoagulation therapy is recommended in patients with risk factors for thromboembolic events after 48 hours of persistent AF. We recommend continuous prospective monitoring of incidence and severity of POAF to track the impact of protocols to predict, prevent and manage POAF.

Impact of patient characteristics on the Canadian Patient Experiences Survey-Inpatient Care: survey analysis from an academic tertiary care centre.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of patient demographics, care domains and self-perceived health status in the analysis and interpretation of results from the Canadian Patient Experience Survey-Inpatient Care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Single large Canadian two campus tertiary care academic centre. PARTICIPANTS: Random sampling of hospital patients postdischarge. INTERVENTION AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression models were developed to analyse topbox scoring on four questions of global care (rate experience, recommend hospital, rate hospital, overall helped). Means of each composite domain were correlated to the four overall scores at the patient level to determine Spearman's rank correlation coefficients which were plotted against the overall (hospital) domain score for the key driver analysis. RESULTS: Topbox scoring was decreased with worse degrees of perceived physical and mental health in all four global questions (p<0.05). Female gender and higher levels of education were associated with worse scoring on rate experience, recommend hospital and rate hospital (p<0.001). Whereas there was a significant difference between hospital departments in unadjusted measures, these differences were no longer evident after adjustment with patient covariates. Key driver analysis identified person-centred care, care transition and the domain related to emergency admission as areas of highest potential for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Global measures of overall care are influenced by patient-perceived physical and mental health. Caution should be exercised in using patient-satisfaction surveys to compare performance between different healthcare provision entities, as apparent differences could be explained by variation in patient mix rather than variation in performance.

All grades of severity of postoperative adverse events are associated with prolonged length of stay after lung cancer resection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether all grades of severity of postoperative adverse events are associated with prolonged length of stay in patients undergoing pulmonary cancer resection. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent pulmonary resection with curative intent for malignancy at The Ottawa Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery (January 2008 to July 2015). Postoperative adverse events were collected prospectively with the Thoracic Morbidity & Mortality System, based on the Clavien-Dindo severity classification. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative investigations, cardiopulmonary assessment, pathologic staging, operative characteristics, and length of stay were retrospectively reviewed. Prolonged hospital stay was defined as >75th percentile for each procedure performed (wedge resection 6 days, segmentectomy 6 days, lobectomy 7 days, extended lobectomy 8 days, pneumonectomy 10 days). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with prolonged hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 1041 patients, 579 (55.6%) were female, 610 (58.1%) were >65 years old, 232 (22.3%) experienced prolonged hospital stay, and 416 (40.0%) patients had ≥1 postoperative adverse event. Multivariable analyses identified significant (P < .05) factors associated with prolonged hospital stay to be (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval): lower diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (0.99; 0.98-0.99), surgical approach: open thoracotomy (1.8; 1.3-2.5), and presence of any postoperative adverse event: Grade I (5.8; 3.3-10.2), Grade II (6.0; 4.0-8.9), Grade III (11.4; 7.0-18.7), and Grade IV (19.40; 7.1-55.18). CONCLUSIONS: Lower diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, open thoracotomy approach, and the development of any postoperative adverse event, including minor events that required no additional therapy, were factors associated with prolonged hospital stay.

Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains a critical component of esophageal cancer treatment with curative-intent. The aim of this study was to compare open (OE) to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE) with respect to perioperative and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective single-institution review of MIE and OE patients operated between 2001 and 2015 was conducted. Univariable and multivariable models were created using Cox regression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare oncologic outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare oncological outcomes in MIE and OE patients. RESULTS: Of 210 esophageal resection patients, 47% had OE (137/291) and 25% had MIE (73/291). The MIE and OE groups were comparable with respect to patient factors and operative details. Fewer OE patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. MIE was associated with improved lymph node yield, (MIE = 30 [IQR:22-39]; OE = 14 [IQR:7-19], p < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (MIE = 312 mL [100-400]; OE = 657 mL [350-700], p < 0.001), and shorter median length of stay (MIE = 10 days [IQR = 8-14]; OE = 14 days [IQR = 11-22] p < 0.01). The OE group had significantly more adverse events resulting in reoperation or intensive care unit admission (MIE = 21%; OE = 34%; p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, age and positive resection margins were associated with decreased odds of survival. The number of lymph nodes retrieved, positive resection margins, and pathologic stage were significant predictors of disease-free survival. Analysis of 69 matched pairs showed equivalent median overall survival (MIE = 49 months [18-67]; OE = 29 months [17-69]; p = 0.26) and disease-free survival (MIE = 9 [6-22]; OE = 13 [6-22]; p = 0.45) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term oncologic outcomes appear to be similar, MIE is associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss, improved lymph node yield, less risk of severe postoperative adverse events, and shorter length of stay.

Impact of Adverse Events and Length of Stay on Patient Experience After Lung Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adverse events (AEs), prolonged length of stay (PLOS), and patient experience are common quality measures after thoracic surgical procedures. Our objective was to investigate the relationship of postoperative AEs on patient experience and hospital length of stay (LOS) after lung cancer resection. METHODS: AEs (using Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system based on Clavien-Dindo schema) and LOS were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing lung cancer resection. A 21-item questionnaire, retrospectively asking about patient experience, was mailed to patients twice (October 2015 and January 2016). The impact of AEs on experience was investigated and stratified by hospital LOS, with PLOS defined as the 75th percentile. Univariate analysis used parametric (t test) and nonparametric (Mann-Whitney) tests according to test conditions. RESULTS: Of 288 patients who responded to the survey (70% response rate), 175 (61%) had no AEs, 113 (39%) had experienced at least one AE, and 52 (18%) had experienced PLOS. Lung cancer patients who experienced PLOS showed significantly decreased experience on several questionnaire items, including their impression of comprehensiveness of surgeons information provision during inpatient period (p = 0.008), inpatient recovery from operation (p = 0.001), quality of life 30 days after operation (p = 0.032), follow-up care, (p = 0.022), and satisfaction with outcome 1 year after operation during follow-up care (p = 0.022). The presence of postoperative AEs led only to reduced impression about inpatient recovery from the operation (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, postoperative AEs were minimally associated with negative patient experience. However, patients who experienced PLOS demonstrated a marked reduction in experience after thoracic surgical procedures.