GnRH agonists in the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: a review.

The development of highly potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) allowed for a significant addition to options for the medical management of symptomatic endometriosis. Pituitary GnRH receptor down-regulation leads to a hypogonadotropic and secondary hypoestrogenic state resulting in lesion regression and symptom improvement. There may be an additional effect of these agents on the inflammatory processes associated with endometriosis as well. This is a review of critical milestones in the clinical application of these agents. Most initial trials of various GnRHa employed danazol as a control and demonstrated general equivalence in reducing symptoms and extent of lesions but without hyperandrogenic side effects and adverse metabolic changes induced by the latter. Short-acting GnRHa is administered intranasally or subcutaneously. Longer-acting preparations are administered intramuscularly or as subcutaneous implants. GnRHa also decrease symptom recurrence rates after surgical management. The hypoestrogenic side effects, including bone mineral density loss and vasomotor symptoms, have limited the duration of use of these agents alone to six months. The use of an appropriate add-back allows for the mitigation of side effects while maintaining efficacy and allowing extension of use for up to 12 months. There is a limited amount of data regarding the use of GnRHa in adolescents out of concern for the effect on developing bone. These agents should be used with caution in this group. The lack of dose flexibility, need for parental administration, and side effect profiles represent drawbacks to GnRHa use. The development of oral GnRH antagonists with short half-lives, variable dosing, and decreased side effects represents an exciting alternative.

Real-World Characterization of Women with Diagnosed Endometriosis Initiating Therapy with Elagolix Using a US Claims Database.

PURPOSE: Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist approved in the United States for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. We performed a real-world evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis who were initiating elagolix therapy in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort database analysis included women 18-49 years of age with ≥1 pharmacy claim for elagolix between August 2018 and December 2019 from the Copyright © 2020 Truven Health Analytics LLC. All Rights Reserved. Women had continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment during the baseline period (year immediately preceding the index date [date of earliest elagolix claim]) and had ≥1 medical claim with endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 code [617.x and N80.x]) on or before the index date. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, ICD code-based endometriosis anatomic site, endometriosis-related treatments, and pain symptoms were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: The study included 2083 patients with mean age at baseline of 33.2 ± 8.1 years. Comorbidities most commonly recorded were non-cancer, non-endometriosis pain (59.5%), including arthritis/joint pain (43.7%) and back/neck pain (31.7%), and mental disorder (40.7%), including anxiety (32.7%). The majority of endometriosis diagnosis codes recorded referred to unspecified location (52.3%) and pelvic peritoneum (23.0%); 61.0% of patients received a medical endometriosis-related treatment in the baseline period, with the most common treatments being contraceptives (various routes of administration, 40.2%) and progestins (31.7%). Additionally, 35.4% of the patients received an endometriosis-related surgery during baseline, with the most common being laparoscopy (33.2% of all patients). Opioids were used during the baseline period by 57.3% of the patients. For pain symptoms, 71.5%, 30.4%, and 19.3% of the patients had claims for pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis therapies were used by a significant proportion of patients with endometriosis in the year immediately preceding elagolix initiation.

Patients' perspectives of endometriosis-related fatigue: qualitative interviews.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-related fatigue is common and negatively impacts multiple areas of many women's lives, particularly in day-to-day activities, social activities, physical activities, mood and emotions, relationships with family or partners, and work or school. Multiple studies have documented fatigue as a significant symptom of endometriosis. Additional research is needed to better understand endometriosis-related fatigue and its impacts on patients. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of individual in-person semistructured interviews conducted with 22 adult females reporting moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain. Women with self-reported, surgically confirmed endometriosis and moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain were recruited from qualitative research firms in two locations in the United States. Qualified subjects participated in semistructured interviews that lasted approximately 45 min each. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: All 22 participants reported experiencing fatigue related to their endometriosis. While the degree of severity of their endometriosis-related fatigue varied, 21 of the 22 participants stated that it was at least "somewhat bothersome." Most participants noted an impact from endometriosis-related fatigue on day-to-day activities, social activities, physical activities, mood and emotions, relationships with family or partner, and work or school. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented here indicate that endometriosis-related fatigue has a pervasive impact on the functioning of women living with this condition. Future studies should measure any changes in fatigue that may be associated with treatment for endometriosis.

Achieving clinically meaningful response in endometriosis pain symptoms is associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and work productivity: analysis of 2 phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-related pain symptoms have a negative impact on health-related quality of life and productivity. In fact, as endometriosis-related symptom severity and the number of symptoms experienced increases, health-related quality of life decreases. Dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain are prominent symptoms experienced by women with endometriosis and were shown to have improved with the oral, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, elagolix. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this post hoc analysis was to address the question of if patients show a clinical response (in dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain), do they also have improvements in health-related quality of life and in productivity? STUDY DESIGN: This post hoc analysis used data from the Elaris Endometriosis-I and Elaris Endometriosis-II phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. A surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (in the past 10 years), premenopausal, aged 18-49 years, and moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were among the inclusion criteria for both trials. Women self-reported pain daily using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain); daily pain was assigned to either dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain based on self-reported bleeding on that particular day. In addition, their self-reported endometriosis-associated pain must have been an average of moderate or severe during the month leading to baseline for inclusion in the trial program. Patients were characterized as achieving a clinical response for dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain (ie, responder or nonresponder), which was defined as women who did not have an increase in analgesic use and who met the pain reduction score threshold at month 3. Pain reduction score thresholds were defined separately for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in the trial using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30; work productivity was assessed using the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire. RESULTS: Women enrolled in Elaris Endometriosis-I (n = 871) and Elaris Endometriosis-II (n = 815) were included in this analysis. Patients with a clinical response during treatment to dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain also experienced a meaningful improvement in all domains of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 at month 3. Patients who did not show a dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain clinical response at month 3 did not exhibit mean improvements in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 domain scores that indicate an Endometriosis Health Profile-30 responder. Productivity improved among dysmenorrhea clinical responders. In the Elaris Endometriosis-I study, clinical responders lost a total of 5.9 hours compared with a total of 13.0 hours for nonresponders of employment-related work at month 3 (P < .0001). Among women in the Elaris Endometriosis-II study, a total of 4.1 hours and 10.4 employment-related hours were lost at month 3 for dysmenorrhea responders vs nonresponders (P < .001). Similar results were obtained when analyzed by non-enstrual pelvic pain responder status. CONCLUSION: Women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain, who are clinical responders based on dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain, also experience significant and clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life and productivity as measured by the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire, respectively.

Impact of Elagolix on Workplace and Household Productivity Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis profoundly impairs women's workplace and household productivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of elagolix on endometriosis-related workplace and household productivity losses. METHODS: Data were pooled from two phase III trials of women aged 18-49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain treated for 6 months with elagolix 150 mg daily (QD), 200 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo. The Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire was administered at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6 to determine workplace and household absenteeism and presenteeism. Productivity changes from baseline were compared between placebo and elagolix doses via analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Workplace analyses included 1270 employed women and household analyses included 1565 women. At baseline, women reported average weekly losses of 16 workplace hours, 8.3 household work hours, 45% of scheduled work, and 64% of planned household chores. At Month 6, treatment with elagolix 150 mg QD or 200 mg BID increased productive workplace hours by 1.7 (95% CI 0.1-3.4; p = 0.041) and 5.4 h (95% CI 3.7-7.1; p < 0.001) relative to placebo, corresponding to gains of 5.2% (95% CI 0.7-9.7; p = 0.022) and 14.6% (95% CI 10.0-19.1; p < 0.001) of scheduled work, respectively. Both elagolix doses improved household productivity at Month 6 by 1.7 (95% CI 0.7-2.7) and 3.1 (95% CI 2.1-4.0) hours relative to placebo (both p < 0.001), with increases of 8.8% (95% CI 3.5-14.1; p = 0.001) and 20.4% (95% CI 15.1-25.6; p < 0.001) of planned household work. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with elagolix improved endometriosis-related workplace and household productivity impairments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ELARIS EM-I (NCT01620528) and ELARIS EM-II (NCT01931670).

Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated with Endometriosis Among Women with Medicaid Insurance.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a painful chronic inflammatory disease caused by endometrial tissue implanting and growing outside the uterus, resulting in pelvic pain symptoms and subfertility. Treatment imposes a substantial economic burden on the patient and health care system. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate direct health care utilization and costs among women newly diagnosed with endometriosis compared with age-matched controls in a U.S. Medicaid population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified health care claims from the 2007-2015 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database. Women (aged 18-49 years) newly diagnosed with endometriosis (ICD-9-CM 617.xx) during January 2008 through September 2014 were identified (date of first diagnosis = index date). Age-matched women without endometriosis (controls) were selected from the database and assigned index dates matching the distribution for endometriosis patients. Direct health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs (medical and pharmacy) over the 12-month post-index period (2015 U.S. dollars) were computed by service category (hospitalization, emergency room visits, outpatient services, and prescriptions) and compared between study cohorts using the chi-square test for proportions and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: The final sample included 15,615 endometriosis patients and 86,829 matched controls. HCRU during the 12-month post-index follow-up period was significantly higher for endometriosis cases compared with controls in all measured categories. Hospital admissions occurred among 33.1% of cases and 7.2% of controls, and 65.8% of endometriosis patients were admitted for endometriosis-related surgery. Emergency room visits occurred in 71.5% of cases, and 42.2% of controls. Mean (SD) office visits were 10.4 (8.5) for endometriosis patients and 5.1 (6.9) for controls. Endometriosis patients had significantly more prescription claims than controls, 45.9 (42.0) versus 25.1 (39.1). Mean total direct health care costs were $13,670 ($29,843) for cases versus $5,779 ($23,614) for controls. All differences between cases and controls were significant at P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs and resource utilization in all measured categories were higher among endometriosis cases than controls. The economic burden of endometriosis among patients with Medicaid insurance is substantial, underscoring the unmet medical need for earlier diagnosis and cost-effective treatments. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AbbVie and conducted by Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company. AbbVie participated in developing the study design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and revisions, and approval for publication. Soliman and Vora are employees of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock/stock options. Surrey has served in a consulting role on research to AbbVie and is on the speaker bureau for Ferring Laboratories. Bonafede and Nelson are employees of Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company, which received compensation from AbbVie for the overall conduct of the study and preparation of the manuscript. Agarwal has served in a consulting role on research to AbbVie. Preliminary results of this study were previously presented in a podium session at the 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Scientific Congress and Expo; October 28-November 1, 2017; San Antonio, TX.

Impact of elagolix treatment on fatigue experienced by women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist, for the reduction of fatigue in women with moderate or severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase III trial. SETTING: Clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 860 women treated with elagolix or placebo. INTERVENTION(S): Women received either elagolix at 150 mg daily (QD) orally, elagolix at 200 mg twice daily (BID) orally, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Change from baseline to month 1, 3, and 6 visits, in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 6a questionnaire T-scores. RESULTS(S): At baseline, 54%-74% of women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis reported having fatigue-related issues "quite a bit" or "very much," depending on the question asked. Fatigue extent was reduced to 29%-43% and 14%-29% for women treated with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively, at 6 months, compared with 35%-50% with placebo. The resultant decrease in fatigue T-scores was significant after elagolix treatment compared with placebo at 6 months, with changes of -2.21 and -5.90 with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively. Significant reduction in fatigue scores were observed among patients reporting clinically meaningful response "reduction" in dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyspareunia (-7.31, -6.62, and -4.31, respectively) compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSION(S): In women with moderate to severe endometriosis related pain, elagolix significantly reduces fatigue levels.

Development of the Painful Periods Screening Tool for endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic delay is common in endometriosis. There is an unmet need for a symptom-based, patient-completed screening tool to facilitate discussions between patients and physicians about potential endometriosis symptoms. The objective of this study was to develop and assess the patient-completed Painful Periods Screening Tool (PPST) to assess the presence of potential endometriosis symptoms. METHODS: To develop and refine the PPST, a cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted with women with endometriosis and healthy controls. Following identification of potentially relevant concepts in the literature and input from clinical experts, a draft version of the PPST was tested during in-depth individual interviews with 16 women: 11 with endometriosis and 5 healthy controls. RESULTS: The six draft items of the PPST were refined iteratively in two rounds of interviews, and one item was deleted following the second set of interviews. All concepts included in the final five-item PPST were found to be relevant to women with endometriosis, and all 11 participants with endometriosis endorsed at least one of the items. No core symptoms of endometriosis were noted as missing from the PPST. CONCLUSION: The PPST assesses the most important endometriosis-related symptoms and may help facilitate discussions between patients and physicians, promoting earlier diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis.

Risk of Developing Comorbidities Among Women with Endometriosis: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis has been associated with higher rates of various chronic conditions, but its epidemiological data are fragmented and dated. We sought to compare the incidence of developing commonly occurring comorbidities among patients with and without endometriosis in a large, contemporary patient cohort that reflects real-world clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of women aged 18-49 with incident endometriosis was extracted from the 2006-2015 de-identified Clinformatics® DataMart commercial insurance claims database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN). Endometriosis was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 617.x on ≥1 inpatient or emergency department claim or ≥2 outpatient claims. Nonendometriosis control patients were exactly matched 4:1 to cases based on state, insurance plan type, and age (±1 year). Based on a literature review and expert consultation, 22 comorbidities were identified for analysis. The risk of developing a comorbidity post-index date was analyzed with stratified Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 26,961 cases and 107,844 controls. Mean age was 36 years. The adjusted risk of developing a comorbid condition among endometriosis cases was statistically significantly higher than the matched controls for all 22 comorbidities (p ≤ 0.001) and was at least twice as large for nine comorbidities (infertility/subfertility, ovarian cyst, uterine fibroids, pelvic inflammatory disorder, interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, constipation/dyschezia, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer). CONCLUSION: The incidence of developing many comorbidities was significantly higher among endometriosis patients compared with matched women without endometriosis. Additional research is needed to establish the implications for healthcare resource use.

Reintervention Rates After Myomectomy, Endometrial Ablation, and Uterine Artery Embolization for Patients with Uterine Fibroids.

BACKGROUND: Women with uterine fibroids (UF) may undergo less invasive procedures than hysterectomy, including myomectomy, endometrial ablation (EA), and uterine artery embolization (UAE); however, long-term need for reintervention is not well characterized. We estimated reintervention rates for 5 years and identified predictors of reintervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective cohort study was conducted in women in MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (Truven Health Analytics) aged 18-49 years with UF diagnosis before myomectomy, EA, or UAE from 2008 to 2014. Patients were categorized by initial procedure (index date) and required to have ≥12 months of continuous coverage before and after. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival without reintervention and hazard of reintervention for 5 years. RESULTS: The study included 35,631 women with myomectomy (n = 13,804: 8,018 abdominal, 941 hysteroscopic, and 4,845 laparoscopic), EA (n = 17,198), and UAE (n = 4,629). Myomectomy had the lowest 12-month reintervention rate (4.2%), followed by UAE (7.0%), then EA (12.4%; both p < 0.001 relative of myomectomy). Estimates of 5-year reintervention rates were 19% for myomectomy (17%, 28%, and 20% for abdominal, hysteroscopic, and laparoscopic, respectively), 33% for EA, and 24% for UAE. EA and UAE had adjusted hazard ratios of 2.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-2.83) and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.42-1.72). Prior anemia, bleeding, pelvic inflammatory disease, and abdominal and pelvic pain increased the hazard of reintervention. CONCLUSION: Reintervention rate estimates ranged from 17% to 33% for 5 years after myomectomy, EA, and UAE for patients with UF. Risk of requiring reintervention should be considered during treatment selection.

Arcuate uterus: is there an impact on in vitro fertilization outcomes after euploid embryo transfer?

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of the arcuate uterus on euploid blastocyst-stage embryo transfer outcomes after comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS). DESIGN: Controlled retrospective trial. SETTING: Tertiary care assisted reproduction technology (ART) center. PATIENT(S): Consecutive patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and euploid embryo transfer after CCS during 2014. INTERVENTION(S): Ultrasound examinations and office hysteroscopy; array comparative genomic hybridization to perform CCS after a trophectoderm biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation and live-birth rates. RESULT(S): Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of arcuate uterus. Exclusion criteria were donor oocytes, evidence of other endometrial cavitary abnormalities, prior uterine surgery, and arcuate uterus <4 mm. Group 1 included 78 patients with arcuate uterus of mean depth 5.43 ± 1.81 mm (range: 4-9.5 mm) undergoing 83 transfer cycles. Group 2 included 354 controls undergoing 378 transfer cycles. There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics or mean number of euploid embryos transferred. Cycle outcomes were similar between the two groups: rates of implantation (63.7% vs. 65.4%), live birth (68.67% vs. 67.81%), biochemical pregnancy (8.4% vs. 7.65%), and spontaneous abortion (4.8% vs. 4.27%). CONCLUSION(S): Arcuate uterus has no impact on ART outcomes after euploid embryo transfer subsequent to CCS, so arcuate uterus should be considered an incidental finding without an indication for surgical resection.

Changes in Healthcare Spending After Diagnosis of Comorbidities Among Endometriosis Patients: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to characterize changes in healthcare spending associated with the onset of 22 endometriosis-related comorbidities. METHODS: Women aged 18-49 years with endometriosis (N = 180,278) were extracted from 2006-2015 de-identified Clinformatics® DataMart claims data. For 22 comorbidities, comorbidity patients were identified on the basis of having a first comorbidity diagnosis after their initial endometriosis diagnosis. Controls were identified on the basis of having no comorbidity diagnosis and were matched 1:1 to comorbidity patients on demographics and baseline spending. Total medical and pharmacy spending was measured during 12 months before and after each patient's index date (first comorbidity diagnosis for comorbidity patients, and equal number of days after earliest endometriosis claim for controls). Pre-post spending differences were compared using difference-in-differences linear regression. Total and comorbidity-related cumulative spending per patient for all endometriosis patients were calculated annually for the 5 years following endometriosis diagnosis. RESULTS: The number of endometriosis patients with each comorbidity varied between 121 for endometrial cancer and 16,177 for fatigue. Healthcare spending increased significantly with the onset of eight comorbidities: breast cancer, ovarian cancer, pregnancy complications, systemic lupus erythematosus/rheumatoid arthritis/Sjogren's/multiple sclerosis, infertility, uterine fibroids, ovarian cyst, and headache [p < 0.001 except for headache (p = 0.045)]. Spending decreased significantly for fatigue, cystitis/UTI, and eczema [p < 0.001 except for fatigue (p = 0.048)] and was not statistically different for the other 11 comorbidities. Difference-in-differences estimates were significantly higher for comorbidity patients for all comorbidities except eczema (p ≤ 0.003). Mean 5-year total cumulative spending was $58,191 per endometriosis patient, of which between 11% and 23% was attributable to comorbidity-related medical claims. CONCLUSION: For all but one of the 22 comorbidities associated with endometriosis, comorbidity onset was associated with a relative increase in total healthcare spending. FUNDING: AbbVie Inc.

Treatment Patterns, Complications, and Health Care Utilization Among Endometriosis Patients Undergoing a Laparoscopy or a Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy and laparoscopy are common surgical procedures used for the treatment of endometriosis. This study compares outcomes for women who received either procedure within the first year post initial surgery. METHODS: The study used data from the Truven Health MarketScan claims databases from 2004 to 2013 to identify women aged 18-49 years who received an endometriosis-related laparoscopy or hysterectomy. Patients were excluded if they did not have continuous insurance coverage from 1 year before through 1 year after their endometriosis-related procedure, if they were diagnosed with uterine fibroids prior to or on the date of surgery (i.e., index date), or if they had a hysterectomy prior to the index date. The descriptive analyses examined differences between patients with an endometriosis-related laparoscopy or hysterectomy in regard to medications prescribed, complications, and hospitalizations during the immediate year post procedure. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 24,915 women who underwent a hysterectomy and 37,308 who underwent a laparoscopy. Results revealed significant differences between the cohorts, with women who received a laparoscopy more likely to be prescribed a GnRH agonist, progestin, danazol, or an opioid analgesic in the immediate year post procedure compared to women who underwent a hysterectomy. In contrast, women who underwent a hysterectomy generally had higher complication rates. Index hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) were higher for women who had a hysterectomy, while post-index hospitalization rates and LOS were higher for women who had a laparoscopy. For both cohorts, post-procedure complications were associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates and longer LOS. CONCLUSION: This study indicated significantly different 1-year post-surgical outcomes for patients who underwent an endometriosis-related hysterectomy relative to a laparoscopy. Furthermore, the endometriosis patients in this analysis had a considerable risk of surgical complications, subsequent surgeries, and hospital admissions, both during and after their initial therapeutic laparoscopy or hysterectomy. FUNDING: AbbVie.

GnRH agonist administration prior to embryo transfer in freeze-all cycles of patients with endometriosis or aberrant endometrial integrin expression.

Prolonged gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration before IVF with fresh embryo transfer to patients with endometriosis or aberrant endometrial integrin expression (-integrin) improves outcomes but may suppress ovarian response and prevents elective cryopreservation of all embryos. This retrospective cohort pilot study evaluates freeze-all cycles with subsequent prolonged GnRHa before embryo transfer in these populations. Patients from 2010 to 2015 who met inclusion criteria and received a long-acting GnRHa every 28 days twice before FET were evaluated. A subset underwent comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) after trophectoderm biopsy. Three groups were identified: Group 1: + CCS, +endometriosis (20 patients, 20 transfers); Group 2: +CCS, -integrin (12 patients, 13 transfers); Group 3: no CCS, +endometriosis or -integrin (10 patients, 12 transfers); Group 4: all transfers after CCS for descriptive comparison only (n = 2809). Baseline characteristics were similar among Groups 1-3 except that the mean surgery to oocyte aspiration interval was longer for Group 1 than Group 3. Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically similar among the three groups and compared favourably to Group 4. A non-significant trend towards improved outcomes was noted in Group 1. Prolonged GnRHa after freeze-all in these patients avoids excessive ovarian suppression and results in excellent outcomes.

The Effect of Endometriosis Symptoms on Absenteeism and Presenteeism in the Workplace and at Home.

BACKGROUND: Characterized by pain symptoms, endometriosis affects women's productivity in their prime working years. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of individual endometriosis symptoms on household chore and employment productivity as measured by presenteeism and absenteeism in a population survey of women with endometriosis. METHODS: An online survey of U.S. women was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of endometriosis, as well as symptoms, demographics, and clinical characteristics of the respondents. Women aged 18-49 years (inclusive) with endometriosis completed the Health-related Productivity Questionnaire to assess presenteeism and absenteeism for employed and household work. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample, survey responses, and the effect of endometriosis symptom severity on household chore and employment productivity. Regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of individual endometriosis symptoms on employment and household productivity lost because of presenteeism and absenteeism. RESULTS: Of 59,411 women who completed the prevalence screener, 5,879 women (9.9%) met the inclusion criteria for completing the survey; 1,318 women (2.2%) reported endometriosis and at least 1 hour of scheduled household chores in the past 7 days. Of these, 810 women had least 1 hour of scheduled employment in the past 7 days. Mean age was 34.6 years (standard error [SE] ± 0.32); 77.2% of the women were white; 59.3% were married or in a civil union; and 59.1% were employed full or part time. Women with endometriosis had a weekly loss of an average of 5.3 hours (SE ± 0.4) because of employment presenteeism, 1.1 hours (SE ± 0.2) of employment absenteeism, 2.3 (SE ± 0.2) hours of household presenteeism, and 2.5 (SE ± 0.2) hours of household absenteeism. Hourly losses in employment and household chore productivity were significantly greater with increasing symptom severity (mild vs. severe: 1.9 vs. 15.8 total employment hours lost and 2.5 vs. 10.1 total household hours lost; P < 0.0001). Women who experienced 3 endometriosis symptoms concurrently lost a significantly greater number of employment hours because of absenteeism and presenteeism compared with those experiencing 1 or 2 symptoms (P < 0.001). Regression analyses showed that a range of endometriosis symptoms predicted employment and household losses because of presenteeism and absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant relationship between the number and patient-reported severity of endometriosis symptoms experienced and hours of employment and household productivity lost because of presenteeism and absenteeism. Study findings indicate a need for guidance strategies to help women and employers manage endometriosis so as to reduce productivity loss. DISCLOSURES: The design and financial support for this study was provided by AbbVie. AbbVie participated in data analysis, interpretation of data, review, and approval of the manuscript. Coyne and Gries are employees of Evidera- Evidence, Value & Access by PPD and were paid scientific consultants for AbbVie in connection with this study. Soliman, Castelli-Hayley, and Snabes are AbbVie employees and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. Surrey is affiliated with Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine and was paid by AbbVie as a consultant for this project. Surrey serves as a consultant for AbbVie outside of this project. All authors participated in data analysis and interpretation, and contributed to the development of the manuscript. The authors maintained control over the final contents of the manuscript and the decision to publish. Study concept and design were contributed by Soliman, Coyne, Gries, and Castelli-Haley. Soliman, Castelli-Haley, Coyne, and Gries collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Snabes, Surrey, Soliman, Coyne, and Gries. The manuscript was written and revised by Soliman, Coyne, and Gries, along with the other authors.

Endometriosis-Related Infertility: The Role of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

The assisted reproductive technologies, particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF), represent the most efficient and successful means of overcoming infertility associated with endometriosis. Although older studies suggest that IVF outcomes are compromised in endometriosis patients, more contemporary reports show no differences compared to controls. The exception may be evidence of poorer outcomes and diminished ovarian response in women with advanced disease, particularly those with significant ovarian involvement or prior ovarian surgery. Prolonged pre-IVF cycle suppressive medical therapy, particularly gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists, appears to improve success rates in a subset of endometriosis patients. However, as of yet, there is no diagnostic marker to specifically identify those who would most benefit from this approach. Pre-IVF cycle surgical resection of nonovarian disease has not been consistently shown to improve outcomes with the possible exception of resection of deeply invasive disease, although the data is limited. Precycle resection of ovarian endometriomas does not have benefit and should only be performed for gynecologic indications. Indeed, there is a large body of evidence to suggest that this procedure may have a deleterious impact on ovarian reserve and response. A dearth of appropriately designed trials makes development of definitive treatment paradigms challenging.