Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 151, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication after major surgery and can cause a variety of adverse effects. However, no large-scale national database was used to assess the occurrence and factors associated with postoperative delirium (POD) following hepatic resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatic resection from 2015 to 2019 were screened using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10th edition clinical modification code from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database. Peri-operative factors associated with delirium were screened and underwent statistical analysis to identify independent predictors for delirium following hepatic resection. RESULTS: A total of 80,070 patients underwent hepatic resection over a five-year period from 2015 to 2019. The overall occurrence of POD after hepatic resection was 1.46% (1039 cases), with a slight upward trend every year. The incidence of elective admission was 6.66% lower (88.60% vs. 81.94%) than that of patients without POD after hepatic resection and 2.34% (45.53% vs. 43.19%) higher than that of patients without POD in teaching hospitals (P < 0.001). In addition, POD patients were 6 years older (67 vs. 61 years) and comprised 9.27% (56.69% vs. 47.42%) more male patients (P < 0.001) compared to the unaffected population. In addition, the occurrence of POD was associated with longer hospitalization duration (13 vs. 5 days; P < 0.001), higher total cost ($1,481,89 vs. $683,90; P < 0.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (12.61% vs. 4.11%; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified hepatic resection-independent risk factors for POD, including non-elective hospital admission, teaching hospital, older age, male sex, depression, fluid and electrolyte disorders, coagulopathy, other neurological disorders, psychoses, and weight loss. In addition, the POD after hepatic resection has been associated with sepsis, dementia, urinary retention, gastrointestinal complications, acute renal failure, pneumonia, continuous invasive mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion, respiratory failure, and wound dehiscence / non-healing. CONCLUSION: Although the occurrence of POD after hepatic resection is relatively low, it is beneficial to investigate factors predisposing to POD to allow optimal care management and improve the outcomes of this patient population.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Delirium , Hepatectomy , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Incidence , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , United States/epidemiology , Adult
2.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging ; 2022: 7440015, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36237583

ABSTRACT

In order to optimize the anesthesia scheme and improve the effect of surgical treatment, the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on postoperative analgesia and cellular immune function of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer have been analyzed. A total of 86 patients admitted to our hospital from March 2021 to March 2022 who received laparoscopic radical gastritis were selected. The combined dexmedetomidine group (n = 43) and the control group (n = 43) are grouped by the random number table method, respectively. Anesthesia induction regimens of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol and conventional propofol are treated, and the changes in serum stress index, immune function index, analgesia score, and pain score are observed. The results show that the postoperative stress response, analgesic effect, and immune function of patients receiving dexmedetomidine combined with propofol anesthesia are significantly better than those receiving conventional anesthesia, and the incidence of postoperative complications in the dexmedetomidine combined group is significantly lower than that in the control group. The results demonstrate that dexmedetomidine combined with propofol anesthesia intervention has high security in undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Dexmedetomidine , Propofol , Stomach Neoplasms , Analgesia/adverse effects , Analgesics , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Immunity , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Propofol/therapeutic use , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...