ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical findings and outcomes of Enterprise and Solitaire stent-assisted coiling (SAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and March 2014, 86 patients (mean age, 60.3 years) harboring 89 aneurysms were treated with Enterprise (n = 57) or Solitaire (n = 32) SAC. The patients' demographics, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: There were no cases of stent navigation, deployment failure, arterial dissection, or intraoperative aneurysmal rupture. Angiographic follow-up imaging was available for 86 (96.6%) aneurysms (Enterprise group, n = 55; Solitaire group, n = 31). Immediate postoperative and follow-up angiographic results showed no flow or only minimal flow into the neck in 83% (Enterprise group, 77.2%; Solitaire group, 93.8%) and 95.3% (Enterprise group, 92.7%; Solitaire group, 100%) of SAC-treated aneurysms, respectively. Both stent groups showed good immediate postoperative and follow-up clinical outcomes. Excepting 2 cases, all patients achieved modified Rankin Scale scores of 0. Coil loop or tail protrusion into the parent artery was observed in 17 (29.8%) and 7 (21.9%) cases in the Enterprise and Solitaire groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference in terms of angiographic results or clinical outcomes was observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: Excellent and comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes for wide-neck intracranial aneurysms were achieved using both stents. Because of its higher radial strength and better vessel wall apposition, we cautiously propose that the Solitaire stent may be more effective for SAC of aneurysms harboring a large or severe tortuous parent artery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The predictors of graft infection after cranioplasty (GIC) following decompressive craniectomy are not well established. Knowledge of the risk factors for GIC will allow development of preventive measures designed to reduce infection rates. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of GIC. METHODS: A total of 85 patients underwent reconstructive cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy between January 2009 and July 2011 and had a follow-up period of > 1 year; charts were reviewed retrospectively. Although autograft was used whenever possible, artificial bone was used for cranioplasty. GIC was defined as infection requiring removal of the bone graft. RESULTS: GIC occurred in six patients (7.05 %). GIC was not related to the indications for craniectomy, the interval of cranioplasty, graft material, or the size of the bone defect (p = 0.433, p = 0.206, p = 0.665, and p = 0.999, respectively). The GIC rate was significantly related to previous temporalis muscle resection, preoperative subgaleal fluid collection, operative times > 120 min, and postoperative wound disruptions (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.035, and p = 0.016, respectively). Multiple logistic regression showed that the presence of a subgaleal fluid collection before cranioplasty significantly increased the risk of GIC (OR: 38.53; 95 % CI: 2.77-535.6; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that long operative times (> 120 min), craniectomy with temporalis muscle resection, the presence of preoperative subgaleal fluid collection, and postoperative wound disruption may be risk factors for graft infection after cranioplasty. Surgical techniques should be developed to reduce operative time and to avoid temporalis muscle resection when possible. In addition, meticulous dural closure aimed at reducing the formation of subgaleal fluid collection is important for the prevention of graft infections after cranioplasty.
