Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Comparison of changes in hemodynamics and functional capacity.

The treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging option for inoperable patients. Comparisons of the hemodynamic and functional outcome between these treatments are scarce. In this single-center observational cohort study, we compared hemodynamics by right heart catheterization and peak oxygen consumption before and 5 months (±14 days) after either PEA or BPA. Comprehensive evaluation and selection for PEA or BPA was performed by an expert CTEPH team. Fourty-two and fourty consecutive patients were treated with PEA or BPA, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. Both PEA and BPA significantly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (from 46 ± 11 mmHg at baseline to 28 ± 13 mmHg at follow-up; p < 0.001 and from 43 ± 12 mmHg to 31 ± 9 mmHg; p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (from 686 ± 347 dyn s cm-5 at baseline to 281 ± 197 dyn s cm-5 at follow-up; p < 0.001 and from 544 ± 322 dyn s cm-5 to 338 ± 180 dyn s cm-5; p < 0.001), with significantly lower reductions for both parameters in the former group. However, cardiopulmonary exercise testing revealed no significant between group differences in exercise capacity. Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide at baseline was the only follow-up predictor for peak VO2. In our study, PEA reduced pulmonary pressures more than BPA did, but similar improvements were observed for exercise capacity. Thus, while long term data after BPA is lacking, BPA treated CTEPH patients can expect physical gains in line with PEA.

[Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19]. / Ekstrakorporal membranoksygenering ved akutt lungesviktsyndrom hos covid-19-pasienter.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In some patients for whom conventional mechanical ventilation is insufficient, venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be life-saving. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of data from patients with ARDS triggered by COVID-19 who received ECMO therapy between March 2020 and February 2022. Premorbid health condition, course of respiratory distress and respiratory support before, during and after ECMO therapy were registered. RESULTS: Thirty patients received ECMO therapy. Median age was 57 years, median body mass index 28 kg/m2, and 23 patients were men. Median duration of lung protective mechanical ventilation with tidal volume 5.8 mL/kg predicted body weight before initiation of ECMO therapy was 8 days. Treatment indication was primarily severe hypoxaemia, frequently combined with hypercapnia. Twenty-three patients developed at least one severe complication while receiving ECMO therapy. Sixteen patients died, 13 during ongoing ECMO therapy. Fourteen were discharged from hospital. Median duration of ECMO and mechanical ventilation was 27 and 37 days, respectively. INTERPRETATION: ECMO therapy for patients with ARDS triggered by COVID-19 can be life-saving, but the treatment is accompanied by severe complications and a high mortality rate.

Measurement of skin conductance responses to evaluate procedural pain in the perioperative setting.

Background and aims The subjective nature of pain makes objective, quantitative measurements challenging. The current gold standard for evaluating pain is patient self-reporting using the numeric rating scale (NRS) or Visual Analog Scale. Skin conductance responses per second (SCR) measured in the palmar region reflect the emotional part of the autonomous nervous system. SCR ≥0.20 have been shown to indicate moderate or severe pain in the postoperative setting. We examined whether SCR can detect procedure-related pain before major surgery. Methods In 20 patients being prepared for major surgery SCR was recorded before and during arterial cannulation, after induction of anaesthesia, and on the first postoperative day. Self-reported pain was evaluated using NRS. NRS >3 was considered to represent moderate or severe pain. Results NRS was 0 [0-0] before arterial cannulation, increasing to 5 [3-6] during arterial cannulation (p<0.05). Before arterial cannulation SCR was 0.27 [0.20-0.27], increasing to 0.33 [0.30-0.37] during arterial cannulation (p<0.01). On the first postoperative day both SCR and reported pain indicated no more than mild pain, SCR 0.13 [0.00-0.20] and NRS 2.0 [0.5-2.0]. The sensitivity of SCR to indicate moderate or severe pain (NRS >3) was 0.93 (0.68-1.0) and specificity was 0.33 (0.25-0.35) when the cut-off established in the postoperative setting (SCR ≥0.20) was used on all data. Conclusions SCR increased during arterial cannulation. Before major surgery the SCR was above the threshold demonstrated to indicate pain in the postoperative setting, even without painful stimuli and no reported pain. Using the threshold established for postoperative pain, SCR cannot reliably discriminate between pain and other stressors before major surgery. Implications Before major surgery, the diagnosis of moderate or severe pain should not be made based on SCR ≥0.20.

Characteristics and Outcome of Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The acute respiratory distress syndrome is a frequent condition following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may serve as rescue therapy in refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome but has not been assessed in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study. SETTING: ICUs in 12 European tertiary care centers (Austria, Germany, France, and Belgium). PATIENTS: All allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome between 2010 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients, nine of whom underwent noninvasive ventilation at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation, were analyzed. ICU admission occurred at a median of 146 (interquartile range, 27-321) days after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The main reason for acute respiratory distress syndrome was pneumonia in 81% of patients. All but one patient undergoing noninvasive ventilation at extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation had to be intubated thereafter. Overall, seven patients (19%) survived to hospital discharge and were alive and in remission of their hematologic disease after a follow-up of 18 (range, 5-30) months. Only one of 24 patients (4%) initiated on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within 240 days after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survived compared to six of 13 (46%) of those treated thereafter (p < 0.01). Fourteen patients (38%) experienced bleeding events, of which six (16%) were associated with fatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Discouraging survival rates in patients treated early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation do not support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in this group. On the contrary, long-term allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients otherwise eligible for full-code ICU management may be potential candidates for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in case of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome failing conventional measures.