The First Six Years of Building and Implementing a Return-to-Work Service for Patients with Acquired Brain Injury. The Rapid-Return-to-Work-Cohort-Study.

Background and objective Despite large activity worldwide in building and implementing new return-to-work (RTW) services, few studies have focused on how such implementation processes develop. The aim of this study was to examine the development in patient and service characteristics the first six years of implementing a RTW service for persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Methods The study was designed as a cohort study (n=189). Data were collected by questionnaires, filled out by the service providers. The material was divided into, and analyzed with, two implementation phases. Non-parametrical statistical methods and hierarchical regression analyses were applied on the material. Results The number of patients increased significantly, and the patient group became more homogeneous. Both the duration of the service, and the number of consultations and group session days were significantly reduced. Conclusion The patient group became more homogenous, but also significantly larger during the first six years of building the RTW service. At the same time, the duration of the service decreased. This study therefore questions if there is a lack of consensus on the intensity of work rehabilitation for this group.

A lifestyle intervention as supplement to a physical activity programme in rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle group intervention on well-being, occupation and social participation. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Senior centres in the community. SUBJECTS: Of 204 stroke survivors screened, 99 (49%) were randomized three months after stroke whereby 86 (87%) participants (mean (SD) age 77.0 (7.1) years) completed all assessments (39 in the intervention group and 47 in the control group). INTERVENTION: A lifestyle course in combination with physical activity (intervention group) compared with physical activity alone (control group). Both programmes were held once a week for nine months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36), addressing well-being and social participation. Assessments were performed at baseline and at nine months follow-up. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences between the groups at the nine months follow-up in the SF-36. Adjusted mean differences in change scores in the eight subscales of SF-36 were; 'mental health' (+1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.0, +7.6), 'vitality' (-3.0, 95% CI -9.6, +3.6), 'bodily pain' (+3.3, 95% CI -7.8, +14.4), 'general health' (-1.6, 95% CI -8.4, +5.1), 'social functioning' (-2.5, 95% CI -12.8, +7.8), 'physical functioning' (+1.0, 95% CI -6.7, +8.6), 'role physical' (-7.1, 95% CI -22.7, +8.4), 'role emotional' (+11.8, 95% CI -4.4, +28.0). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements were seen in both groups, but no statistically significant differences were found in the intervention group compared to controls. An intervention comprising regular group-based activity with peers may be sufficient in the long-term rehabilitation after stroke.

Validation of the Brief ICF core set for low back pain from the Norwegian perspective.

AIM: The aim of this study was to identify candidate categories from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to be included in the Brief ICF Core Set for low back pain (LBP) by examining their relation to general health and functionality. METHODS: This was part of an international multicentre study with 118 participating Norwegian patients with LBP. The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for LBP was filled in by health professionals. The patients reported their health-related quality of life in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and function in the Oswestry Disability Index. Two questions regarding the patient's general health and functioning were completed by the health professionals and the patients themselves. Regression models were developed in order to identify ICF categories explaining most of the variance of the criterion measures. RESULTS: Twelve ICF categories remained as significant explanatory factors according to the eight regression models, four of which were not included in a previously proposed Brief ICF Core Set for LBP. CONCLUSIONS: The present study complements the development of the Brief ICF Core Set for LBP, and indicates a minimum number of categories needed to explain LBP patients' functioning and health. Further elaboration of the Brief ICF Core Set for LBP with multinational data is needed.

Functional outcome and health-related quality of life 10 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQL) 10 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, population-based study of 62 survivors of working-age with moderate-to-severe TBI injured in 1995/1996, and hospitalized at the Trauma Referral Center in Eastern Norway. Functional status was measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). HRQL was assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean current-age was 40.8 years. The frequency of epilepsy was 19% and the depression rate 31%. A majority had good recovery (48%) or moderate disability (44%). Employment rate was 58%. Functional and employment status were associated with initial injury severity in contrast to HRQL. Study patients had significantly lower scores in all SF-36 dimensions when compared with the general Norwegian population. CONCLUSION: At 10-years follow-up, our study population is still in their most productive years and affected domains should be considered in long-term follow-up and intervention programs.

Does the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for low back pain cover the patients' problems? A cross-sectional content-validity study with a Norwegian population.

AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate the Norwegian form of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for low back pain patients and investigate the feasibility of the Core Set in clinical practice. METHODS: This was part of an international multicenter study with 118 participating Norwegian patients referred to Departments of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation with low back pain (LBP). The ICF Core Set for LBP was filled in by the health professionals. The patients reported their problems using the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI). RESULTS: The ICF Core Set categories capture the problems of the LBP patients, and few categories were reported to be missing. Many problems were reported within body function, and problems within work and employment were captured by the activity and participation component. The environmental factors in ICF were most frequently scored as facilitators, but the same factor could also represent a barrier in other individuals. Health professionals, family and friends were important factors within this domain. Few problems were scored as severe or complete indicating the need of collapsing the qualifier levels. Scoring of the ICF Core Set was feasibly, but rather time-consuming. CONCLUSION: The ICF Core Set for LBP captures the problems of LBP, and adds important aspects to clinical practice in the field of LBP. However, the ICF Core Set for LBP needs further elaboration in order to improve the clinical feasibility.

Early supported discharge of patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of early supported discharge (ESD) following acute stroke. METHOD: An ESD scheme was compared to conventional rehabilitation in a randomized controlled trial. All patients admitted with acute stroke were considered for inclusion. Eighty-eight (20.2%) were found to be eligible and 82 were randomized either to early supported discharge (n = 42) or conventional rehabilitation (n = 40). The primary outcome measure was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. The General Health Questionnaire, the Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale, mortality, placement and patient and career satisfaction served as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Median length of stay was reduced from 31 days in the conventional hospital rehabilitation group to 22 days in the early supported discharge group (p = 0.09). No differences were found regarding primary outcome. The General Health Questionnaire score showed a significant difference in favour of the early supported discharge group at three months (19.5/24, p = 0.02), but not at six. At six months, the proportion of patients being dead or in institution showed a trend of being higher in the conventional rehabilitation group (OR 3.8, 95% CI 0.8-23). CONCLUSIONS: Early supported discharge after stroke is feasible and it is possible that it has benefits compared with conventional rehabilitation.

Association between impairments, self-care ability and social activities 1 year after stroke.

PURPOSE: To explore how motor and cognitive impairments relate to physical activities of daily living (PADL) and social activities after stroke. METHOD: The data related to 65 patients (mean age 74.4 years, 43% females), assessed 1 year after stroke by means of the Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke patients and the Assessment of Stroke and other Brain damage instruments. The self-care and social activities scales applied were the Barthel ADL Index and the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). The association between impairment variables on the one hand and PADL and FAI scores on the other was estimated using Kendall rank correlations. RESULTS: Arm motor function correlated most strongly with the Barthel score (tau = 0.76), and visuospatial function came second (tau = 0.58). Factor analysis of the FAI produced three subscales: a 'domestic' factor most strongly related to arm motor function (tau = 0.49); 'outdoor' related to visuospatial ability (tau = 0.48); and 'hobby' which had no significant correlates. CONCLUSION: In the chronic phase of stroke, self-care and involvement in social activities relate most strongly to arm motor function and visuospatial ability. Outdoor activities depend mainly on visuospatial function.

Validation of the screening instrument for neuropsychological impairment in stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Full neuropsychological assessment is time-consuming and exhausting for the patient in the early phase of stroke. The screening instrument for neuropsychological impairment in stroke (SINS) is a brief, bedside-applicable instrument designed to screen perceptual and cognitive dysfunction related to functional activities in stroke. It has been developed by physiotherapists to be incorporated in the general assessment of the patient. This study evaluates the validity of the method against a more extensive reference method assessing cognitive function. METHODS AND RESULTS: An unselected group of hospitalized stroke patients (N = 87) was assessed 10 days and 12 months after stroke. Factor analyses (52% explained variance), identified three factors: 'aphasia', 'apraxia' and 'visuocognitive dysfunction'. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves demonstrated that for all factors, high specificity was maintained at the high sensitivity needed for a screening method. Kendall rank correlation coefficients between the scorings on the new instrument and the reference method were high. Effect size analysis showed that the ability of the new instrument to detect change in cognitive functioning during the first year was of the same magnitude as the reference method. CONCLUSIONS: SINS has a high sensitivity regarding cognitive dysfunction, as diagnosed by the more comprehensive and time-consuming reference method. The instrument would be useful as an initial step in the assessment of neuropsychological impairment in stroke patients.

Subjective well-being one year after stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the subjective well-being of stroke patients with that of a reference group, and to study its relationship to patient characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Interviews performed in the respondents' homes, tests performed at the outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS: Sixty patients one year after stroke (median age 74 years, interquartile range (IQR) 68-80), and 419 reference individuals (median age 75 years, IQR 71-80). MEASURES: Subjective well-being assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-20). Explanatory variables were demographic and medical characteristics of the individuals and scores on validated tests: Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients, Assessment of Cerebral Stroke and other Brain Damage, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the stroke patients than of the controls rated their subjective well-being as low, also after adjustment for age and gender (adjusted odds ratio 20.1, 95% confidence interval 9.6-42.0 by logistic regression). In bivariate analyses, leg and arm motor impairment, visuospatial impairment, apraxia, aphasia, low Barthel score, low FAI score, low MMSE score, and institutionalization were highly significant predictors of low subjective well-being (p-values < 0.01). In multiple linear regression, a model with gender (p = 0.3) and upper extremity motor score (p < 0.01) fitted the data well, and explained 48% of the variance in GHQ. CONCLUSION: Subjective well-being is decreased one year after stroke, and this is mainly attributed to arm motor impairments.

Are there gender differences in functional outcome after stroke?

PURPOSE: To study gender differences in functional outcome unexpectedly observed in a follow-up study of stroke patients. DESIGN: Prospective study of hospitalized stroke patients, with evaluations in the subacute phase and after one year. SETTING: Geriatric and general medical wards, and geriatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital serving as general hospital for a defined population. SUBJECTS: All stroke patients admitted during a six-month period (n = 165) were considered for inclusion, of whom 87 could be assessed in the subacute phase and 65 after one year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motor function assessed by the Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients; cognitive function by the Assessment of Stroke and other Brain Damage; and activities of daily living (ADL) function by the Barthel Index. Nursing-home residency registered after one year. RESULTS: Men achieved a significantly better score than women on most of the scales used. The age-adjusted odds for a man to have a higher Barthel score than a woman was 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-7.0) in the subacute phase and 3.3 (95% CI 1.2-9.0) after one year. Differences of the same magnitude were seen on the subscales of the motor and cognitive tests. The same trend was observed on all items of the Barthel Index. The males had a lower likelihood to be permanent nursing-home residents after one year, the age-adjusted odds ratio for nursing-home residency for females versus males being 6.3 (95% CI 1.2-65.3). CONCLUSION: Women seem to be functionally more impaired by stroke than men.

Predictive validity of the Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients (SMES).

The Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients (SMES) has been developed as an instrument for the evaluation by physiotherapists of motor function and activities in stroke patients. The predictive validity of the instrument was studied in a consecutive sample of 93 acute stroke patients, assessed in the acute phase and after one year. The outcome measures were: survival, residence at home or in institution, the Barthel ADL index (dichotomized at 19/20), and the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) (dichotomized at 9/10). The SMES, scored in the acute phase, demonstrated a marginally significant predictive power regarding survival, but was a highly significant predictor regarding the other outcomes. The adjusted odds ratio for a good versus a poor outcome for patients in the upper versus the lower tertile of the SMES arm subscore was 5.4 (95% confidence interval 0.9-59) for survival, 11.5 (2.1-88) for living at home, 86.3 (11-infinity) for a high Barthel score, and 31.4 (5.2-288) for a high FAI score. We conclude that SMES has high predictive validity.

The Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients: agreement between scores by patients and by relatives.

The aim of the study was to compare stroke patients' own scorings of the Frenchay Activities Index with scorings based on interviews with their nearest relatives. Fifty-two patients and relatives were interviewed separately 1 year after the stroke. The mean sumscore based upon information from the patients was 29.0, and that based upon the relatives' replies was 27.7 (mean difference 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.1 to 2.8). The Kendall tau B correlation between the two sumscores was 0.72 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.81). In half of the patients the two sumscores differed by four points or more, and in every fourth the two sumscores differed by six points or more. The weighted kappa for the single items varied between 0.36 and 0.89. No characteristics of patients or relatives were identified that were related to disagreement between the two scores.

The Barthel ADL index: factor structure depends upon the category of patient.

The validity and reliability of the Barthel index were studied in 60 geriatric patients, 87 stroke patients, and 102 patients with hip fracture, using a factor analysis methodology which explicitly accounts for the ordinal nature of the scoring on each item. The findings substantiate that the Barthel index is unidimensional among stroke patients, but not among geriatric patients or patients with hip fracture. In the latter two groups, one factor related to mobility, the other to bodily functions. A sum-score to characterize geriatric and hip fracture patients does not take into account the complex structure of the Barthel index.

The Barthel ADL index one year after stroke: comparison between relatives' and occupational therapist's scores.

The activities of daily living of 54 patients 1 year after stroke were rated with the Barthel Index by an occupational therapist (OT). A physician independently rated the same patients from interviews with their nearest relative. The mean sum-score obtained by the doctor was 16.7, while the mean sum-score obtained by the OT was 17.1. In more than 80% of the patients, the difference in sum-score was two points or less, which was considered to reflect acceptable agreement. Weighted kappa values of each item varied between 0.42 and 0.92, indicating moderate agreement for the items 'grooming' and 'bladder' and good or very good agreement for the other items. There was a statistically significant bias in the bladder item; the doctor's score being lower than that of the OT. The other items showed no significant bias. The probability of disagreement between the two raters increased with the patient's age; no other factors were found to be related to disagreement.