Concurrent weekly cisplatin and simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer represents a major clinical challenge. Any treatment intensification aiming at improved treatment outcomes poten-tially results in a higher toxicity. The search for optimal treatment schedule involving conventional or altered fractionation of radiotherapy and the frequency and dose of concomitant cisplatin or other systemic agents has been spanning over several decades. PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term outcomes and toxicity of accelerated chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with stage III and IVA (TNM, 7th Ed.) LA SCCHN were treated with accelerated radiotherapy with a total dose of 67.5 Gy in 6 weeks delivered with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB IMRT) and concomitant weekly cisplatin 40mg/m2. Five-year outcomes and early and late toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: With the median follow-up of 47.8 months, a 5-year locoregional control rate (LCR) was 56.5%, distant control rate (DCR) was 87% and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37 and 45%, respectively. Cisplatin cumulative dose of 200mg/m2 was administered in 83% of patients. Grade 2 late toxicity with dietary change was observed in 21 (53%) patients. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status determined by p16 immunohistochemistry was the only significant factor in 5-year treatment outcomes analysis with LCR 100 vs. 41% (P < 0.01), DCR 100 vs. 78% (P = 0.154), PFS 80 vs. 23% (P = 0.01) and OS 80 vs. 34% (P = 0.03) for HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and other HPV negative LA SCCHN. CONCLUSION: High proportion of patients with LA SCCHN received an adequate cumulative dose of concurrent cisplatin with accelerated radiotherapy with SIB IMRT. This study demonstrated that chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin resulted in favorable local control rate and survival in patients with HPV+ OPC.

Radical external beam reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent head and neck carcinomas represent a therapeutic challenge for the surgeons as well as for the treating radiation oncologists. Despite advances in the treatment of newly dia-gnosed head and neck carcinomas, relapses occur very frequently and contribute significantly to patient mortality. External beam reirradiation is still considered to be a controversial therapeutic intervention. Historically, in the era of 2- and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, its narrow therapeutic ratio has long led to a general concern that the potential benefit could not sufficiently outweigh the high risk associated with the treatment. The unfavorable therapeutic ratio, however, could be positively influenced by the use of modern techniques of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and heavy-ion radiotherapy (protons, carbon ions). PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to create a practical tool for clinical decision-making on the type of patient suitable for reirradiation and the exact type of radiotherapy technique with respect to its expected therapeutic effect, toxicity profile and availability throughout the institutions. In the introductory section, selection of patients is defined with an emphasis on factors that significantly affect overall survival and may be particularly useful in shared decision-making approach within multidisciplinary teams. Furthermore, the text deals with the individual types of external beam radiotherapy techniques (IMRT, SBRT, heavy-ion radiotherapy) with a clear summary of therapeutic outcomes and toxicity from published scientific evidence that had a significant impact on clinical practice.

Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the improvement of the results of oncological treatment, the concept of Quality of Life (QoL) has become increasingly important. Quantitative expression of the length of survival does not provide complete information on all advantages and disadvantages of the applied treatment. Hence, natural societal inquiry arises to answer the question what is QoL that such treatment option brings to the patient. With equivalent effi cacy of diff erent treatment modalities, the expected QoL after treatment might be the most important factor infl uencing the patients decision for a particular type of treatment. Questionnaires are the basic tools on quantifying QoL. Over the last decades, the development of questionnaire tools has undergone a signifi cant process of evolution and nowadays, many diff erent validated measures are available to assess the physical, functional, emotional, and social impact of cancer and its treatment on patients life. In head and neck cancer treatment, the assessment of QoL outcomes is especially important for patients and healthcare workers because of the potential negative impact of the treatment on important functions such as speech, swallowing, communication and social relationships. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date overview of validated questionnaire tools used in clinical practice with emphasis on potential future improvement in their design and clinical utility. The article defi nes the concept of QoL itself and currently available forms of its evaluation. Furthermore, the types of individual questionnaire tools are discussed within the text with practical and clearly arranged examples of world-famous validated scales evaluating specifi c items that represent the focus of research interest.