Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Exp Biol ; 225(13)2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35708202

ABSTRACT

Polarisation vision is commonplace among invertebrates; however, most experiments focus on determining behavioural and/or neurophysiological responses to static polarised light sources rather than moving patterns of polarised light. To address the latter, we designed a polarisation stimulation device based on superimposing polarised and non-polarised images from two projectors, which can display moving patterns at frame rates exceeding invertebrate flicker fusion frequencies. A linear polariser fitted to one projector enables moving patterns of polarised light to be displayed, whilst the other projector contributes arbitrary intensities of non-polarised light to yield moving patterns with a defined polarisation and intensity contrast. To test the device, we measured receptive fields of polarisation-sensitive Argynnis paphia butterfly photoreceptors for both non-polarised and polarised light. We then measured local motion sensitivities of the optic flow-sensitive lobula plate tangential cell H1 in Calliphora vicina blowflies under both polarised and non-polarised light, finding no polarisation sensitivity in this neuron.


Subject(s)
Butterflies , Optic Flow , Animals , Vision, Ocular
2.
FEBS Lett ; 594(24): 4381-4389, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979222

ABSTRACT

The P2X4 receptor (P2X4R) is an ATP-gated cation channel. Here, we used fast-scan atomic force microscopy (AFM) to visualize changes in the structure and mobility of individual P2X4Rs in response to activation. P2X4Rs were purified from detergent extracts of transfected cells and integrated into lipid bilayers. Activation resulted in a rapid (2 s) and substantial (10-20 nm2 ) increase in the cross-sectional area of the extracellular region of the receptor and a corresponding decrease in receptor mobility. Both effects were blocked by the P2X4R antagonist 5-BDBD. Addition of cholesterol to the bilayer reduced receptor mobility, although the ATP-induced reduction in mobility was still observed. We suggest that the observed responses to activation may have functional consequences for purinergic signalling.


Subject(s)
Movement , Receptors, Purinergic P2X4/chemistry , Receptors, Purinergic P2X4/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Animals , Cholesterol/metabolism , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Lipid Bilayers/chemistry , Lipid Bilayers/metabolism , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Rats , Receptors, Purinergic P2X4/isolation & purification , Receptors, Purinergic P2X4/ultrastructure , Signal Transduction
3.
Curr Biol ; 30(4): 645-656.e4, 2020 02 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31956029

ABSTRACT

Akin to all damselflies, Calopteryx (family Calopterygidae), commonly known as jewel wings or demoiselles, possess dichoptic (separated) eyes with overlapping visual fields of view. In contrast, many dragonfly species possess holoptic (dorsally fused) eyes with limited binocular overlap. We have here compared the neuronal correlates of target tracking between damselfly and dragonfly sister lineages and linked these changes in visual overlap to pre-motor neural adaptations. Although dragonflies attack prey dorsally, we show that demoiselles attack prey frontally. We identify demoiselle target-selective descending neurons (TSDNs) with matching frontal visual receptive fields, anatomically and functionally homologous to the dorsally positioned dragonfly TSDNs. By manipulating visual input using eyepatches and prisms, we show that moving target information at the pre-motor level depends on binocular summation in demoiselles. Consequently, demoiselles encode directional information in a binocularly fused frame of reference such that information of a target moving toward the midline in the left eye is fused with information of the target moving away from the midline in the right eye. This contrasts with dragonfly TSDNs, where receptive fields possess a sharp midline boundary, confining responses to a single visual hemifield in a sagittal frame of reference (i.e., relative to the midline). Our results indicate that, although TSDNs are conserved across Odonata, their neural inputs, and thus the upstream organization of the target tracking system, differ significantly and match divergence in eye design and predatory strategies. VIDEO ABSTRACT.


Subject(s)
Flight, Animal , Odonata/physiology , Predatory Behavior/physiology , Visual Fields/physiology , Animals
4.
J Neurosci ; 38(50): 10725-10733, 2018 12 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30373766

ABSTRACT

For many animals, target motion carries high ecological significance as this may be generated by a predator, prey, or potential mate. Indeed, animals whose survival depends on early target detection are often equipped with a sharply tuned visual system, yielding robust performance in challenging conditions. For example, many fast-flying insects use visual cues for identifying targets, such as prey (e.g., predatory dragonflies and robberflies) or conspecifics (e.g., nonpredatory hoverflies), and can often do so against self-generated background optic flow. Supporting these behaviors, the optic lobes of insects that pursue targets harbor neurons that respond robustly to the motion of small moving objects, even when displayed against syn-directional background clutter. However, in diptera, the encoding of target information by the descending neurons, which are more directly involved in generating the behavioral output, has received less attention. We characterized target-selective neurons by recording in the ventral nerve cord of male and female predatory Holcocephala fusca robberflies and of male nonpredatory Eristalis tenax hoverflies. We show that both species have dipteran target-selective descending neurons that only respond to target motion if the background is stationary or moving slowly, moves in the opposite direction, or has un-naturalistic spatial characteristics. The response to the target is suppressed when background and target move at similar velocities, which is strikingly different to the response of target neurons in the optic lobes. As the neurons we recorded from are premotor, our findings affect our interpretation of the neurophysiology underlying target-tracking behaviors.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Many animals use sensory cues to detect moving targets that may represent predators, prey, or conspecifics. For example, birds of prey show superb sensitivity to the motion of small prey, and intercept these at high speeds. In a similar manner, predatory insects visually track moving prey, often against cluttered backgrounds. Accompanying this behavior, the brains of insects that pursue targets contain neurons that respond exclusively to target motion. We here show that dipteran insects also have target-selective descending neurons in the part of their nervous system that corresponds to the vertebrate spinal cord. Surprisingly, and in contrast to the neurons in the brain, these premotor neurons are inhibited by background patterns moving in the same direction as the target.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Predatory Behavior/physiology , Visual Fields/physiology , Animals , Diptera , Female , Male , Odonata , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...