Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 121(12): 1464-8, 2001 May 10.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11449768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A study comparing diphtheria immunity in Norwegian and Russian schoolchildren indicated low immunity against diphtheria in Norwegian children before the booster dose given at age 11 years. The pertussis epidemic in Norway 1997-98 demonstrated decreasing vaccine immunity from age 5-6 years. The possibility of improving immunity against both diseases by a booster dose during early school age is therefore under consideration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Immune response and adverse events were studied after a combined vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (acellular) and poliomyelitis (DTPa-IPV) given at seven years of age, and a combined vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (acellular) (DTPa) at 11 years of age, in two parallel trials including 124 and 83 participants respectively. RESULTS: The trials confirmed that the diphtheria immunity is lower than it ideally should be in more than 40% of children before the booster dose at age 11. Pertussis immunity is difficult to assess because there is no clear relationship between antibody levels and protection. All study participants responded well to all vaccine components. The 11-year-old children reported higher occurrence of adverse events than the 7-year-olds. All adverse events were brief and none were serious. INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that a booster dose of DTPa-IPV in early school age would give better protection against diphtheria and pertussis in Norwegian schoolchildren, without unacceptable side effects.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Poliovirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Bacterial/analysis , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Child , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/adverse effects , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Norway , Poliovirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Poliovirus Vaccines/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies
3.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 113(24): 3041-5, 1993 Oct 10.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8259578

ABSTRACT

In September 1990, 40 doctors started a two year management training programme consisting of six one week courses organised by the Norwegian Medical Association. The programme was evaluated, and this article presents the results of two of the methods, used for evaluation: the first an interview with 12 participants, and the second a questionnaire answered by participants, colleagues at the same department and colleagues at other hospitals (a control group) before and after the course. Compared with colleagues from the same department and from the control group the participants had changed their attitude towards important questions of management. They had become more concerned about the importance of motivating the staff, that the department should give priority to the hospital's objectives in preference to own interests, and that the ultimate responsibility for the department should reside in one person and this person should be a doctor with a relevant specialty. The results of the questionnaire survey are confirmed by the results of the interviews. In addition the results of the interviews suggest that, during the management training programme, the participants had changed from an individual-oriented to a more group-oriented style of management.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , Leadership , Physician's Role , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Financial Management, Hospital , Hospital Planning , Humans , Norway , Personnel Management , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 112(29): 3672-6, 1992 Nov 30.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1471129

ABSTRACT

The article describes what can be done to improve quality in the Norwegian primary health services, seen from the point of view of the municipal health officer. Quality assurance is particularly important in the primary health services for the following reasons: They, i.e. the primary health services constitute a major part of the total health services, and they are unique by being a basic front-line service consisting of many small units. Compared with the rest of the health services, many of the personnel employed at these units are not fully qualified. As a consequence, we argue that setting quality standards and ensuring and improving quality in patient care must be an integrated part of the work of all primary health care personnel. Ensuring quality has been a major issue for the national health authorities in recent years, but has not yet been incorporated as a routine in the services. We give six examples where quality assurance is relevant, with references from research.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Health Priorities , Norway , Primary Health Care/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...