Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Behav Brain Res ; 469: 115046, 2024 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to comprehensively explore the impact of psychostimulant substances on neurotrophic and inflammatory pathways, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), pro-BDNF, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), interleukins, and the role of genetic factors. The study seeks to address existing gaps in the literature by providing a thorough evaluation of neurotrophic and inflammatory system alterations associated with different stages of psychostimulant dependence for a more nuanced understanding of substance use disorder (SUD) neurobiology. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. The research encompasses 50 studies with a participant pool totaling 6792 individuals using psychostimulant substances. RESULTS: Key findings include diverse impacts of cocaine on BDNF levels, mainly consisting of their significant increase during withdrawal. In contrast, NGF showed an opposite behavior, reducing during withdrawal. Cortisol and DHEAS levels exhibited relevant increases after psychostimulant use, while TBARS showed conflicting results. Genetic investigations predominantly focused on the Val66Met polymorphism of the BDNF gene, revealing associations with susceptibility to stimulant addiction. CONCLUSIONS: Neurotrophins and inflammatory molecules play a significant role in the pathophysiological mechanisms following psychostimulant use. A better understanding of their complex interplay could aid clinicians in identifying biomarkers of different disease stages. Moreover, clinical interventions designed to interfere with neurotrophic and inflammatory pathways could possibly lead to craving-modulatory strategies and reduce pathological neuronal and systemic consequences of psychostimulant use.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Nerve Growth Factors , Oxidative Stress , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Biomarkers/metabolism , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Nerve Growth Factors/genetics , Nerve Growth Factors/metabolism , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Substance-Related Disorders/genetics
2.
J Clin Med ; 13(8)2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673478

ABSTRACT

Background: Dual disorders (DD) entail the coexistence of a substance use disorder (SUD) and another mental health condition, often within psychotic and affective disorders. This study aims to evaluate lurasidone, an innovative atypical antipsychotic, in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and concurrent comorbidities of alcohol use disorder/substance use disorder (AUD/SUD). Methods: A cohort of 23 subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and comorbid AUD/SUD underwent psychometric assessments at baseline (T0) and one-month (T1) post-lurasidone initiation. Results: Lurasidone exhibited significant reductions in psychopathological burden, evidenced by decreased total PANSS scores (Z = 2.574, p = 0.011). Positive symptoms, substance craving (VAS Craving; Z = 3.202, p = 0.001), and aggressivity (MOAS scale; Z = 2.000, p = 0.050) were notably reduced. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores significantly improved (Z = 2.934, p = 0.003). Quality of life enhancements were observed in SF-36 subscales (energy, emotional well-being, and social functioning) (p < 0.05) and Q-LES-Q-SF scale (Z = -2.341, p = 0.021). A safety analysis indicated lurasidone's good tolerability, with only 8.7% reporting discontinuation due to side effects. Conclusions: This study offers initial evidence supporting lurasidone's efficacy and safety in dual diagnoses, highlighting positive effects on psychopathology, substance craving, and quality of life. These findings emphasize the need for tailored, comprehensive treatment strategies in managing the complexities of this patient population.

3.
Psychiatry Res ; 326: 115251, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37270864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Peripartum depression is defined as the onset of depressive symptoms during pregnancy or within 12 months postpartum and affects 11.9% of women. Currently, its treatment often involves psychotherapy and antidepressants, though only one medication has been specifically approved to treat it. In this context, novel, safe non-pharmacological treatment options have gained growing interest. The present review aims to assess current literature on possible side effects on the developing fetus/newborn of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) use in women with peripartum depression. METHOD: A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. PRISMA and PROSPERO guidelines were applied. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in our systematic review, two were randomized controlled trials. Eleven studies reported mothers experienced mild side effects; none of the included studies reported major side effects for newborns. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review demonstrated that TMS use in women with peripartum depression is safe, feasible and well-tolerated by the developing fetus/newborn, with a good safety and tolerability profile even during breastfeeding.


Subject(s)
Depression , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Infant, Newborn , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/adverse effects , Depression/therapy , Peripartum Period , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34886357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) is the time between the first-episode psychosis (FEP) and the initiation of antipsychotic treatment. It is an important predictor of several disease-related outcomes in psychotic disorders. The aim of this manuscript is investigating the influence of cannabis on the DUP and its clinical correlates. METHODS: During years 2014-2019, sixty-two FEP patients with and without cannabis use disorder (CUD) were recruited from several Italian psychiatric hospitals. The subjects were then divided into two groups based on the duration of the DUP and assessed at the beginning of the antipsychotic treatment and after 3 and 6 months, using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, and the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II). RESULTS: As expected, a longer DUP was associated with worse symptoms and cannabis use did not seem to affect the DUP, but both were related with more dissociative symptoms at onset and over time. DISCUSSION: According to our study, cannabis use can be a predictor of FEP and DUP, and of disease outcome. However, several factors might influence the relationship between cannabis use and DUP. Preventing cannabis use and early diagnosis of psychotic disorders might impact the disease by reducing the persistence of symptoms and limiting dissociative experiences.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Cannabis , Hallucinogens , Psychotic Disorders , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Dissociative Disorders/epidemiology , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...