Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Can J Public Health ; 105(1): e11-4, 2014 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24735690

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Current estimates indicate that cigarillo use has become commonplace among young adults in Canada despite the established risks to health. However, little else is known about patterns of cigarillo use in this subpopulation. The intent of this research was to examine the patterns, attitudes, and beliefs regarding cigarillo use and co-use of cigarillos and cigarettes among Canadian young adults. METHODS: Canadians aged 19-29 years from the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario and Edmonton, Alberta were recruited from September 2009 to February 2010 and in June 2010, respectively (n=133). Eligible participants completed questionnaires assessing cigarillo, cigarette, and cannabis use; social influence of usage; and beliefs about cigarillo use. RESULTS: Cigarillo use was common in social settings, with friends, and during leisure time. The majority of participants were co-users of cigarillos and cigarettes (82%), and currently used cannabis (72%). Respondents reported "replacing cigarette smoking" and "flavour" as main reasons for smoking cigarillos; and half (52%) believed they were not at all addicted to cigarillos. Disconcertingly, participants perceived the risk of cancer attributed to smoking cigarillos as significantly less than the risk of cancer attributed to smoking cigarettes (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the social nature of cigarillo use, and suggest a lack of awareness of the health risks associated with cigarillo and polytobacco use in this small convenience sample of Canadian young adults. Population-level analyses are needed to further investigate cigarillo, polytobacco and concurrent cannabis use patterns and beliefs among Canadian young adults.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Urban Population , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Friends/psychology , Humans , Leisure Activities/psychology , Male , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Risk-Taking , Social Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Can Fam Physician ; 55(2): 170-5, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19221080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of endoscopic procedures performed by a family physician trained in endoscopy. DESIGN: Quality assurance practice audit involving medical chart review. SETTING: Rural family practice in Peace River, Alta. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who had endoscopic procedures performed by a rural family physician during the period September 24, 1999, to May 31, 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of endoscopic procedure performed, indications for and results of the endoscopies, complication rates, referral to tertiary care physicians, and patient demographic information. Colonoscopy competency was determined by the reach-the-cecum rate and by time for colonoscopy completion. RESULTS: A total of 1956 endoscopic examinations were performed; complete data were verified for 1949 procedures, including 667 gastroscopies, 1178 colonoscopies, and 104 sigmoidoscopies. Endoscopic findings with gastroscopy included 50 (7.5%) cases of peptic ulcer disease, 17 (2.5%) cases of celiac disease, and 6 (0.9%) cases of upper gastrointestinal cancer; 27 (2.1%) cases of colorectal cancer and 48 (3.7%) new cases of inflammatory bowel disease were discovered with lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. The overall adenoma detection rate was 23.7% for male patients and 15.4% for female patients; for patients 50 years and older, it was 29.8% and 18.0% for male and female patients, respectively. The adjusted reach-the-cecum rate for colonoscopies was 92.3%. There was 1 colonic perforation and 1 postpolypectomy bleed. A total of 123 (6.3%) patients required referral to tertiary care physicians, half for definitive surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: A trained family physician can perform endoscopy competently with findings and complication rates consistent with current quality assurance guidelines for endoscopy.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Family Practice/education , Medical Audit , Rural Health Services , Alberta , Analysis of Variance , Education, Medical, Continuing , Endoscopy/education , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Needs Assessment , Physicians, Family , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...