Effects of rumen-undegradable protein and feed intake on purine derivative and urea nitrogen: comparison with predictions from the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System.

Six multiparous Holstein cows were used in a 6 x 6 Latin square to investigate the ability of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System to predict accurately rumen microbial yield, plasma urea N, and milk urea N. Estimations for microbial protein yield were compared with the measured excretion of purine derivative N in urine. A 3 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was adopted. Three concentrations of a rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) supplement (4.5, 14.9, and 29.1% of dry matter intake) and two levels of feed restriction (90 and 80% of ad libitum intake) were the corresponding factors. No effect of concentration of RUP supplement or feed restriction was detected on the excretion of purine derivative N in urine (mean, 18.5 g/d). Conversely, the Cornell system predicted a linear decrease in metabolizable protein from bacteria as the concentration of the RUP supplement increased. The Cornell system also predicted a significant reduction in metabolizable protein of microbial origin as feed restriction was increased. Measured values and values derived from the Cornell system for plasma and milk urea N increased linearly as the concentration of the RUP supplement increased. The Cornell system overpredicted milk urea N for cows consuming the highest RUP concentration. Predictions by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System were of limited value because the empirical nature of the model is insufficiently rigorous to yield accurate predictions under the conditions described herein.

Effects of rumen-undegradable protein and feed intake on nitrogen balance and milk protein production in dairy cows.

An experiment was designed to determine the response of milk protein production and N utilization in dairy cows to supplementation of a predominantly rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) mixture with a fixed amino acid (AA) pattern and the response to the amount of feed intake. The experiment was designed as a 6 x 6 Latin square with a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The factors were three concentrations of RUP supplement (4.5, 14.9, and 29.1% of dry matter intake) and two levels of feed intake restriction (10 and 20%) of the basal diet. The supplement was designed to approximate a postruminal AA pattern that was similar to bovine caseins for Met, Lys, Phe, His, and Thr. Measurements were made during the last 5 d of each 21-d period. Milk protein production responded linearly as the concentration of RUP supplement in the treatment diet increased within the given range. The difference in feed intake restriction did not affect milk protein production. Efficiency of N utilization for milk production exceeded 30% for cows fed the lowest RUP supplement. Results indicated that there is an opportunity to increase milk protein production by using RUP formulations that are balanced for AA while minimizing waste N excretion.

Ability of mathematical models to predict faecal output with a pulse dose of indigestible marker.

The aim of the work was to compare the faecal output and digestibility estimated by two mathematical approaches with the actual amount of faeces excreted or feed digested by Simmental cows. Experimental data (intakes and digestibility measured over 5 d) and faecal Cr concentrations (measured at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 56, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h after a pulse dose of Cr-mordanted forage) were collected from published experiments and fitted to a multicompartmental (MC) model and a gamma age-dependent (AD) model. From a statistical point of view, the MC model was very satisfactory while the AD model produced lower r2 and higher SE values and reached satisfactory statistical values only for higher DM intakes (lactating animals). The MC model produced higher correlations with the digestibility values while the AD model generated better correlations with the intake data; DM intake and digestibilities were more highly correlated with the model's parameters than neutral-detergent fibre terms. The regression between the estimated faecal outputs obtained with the two models showed an intercept close to 0 (P > 0.05) and angular coefficients near 1; there was a good correspondence of the estimates especially for the lowest values of output. The r2 values of the regressions were 0.800 and 0.829 for the MC and AD models respectively and their SE were 2.93 and 2.63. The ability of the two models to predict faecal output and digestibility was very similar, independent of the statistical accuracy of fitting the Cr-concentration data. The results indicate that variation of Cr concentration is the result of the entire digestive process, i.e. dilution and passage, which interact in a competitive or associative way.