Staining Pattern of Alcian Blue in Endometrial Cytology: Utility in Distinguishing Grade 1-Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma from Endometrial Glandular Stromal Breakdown.

Background and Objective: In endometrial cytology, differentiating endometrial glandular stromal breakdown (EGBD) from endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (G1-EEC) is often difficult. In this study, we provided a new focus on chondroitin sulfate (CS), a major substrate component of the endometrial stroma, and assessed the diagnostic utility of Alcian Blue (AB) staining in the differential diagnosis in liquid-based cytological (LBC) samples. Materials and Methods: LBC specimens from 19 patients with a proliferative endometrium, 36 with EGBD, and 30 with G1-EEC who underwent endometrial cytology were stained with AB (pH 1.0), and their reactivity was observed. In addition, immunocytochemical staining of CS and CD31 was performed for five cases each to evaluate their interrelationship with blood vessels. Results: Regarding the 30 G1-EEC cases, at least one of the three representative staining patterns was observed by AB staining: dot-like, microtubular, and finely branched linear patterns. Moreover, the inner portion of the tubular material observed by AB staining expressed CD31. Conversely, in the 36 EGBD cases, only five metaplastic clusters with irregular protrusions and condensed stromal clusters (CSCs) showed a dot-like positive pattern, and background CSCs did not show reactivity to AB staining in any of the cases. Furthermore, the vascular structure expressing CD31 in cell clusters was also unclear. Conclusions: We demonstrated that AB staining shows different staining patterns in G1-EEC and EGBD, reflecting their different tissue structures. Our data provide new insights into endometrial cell diagnosis changes and demonstrate that AB staining is a potential new diagnostic aid tool for the differentiation of G1-EEC from EGBD.

Can Mitotic Figures in Hyperchromatic Crowded Groups be Cytodiagnostic Criteria for High-Grade Squamous Intra-epithelial Lesions?

Aims: The present study aimed to investigate whether the presence of mitoses in hyperchromatic crowded groups (HCGs) in cervical cytological specimens can serve as cytological criteria for high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (HSILs). Methods and Material: Various parameters were examined, including the frequency of mitotic figures per high power field (HPF) in Pap, hematoxylin eosin (HE) samples, and PHH3 immunocytochemical (ICC) and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses. Results: In the Pap and PHH3-ICC samples, the number of mitotic figures observed in HCGs was significantly higher in HSIL (P < 0.001) compared to other groups. Furthermore, the frequency of observing two or more mitoses was significantly higher in HSIL (Pap: P = 0.002, PHH3-ICC: P < 0.001) than in low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSILs). Moreover, a comparison between Pap samples and PHH3-ICC showed that the frequency of two or more mitoses was significantly higher in the PHH3-ICC analysis of HSIL (P = 0.042). Regarding HE and PHH3-IHC samples, counting the number of mitoses in the lower and middle/upper layers of the squamous epithelial layer revealed that HSIL had a significantly higher value (HE: P = 0.0089, PHH3-IHC: P = 0.0002) than LSIL in the middle/upper layers. Conclusions: Hence, the presence of two or more mitotic figures in HCGs per HPF in cervical cytology indicates a suspicion of HSIL. The detection of mitoses in PHH3-ICC samples is more sensitive and easier to observe than in Pap samples, making it a valuable mitotic marker.

Assessment of the localization of chondroitin sulfate in various types of endometrial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the localization of chondroitin sulfate (CS), a primary extracellular matrix component, in the stromal region of endometrial carcinoma (EC). METHODS: Immunostaining was performed on 26 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) samples of different grades and 10 endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) samples to evaluate CS localization. This was further confirmed by Alcian Blue (AB) staining as well. RESULTS: In the G1-EEC samples, CS showed reactivity with fibrovascular stroma, supporting closely packed glandular crowding and papillary structures. As the grade increased, the original interstitial structure was re-established, and the localization of CS in the perigulandular region decreased. In the ESC samples, the thick fibrous strands supporting the papillary architecture showed reactivity with CS; however, the delicate stromal region branching into the narrow region showed poor reactivity. The AB staining results showed similar characteristics to the immunostaining ones. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic localization of CS in various EC types was elucidated. The present study provides new information on endometrial stromal assessment.

The expression pattern of CD10 and CD31 identifies fine fibrovascular stroma of grade 1-endometrial endometrioid carcinomas in cytology.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of CD10 in the differential diagnosis of grade 1-endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (G1-EEC) and the metaplastic changes associated with the endometrial glandular and stromal breakdown (EGBD) on liquid-based cytological (LBC) samples. METHODS: (1) The type and distribution of CD10-positive cells in EGBD and G1-EEC patients were evaluated. (2) Based on the results from (1), histological and cytological specimens were double-immunostained with CD31 and CD10 to confirm whether CD10-positive tubular-canalicular material found in (1) was represented by fine threads of endometrial-type fibrovascular stroma. (3) Based on the results from (2), additional immunostaining of histological specimens was performed for CD146 and αSMA as markers of perivascular cells. RESULTS: (1) CD10 positive cells showed two main patterns of expression: cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in the form of dense brown granules in EGBD and tubular-canalicular branching patterns in G1-EEC. (2) The tubular-canalicular material observed in cytological specimens of G1-EEC samples co-expressed CD10 and CD31, and was interpreted as representing fine threads of endometrial fibrovascular stroma in the corresponding histological samples. Conversely, metaplastic changes in EGBD cases, only a few CD31-positive signals were found inside the condensed stromal clusters with CD10-positive. (3) Cells surrounding the CD31-positive vascular endothelial cells expressed CD146 and αSMA; moreover, some of the thin CD10-positive fibrous stromal strands also co-expressed αSMA. CONCLUSIONS: CD10 is a very useful immunomarker for distinguishing between G1-EEC and the metaplastic changes of EGBD in LBC samples.

A study on preserving endometrial glandular architecture during preparation using BD SurePath™ liquid-based cytology reagents: Cellular fixation with preservative fluid requires at least 18 h.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the causes of disruption of the three-dimensional architecture of endometrial glands prepared using BD SurePath™ liquid-based cytology (SP-LBC) reagents. One sample preparation method for endometrial cytology is presented in which this three-dimensional architecture can be retained. METHODS: SP-LBC specimens were prepared by the following three methods: (1) using the BD PrepMateTM (PrepMate) System after cellular fixation for 1-6 h (method A); (2) without using the PrepMate System after cellular fixation for 1-6 h (method B); and (3) using the PrepMate System after cellular fixation for at least 18 h (method C). Size and numbers of endometrial cell clusters and numbers of solitary scattered cells were then evaluated. RESULTS: Significantly higher numbers of cell clusters with a major axis of 200 µm or more were yielded by method C (71.3 ± 57.2) than methods A (9.3 ± 5.9, P < 0.001) or B (44.3 ± 28.8, P < 0.05). Method B yielded significantly higher numbers of cell clusters than method A (P < 0.001). Method A (132.2 ± 107.7, p < 0.001) yielded significantly higher numbers of solitary scattered cells than methods B (29.1 ± 14.8) and C (35.7 ± 23.3). No significant difference in solitary cell numbers was found between methods B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Retention of endometrial glandular architecture is rendered possible by allowing sample fixation times of 18 h or more when preparing specimens using the PrepMate System.