Headache after concussion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic post-traumatic headache attributed to mild head injury is a somewhat disputed headache diagnosis. A main object of this study was to assess the validity of this diagnosis by studying the headache pattern of concussed patients that participated in one historic (n = 131) and one prospective cohort (n = 217) study. METHODS: Head injury patients were recruited from two hospitals in Kaunas, Lithuania. Controls were recruited amongst patients with minor orthopaedic traumas not involving the head and neck. RESULTS: When data from the two studies were pooled, no difference in any headache category (diagnosis, attack frequency, symptoms) was found one or more years after the trauma, except that photophobia was somewhat more prevalent amongst the concussed patients. In both injury groups, the existence of pre-traumatic headache was a predictor of post-traumatic headache, although pre-traumatic headache seems to have been underreported amongst the concussed patients. There was a significant negative correlation between the duration of unconsciousness and the headache. CONCLUSIONS: This negative correlation, and the lack of specificity indicates that headache occurring 3 months or more after concussion is not caused by the head or brain injury. Rather it may represent an episode of one of the primary headaches, possibly induced by the stress of the situation.

Examination of the diagnostic validity of 'headache attributed to whiplash injury': a controlled, prospective study.

Acute and chronic headache attributed to whiplash injury are new diagnostic entities in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition. A main objective of the present study was to assess the validity of these nosologic entities by studying the headache pattern in an inception cohort of 210 rear-end car collision victims and in 210 matched controls. Consecutive drivers involved in rear-end collisions were identified from the daily records of the Traffic Police Department of Kaunas, Lithuania. A standard self-report questionnaire was sent to the drivers between 2 and 7 days after the collision, and their passengers were recruited as well. Headache and neck pain were evaluated within 7 days of the collision, at 2 months and 1 year after the collision. A control group of non-traumatized subjects received questionnaires at the time of the selection and 1 year later. Of the 75 collision victims who developed headache within the first 7 days of the collision, 37 had a clinical picture in accordance with the criteria for acute whiplash headache (i.e., concomitant neck pain) and 38 did not. For acute headache after collision, concomitant neck pain was of no relevance to the headache type or its course. In both these subgroups, migraine and tension-type headache could be diagnosed in similar proportions and the prognosis after 2 months and 1 year was also similar. Preexisting headache was a strong prognostic factor in both groups for both acute and chronic pain. Compared with the non-traumatized control group, the 1-year incidence of new or worsened headache, or of headache improvement, was the same. A likely interpretation of the data is that acute headaches after rear-end car collisions mainly represent episodes of a primary headache precipitated by the stress of the situation. We conclude that the nosologic validity of both acute and chronic whiplash headache is poor as the headaches, in accordance with the criteria lack distinguishing clinical features and have the same prognosis compared with headaches in a control group.

A controlled prospective inception cohort study on the post-concussion syndrome outside the medicolegal context.

In an earlier historical cohort study on the post-concussion syndrome (PCS) in Lithuania, a country in which there are few confounding factors, the validity of this condition as a disease entity could not be confirmed. In order to register the post-traumatic symptoms, the influence of sociodemographic factors, and the effect of expectation on these symptoms more reliably, we performed a controlled prospective study. Three hundred subjects with concussion were followed up with repeated questionnaires for 1 year. For each study subject, a sex- and age-matched control person with minor non-head injury was identified. These controls received similar questionnaires. Headache both after 3 months and after 1 year did not differ significantly between the head-injured participants and the non-head-injured controls. Several other symptoms attributed to PCS did not differ significantly between the groups after 3 months. After 1 year the vast majority of symptoms did not differ significantly. Exceptions were slightly significant differences concerning memory problems, concentration problems, dizziness and tiredness. These differences were insignificant when analysing symptoms in unmarried and/or people with lower education, separately. No relationship between cognitive dysfunction and the severity of concussion was found. Although the possibility of a mild organic brain injury cannot be completely ruled out, our results cast doubt on the validity of PCS as a useful clinical entity, at least for head injuries with loss of consciousness for <15 min. Sociodemographic factors and expectation seem to influence reporting of symptoms after concussion.

A controlled historical cohort study on the post-concussion syndrome.

In Lithuania, expectation of chronic symptoms after minor head injury is less than in western countries and possibilities for monetary compensation are minimal. Therefore, an opportunity exists to study the post-concussion syndrome (PCS) without several confounding factors present in western societies. We sent questionnaires about symptoms attributed to PCS to 200 subjects who had a concussion with loss of consciousness between 35 and 22 months before the study. For each study subject, a sex- and age-matched control person with minor non-head injury was identified. These controls received similar questionnaires. All the responding post-concussion patients stated that they had had acute headache after the trauma but this headache had disappeared in 96% of cases within 1 month. Headache and dizziness at the time of the questioning were not significantly more prevalent in the patients with concussion than in the controls, and there was no significant difference concerning subjective cognitive dysfunction. Scores of visual analogue scales of symptoms attributed to PCS showed no significant differences except for depression, alcohol intolerance and worry about brain injury, which were more frequent in the concussion group. No specific effect of the head injury was detected when various definitions and different constellations of core symptoms of PCS were used. These findings question the validity of the PCS as a useful clinical entity.

Headache after whiplash: a historical cohort study outside the medico-legal context.

Headache is frequently reported as a chronic complaint after whiplash traumas. Criteria have been presented, but it has not been validated whether any specific headache type emerges after a trauma with whiplash mechanism. In a questionnaire-based historical cohort design, 202 adult Lithuanian individuals were interviewed 1-3 years after experiencing a rear-end car collision. The questionnaire was designed so that a diagnosis of migraine and tension-type headache in accordance with the International Headache Society criteria could be made. "Possible cervicogenic headache" was diagnosed according to Sjaastad et al.'s minimal criteria. The diagnostic panorama in those with traumas was compared with that of an age- and sex-matched control group. The introductory questions did not reveal differences in headache frequencies between the traumatized and control groups (p = 0.60). The prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache (both episodic and chronic) was also similar. A higher frequency of possible cervicogenic headache was observed in the traumatized group (10 vs 5), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.28). Sixteen patients in the accident group had headache > 15 days per month, 11 of the 16 had similar complaints before the trauma, while 5 had worsened headache as compared to (the recollected headache) before the trauma. None of the patients with possible cervicogenic headache reported increased headache after the accident. Accordingly, the present results obtained outside the medico-legal context do not confirm that a specific headache pattern emerges 1-3 years after a rear-end car collision.

Natural evolution of late whiplash syndrome outside the medicolegal context.

BACKGROUND: In Lithuania, few car drivers and passengers are covered by insurance and there is little awareness among the general public about the potentially disabling consequences of a whiplash injury. We took this opportunity to study the natural course of head and neck symptoms after rear-end car collisions. METHODS: In a retrospective questionnaire-based cohort study, 202 individuals (157 men; 45 women) were identified from the records of the traffic police department in Kaunas, Lithuania. These individuals were interviewed 1-3 years after experiencing a rear-end car collision. Neck pain, headache, subjective cognitive dysfunction, psychological disorders, and low back pain in this group were compared with the same complaints in a sex-matched and age-matched control group of uninjured individuals selected randomly from the population register of the same geographic area. FINDINGS: Neck pain was reported by 71 (35% [95% CI 29-42]) accident victims and 67 (33% [27-40]) controls. Headache was reported by 107 (53% [46-60]) accident victims and 100 (50% [42-57]) controls. Chronic neck pain and chronic headache (more than 7 days per month) were also reported in similar proportions (17 [8.4%; 5-13] vs 14 [6.9%; 4-12] and 19 [9.4%; 6-15] vs 12 [5.9%; 3-10]) by the two groups. Of those who reported chronic neck pain or daily headache after the accident, substantial proportions had had similar symptoms before the accident (7/17 for chronic neck pain; 10/12 for daily headache). There was no significant difference found. No one in the study group had disabling or persistent symptoms as a result of the car accident. There was no relation between the impact severity and degree of pain. A family history of neck pain was the most important risk factor for current neck symptoms in logistic regression analyses. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that chronic symptoms were not usually caused by the car accident. Expectation of disability, a family history, and attribution of pre-existing symptoms to the trauma may be more important determinants for the evolution of the late whiplash syndrome.