Clinical Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Program for Lower-extremity Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) implementation with length of stay (LOS) and perioperative outcomes after lower-extremity bypass (LEB). BACKGROUND: ERPs have been shown to decrease hospital LOS and improve perioperative outcomes, but their impact on patients undergoing vascular surgery remains unknown. METHODS: Patients undergoing LEB who received or did not receive care under the ERP were included; pre-ERP (January 1, 2016-May 13, 2018) and ERP (May 14, 2018-July 31, 2022). Clinicopathologic characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 393 patients who underwent LEB [pre-ERP: n = 161 (41%); ERP: n = 232 (59%)], most were males (n = 254, 64.6%), White (n = 236, 60%), and government-insured (n = 265, 67.4%). Pre-ERP patients had higher Body Mass Index (28.8 ± 6.0 vs 27.4 ± 5.7, P = 0.03) and rates of diabetes (52% vs 36%, P = 0.002). ERP patients had a shorter total [6 (3-13) vs 7 (5-14) days, P = 0.01) and postoperative LOS [5 (3-8) vs 6 (4-8) days, P < 0.001]. Stratified by indication, postoperative LOS was shorter in ERP patients with claudication (3 vs 5 days, P = 0.01), rest pain (5 vs 6 days, P = 0.02), and tissue loss (6 vs 7 days, P = 0.03). ERP patients with rest pain also had a shorter total LOS (6 vs 7 days, P = 0.04) and lower 30-day readmission rates (32%-17%, P = 0.02). After ERP implementation, the average daily oral morphine equivalents decreased [median (interquartile range): 52.5 (26.6-105.0) vs 44.12 (22.2-74.4), P = 0.019], while the rates of direct discharge to home increased (83% vs 69%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest single-center cohort study evaluating ERP in LEB, showing that ERP implementation is associated with shorter LOS and improved perioperative outcomes.

Treatment Location Variation for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Patients With Kidney Failure.

INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is an established risk factor for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Procedural location for ESKD patients has not been well described. This study aims to examine variation in index procedural location in ESKD versus non-ESKD patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention for CLTI and identify preoperative risk factors for tibial interventions. METHODS: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) peripheral vascular intervention dataset. Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared between patients with and without ESKD and those undergoing index tibial versus nontibial interventions. A multivariable logistic regression evaluating risk factors for tibial intervention was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 23,480 procedures were performed on CLTI patients with 13.6% (n = 3154) with ESKD. End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients were younger (66.56 ± 11.68 versus 71.66 ± 12.09 y old, P = 0.019), more often Black (40.6 versus 18.6%, P < 0.001), male (61.2 versus 56.5%, P < 0.001), and diabetic (81.8 versus 60.0%, P < 0.001) than non-ESKD patients. Patients undergoing index tibial interventions had higher rates of ESKD (19.4 versus 10.6%, P < 0.001) and diabetes (73.4 versus 57.5%, P < 0.001) and lower rates of smoking (49.9 versus 73.0%, P < 0.001) than patients with nontibial interventions. ESKD (odds ratio (OR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-1.86, P < 0.001), Black race (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.30, P < 0.001), and diabetes (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.71-2.00, P < 0.001) were risk factors for tibial intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESKD and CLTI have higher rates of diabetes and tibial disease and lower rates of smoking than non-ESKD patients. Tibial disease was associated with ESKD, diabetes, and Black race.

Differences in Long-Term Outcomes in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a risk factor for peripheral arterial disease and major adverse limb events following infra-inguinal bypass. Despite comprising an important patient population, ESKD patients are rarely analyzed as a subgroup and are underrepresented in vascular surgery guidelines. This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with and without ESKD undergoing endovascular peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: CLTI patients with and without ESKD from 2007-2020 were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative PVI dataset. Patients with prior bilateral interventions were excluded. Patients undergoing femoral-popliteal and tibial interventions were included. Mortality, reintervention, amputation, and occlusion rates at 21 months following intervention were examined. Statistical analyses were completed with the t-test, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The ESKD cohort was younger (66.4 ± 11.8 vs. 71.6 ± 12.1 years, P < 0.001) with higher rates of diabetes (82.2 vs. 60.9%, P < 0.001) the non-ESKD cohort. Long-term follow-up was available for 58.4% (N = 2,128 procedures) of ESKD patients and 60.8% (N = 13,075 procedures) of non-ESKD patients. At 21 months, ESKD patients had a higher mortality (41.7 vs. 17.4%, P < 0.001) and a higher amputation rate (22.3 vs. 7.1%, P < 0.001); however, they had a lower reintervention rate (13.2 vs. 24.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CLTI patients with ESKD have worse long-term outcomes at 2 years following PVI than non-ESKD patients. Mortality and amputation are higher with ESKD, while the reintervention rate is lower. Development of guidelines within the ESKD population has the potential to improve limb salvage.

Investigating glycemic control in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass within an enhanced recovery pathway at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) aim to lower perioperative stress to facilitate recovery. Limited fasting combined with carbohydrate loading is a common ERP element. The effect of limited fasting has not been elucidated in patients with diabetes. Given the known deleterious effects of poor glycemic control in the perioperative period, such as increased rates of surgical site infection, the associations of preoperative limited fasting with perioperative glycemic control and early outcomes after lower extremity bypass (LEB) were investigated. METHODS: A single institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent infrainguinal LEB from 2016 to 2022 was performed. The ERP was initiated in May 2018. Patients were stratified by diabetes diagnosis and preoperative hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels. Perioperative glycemic control was compared between the limited fasting and traditional fasting patients (nil per os at midnight). Limited fasting was defined as a clear liquid diet until 2 hours before surgery with recommended carbohydrate loading consisting of 400 cc of a clear sports drink (approximately 30 g of carbohydrates). All limited fasting patients were within the ERP. Early perioperative hyperglycemia (EPH) was defined as blood glucose of >180 mg/dL within the first 24 hours of surgery. Perioperative outcomes such as surgical site infection, readmission, reinterventions, and complications were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients were included (limited fasting patients N = 135; traditional fasting patients N = 258). A trend toward EPH was seen in all limited fasting groups. Evaluating limited fasting within diabetic patients revealed that 74.5% of limited fasting-diabetic patients had EPH compared with 49.6% of traditional fasting-diabetic patients (P = .001). When stratified by the HbA1C level, a significantly higher rate of EPH was seen in the HbA1c >8.0% groups, with 90.5% in the limited fasting patients compared with 67.9% in traditional fasting patients (P = .05). Limited fasting-diabetic patients experience a longer postoperative length of stay at 5.0 days (interquartile range: 3, 9) vs 4.0 days (2, 6) in nondiabetic patients (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: ERP limited fasting was associated with early perioperative hyperglycemia after LEB, particularly in patients with HbA1C >8.0%. Due to the high prevalence of diabetic patients undergoing LEB under ERP, the role of limited fasting and common glycemic elements of ERP may need to be re-evaluated in this subpopulation.

The use of social media and virtual opportunities by integrated vascular surgery residency programs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the 2021 match application cycle as in person sub-internships and interviews have been halted. Given the abrupt change, we aimed to characterize the utilization of social media and virtual open house platforms by integrated vascular surgery residency programs for outreach and networking during the pandemic for the 2021 cycle. METHODS: A list of accredited integrated vascular surgery residency programs was compiled using the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) website provided by the Academic Medical Colleges (AMC). The social media platforms Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook were queried for accounts associated with the training programs or their associated institutional vascular surgery divisions. Each discovered account was surveyed for date of creation as well as posts outlining virtual interactive events such as open houses, meet-and-greets, and virtual sub-internship opportunities. Slopes of the curves representing total account numbers and account numbers on each platform were compared from pre-COVID to current day using linear regression and t-statistics. RESULTS: There were 64 integrated vascular surgery residency programs participating in the 2021 match cycle. 70.3% (N = 45) of programs had a social media presence on at least one of the three platforms. 54.7% (N = 35) of programs had an associated Twitter account. 43.9% (N = 28) of programs had an associated Instagram account. Six (9.4%) programs were found on Facebook. The number of social media accounts significantly increased from March 2020 (37 vs 69, p < .001) to March 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgery residency programs have significantly increased use of social media platforms over a 12-month period beginning in March 2020, indicating adaptation to the restrictions prompted by the pandemic.

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulant and Associated Bleeding and Thrombotic Complication after Lower Extremity Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic anticoagulation with either a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct anticoagulant (DOAC) is often newly prescribed to patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB) to aid in graft patency when risk factors for thrombosis are present or to treat postoperative venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation. There is a gap in knowledge as to how DOAC usage impacts postoperative outcomes compared with the standard-of-care VKAs. STUDY DESIGN: To determine temporal trends in DOAC prescription after infrainguinal LEB, impact on length of stay (LOS), and associated bleeding and thrombotic complications, patients undergoing elective LEB were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative between January 2013 and May 2019. Postoperative bleeding, LOS, and graft occlusion for patients receiving VKA compared with DOAC were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 24,459 LEBs were performed during the study period. Among 2,656 patients newly prescribed an anticoagulant, 78.0% (n = 2,072) received VKA and 22.0% (n = 584) received a DOAC, with DOAC use increasing throughout the study period. There was no significant difference in postoperative bleeding (VKA 2.3%, DOAC 1.7%, p = 0.413) or graft occlusion (VKA 1.2%, DOAC 1.4%, p = 0.762) between the anticoagulant classes. LOS was shorter in the DOAC group than in the VKA group (5.7 vs 6.8 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that DOAC use is increasing with time in Vascular Quality Initiative centers. DOACs are a safe and comparable alternative to VKAs in the postoperative setting with similar rates of bleeding complications and early graft patency and are associated with a reduced postoperative LOS.

Progressive aortic enlargement in medically managed acute type B aortic dissections with visceral aortic involvement.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic remodeling of the thoracic aorta has been studied in patients treated with medical or endovascular therapy for the treatment of acute aortic dissections; however, particular attention has not yet focused on identifying specific growth patterns and rates across all aortic zones. Additionally, previous studies have not delineated between dissections with and without visceral aortic involvement, and we hypothesize that these two cohorts may exhibit distinct differences. The aim of this study is to investigate aortic behavior over time in medically managed acute Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS/STS) type B dissections with visceral aortic involvement and identify potential associations of subsequent aortic behavior with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed of all patients between 2010 and 2020 with acute SVS/STS type B aortic dissections with visceral aortic involvement that were not surgically managed. Short-axis centerline measurements of the true/false lumen and total aortic diameter (TAD) were taken at standardized locations relative to aortic anatomy within each aortic zone, including nondissected zones. Measurements were taken at the time of diagnosis and at six subsequent yearly intervals. Diameter changes over time were evaluated using repeated measures mixed models linear growth analysis. Aortic enlargement was classified by growth in TAD ≥5 mm in either the thoracic (thoracic segment enlargement [TSE], zone 0-4) or visceral segments (visceral segment enlargement [VSE], zone 5-9). RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were identified with a median length of follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.3-6.6 years). Follow-up past 5 years was seen in 31% of the cohort. For the entire cohort, mean thoracic growth in TAD was 2.0 ± 2.0 mm/year, and visceral growth in TAD was 2.5 ± 2.4 mm/year. TSE was observed in 65% of patients, with a median time until onset of 0.8 years (IQR, 0.4-2.3 years). VSE was observed in 57% of the cohort, with a median time until onset of 1.6 years (IQR, 0.9-3.3 years). Repeat measures mixed models linear growth analysis identified significant predictable linear growth in all aortic zones except for the nondissected zones 0-2. Odds for TSE are significantly increased in patients with known genetically triggered aortic conditions (odds ratio [OR], 2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-4.5; P = .044) and in cases where the dissection entry tear was in either zone 1 or 2 (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.2-8.4; P = .044). In adjusted regression analysis, odds for intervention in the thoracic aorta were significantly increased in patients with rapid TSE in zone 3 (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-8.4; P = .045). Similarly, odds for intervention targeting the visceral aortic segment were significantly increased in patients with zone 9 VSE (OR, 9.3; 95% CI, 1.1-13.3; P = .014). Odds for 5-year all-cause mortality were significantly increased in cases with large thoracic aneurysms (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.1-14.9; P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic enlargement was present in the majority of patients with medically managed acute SVS/STS Type B aortic dissections with visceral aortic involvement, with analysis demonstrating predictable linear growth in all dissected zones. Patients with aortic enlargement demonstrated higher gross changes in diameter in addition to higher yearly rates of change compared with all comers. Odds for enlargement were impacted by both patient demographic and anatomic dissection characteristics. Growth in zone 3 and zone 9 significantly increased odds for aortic intervention. Odds for 5-year mortality were significantly increased in the presence of large thoracic aneurysms. Results highlight risk of progressive degeneration beyond acute phase in SVS/STS Type B aortic dissections with visceral aortic involvement, with life-long surveillance remaining crucial in management of dissections.

Association of Statin and Antiplatelet Use with Survival in Patients with AAA with and without Concomitant Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Statin therapy has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for vascular disease. Current guidelines do not address statin therapy in isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the absence of other atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aims to elucidate effects of statin therapy, either as monotherapy or combined with antiplatelet agents, on the long-term mortality of patients with and without ASCVD who undergo elective AAA repair. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all AAA patients treated electively with endovascular (EVAR) and open aortic repair (OAR) in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003-2020. Long-term mortality was evaluated based on the presence of statin and antiplatelet medication use at discharge stratified by those with and without a history of ASCVD. Unadjusted survival was estimated by Kaplan Meier methodology. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine mortality risk after adjusting for key factors. RESULTS: A total of 47,012 AAA repairs were selected for analysis: 80.7% EVAR (N = 40,153) and 19.3% OAR (N = 6,859). EVAR patients on combined statin/antiplatelet (AP) therapy had significantly better survival irrespective of whether they had known ASCVD. In the presence of ASCVD, EVAR patients on statin alone had improved survival compared to those not on a statin (10.9 ± 0.5 vs. 10.5 ± 0.4 years, Log Rank < 0.001), with survival being even greater among those receiving combined statin/AP therapy (12.2 ± 0.2 vs. 10.5 ± 0.4 years, Log Rank < 0.001). In the absence of ASCVD, EVAR patients on statin alone also had better mean survival compared to patients not on a statin (8.7 ± 0.5 vs. 8.4 ± 0.4 years, Log Rank<.001), with higher survival among statin/AP therapy patients (9.4 ± 0.2 years vs. 8.7 ± 0.5 years, Log Rank < 0.001). Comparison of adjusted survival via Cox multivariable regression demonstrated a protective effect of statins (HR = 0.737, P = 0.04, vs. no medication) and combined statin/AP therapy (HR = 0.659, P = 0.001, vs no medication) in patients with ASCVD history. A similar protective effect (statin: HR 0.826, P = 0.05. Combination statin/AP: HR 0.726, P < 0.001, vs. no medication) was identified in patients without ASCVD history. Within the OAR cohort, statin therapy was not associated with improved survival among patients without ASCVD; however, combined statin/AP therapy had a protective effect for patients with a known ASCVD diagnosis. Based on KM analysis, OAR patients with ASCVD on combined statin/AP therapy had significantly higher mean survival compared to isolated statin therapy (12.7 ± 0.2 vs. 10.3 ± 0.65 years) and no medical therapy (10.5 ± 0.8 years, Log Rank < 0.001). In KM analysis, OAR patients without known ASCVD indications (N = 3591) had no significant survival differences based on the presence of combined statin/AP therapy (8.4 ± .07 vs. 8.5 ± .11 years, Log Rank = 0 638). CONCLUSION: Isolated statin therapy and combined statin/AP therapy showed significant survival benefit in all EVAR and OAR patients with ASCVD indications, as well as among EVAR patients without a known ASCVD diagnosis. OAR patients without ASCVD did not have a significant survival benefit from statin therapy, but low numbers in this group may have confounded the findings. Combined statin/AP therapy appears to have significant post-repair survival benefits even in isolated AAA without ASCVD, as demonstrated in post-EVAR patients in this study. Expansion of statin use recommendations within aneurysm treatment guidelines may be warranted.

Clinical practice and volume trends of inferior vena cava filter usage at a single tertiary care center during a 19-year period.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical practice and volume trends of inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) usage at a single institution for an extended period and identified the potential factors affecting the clinical decision for placement, follow-up, and retrieval. METHODS: An institutional database was queried for IVCFs placed from 2000 to 2018 using the Current Procedural Terminology codes. The medical records were reviewed to evaluate the demographics, economic status, placement indication, IVCF type, follow-up evaluation for retrieval, and retrieval success rates. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, and t tests for continuous and χ2 for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 3915 IVCFs were placed from 2000 to 2018. The placement of IVCFs had increased steadily from 2000 (127 IVCFs/y), peaking in 2010 at 371 IVCFs/y and representing a 292% increase in IVCF usage. Since 2010, the number of IVCFs placed has steadily declined until 2016 to 2018, with a 426% decrease from the peak. In a subgroup of IVCFs placed for prophylaxis, the total volume trends paralleled a shift in clinical indications, peaking in 2010 and accounting for 45% of all IVCFs placed and then decreasing from 2013 to 2018 to ≤10%. Overall, 989 permanent IVCFs (25.3%) and 2926 retrievable IVCFs (74.7%) were placed during the entire study period. Before dedicated efforts to implement retrieval follow-up visits, the successful retrieval rate was ∼1% from 2000 to 2006 and had increased to ∼10% to 15% from 2007 to 2015, 36.7% in 2016, 40.2% in 2017, and 40.3% in 2018 after implementation of more active retrieval follow-up protocols. The predictors for the lack of evaluation for IVCF retrieval included an extended length of stay (P = .004) and geographic distance (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVCFs during the past 19 years at our institution reflected increased usage from 2000 to 2010, corresponding to an increase in prophylactic placement, followed by a decreasing total volume from 2011 to 2018, largely attributable to decreased prophylactic IVCF placement. Improved retrieval rates were seen after implementation of an active IVCF retrieval program.

Vascular complications based on mode of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications remain a prevalent and devastating complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Risks for vascular complications have risen as the volume and medical complexity of ECMO cases has rapidly increased in recent years. This study assesses occurrence and clinical impact of vascular complications across all ECMO modes and cannulation methods in a high-volume academic center. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was performed of all ECMO cannulations for central or peripheral venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) ECMO in 2019-2020. Patients who expired during cannulation were excluded. Primary outcomes of vascular consultation rates at or after ECMO placement, limb loss, and mortality were assessed during index hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were identified during the 2-year study period. VA ECMO was used in the majority of patients (n = 137, 60%), with 83% (N = 114) undergoing peripheral cannulation. Vascular surgery was consulted in 54 (23.6%) patients. Complication rates ranged from 33.9% in peripheral VA cannulation to 7% in jugular VV cannulation. Overall, 65% of vascular consults required operative intervention; interventions were highest in peripheral VA ECMO (n = 30 of 114, 26.3%). Across all ECMO types, acute limb ischemia (ALI) was the most common complication (n = 38, 16.5%), with rates ranging from 26.1% in central VA ECMO to 4.8% in jugular VV ECMO. Distal antegrade perfusion catheters (DPCs) were employed in n = 68 of 114 (59.6%) of all peripheral VA ECMO cases. Prophylactic DPCs were found to be incorrectly placed in 10.2% (n = 7 of 68) of cases, which obscured the ability to fully evaluate the effect of prophylactic DPCs on reducing rates of ALI. Major amputation (Below Knee Amputation/Above Knee Amputation) occurred in six peripheral VA patients (5.3%), two central VA patients (8.65), and two femoral-femoral VV patients (4%). Patients with ALI experienced significantly lower rates of in-hospital survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (32.5% vs 54%, log-rank = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the prevalence of vascular complications, and their associated mortality impact, across all modes of ECMO and additionally identifies several areas for institutional performance improvement. ALI was the most common complication across all cohorts and was associated with decreased in-hospital survival. The impact of DPC on ALI was difficult to elucidate due to nonstandardized placement patterns and selective use. In the care of these medically complex patients on multidisciplinary teams, review of outcomes and group discussions targeting areas for improvement are critical to success; in this study, findings resulted in the development of a lower extremity perfusion management protocol.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Practice in 13 Countries: A Report From VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess practice patterns and short-term outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), based on an international vascular registry collaboration. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: TEVAR has become the primary surgical treatment modality for descending aortic pathologies, and has expanded to new patient cohorts, including the elderly. METHODS: Data on thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA), type B aortic dissections (TBAD), and traumatic aortic injuries (TAI) treated with TEVAR from 2012 to 2016 were retrieved from registries and centers in 13 countries. RESULTS: Nine-thousand five-hundred eighteen TEVAR for TAA ( n = 4436), TBAD ( n = 3976) and TAI ( n = 1106) were included. The distribution of TEVAR procedures per pathology varied, with TAA repair constituting from 40% of TEVARs in the US to 72% in the UK ( P < 0.001).Mean intact TAA (iTAA) diameter varied from 59 (US) to 69 mm (Nancy, France) ( P < 0.001), 25.3% of patients having a diameter of <60 mm. Perioperative mortality after iTAA repair was 4.9%; combined mortality, stroke, paraplegia, and renal replacement therapy outcome was 12.8%. 18.6% of iTAA patients were ≥80 years old. Mortality was higher in this group (7.2%) than in patients <80 (3.8%) ( P < 0.001). After rTAA repair, perioperative mortality was 26.8%.Mortality was 9.7% after acute (within 14 days from onset of dissection) and 3.0% after chronic TBAD repair ( P < 0.001). Mortality after TAI was 7.8%, and depended on injury severity (grade IV (free rupture) 20.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This registry collaboration provides a unique platform to evaluate cross-border patterns of use and outcomes of TEVAR. A common core dataset is proposed, to achieve harmonization of registry-based quality outcome measures for TEVAR.

Low to Moderate Risk Non-orthopedic Surgical Patients Do Not Benefit From VTE Chemoprophylaxis.

This retrospective cohort study analyzes venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence, morbidity, and mortality amongst postsurgical patients with and without VTE chemoprophylaxis within a quality collaborative. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis was broadly applied, yet was associated with no decrease in VTE, without affecting transfusion or mortality. Predictors of breakthrough VTE development despite evidence-based thromboprophylaxis are identified. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a high rate of prescription of VTE chemoprophylaxis would be associated with decreased VTE incidence and mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recommendations for VTE prevention in surgical patients include chemoprophylaxis based upon preoperative risk stratification. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed VTE incidence, morbidity, and mortality amongst postsurgical patients with and without VTE chemoprophylaxis between April 2013 and September 2017 from 63 hospitals within the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. A VTE risk assessment survey was distributed to providers. Bivariate and multivariate comparisons were made, as well as using propensity score matched cohorts to determine if VTE chemoprophylaxis was associated with decreased VTE events. Hospitals were compared using risk-reliability adjusted VTE prophylaxis and postoperative VTE event rates. RESULTS: Within the registry, 80% of practitioners reported performing formal VTE risk assessment. Amongst 32,856 operations, there were 480 (1.46%) postoperative VTE, and an overall mortality of 609 (1.85%) patients. Using a propensity matched cohort, we found that rates of VTE were similar in those receiving unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin compared to those not receiving chemoprophylaxis (1.22 vs 1.13%, P = 0.57). When stratified further by VTE risk scoring, even the highest risk patients did not have an associated lower VTE rate (3.68 vs 4.22% P = 0.092). Postoperative transfusion (8.28 vs 7.50%, P = 0.057) and mortality (2.00% vs 1.62%, P = 0.064) rates were similar amongst those receiving and those not receiving chemoprophylaxis. No correlation was found between postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis application and hospital specific risk adjusted postoperative VTE rates. CONCLUSIONS: In modern day postsurgical care, VTE remains a significant occurrence, despite wide adoption of VTE risk assessment. Although postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis was broadly applied, after adjusting for confounders, no reduction in VTE was observed in at-risk surgical patients.

Closing the gap: Increasing female representation in surgical leadership.

BACKGROUND: Female medical students outnumber males with increasing representation in the workforce. However, women remain underrepresented in surgical leadership. Suggested reasons for this discrepancy are lack of female role models, mentorship, and gender discrimination. Thus, we set out to examine the change in leadership over time in our Department. METHODS: Leadership data was gathered from a Department of Surgery in 2016 and 2020. Demographics including gender, age, and leadership position were compared using chi-squared testing. RESULTS: Female representation in leadership roles increased from 2016 to 2020 at each professor rank(professor 0-100%, p < .001; associate professor 25-90%, p < .001, and assistant professor 7-71%, p < .001). In 2020, there were more female faculty(19.8 vs 26.4%, p = .270). CONCLUSIONS: Female leadership in the Department has increased since 2016. Promoting females to leadership roles provides role models for upcoming female surgeons. Resources should be allocated to promote gender equity in surgical leadership.

Does Chair of Surgery Gender Influence Divisional or Residency Program Director Gender Diversity?

BACKGROUND: Workplace diversity is beneficial and results in new ideas and improved performance. Within surgery leadership, the gender gap is improving, but still present. Given the increasing number of women surgery department chairs, we aimed to examine the association of surgery chair gender with division and residency program director gender. We hypothesized that surgery departments with female leadership would have an increase in gender diversity compared to departments led by male chairs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A list of all surgery departments were compiled from the Society of Surgical Chairs website. Gender of department chair, division director and residency program director were examined and compared. Chair position term length was determined based on online public announcements, publicly available curriculum vitae, and institutional profile biographies. RESULTS: Of 178 department chairs included, 10.7% were female, and 89.3% were male. There was no difference in female residency program director leadership between female versus male led programs (42.1 versus 26.1%, P= 0.147). Of the programs with female department chairs, only 29.4% had any female division directors compared to 54.6% led by male chairs (P= 0.055). When examining departments with ≥5 division directors, there was no difference in the average number of female division directors within departments led by female versus male chairs. There was a significant difference in length of surgery chairship, with female chairs holding the position for fewer years than male chairs (median time 5.3 (IQR = 3.4-5.8) versus 7.0 (IQR=4.3-12.3) years, P= 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Female department chair leadership was not associated with increased diversity in divisional leadership compared to departments of surgery led by males.

OpTrust: An Effective Educational Bundle for Enhancing Faculty-resident Intraoperative Entrustment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of a novel faculty and resident educational bundle focused on development of faculty-resident behaviors and entrustment in the operating room. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: As surgical training environments are orienting to entrustable professional activities (EPAs), successful transitions to this model will require significant faculty and resident development. Identifying an effective educational initiative which prepares faculty and residents for optimizing assessment, teaching, learning, and interacting in this model is critical. METHODS: From September 2015 to June 2017, an experimental study was conducted in the Department of Surgery at the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS). Case observations took place across general, plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgical specialties. A total of 117 operating room observations were conducted during Phase I of the study and 108 operating room observations were conducted during Phase II following the educational intervention. Entrustment behaviors were rated for 56 faculty and 73 resident participants using OpTrust, a validated intraoperative entrustment instrument. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed a significant increase in faculty entrustment (Phase I = 2.32 vs Phase II = 2.56, P < 0.027) and resident entrustability (Phase I = 2.16 vs Phase II = 2.40, P < 0.029) scores following exposure to the educational intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows improved intraoperative entrustment following implementation of faculty and resident development, indicating the efficacy of this innovative educational bundle. This represents a crucial component in the implementation of a competency-based assessment framework like EPAs.

Trends in the use of cerebrospinal drains and outcomes related to spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair and complex endovascular aortic repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a dreaded complication of thoracic and complex endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/cEVAR). Controversy exists surrounding cerebrospinal fluid drain (CSFD) use, especially preoperative prophylactic placement, owing to concerns regarding catheter-related complications. However, these risks are balanced by the widely accepted benefits of CSFDs during open repair to prevent and/or rescue patients with SCI. The importance of this issue is underscored by the paucity of data on CSFD practice patterns, limiting the development of practice guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of the present analysis was to evaluate the differences between patients who developed SCI despite preoperative CSFD placement and those treated with therapeutic postoperative CSFD placement. METHODS: All elective TEVAR/cEVAR procedures for degenerative aneurysm pathology in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed. CSFD use over time, the factors associated with preoperative prophylactic vs postoperative therapeutic CSFD placement in patients with SCI (transient or permanent), and outcomes were evaluated. Survival differences were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 3406 TEVAR/cEVAR procedures met the inclusion criteria, with an overall SCI rate of 2.3% (n = 88). The SCI rate decreased from 4.55% in 2014 to 1.43% in 2018. Prophylactic preoperative CSFD use was similar over time (2014, 30%; vs 2018, 27%; P = .8). After further exclusions to evaluate CSFD use in those who had developed SCI, 72 patients were available for analysis, 48 with SCI and prophylactic CSFD placement and 24 with SCI and therapeutic CSFD placement. Specific to SCI, the patient demographics and comorbidities were not significantly different between the prophylactic and therapeutic groups, with the exception of previous aortic surgery, which was more common in the prophylactic CSFD cohort (46% vs 23%; P < .001). The SCI outcome was significantly worse for the therapeutic group because 79% had documented permanent paraplegia at discharge compared with 54% of the prophylactic group (P = .04). SCI patients receiving a postoperative therapeutic CSFD had had worse survival than those with a preoperative prophylactic CSFD (50% ± 10% vs 71% ± 9%; log-rank P = .1; Wilcoxon P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CSFD use with TEVAR/cEVAR remained stable during the study period. Of the SCI patients, postoperative therapeutic CSFD placement was associated with worse sustained neurologic outcomes and overall survival compared with preoperative prophylactic CSFD placement. These findings highlight the need for a randomized clinical trial to examine prophylactic vs therapeutic CSFD placement in association with TEVAR/cEVAR.

Identification of promotion and prevention associated surgeon behaviors in the operating room to facilitate resident self-regulated learning.

BACKGROUND: The regulatory focus theory (RFT) posits that people can pursue goals with a promotion or prevention focus. Greater alignment of RFT motivational styles between faculty and residents may enhance resident operative autonomy. This study establishes a set of faculty behaviors residents can identify to infer faculty motivational styles. METHODS: 10 behaviors associated with promotion and prevention motivational styles were identified. General surgery residents rated faculty on how strongly they exhibit these behaviors. Faculty conducted a self-assessment of how strongly they exhibit these behaviors. RESULTS: There is a positive correlation between resident and faculty ratings for the promotion-associated behaviors of "works quickly," "high energy," and "mostly provides broad oversight," and for the prevention-associated behaviors of "works slowly and deliberately," "quiet and calm," and "preference for vigilant strategies." CONCLUSION: Residents can observe faculty operative behaviors to infer faculty motivational styles. Residents may use this knowledge to adjust to faculty motivational styles and enhance operative interactions.

Exploring the rapid expansion of office-based laboratories and peripheral vascular interventions across the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship between office-based laboratory (OBL) use and Medicare payments for peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). METHODS: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use Files from 2014 to 2017, we identified providers who performed percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stent placement, and atherectomy. Procedures were aggregated at the provider and hospital referral region (HRR) level. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 2641 providers performed 308,247 procedures. The mean payment for OBL stent placement in 2017 was $4383.39, and mean payment for OBL atherectomy was $13,079.63. The change in the mean payment amount varied significantly, from a decrease of $16.97 in HRR 146 to an increase of $43.77 per beneficiary over the study period in HRR 11. The change in the rate of PVI also varied substantially, and moderately correlated with change in payment across HRRs (R2 = 0.40; P < .001). The majority of HRRs experienced an increase in rate of PVI within OBLs, which strongly correlated with changes in payments (R2 = 0.85; P < .001). Furthermore, 85% of the variance in change in payment was explained by increases in OBL atherectomy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A rapid shift into the office setting for PVIs occurred within some HRRs, which was highly geographically variable and was strongly correlated with payments. Policymakers should revisit the current payment structure for OBL use and, in particular atherectomy, to better align the policy with its intended goals.

Comparison of unilateral vs bilateral and staged bilateral vs concurrent bilateral truncal endovenous ablation in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Venous insufficiency is commonly bilateral, and patients often prefer single-episode care compared with staged procedures. Few studies have investigated clinical outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral venous ablation procedures or between staged and concurrent bilateral procedures. Here, we report data from the Vascular Quality Initiative regarding truncal venous ablation for chronic venous insufficiency. METHODS: Using data from the Vascular Quality Initiative, we investigated immediate postoperative as well as long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral vs bilateral truncal endovenous ablation from 2015 to 2019. We further investigated outcomes between staged bilateral and concurrent bilateral ablations. Preprocedural and postprocedural comparisons were performed using t-test, χ2 test, or their nonparametric counterpart when appropriate. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed on ordinal outcome variables. RESULTS: A total of 5029 patients were included, of whom 3782 (75.2%) underwent unilateral procedures. Median follow-up was 227 days (interquartile range [IQR], 55-788 days). Unilateral patients were less likely to be female (67.0% vs 70.3%; P = .031) and white (86.3% vs 91.2%; P < .001) and had lower body mass index (30.3 ± 7.3 kg/m2 vs 31.8 ± 7.6 kg/m2; P < .001) compared with patients undergoing bilateral procedures. In addition, unilateral patients had fewer prior varicose vein treatments (23.0% vs 15.7%; P < .001) and had higher median preprocedural Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS; 8 [IQR, 6-10] vs 7 [IQR, 5.5-9]; P < .001). No difference was seen in complications (6.9% vs 8.2%; P = .292), and systemic complications were rare in both groups. No difference was seen in VCSS improvement after treatment (median, 3 [IQR, 1-6] for unilateral; median, 3 [IQR 1-5] for bilateral; P = .055). In comparing staged with concurrent bilateral procedures, there was no difference in overall complications (7.5% vs 12.2%; P = .144). Staged bilateral patients were older (56.9 ± 13.3 years vs 54.2 ± 12.9 years; P = .002), less likely to have had prior varicose vein treatment (14.3% vs 19.8%; P = .020), and more likely to be therapeutically anticoagulated (10.8% vs 6.5%; P = .028) compared with concurrent bilateral patients. Staged patients also have higher preprocedural VCSS compared with concurrent patients (median, 8 [IQR, 6-10] vs 7 [IQR, 5.5-9]; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in the likelihood of VCSS improvement for concurrent compared with staged procedures (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.24; P = .226). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent bilateral truncal endovenous ablation can be performed safely without increased morbidity compared with staged bilateral or unilateral ablations.