ABSTRACT
This case report illustrates the successful treatment of an iatrogenic furcal perforation using mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and its reinforcement with fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs). Endodontic perforations, particularly in the furcal area, present unique challenges that demand effective management strategies. MTA, known for its multifaceted properties including osteoinductive activity and sealing capabilities, has emerged as the gold standard material for perforation repair. This case report demonstrates the application of MTA in repairing the perforation site following thorough cleaning and shaping of the root canals. Furthermore, the use of FRCs, specifically glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC), is introduced to reinforce the repaired site, enhancing its mechanical properties and long-term stability. The discussion emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate materials for endodontic perforation repair and highlights the advantages of FRCs in preventing structural failures. Future directions suggest further research to refine FRC formulations and standardize clinical protocols to maximize treatment outcomes. This case report contributes valuable insights to the advancement of endodontic therapy, showcasing the combined benefits of MTA and FRCs in achieving favorable treatment outcomes for iatrogenic furcal perforations.
ABSTRACT
This article provides an overview of a biologically based method for restoring damaged tooth structures and pulp tissues known as regenerative endodontics. It explores the concept of regenerative endodontics, its tissue engineering approach, and its application in maintaining vitality. The article discusses the significance of the factors affecting growth, scaffolds, and stem cells being the three tissue engineering components involved in the regeneration of pulp tissues. It also delves into the classification of scaffolds and the role of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as biological scaffolds. The methodology section details the search process for relevant studies, and the review section presents research findings associated with PRF and its application in regeneration and repair of tissue. The article concludes by highlighting the potential of advanced PRF and injectable PRF in regenerative endodontics, with a focus on their impact on tissue regeneration and healing.
ABSTRACT
As periodontal and endodontic tissues have a close association, they come into close touch and have a lot of possible places for communication. In a clinical setting, this correlation promotes infection spread and results in the typical endo-perio lesion appearance. Because the two tissues are in close touch with one another, managing such lesions can be difficult. The success of treatment depends on a thorough examination and careful planning, with the sole focus on repair and regeneration. In these situations, bone graft materials with such characteristics have demonstrated encouraging outcomes. The treatment outcome along with a follow-up for a case of an endo-perio lesion with furcation involvement is shown in the accompanying case report. In treating such instances, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary, emphasizing regeneration.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Microorganisms are pivotal contributors to pulp and periapical pathology, often culminating in endodontic treatment failures. The successful outcome of such treatment hinges on the effective eradication of microbial flora through various interventions, including intracanal medicaments (ICMs). However, Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), a highly adaptive Gram-positive bacterium, exhibits remarkable resilience and can persist even after rigorous disinfection efforts. This study explores the efficacy of two ICMs, calcium hydroxide-based triple antibiotic paste (TAP) and a novel alternative containing bromelain, derived from pineapples, in combating E. faecalis infections in vivo. Methodology This in-vivo study was conducted at Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, India, and ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical committee. The sample size was calculated using the OpenEpi program (version 3.04.04, Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, www.OpenEpi.com), resulting in 15 participants per group. Inclusion criteria encompassed mandibular premolars with carious involvement but no prior restorations, diagnosed with necrotic or infected pulp, and no significant medical history. Exclusion criteria included systemic conditions, pregnancy, retreatment cases, recent antibiotic therapy, calcified canals, and other contraindications. After proper patient consent, access opening and chemomechanical preparation were performed, and root canals (RCs) were randomly divided into two groups: TAP and bromelain paste (BP). TAP was prepared using ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline, while BP comprised bromelain powder mixed with saline. Both groups received intracanal medicaments, followed by temporary sealing. Microbiological samples were collected before and after treatment for analysis. Results E. faecalis count (CFU/mL) before instrumentation for the TAP group was (1.94 x 105 [Formula: see text] 7.45 x 103) and for BP group was (1.97 x 105 [Formula: see text] 7.70 x 103) with p-value 0.26 [Formula: see text] p=0.05, so no significant difference was found between them. E. faecalis count (CFU/mL) after instrumentation for the TAP group was (7.70 x 103 [Formula: see text] 9.11 x 102) and for the BP group was (7.26 x 103 [Formula: see text] 8.43 x 102) with p-value 0.18 [Formula: see text] p=0.05, so no significant difference was found between them. However, the E. faecalis count obtained after seven days of intracanal medicament for the TAP group was (3.63 x 101 [Formula: see text] 5.60) and for the BP group was (3.13 x 101 [Formula: see text] 4.55) with p-value 0.012 < p=0.05, so a significant difference was found between them. This means that when compared with the TAP group, there was a greater amount of reduction in E. faecalis count (CFU/mL) for the BP group seven days after the placement of intracanal medicament, and this reduction was statistically significant. Conclusion This in-vivo study highlights the potential of BP as a more effective intracanal medicament against E. faecalis when compared to the conventional TAP. Bromelain's selectivity for Gram-positive bacteria and its diverse therapeutic properties make it a promising natural alternative for endodontic treatment. Further research is warranted to optimize bromelain's clinical application and assess its potential to enhance endodontic outcomes, potentially revolutionizing the field of endodontics.
ABSTRACT
This case report presents a novel non-surgical approach for managing a substantial periapical lesion associated with tooth 12 using a combination of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). A 28-year-old male patient presented with pus discharge and intermittent swelling following a history of dental trauma. Clinical and radiographic assessments confirmed a large periapical cyst associated with tooth 12. The treatment involved root canal therapy with calcium hydroxide medication, leading to symptom relief. Subsequently, i-PRF combined with MTA was used as a regenerative material for periapical healing. Follow-up examinations at three, six, and nine months showed complete resolution of symptoms and radiographic evidence of lesion healing. This innovative technique demonstrates the potential of i-PRF and MTA synergy in the non-surgical management of periapical lesions, avoiding the risks associated with surgical interventions and promoting effective tissue healing.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Adequate perioperative pain control through peripheral nerve blocks is a time-honored practice. Local anesthetic (LA) alone may fail to provide desirable pain control operatively. Dexmedetomidine (DEXMED), is a relatively latest addition to the class of α agonists. The present study was deliberated with the hypothesis that addition of DEXMED to LA does not alter the potency and efficacy of lignocaine. The primary outcome variable measured was pain. Onset, depth of anesthesia, and vital parameters duration of postoperative analgesia following administration of nerve blocks with the two solutions were also measured. Method A prospective, randomized, crossover, double-blind study was conducted on 60 systemically healthy subjects for extraction of premolars in all four quadrants. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive lignocaine mixed with epinephrine (2% lignocaine in 1:2,00,000 epinephrine) or lignocaine plus DEXMED (1µcg/ml lignocaine). On the second appointment of the study, the subjects received the other solution. Pulse rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation (SPo2), and respiratory rate were recorded as a baseline before performing, during, and two hours later. Results It showed the comparison of onset of anesthesia, and duration of anesthesia in between the two groups was found to be significant (p=0.00) in Group D and Group L. Number of subjects who consumed analgesics in Group L was 34 and in Group D was 14. The hemodynamic parameters displayed no statistically significant difference from their baseline values in the two groups. Conclusion The study concluded that dexmedetomidine when administered with lignocaine in nerve blocks provides greater hemodynamic stability and increases its anesthetic and analgesic potency making it a suitable addition to the existing list of additives for local anesthetic agents.
ABSTRACT
Children are particularly terrified of having dental treatment. They are physically resistant, frail, and unwilling to cooperate. This severe distress during the pre-operative phase could cause the dentist to have issues with behavior control. Additionally, it may make pediatric dental treatments less effective. In order to reduce anxiety and control behavior in children receiving dental care, sedation is a pharmacological management technique that supports the provision of effective and high-quality dental services. The aim is to compare and evaluate the efficacy of sedative agents like dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric dental practice. A thorough review of the literature was conducted using electronic databases like "MEDLINE, PubMed, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), as well as the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, www.clinicaltrials.gov, conference proceedings abstracts, a bibliography of pertinent references, and manual searches of journals, conferences, and books". There were no restrictions on the language or the date of publication when searching the electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials were included which compared dexmedetomidine and midazolam in children up to 16 years of age subjected to dental treatment. Information on procedures, participants, interventions, outcome measures, and results were independently extracted by three review writers (TS, SL, and RO). Trial authors were contacted for papers that were confusing or lacking information. The risk of bias was evaluated for each study. We adhered to the Cochrane statistical recommendations. Three trials totaling 229 participants were included. All three studies were rated as having a low risk of bias, with none of them having a high or unclear risk. Meta-analysis was done for the available data for the primary outcomes like sedation level and recovery time. We searched for randomized controlled trials up to Jan 31, 2020. Participants are randomly assigned to an intervention or control group in randomized controlled trial research. While patients in the control group often get a placebo therapy or procedure, those in the interventional group receive the treatment being studied. We found three studies eligible to include in the review. One study evaluated 73 individuals who received general anesthesia for dental treatment. There were 72 and 84 individuals in the second and third investigations, respectively. All the participants of the three studies were divided randomly into two groups and were subjected to dexmedetomidine and midazolam as sedative agents. We gave the evidence an "extremely low certainty" rating. Because there are just three short trials with unusual parameters for comparison, the results are questionable. Overall, the results do not allow us to draw any firm conclusions. Three randomized controlled trials included in this systematic review reported data with varying conclusions; hence we recommend more randomized controlled trials to be conducted on this subject matter.
