Patients, carers and healthcare providers' perspectives on a patient-owned surveillance system for diabetic foot ulcer care: A qualitative study.

Objective: Digital health has recently gained a foothold in monitoring and improving diabetes care. We aim to explore the views of patients, carers and healthcare providers (HCPs) regarding the use of a novel patient-owned wound surveillance application as part of outpatient management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with patients, carers and HCPs in wound care for DFUs. The participants were recruited from a primary care polyclinic network and two tertiary hospitals in Singapore, within the same healthcare cluster. Purposive maximum variation sampling was used to select participants with differing attributes to ensure heterogeneity. Common themes relating to the wound imaging app were captured. Results: A total of 20 patients, 5 carers and 20 HCPs participated in the qualitative study. None of the participants have used a wound imaging app before. Regarding a patient-owned wound surveillance app, all were open and receptive to the system and workflow for use in DFU care. Four major themes emerged from patients and carers: (1) technology, (2) application features and usability, (3) feasibility of using the wound imaging application and (4) logistics of care. Four major themes were identified from HCPs: (1) attitudes towards wound imaging app, (2) preferences regarding functionality, (3) perceived challenges for patients/carers and (4) perceived barriers for HCPs. Conclusion: Our study highlighted several barriers and facilitators from patients, carers and HCPs regarding the use of a patient-owned wound surveillance app. These findings demonstrate the potential of digital health and areas to improve and tailor a DFU wound app suitable for implementation in the local population.

Prospective study on the clinical and economic burden of venous leg ulcers in the tropics.

OBJECTIVE: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are both chronic and recurrent. The treatment of such ulcers often require multiple outpatient visits and dressing changes. Several reports on the costs of treating such VLUs have been reported in the west. We prospectively evaluated the clinical and economic burden of VLUs in a population of Asian patients in the tropics. METHODS: Patients from a prospective two-center study conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Singapore, as a part of the Wound Care Innovation in the Tropics program, between August 2018 and September 2021 were recruited. The patients were followed up for 12 weeks (visit 1 to visit 12), until index ulcer healing, death, or lost to follow-up (whichever came first). These patients were then followed up 12 weeks later to determine the longer term outcome of the wound (healed, recurrence, remained unhealed). The itemized costs derived from the medical service were retrieved from the relevant departments of the study sites. The patients' health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and the last visit of the 12-week follow-up period (or until index ulcer healing), using the official Singapore version of the EuroQol five-dimension-5L questionnaire, which also includes a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled; 63% were men, and the mean patient age was 64.7 years. Of the 116 patients, 85 (73%) had a healed ulcer at 24 weeks (mean duration to ulcer healing, 49 days), and 11 (12.9%) had experienced ulcer recurrence within the study period. Within the 6-month follow-up period, the mean direct healthcare cost per patient was USD$1998. The patients with healed ulcers had significantly lower costs per patient compared with those with unhealed ulcers (USD$1713 vs USD$2780). Regarding health-related quality of life, 71% of the patients had a lower quality of life at baseline, which had improved at 12 weeks of follow-up, with only 58% of the patients reported to have a lower quality of life. Also, the patients with healed ulcers scored higher for both utilities (societal preference weights) and EQ-VAS at follow-up (P < .001). In contrast, patients with unhealed ulcers only scored higher EQ-VAS at follow-up (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this exploratory study provide information on the clinical, quality of life, and economic burden of VLUs in an Asian population and suggest the importance of healing VLUs to reduce the effects on patients. The present study provides data as a basis for economic evaluation as a consideration for the treatment of VLUs.

Clinical and economic burden of diabetic foot ulcers: A 5-year longitudinal multi-ethnic cohort study from the tropics.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present a substantial clinical and economic burden to healthcare systems around the world, with significant reductions in quality of life for those affected. We aimed to analyse the clinical and economic burden of DFU via a 5-year longitudinal multi-ethnic cohort study. A longitudinal analysis of inpatient and outpatient DFUs data over 5 years from a university tertiary hospital in Singapore was performed. Data included baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, hospitalisation, and outpatient details. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional hazard models were performed. Patients treated for DFUs (n = 1729, mean patient age of 63·4 years) were assessed. The cohort consists of Chinese (61.4%), Malay (13.5%), and Indian (18.4%) patients. Common comorbidities included peripheral arterial disease (74.8%), peripheral neuropathy (14.5%), and a median haemoglobin A1c of 9.9%. Patients underwent toe(s) amputation (36.4%), transmetatarsal amputations (16.9%), or major amputations (6·5%). The mean length of inpatient stay for ulcer-only, minor amputation, and major amputation was 13.3, 20.5, and 59.6 days, respectively. Mean cost per patient-year was US $3368 (ulcer-only), US $10468 (minor amputation), and US $30131 (major amputation). Minor amputation-free survival was 80.9% at 1 year and 56.9% at 5 years, while major amputation-free survival was 97.4% at 1 year and 91.0% at 5 years. In conclusion, within our multi-ethnic cohort of patients from the tropics, there was significant clinical and economic burden of DFUs, with a high wound per patient ratio and escalating healthcare costs corresponding to more proximal amputation levels.

Cost utility analysis of end stage renal disease treatment in Ministry of Health dialysis centres, Malaysia: Hemodialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVES: In Malaysia, there is exponential growth of patients on dialysis. Dialysis treatment consumes a considerable portion of healthcare expenditure. Comparative assessment of their cost effectiveness can assist in providing a rational basis for preference of dialysis modalities. METHODS: A cost utility study of hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was conducted from a Ministry of Health (MOH) perspective. A Markov model was also developed to investigate the cost effectiveness of increasing uptake of incident CAPD to 55% and 60% versus current practice of 40% CAPD in a five-year temporal horizon. A scenario with 30% CAPD was also measured. The costs and utilities were sourced from published data which were collected as part of this study. The transitional probabilities and survival estimates were obtained from the Malaysia Dialysis and Transplant Registry (MDTR). The outcome measures were cost per life year (LY), cost per quality adjusted LY (QALY) and incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the Markov model. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: LYs saved for HD was 4.15 years and 3.70 years for CAPD. QALYs saved for HD was 3.544 years and 3.348 for CAPD. Cost per LY saved was RM39,791 for HD and RM37,576 for CAPD. The cost per QALY gained was RM46,595 for HD and RM41,527 for CAPD. The Markov model showed commencement of CAPD in 50% of ESRD patients as initial dialysis modality was very cost-effective versus current practice of 40% within MOH. Reduction in CAPD use was associated with higher costs and a small devaluation in QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest provision of both modalities is fiscally feasible; increasing CAPD as initial dialysis modality would be more cost-effective.

Health related quality of life of dialysis patients in Malaysia: Haemodialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important predictor of clinical outcomes for End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients and to establish quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for economic evaluation studies. This study aims to measure the health utilities and to identify socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with HRQOL for haemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in Malaysia. METHODS: A total of 141 patients (77 HD and 64 CAPD) from 1 federal and four state hospitals participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients were randomly selected from the National Renal Registry (NRR) using a stratified random sampling. The EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire was used to measure HRQOL. Variables investigated include dialysis modalities, sociodemographic characteristics, co-morbidities and biochemical markers. Utilities are measured on an ordinal scale of 0-1, where 1 indicates full health and 0 indicates death. RESULTS: The mean utility scores were 0.854 ± 0.181 and 0.905 ± 0.124 (p > 0.05) and the mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were 76.2 ± 12.90 and 77.1 ± 10.26 (p > 0.05) for HD and CAPD patients respectively. There was a significant difference in problems reported between HD (35.1%) and CAPD (15.6%) on usual activities dimension (p = 0.009). The proportion of patients having problems in the pain/discomfort domain in both modalities was high (34.0%). Haemoglobin (< 10 g/dL) (p = 0.003), number of co-morbidities ≥3 (p = 0.004) and wheelchair-bound status (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of poor HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: The present cross-sectional study shows that CAPD patients have a higher utility index score than HD patients but this was not statistically significant. The utilities index score may be used to calculate QALYs.

Dialysis Provision and Implications of Health Economics on Peritoneal Dialysis Utilization: A Review from a Malaysian Perspective.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is managed by either lifesaving hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) or a kidney transplant. In Malaysia, the prevalence of dialysis-treated ESRD patients has shown an exponential growth from 504 per million population (pmp) in 2005 to 1155 pmp in 2014. There were 1046 pmp patients on HD and 109 pmp patients on PD in 2014. Kidney transplants are limited due to lack of donors. Malaysia adopts public-private financing model for dialysis. Majority of HD patients were treated in the private sector but almost all PD patients were treated in government facilities. Inequality in access to dialysis is visible within geographical regions where majority of HD centres are scattered around developed areas. The expenditure on dialysis has been escalating in recent years but economic evaluations of dialysis modalities are scarce. Evidence shows that health policies and reimbursement strategies influence dialysis provision. Increased uptake of PD can produce significant economic benefits and improve patients' access to dialysis. As a result, some countries implemented a PD-First or Favored Policy to expand PD use. Thus, a current comparative costs analysis of dialysis is strongly recommended to assist decision-makers to establish a more equitable and economically sustainable dialysis provision in the future.