Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction show comparable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcome measures, but lower donor-site morbidity compared with hamstring tendon autograft: A matched-pairs study with a mean follow-up of 6.5 ​years.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and functional outcomes of patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon- (QT-A) and hamstring tendon (HT-A) autograft with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 5 years. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, all patients undergoing ACLR were recorded in a prospectively administered database. All patients with primary, isolated QT-A ACLR and without any concomitant injuries or high grade of osteoarthritis were extracted from the database and matched to patients treated with HT-A. Re-rupture rates, anterior-posterior (ap) knee laxity, single-leg hop test (SLHT) performance, distal thigh circumference (DTC) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. Between group comparisons were performed using chi-square-, independent-samples T- or Mann-Whitney-U tests. RESULTS: 45 QT-A patients were matched to 45 HT-A patients (n â€‹= â€‹90). The mean FU was 78.9 â€‹± â€‹13.6 months. 18 patients (20.0%/QT-A: N â€‹= â€‹8, 17.8%; HT-A: n â€‹= â€‹10, 22.2%; p â€‹= â€‹.60) sustained a graft rupture and 17 subjects (18.9%/QT-A: n â€‹= â€‹9, 20.0%; HT-A: n â€‹= â€‹8, 17.8%; p â€‹= â€‹.79) suffered a contralateral ACL injury. In high active patients (Tegner activity level ≥ 7) rerupture rates increased to 37.5% (HT-A) and 22.2% (QT-A; p â€‹= â€‹.32), respectively. Patients with graft failure did not differ between both groups in terms of mean age at surgery (QT-A: 26.5 â€‹± â€‹11.6 years, HT-A: 23.3 â€‹± â€‹9.5 years, p â€‹= â€‹.63) or graft thickness (mean graft square area: QT-A: 43.6 â€‹± â€‹4.7 mm2, HT-A: 48.1 â€‹± â€‹7.9 mm2, p â€‹= â€‹.27). No statistical between-group differences were found in ap knee laxity side-to-side (SSD) measurements (QT-A: 1.9 â€‹± â€‹1.2 â€‹mm, HT-A: 2.1 â€‹± â€‹1.5 â€‹mm; p â€‹= â€‹.60), subjective IKDC- (QT-A: 93.8 â€‹± â€‹6.8, HT-A: 91.2 â€‹± â€‹7.8, p â€‹= â€‹.17), Lysholm- (QT-A 91.9 â€‹± â€‹7.2, HT-A: 91.5 â€‹± â€‹9.7, p â€‹= â€‹.75) or any of the five subscales of the KOOS score (all p â€‹> â€‹.05). Furthermore, Tegner activity level (QT-A: 6(1.5), HT-A: 6(2), p â€‹= â€‹.62), VAS for pain (QT-A: 0.5 â€‹± â€‹0.9, HT-A: 0.6 â€‹± â€‹1.0, p â€‹= â€‹.64), Shelbourne-Trumper score (QT-A: 96.5 â€‹± â€‹5.6, HT-A: 95.2 â€‹± â€‹8.2, p â€‹= â€‹.50), Patient and Observer Scar -Assessment scale (POSAS) (QT-A: 9.4 â€‹± â€‹3.2, HT-A: 10.7 â€‹± â€‹4.9, p â€‹= â€‹.24), SSD-DTC (QT-A: 0.5 â€‹± â€‹0.5, HT.- A: 0.5 â€‹± â€‹0.6, p â€‹= â€‹.97), return to sports rates (QT-A: 82.1%, HT-A: 86.7%) and SLHT (QT -A: 95.9 â€‹± â€‹3.8%, HT-A: 93.7 â€‹± â€‹7.0%) did not differ between groups. Donor-site morbidity (HT-A n â€‹= â€‹14, 46.7%; QT-A n â€‹= â€‹3, 11.5%; p â€‹= â€‹.008) was statistically significantly lower in the QT-A group. Five patients (11.1%) of the HT-group and three patients (6.7%) in the QT-group required revision surgery (p â€‹= â€‹.29). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcome measures, knee laxity, functional testing results and re-rupture rates are similar between patients treated with QT- and HT- autografts. However, patients with QT-autograft have a smaller tibial postoperative scar length and lower postoperative donor-site morbidity. There is a tendency towards higher graft rupture rates in highly active patients treated with HT autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures in patients younger than 60 years: long-term results.

HYPOTHESIS: Is salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) a justifiable treatment for failed operative treatment (open reduction-internal fixation [ORIF] or primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty) of proximal humeral fractures in patients younger than 60 years? METHODS: Thirty patients (mean age, 52 years; age range, 30-59 years) were reviewed after a mean follow-up period of 11 years (range, 8-18 years). Of the patients, 7 (23%) underwent RTSA for failed ORIF and 23 (77%) for failed hemiarthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed longitudinally. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the mean relative Constant score had improved from 25% (±12%) to 58% (±21%, P < .001). Significant improvements were seen in the mean Subjective Shoulder Value (20% to 56%), active elevation (45° to 106°), abduction (42° to 99°), pain scores, and strength (P < .001). Clinical outcomes did not significantly deteriorate over a period of 10 years. Patients with salvage RTSA for failed secondary hemiarthroplasty (n = 8) vs. those for failed ORIF (n = 6) showed significantly inferior active abduction (77° vs. 116°, P = .023). Patients with a healed greater tuberosity (n = 9) showed significantly better external rotation than patients with a resorbed/resected greater tuberosity (n = 13, 21° vs. 3°, P = .025). One or more complications occurred in 18 shoulders (60%), and 6 (20%) resulted in explantation of the RTSA. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage RTSA in patients younger than 60 years is associated with a high complication rate. It leads nonetheless to substantial and durable improvement beyond 10 years, provided the complications can be handled with implant retention. Inferior shoulder function is associated with greater tuberosity resorption or resection and inferior overhead elevation with the diagnosis of failed hemiarthroplasty.

Watertightness of wound closure in lumbar spine-a comparison of different techniques.

BACKGROUND: Since a primary watertight dural suture after incidental durotomies has a failure rate of 5-10%, a watertight closure technique of the overlying layers (fascia, subcutis and skin) is essential. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to find the most watertight closure technique for fascia, subcutis and skin. METHODS: Different suturing techniques were tested for each layer in a sheep cadaveric model by measuring the leakage pressure. The specimens were mounted on a pressure chamber connected to a manometer and a water tube system. Subsequently, the leakage was over-sewed with a cross stitch and the experiment was repeated. RESULTS: Cross stitch suturing [median =180 mbar (43; 660)] performed best compared to continuous [median =16 mbar (6; 52)] (P=0.003) but not to single knot [median =118 mbar (21; 387)] (P=1.0) or locking stitch suturing [median =109 mbar (3; 149)] (P=0.93) for fascia closure. Continuous suture [median =9 mbar (3; 14)] resulted in a higher leakage pressure than single knot [median =1 mbar (1; 6)] (P=0.017) for subcutaneous closure. No significant differences were found between intracutaneous, Donati-continuous, single knot and locking stitch for skin closures (P=0.075). However, the Donati-continuous stitch closure resulted in higher pressures in tendency. Over-sewing increased median leakage pressure from 8.0 to 11.0 mbar (P=0.068) and from 4.0 to 13.0 mbar (P=0.042) for single knot and for locking stitch skin closures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cross stitches for the fascia, continuous suturing technique for the subcutis and Donati-continuous stitch for the skin resulted in the most watertight closure within this experimental setting. If leakage occurs, over-sewing might relevantly improve the watertightness of the wound.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Before the Age of 60 Years: Long-Term Results.

BACKGROUND: There has been serious concern regarding the longevity and durability of outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in younger patients. It was the purpose of this study to analyze long-term outcomes and complications of RTSA for irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 60 years. METHODS: Twenty patients (23 shoulders) with a mean age of 57 years (range, 47 to 59 years) were evaluated at a mean of 11.7 years (range, 8 to 19 years) after RTSA. Fifteen shoulders (65%) had undergone previous non-arthroplasty surgery. Longitudinal clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: At the time of final follow-up, the mean absolute and relative preoperative Constant score (CS) (and standard deviation) had improved from 24 ± 9 to 59 ± 19 points (p < 0.001) and from 29% ± 11% to 69% ± 21% (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) had increased from 20% ± 13% to 71% ± 27% (p < 0.001). There were also significant improvements in the mean active anterior elevation (from 64° to 117°), active abduction (from 58° to 111°), pain scores, and strength (all p ≤ 0.001). Clinical outcomes did not significantly deteriorate beyond 10 years and the functional results of patients with previous surgical procedures were not significantly inferior to the results of those with primary RTSA. The grade of, and number of patients with, radiographically apparent notching increased over time; the mean relative CS was lower in patients in whom the notching was grade 2 or higher (57%) than it was in those with no or grade-1 notching (81%; p = 0.006). Nine (39%) had ≥1 complication, with 2 failed RTSAs (9%). CONCLUSIONS: RTSA in patients younger than 60 years leads to substantial subjective and functional improvement without clinical deterioration beyond 10 years. It is associated with a substantial complication rate, and complications compromise ultimate subjective and objective outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

MR findings associated with positive distraction of the hip joint achieved by axial traction.

PURPOSE: To determine which MR-arthrography findings are associated with positive hip joint distraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with MR arthrography of the hip using axial traction were included. Traction was applied during the MR examination with an 8 kg (females) or 10 kg (males) water bag, attached to the ankle over a deflection pulley. Fifty patients showing joint space distraction were compared to an age- and gender-matched control group of 50 patients that did not show a joint distraction under axial traction. Two radiologists assessed the neck-shaft angle, lateral and anterior center-edge (CE) angles, CE angles in the transverse plane, extrusion index of the femoral head, acetabular depth, alpha angle, acetabular version, ligamentum teres, joint capsule and ligaments, iliopsoas tendon and the labrum. RESULTS: Mean joint space distraction in the study group was 0.9 ± 0.6 mm. Patients with positive joint space distraction had significantly higher neck-shaft angles (control group 131.6 ± 5.4°/study group 134.1 ± 6.1°, p < 0.05), smaller lateral CE angles (38.1 ± 5.9°/34.6 ± 7.2°, p < 0.05), smaller overall transverse CE angles (161.4 ± 9.9°/153.6 ± 9.6°, p < 0.001), smaller acetabular depth (4.1 ± 2.4 mm/5.8 ± 2.5 mm, p < 0.01), higher alpha angles (53.5 ± 7.8°/59.2 ± 10.1°, p < 0.01) and a thicker ligamentum teres (4.7 ± 1.4 mm/5.4 ± 1.8 mm, p < 0.05). The other parameters revealed no significant differences. ICC values for interobserver agreement were 0.71-0.95 and kappa values 0.43-0.92. CONCLUSION: Increased neck-shaft angles, small CE angles, small acetabular depth, higher alpha angles and a thick ligamentum teres are associated with positive joint distraction.

Supraacetabular fossa (pseudodefect of acetabular cartilage): frequency at MR arthrography and comparison of findings at MR arthrography and arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of the supraacetabular fossa (SAF) (pseudodefect of acetabular cartilage) at magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the hip and to compare the MR findings with those from arthroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients gave written permission for anonymized use of their medical data for scientific purposes before the imaging examination. The study was submitted to the institutional review board, and the need to obtain additional approval was waived. A medical student, a radiology fellow, and two senior radiologists reviewed 1002 consecutive MR arthrograms for the presence of an accessory bony fossa in the roof of the acetabulum, or SAF. SAF was classified into two types: type 1, which was filled with contrast material on MR arthrograms, and type 2, which was filled with cartilage. The width of the SAF was measured on coronal and sagittal MR images. MR arthrograms showing SAF were evaluated for subchondral reactions. Findings at MR arthrography were compared with those from arthroscopy in four hip joints with SAF type 1 and 13 with SAF type 2. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 1002 hip joints (1.6%; four female and 12 male patients; mean age, 20.1 years) had SAF type 1 (mean width, 5.2 × 4.5 mm). Eighty-nine hip joints (8.9%; 43 female and 46 male patients; mean age, 37.8 years) had SAF type 2 (mean width, 5.1 × 4.7 mm). No subchondral changes were found around the SAF. No cartilage defect was seen at the site of the SAF at arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: The high frequency of SAF on MR arthrograms (10.5%), the absence of subchondral reaction, and the absence of cartilage defects at arthroscopy indicate that the SAF of the acetabulum likely represents a variant.