Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Women Health ; 64(2): 131-141, 2024 02 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38221667

ABSTRACT

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the Pilates exercise program during pregnancy on different delivery outcomes. Various databases were searched from inception until November 2022. The included studies compared Pilates exercise to routine antenatal care in pregnant women. The primary outcomes assessed were vaginal and cesarean delivery rates, as well as labor duration. Secondary outcomes included episiotomy incidence, Apgar scores, and epidural analgesia. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 1,003 patients. Results indicated a significant increase in the vaginal delivery rate among the Pilates exercise group compared to the control group (p < .001). Moreover, the Pilates exercise group exhibited significantly reduced rates of cesarean delivery and shorter labor duration. Pilates exercise was associated with a significant decline in the incidence of episiotomy and the number of women requiring epidural analgesia during delivery (p < .001 & p = .008). In addition, Apgar scores at one and five minutes were significantly higher in the Pilates exercise group compared to the control group (p < .001). In conclusion, Pilates exercise during pregnancy has a positive effect on maternal outcomes and Apgar scores. However, more trials are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Exercise Movement Techniques , Labor, Obstetric , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Cesarean Section
2.
IBRO Neurosci Rep ; 14: 86-94, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36632242

ABSTRACT

Background: Dementia is a neurological disorder that commonly affects the elderly. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are small, tiny lesions of the cerebral blood vessels and have been suggested as a possible risk factor for dementia. However, data about the association between CMBs and dementia risk are inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between CMBs and dementia and highlight the possible explanations. Methods: We followed the standard PRISMA statement and the Cochrane Handbook guidelines to conduct this study. First, we searched medical electronic databases for relevant articles. Then, we screened the retrieved articles for eligibility, extracted the relevant data, and appraised the methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Finally, the extracted data were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) in the random-effects meta-analysis model using the Review Manager software. Results: We included nine studies with 14,221 participants and follow-up periods > 18 months. Overall, CMBs significantly increased the risk of developing dementia (RR 1.84, 95% CI [1.27-2.65]). This association was significant in the subgroups of studies on high-risk populations (RR 2.00, 95% CI [1.41-2.83], n = 1657 participants) and those in the general population (RR 2.30, 95% CI [1.25-4.26], n = 12,087 participants) but not in the memory clinic patients. Further, CMBs increased the risk of progressing to incident dementia over time (HR 2, 95% CI [1.54-2.61]). Conclusion: Individuals with CMBs have twice the risk of developing dementia or progressing to MCI than those without CMBs. The detection of CMBs will help identify the population at higher risk of developing dementia. Physicians should educate individuals with CMBs and their families on the possibility of progressing to dementia or MCI. Regular cognitive assessments, cognitive training, lifestyle modifications, and controlling other dementia risk factors are recommended for individuals with CMBs to decrease the risk of cognitive decline and dementia development.

3.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 36(4): 233-241, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35939039

ABSTRACT

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block in pain relief among women undergoing hysterectomy. Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2021 for the available randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We included RCTs that compared SHP block (intervention group) to saline (control group) in hysterectomy. Our primary outcomes were pain scores at different time intervals using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Our secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption within 24 hours and postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Four RCTs with a total number of 289 patients met our inclusion criteria. The VAS pain scores were significantly declined at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively among SHP block group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was reported in VAS pain score 1 day postoperatively between intervention and control groups. Moreover, SHP block significantly reduced the postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of nausea and vomiting (p = 0.03 & p = 0.003). In conclusion, superior hypogastric plexus block effectively reduces postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and incidence of nausea and vomiting post-hysterectomy.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Pain Management , Female , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Hypogastric Plexus , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Hysterectomy/adverse effects
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 263: 223-230, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242930

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a great controversy regarding the benefits of ultrasound-guided intrauterine insemination (IUI) in improving pregnancy rates. Thus, we aimed to compare ultrasound-guided IUI versus classical IUI regarding the pregnancy rates improvement. METHODS: A systematic search was done in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus during June 2021. We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared ultrasound-guided IUI versus classical IUI in different pregnancy outcomes. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. Our secondary outcomes were miscarriage, live birth rates, and incidence of difficulty reported during the procedure. The overall quality of evidence was assessed through GRADEpro GDT software. RESULTS: Seven RCTs met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 1338 patients. We found that ultrasound-guided IUI significantly improved the clinical pregnancy rate when compared to the classical group (RR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.05, 1.68], p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences between both groups in terms of miscarriage and live birth rates. Ultrasound-guided IUI significantly reduced the incidence of difficulty reported during the procedure (RR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.21, 0.84], p = 0.01). The GRADEpro GDT tool showed high quality of evidence for the evaluated outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of high quality that ultrasound-guided IUI improves the pregnancy rate and reduces the incidence of difficulty reported during the procedure.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Live Birth , Female , Humans , Insemination , Insemination, Artificial , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
J Perinat Med ; 49(2): 178-190, 2021 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32950965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy between high dose and low dose oxytocin administration for labor augmentation. METHODS: We searched for the available studies during March 2020 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI Web of science. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed safety and efficacy of high dose vs. low dose oxytocin for labor augmentation were considered. The extracted data were entered into RevMan software. Dichotomous and continuous data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) respectively, with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our main outcomes were cesarean delivery rate, spontaneous vaginal delivery rate, uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole, and labor duration from oxytocin infusion. RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 3,154 patients were included. High dose oxytocin did not reduce cesarean delivery rate compared to low dose oxytocin (OR=0.76, 95% CI [0.52, 1.10], p=0.15). After solving the reported heterogeneity, high dose oxytocin did not increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries vs. low dose oxytocin (OR=1.06, 95% CI [0.84, 1.32], p=0.64). Low dose oxytocin was linked to a significant decline in uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole (p>0.001). A reduction in labor duration was found in high dose oxytocin group over low oxytocin regimen (MD=-1.02 h, 95% CI [-1.77, -0.27], p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantages for high dose oxytocin over low dose oxytocin in labor augmentation except in reducing labor duration. Low dose oxytocin is safer as it decreases the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole. More trials are needed to confirm our findings.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Labor, Obstetric , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Oxytocics/adverse effects , Oxytocin/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 24(5): 327-336, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517549

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare early vs. delayed postpartum insertion of the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Methods: The databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched to February 2019. The search comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early vs. delayed postpartum insertion of the LNG-IUS. Data were extracted and combined in a meta-analysis. Pooled results were expressed as the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The main outcome measures were breastfeeding continuation, LNG-IUS expulsion, uterine perforation, LNG-IUS use, satisfaction and number of pregnancies. Results: Twelve RCTs were included, comprising 1006 women in total. Our analysis indicated no significant difference between early and delayed insertion of the LNG-IUS in terms of any breastfeeding continuation (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.84, 1.16; p = 0.88). After removal of heterogeneity, there was a statistically significant superiority in LNG-IUS use at the endpoint in the early insertion group compared with the delayed insertion group (RR 1.27; 95% CI 1.07, 1.51; p = 0.006). LNG-IUS expulsion was significantly less in the delayed insertion group in comparison with the early insertion group (RR 5.32; 95% CI 2.68, 10.53; p = 0.00001). No significant differences were found between the groups in satisfaction, number of pregnancies and risk of uterine perforation. Conclusion: Early postpartum insertion of the LNG-IUS has no negative effects on breastfeeding continuation. Early postpartum insertion may be used as an alternative to delayed postpartum insertion.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Contraceptive Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/statistics & numerical data , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Adult , Female , Humans , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...