Dyspnea-induced Limitation (DYSLIM), a new self-administered concise questionnaire to evaluate dyspnea-related activity limitation in chronic respiratory diseases.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Few questionnaires are available for routine assessment of dyspnea. The study aimed to design a self-administered questionnaire assessing the impact of chronic dyspnea on daily activities, named DYSLIM (Dyspnea-induced Limitation). METHODS: The development followed 4 steps: 1: selection of relevant activities and related questions (focus groups); 2: clinical study: internal and concurrent validity vs. modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ); 3: item reduction; 4: responsiveness. Eighteen activities (from eating to climbing stairs) were considered with 5 modalities for each: doing the task slowly, taking breaks, seeking assistance, changing habits, and activity avoidance. Each modality was graded from 5 (never) to 1 (very often). Validation study included 194 patients: COPD (FEV1 ≥ 50% pred: n = 40; FEV1 < 50% pred: n = 65); cystic fibrosis (n = 30), interstitial lung disease (n = 30), pulmonary hypertension (n = 29). Responsiveness was evaluated by post-pulmonary rehabilitation data in 52 COPD patients. RESULTS: Acceptability was high and short term (7 days) reproducibility was satisfactory (Kappa mostly above 0.7). Concurrent validity was high vs. mMRC (Spearman correlation coefficient, r = 0.71), BDI (r = - 0.75) and SGRQ (r = - 0.79). The reduced questionnaire with 8 activities (from cleaning to climbing stairs) and 3 modalities (slowly, seeking help, changing habits) showed a comparable validity and was chosen as the final short version. Effect size of rehabilitation was good for both the full (0.57) and short (0.51) versions. A significant correlation was also found between changes of SGRQ and DYSLIM post rehabilitation: r = - 0.68 and r = - 0.60 for full and reduced questionnaires, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DYSLIM questionnaire appears promising for the evaluation of dyspnea-induced limitations in chronic respiratory diseases and seems suitable for use in various contexts.

Relationship between gender and survival in a real-life cohort of patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Although COPD affects both men and women, its prevalence is increasing more rapidly in women. Disease outcomes appear different among women with more frequent dyspnea and anxiety or depression but whether this translates into a different prognosis remains to be determined. Our aim was to assess whether the greater clinical impact of COPD in women was associated with differences in 3-year mortality rates. METHODS: In the French Initiatives BPCO real-world cohort, 177 women were matched up to 458 menon age (within 5-year intervals) and FEV1 (within 5% predicted intervals). 3-year mortality rate and survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: For a given age and level of airflow obstruction, women with COPD had more severe dyspnea, lower BMI, and were more likely to exhibit anxiety. Nevertheless, three-year mortality rate was comparable among men and women, respectively 11.2 and 10.8%. In a multivariate model, the only factors significantly associated with mortality were dyspnea and malnutrition but not gender. CONCLUSION: Although women with COPD experience higher levels of dyspnea and anxiety than men at comparable levels of age and FEV1, these differences do not translate into variations in 3-year mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 04-479.

Minimal clinically important difference of 3-minute chair rise test and the DIRECT questionnaire after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: The 3-minute chair rise test (3-minute CRT) and the Disability Related to COPD Tool (DIRECT) are two reproducible and valid short tests that can assess the benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in terms of functional capacity and dyspnea in everyday activities. METHODS: We determined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the DIRECT questionnaire and 3-minute CRT using distribution methods and anchor encroaches with a panel of eight standard tests in a cohort of 116 COPD patients who completed a PR program in real-life settings. RESULTS: The estimated MCID for the 3-minute CRT and DIRECT scores was five repetitions and two units, respectively, using separate and combined independent anchors. The all-patient (body mass index-obstruction-dyspnea-exercise [BODE] scores 0-7), BODE 0-2 (n=42), and BODE 3-4 (n=50) groups showed improvements greater than the MCID in most tests and questionnaires used. In contrast, the BODE 5-7 group (n=24) showed improvements greater than MCID in only the 3-minute CRT, 6-minute walk test, endurance exercise test, and DIRECT questionnaire. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the short and simple DIRECT questionnaire and 3-minute CRT are responsive to capture the beneficial effects of a PR program in COPD patients, including those with severe disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03286660.

Impact of gender on COPD expression in a real-life cohort.

Reports regarding gender-related differences in COPD expression have provided conflicting results. In the French Initiatives BPCO real-world cohort, which contained 688 patients (146 women) when data were extracted, women were matched with men (1:3 ratio: n = 107:275) on age (5-year intervals) and FEV1 (5% predicted intervals) and comparisons were performed using univariate logistic regressions. For a given age and level of airflow obstruction, women with COPD had higher BOD scores due to more pronounced dyspnea and lower BMI, suggesting worse prognosis, and were more likely to exhibit anxiety, suggesting the need for specific assessment and care.

Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.

The aim was to study the overall content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes from a global perspective in order to get an initial appraisal on the degree of heterogeneity worldwide. A 12-question survey on content and organisational aspects was completed by representatives of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes that had previously participated in the European Respiratory Society (ERS) COPD Audit. Moreover, all ERS members affiliated with the ERS Rehabilitation and Chronic Care and/or Physiotherapists Scientific Groups, all members of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and all American Thoracic Society Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly members were asked to complete the survey via multiple e-mailings. The survey has been completed by representatives of 430 centres from 40 countries. The findings demonstrate large differences among pulmonary rehabilitation programmes across continents for all aspects that were surveyed, including the setting, the case mix of individuals with a chronic respiratory disease, composition of the pulmonary rehabilitation team, completion rates, methods of referral and types of reimbursement. The current findings stress the importance of future development of processes and performance metrics to monitor pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, to be able to start international benchmarking, and to provide recommendations for international standards based on evidence and best practice.