Development of an electronic food ordering system and a la carte menu: Enhancing patient involvement in nutritional care.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a significant issue in hospitals, leading to weight loss and reduced quality of life for patients. Hospital food plays a crucial role in preventing malnutrition, especially for patients with high nutritional risk or malnourishment. However, barriers to providing adequate nutritional care include a lack of tools to record patients' nutritional intake and a limited understanding of energy and protein content in hospital menus. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to develop an electronic patient-centered food ordering system and an à la carte menu to improve patients' nutritional care and involvement in their dietary choices. METHODS: The study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 involved a questionnaire survey among hospitalized patients to determine their food preferences, self-assessed ability to use an electronic food ordering system, and preferences for different types of cuisine. The survey also investigated patients' meal choices for a full day, including portion sizes. Part 2 comprised usability tests of the electronic food ordering system prototype, conducted on hospitalized patients to identify interface issues and assess overall satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients participated in the questionnaire survey. The majority (78.7 %) found the selection of dishes appropriate. Patients' preferences were used to adjust the à la carte menu to reflect their meal choices. In the usability tests, the electronic food ordering system prototype showed positive results, and the System Usability Score was above the threshold for minor adjustments. CONCLUSION: The study successfully developed an electronic patient-centered food ordering system and an à la carte menu that aligned with patients' preferences and needs. The system demonstrated usability and potential to improve patients' nutritional care and involvement in their dietary decisions. By addressing the barriers to nutritional care, this system offers a feasible solution to prevent and treat malnutrition in hospitalized patients.

The association between malnutrition and dehydration in older adults admitted to a geriatric unit: An observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is an overlap between the risk factors causing low intake of water and low intake of nutrients, respectively. This study aims to explore the agreement between the assessment of malnutrition and the outcome of low-intake dehydration in a population of older hospitalized patients. METHODS: Patients ≥65 years old and hospitalized at the geriatric hospital ward were screened for eligibility within 96 h of admission. Dehydration was assessed with the calculated serum osmolarity ≥295 mmol/L (1.86 × (Na+ + K+) + 1.15 × glucose + urea + 14), and (risk of) malnutrition was assessed with NRS-2002 ≥ 3 points, MNA-SF ≤ 7 points, MNA-LF < 17, MUST ≥ 2 points, and GLIM after screening with NRS-2002 and MNA-LF. Follow-up data regarding exercise rehabilitation, readmissions, and mortality was collected 30 days after discharge. Statistics used were the Chi-squared test, Fishers-exact test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients (57% females) were included. Median age 85.5 (IQR 80; 89.25) years. A total of 49 (43%) were dehydrated. Fewer females were dehydrated (F: 42.9% vs. M: 67.7%, p = 0.013). The patients with osmolarity ≥295 mmol/L had a higher median weight (68.3 (IQR 58.5; 78.4) vs. 62 (IQR 51.8; 72.1), p = 0.021) and mid-up-arm circumference (27 (IQR 26; 30) vs. 25.5 (IQR 22.9; 28.3), p = 0.004). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of malnutrition between those with or without dehydration (NRS-2002; 70% vs. 81%, p = 0.174; MNA-SF: 23.1 vs. 23.2%, p = 1.0; MNA-LF: 37.1 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.644; MUST: 24.5 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.308; GLIM after screening with NRS-2002: 84.4 vs. 74.5%, p = 0.405, GLIM after screening with MNA-LF: 74.1 vs. 75.6%, p = 0.438). Kappa values varied around 0 and reflected low agreement. There were no differences in the follow-up data, between those who were normohydrated and those who were dehydrated. CONCLUSION: We found low agreement between the assessment of malnutrition and low-intake dehydration in a population of older hospitalized patients. All geriatric patients should therefore be assessed for both conditions.

A multimodal nutritional intervention after discharge improves quality of life and physical function in older patients - a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Many older hospitalized patients are at nutritional risk or malnourished and the nutritional condition is often further impaired during hospitalization. When discharged to own home, a "Nutrition Gap" often occurs, causing inadequate dietary intake, and potentially impeded recovery. Previously, cross-sectorial studies of single component nutritional intervention have shown a limited effect on clinically relevant outcomes. We hypothesized that a multimodal nutritional intervention is necessary to elicit a beneficial effect on clinically relevant outcomes. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed for a period of 16 weeks. At discharge, the intervention group (IG) received dietetic counselling including a recommendation of daily training, an individual nutrition plan and a package containing foods and drinks covering dietary requirements for the next 24 h. Further, a goodie-bag containing samples of protein-rich milk-based drinks were provided. Information regarding recommendations of nutritional therapy after discharge was systematically and electronically communicated to the municipality. The dietician performed telephone follow-ups on day 4 and 30 and a home visit at 16 weeks. The control group (CG) received standard treatment. The primary outcome was readmissions within 6 month, secondary outcomes were Length of Stay (LOS), Health Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L), nutritional status, physical function (30s-CST) and mortality. This trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier no. NCT03488329. RESULTS: We included 191 patients (IG: n = 93). No significant difference was seen in readmissions within 6 month (IG: 45% vs. CG: 45%, Risk Ratio (RR): 0.96 0.71-1.31, p = 0.885). At the 16-weeks follow-up more patients in the IG reached at least 75% of energy and protein requirements (82% vs. CG: 61%, p = 0,007). The energy (kcal) and protein intake (g) per kg was significantly higher in the IG (26.4 kcal/kg (±7.4) vs. 22.6 (±7.4), p = 0.0248) (1.1 g/kg (±0.3) vs. 0.9 g/kg (±0.3). Furthermore, significant lower weight loss was seen in IG (0.7 (±4.3) vs. -1.4 (±3.6), p = 0.002). A significant and clinically relevant difference was found in the EQ-5D-3L VAS-score (IG: mean 61.6 ± 16.2 vs. CG: 53.3 ± 19.3, p = 0.011) (Δ14.3 (±15.5) vs. Δ5.6 (±17.2), p = 0.002). A significant difference in mean 30s-CST in IG was also found (7.2 (±4.3) vs. 5.3 (±4.1), p = 0.010). The improvements in physical function were of clinical relevance in both groups, but significantly higher in the IG (Δ4.2 (±4.4) vs. Δ2.2 (±2.5), p = 0.008). In fact, 86% in IG experienced improvements in the 30s-CST compared with 68% in the CG (p = 0.022). LOS was found to be lower at all time points, however not significant (30 days: -3 (-8.5 to 2.5), p = 0.276, 16 weeks: -4 (-10.2 to 2.2, p = 0.204), 6 months: -3 (-9.3 to 3.3, p = 0346)). All-cause mortality was not different between groups, however RR showed a non-significantly 47% reduction at day 30 (0.53 (0.14-2.05, p = 0.499)) and a 17% reduction at 16 weeks (0.83 (0.40-1.73, p = 1.000)) in IG. Per protocol (PP) analysis revealed a non-significant decrease of 32% in readmission at 6 months (RR: 0.68 (0.42-1.08), p = 0.105). CONCLUSION: The present study, using a multimodal nutritional approach, revealed no significant effect on readmissions however a significant positive effect on nutritional status, quality of life and physical function was found. The improvements in quality of life and physical function were of clinical relevance. No significant effect was found on LOS and mortality.

Effect of nutritional interventions on discharged older patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: During hospitalization, many older patients are at nutritional risk or malnourished, and their nutritional condition is often further impaired during hospitalization. After discharge, a "nutrition gap" often occurs in which the patient does not receive enough nutrition to ensure an optimal recovery. METHODS: The study is a randomized controlled study ongoing over 112 days. At discharge, the intervention group receives guidance from a clinical dietitian, and an individualized nutrition plan is made. The dietitian will perform telephone follow-up after 4 and 30 days. It will also be possible for the participant, the participant's relatives, or the participant's municipality to contact the dietitian if nutritional questions arise. At the time of discharge, the intervention group will receive a package containing foods and drinks that will cover their nutritional needs on the first day after discharge. They will also receive a goodie bag containing samples of protein-rich, milk-based drinks. Data are collected on quality of life, appetite, physical function, dietary intake, weight, height, energy and protein needs, and experience of discharge and cooperation with the municipality. Information about nutrition status will be sent to the municipality so that the municipality can take over nutritional treatment. The control group receives a standard treatment. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to combine previously successful single nutritional interventions into a multimodal intervention whose aim is to obtain an effect on patient-related outcomes. We hope that the results will prove beneficial and help to ensure the cross-sector quality of nutritional support to older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03488329. April 5, 2018.