ABSTRACT
Purpose: To develop a clinical risk score for the prediction of urgency in patients with carotid cavernous sinus fistulas (CCFs) and test for the discriminative ability of the diagnostic prediction. Methods: The medical charts of 60 patients with CCFs were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical characteristics of direct and dural CCFs were analyzed by logistic regression. The clinical risk score was developed from the coefficient in the multivariable regression model and used to predict direct CCFs which were more urgent than the dural type. The score prediction was reported as an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AuROC) curve and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: In a univariable analysis, the clinical characteristics which increased the risk of direct CCFs were age, gender, trauma, underlying diseases, visual acuity (VA) at presentation, bruit, chemosis, and dilated retinal vessels. However, in multivariable analysis, the significant predictors were limited to age, trauma, bruit, underlying diseases and logMAR VA. Regression coefficient of each predictor was converted to a risk score and summation of scores from these predictors for each patient was calculated. The total risk score predicted the urgent direct CCFs correctly with AuROC of 97.77% (95% CI; 93.57, 100). Conclusion: The clinical risk score for the prediction of urgent direct CCFs has been developed and used in the patients with CCFs in our setting. The discriminative ability of the score prediction is high. This simple clinical risk score may help clinicians suspect direct CCFs and urgently refer the patients to have prompt angiography and treatment.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To compare the clinical characteristics of patients with direct and dural carotid cavernous sinus fistulas (CCFs). Methods: The medical records of 60 patients diagnosed with CCFs were retrospectively reviewed. The collected data included demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and ocular manifestation. The clinical characteristics of the direct and the dural CCFs were compared on head-to-head basis. Logistic regression analysis was used to demonstrate the direction and magnitude of the difference and reported as odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval. Results: There were 28 patients (46.67%) with direct CCFs, and 32 patients (53.33%) with dural CCFs. Patients with direct CCF were mostly male (p=0.023), younger age (p<0.001), had history of trauma (p<0.001), and more visual impairment at presentation (p=0.025), when compared to those with dural CCFs. In addition, patients with direct CCF had significantly more chemosis (p=0.005), proptosis (p=0.042), bruit (p<0.001) and dilated retinal vessels (p=0.008) than those with dural CCF. Thirty patients (50%) had increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Mean IOP of the affected eyes was significantly higher than the unaffected eyes (p<0.0001). In patients with normal IOP, mean IOP of the affected eyes was also higher than the unaffected eyes (p=0.0027). Conclusion: Patients with direct CCF were younger age, associated with trauma, and more visual impairment at presentation. Chemosis, proptosis, bruit and dilated retinal vessels were detected more in the direct CCF than the dural CCF. Despite normal IOP, affected eyes had significantly higher IOP than the unaffected eyes. Information on these clinical characteristics may be helpful in discrimination of the direct type, which is more urgent for further investigation and treatment.
