White Blood Cell and Platelet Dynamics Define Human Inflammatory Recovery.

Inflammation is the physiologic reaction to cellular and tissue damage caused by pathologic processes including trauma, infection, and ischemia 1 . Effective inflammatory responses integrate molecular and cellular functions to prevent further tissue damage, initiate repair, and restore homeostasis, while futile or dysfunctional responses allow escalating injury, delay recovery, and may hasten death 2 . Elevation of white blood cell count (WBC) and altered levels of other acute phase reactants are cardinal signs of inflammation, but the dynamics of these changes and their resolution are not established 3,4 . Patient responses appear to vary dramatically with no clearly defined signs of good prognosis, leaving physicians reliant on qualitative interpretations of laboratory trends 4,5 . We retrospectively, observationally studied the human acute inflammatory response to trauma, ischemia, and infection by tracking the longitudinal dynamics of cellular and serum markers in hospitalized patients. Unexpectedly, we identified a conserved pattern of recovery defined by co-regulation of WBC and platelet (PLT) populations. Across all inflammatory conditions studied, recovering patients followed a consistent WBC-PLT trajectory shape that is well-approximated by exponential WBC decay and delayed linear PLT growth. This recovery trajectory shape may represent a fundamental archetype of human physiologic response at the cellular population scale, and provides a generic approach for identifying high-risk patients: 32x relative risk of adverse outcomes for cardiac surgery patients, 9x relative risk of death for COVID-19, and 5x relative risk of death for myocardial infarction.

Outcomes After Surgical Pulmonary Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolus: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) has been sparingly used for the successful treatment of massive and submassive pulmonary emboli. To date, all data regarding SPE have been limited to single-center experiences. The purpose of this study was to document short-term outcomes after SPE for acute pulmonary emboli (PE) at four high-volume institutions. METHODS: A retrospective review of multiple local Society of Thoracic Surgeons databases of adults undergoing SPE from 1998 to 2014 for acute PE was performed (n = 214). Demographic, operative, and outcomes data were collected and analyzed. Patients were summarily categorized as having either massive or submassive PEs based on the presence or absence of preoperative vasopressors. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients with acute PE were treated by SPE. The mean age was 56.0 ± 14.5 years, and 92 (43.6%) patients were female. Of those, 176 (82.2%) PEs were submassive and 38 (17.8%) were massive. Fifteen (7.0%) patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures, with 10 (4.7%) having simultaneous valvular interventions and 5 (2.4%) undergoing concomitant bypass grafting. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used for all cases. Cardioplegic arrest was used for 80 (37.4%) patients. The median CPB and aortic cross clamp times were 71.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 47.0-109.5) and 46.0 (IQR, 26.0-74.5), respectively. Notably, only 25 (11.7%) patients died in the hospital. Mortality was highest among the 28 patients who experienced preoperative cardiac arrest (9, 32.1%) CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the first multicenter experience with SPE for acute pulmonary emboli. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy for acute massive and submassive PE is safe and can be performed with acceptable in-hospital outcomes; the procedure should be included in the multimodality treatment of life-threatening pulmonary emboli.