Neuropsychiatric manifestations are associated with increased mortality in Indian patients with lupus: A single centre retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of different NPSLE manifestations in our cohort and to compare clinical and immunological features and outcomes including mortality of patients with NPSLE and SLE controls without NP involvement. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in a tertiary care referral centre. All patients of SLE seen in the last 10 years and fulfilling the SLICC criteria with neuropsychiatric manifestations as per the ACR definitions were included. Patients of SLE without NP involvement were sequentially assigned as controls in a ratio of 1:2. RESULTS: Of the 769 patients diagnosed with SLE from Jan 2011 to December 2020, 128 (16.6%) had NPSLE manifestations as per the ACR definitions. The commonest NPSLE manifestation was seizures (6.5%) followed by cerebrovascular accident (3.9%). NPSLE manifestation occurred at the first presentation of SLE in 99/128 (77.3%) patients and 58 (45.3%) patients had more than one NPSLE manifestation. Lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibody were tested in 120 patients and were positive in 16 (13.3%) and 12 (10%), respectively. No difference was found in anti-ribosomal p, lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies between the cases and controls. Twenty-one (16.4%) deaths occurred in patients with NPSLE (median follow-up of 40 months) as compared to 13 (5%) in controls (median follow-up of 32 months) (p = <0.001). The cumulative survival of patients with NPSLE was lower as compared to controls (p < 0.001). Relapse of NPSLE was seen in 11(8.6%) patients and was associated with mortality (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Seizures and cerebrovascular accidents are the commonest NPSLE syndromes in our patients. The presence of NPSLE was associated with high mortality in Indian patients with lupus.

Taxane Combination Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India.

AIMS: Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide (TAC) is an intensive chemotherapy regimen; however, being highly myelosuppressive, its usage is limited in developing countries and hence merits exploration for feasibility and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective audit of medical records of breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy) from 2004 to 2008. Demographic details, toxicity, and outcome analysis were carried out. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients (126 in [neo] adjuvant and 7 in metastatic setting) received TAC chemotherapy. The median age was 45 (21-67) years; 31% had coexisting diabetes and 12% hypertension. The delivered dose intensity was 94%. Discontinuation rate was 21/133 (15.8%) and the most common reason was hematological toxicity. There were 43 (32%) cases of febrile neutropenia and 2 (1.5%) Grade III thrombocytopenia with 3 (2%) toxic deaths. Grade III gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhea) occurred in 35 (26%) and cardiac toxicity (congestive cardiac failure) in 2 (1.5%) patients. On univariate analysis, none of the variables (baseline serum albumin, hemoglobin, disease stage, or age) was found significant for chemotoxicity. At a median follow-up of 27 months (0.13-71.30 months), the estimated median disease-free survival (DFS) was 52 months in locally advanced group; however, the early breast cancer cohort has not reached to median DFS. CONCLUSIONS: TAC is an effective regimen but has significant toxicity despite the use of primary prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating-Factor (G-GSF), including a small possibility of death. It can be considered "practically feasible" regimen in the adjuvant setting in carefully selected, fit patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas Conflicts, consensus, and controversies.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are an uncommon and diverse group of more than 50 mesenchymal malignancies. Each of these histologic subtypes represents a unique disease with distinct biologic behavior and varying sensitivity to chemotherapy. The judicious use of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with surgery and radiation in the treatment of localized STS has a role in improving patient outcomes by decreasing local and distant recurrences. There is evidence that the use of adjuvant chemotherapy to a mixed cohort of chemo sensitive and insensitive sarcoma subtypes results in limited benefit. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to identify the subpopulation with high metastatic potential and to identify effective histology-specific treatment options to these patients. Present perspective, will focus on the rationale for adjuvant chemotherapy in sarcoma, with emphasis on the histology driven chemotherapy. It will outline key therapeutic opportunities and hurdles in adjuvant medical treatment of sarcoma, focusing on specific subtypes that are on the verge of new breakthroughs, as well as those in which promise has not lived up to expectations.

Chemotherapy compliance in patients with osteosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Histological response (HR) to neoadjuvant-chemotherapy (NACT) is considered as a robust prognostic marker in treated osteosarcomas. Chemotherapy compliance can affect both, dose intensity and density and may affect the final outcome in these cases. This vital aspect has been inadequately addressed and therefore merits further investigation. METHOD: A retrospective study of NACT-treated osteosarcoma patients, during the year 2010 was conducted. Compliance was defined as receipt of planned cycles of chemotherapy in the planned doses, within the planned duration or up to 25% additional time. HR was assessed by grading for histological necrosis (HN). Good responders (GR) included those with tumors showing ≥90% HN. RESULTS: Of 124 patients, 115 were analyzed for post-NACT HR. Of the 73 (64%) compliant patients, 47 were GR and of the 42 (36%) non-compliant patients, 18 were GR. There was significant association between GR and compliance (P = 0.031). However, at a median follow-up of 7.9 months, there was no significant difference in survival between the noncompliant versus compliant group. Non-compliance was justifiable in 26 patients and not justifiable in 16 patients. Using univariate analysis, T-size, pain, performance status, albumin, LDH, and education were identified as significant factors, while in multivariate analysis, only poor performance status was identified as an independent variable for non-compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds patients were found to be compliant with NACT. There was a significant association between GR and compliant patients. Significant correlation between compliance and survival may be established with a longer follow-up particularly since "good necrosis" is generally predictive of good survival.