ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Access to emergency care is an essential part of the health system. Improving access to emergency services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) decreases mortality and reduces global disparities; however, few studies have assessed emergency services resources in LMICs. To guide future improvements in care, we performed a comprehensive assessment of the emergency services capacity of a rural community in Guatemala serving a mostly indigenous population. METHODS: We performed an exhaustively sampled cross-sectional survey of all healthcare facilities providing urgent and emergent care in the four largest cities surrounding Lake Atitlán using the Emergency Services Resource Assessment Tool (ESRAT). RESULTS: Of 17 identified facilities, 16 agreed to participate and were surveyed: nine private hospitals; four public clinics; and three public hospitals, including the region's public departmental hospital. All facilities provided emergency services 24/7, and a dedicated emergency unit was available at 67% of hospitals and 75% of clinics. A dedicated physician was present in the emergency unit during the day at 67% of hospitals and 75% of clinics. Hospitals had a significantly higher percentage of available equipment compared to clinics (85% vs 54%, mean difference 31%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 23-37%; P = 0.004). There was no difference in availability of laboratory tests between public and private hospitals or between cities. Private hospitals had access to a significantly higher percentage of medications compared to clinics (56% vs 27%, mean difference 29%; 95% CI 9-49%; P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: We found a high availability of emergency services and universal availability of personal protective equipment but a severe shortage of critical medications in clinics, and widespread shortage of pediatric equipment.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Rural Population , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Guatemala , Health Services Accessibility , Hospitals, Public , HumansABSTRACT
Antimicrobial resistance resulting from antibiotic overuse represents an increasing public health challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic self-medication practices in a rural, indigenous Guatemalan population, and to compare self-prescribing patterns in rural and semi-urban populations using a One Health integrated approach, a framework acknowledging that health arises at the interface of humans, animals, and the environment. We conducted a mixed methods study using semi-structured interviews in and around San Lucas Tolimán, Guatemala. Antibiotic self-medication was common in both rural and semi-urban populations, regardless of demographic characteristics. Antibiotic usage in animals, while less common, almost always occurred without a veterinary consult. Although subjects recognized that self-medication could be harmful to health, they face significant barriers to accessing appropriate care. These patterns of use have impacts on the rise of antimicrobial resistance locally, and have the potential to contribute to the spread of such resistance globally.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , One Health , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Guatemala , Humans , Rural Population , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The global burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing, especially in Central America. In resource-limited settings, such as Guatemala, there are significant barriers to diabetes care and many Guatemalans use medicinal plants as treatment. The purpose of this study is to understand the use of medicinal plants in an indigenous population with diabetes in rural Guatemala. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in communities around San Lucas Tolimán, Guatemala with people with diabetes, health promoters, and traditional healers. RESULTS: Out of the 55 people with diabetes interviewed, 35 (63.6%) had used medicinal plants, most frequently using Artemisia absinthium, Moringa oleifera, Carica papaya, and Neurolaena lobata. The majority of participants cited lack of access to medications as the reason for their use of medicinal plants. CONCLUSION: There is widespread use of medicinal plants in San Lucas Tolimán. More research is needed to understand the degree of glycemic control in these communities.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Medicine, Traditional/statistics & numerical data , Plants, Medicinal , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Artemisia absinthium , Attitude of Health Personnel , Carica , Developing Countries , Female , Guatemala , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Medicine, Traditional/methods , Medicine, Traditional/psychology , Middle Aged , Moringa oleifera , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Installation of ventilated cookstoves has been shown to improve 24-h carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate exposure in the Guatemalan highlands. However, a survey of villagers around San Lucas Tolimán found much higher than expected CO levels. Our purpose is to evaluate the effects of improved cookstoves on CO levels in these villagers. METHODS: This is cross sectional observational study in six rural communities. Blood carboxyhemoglobin (SpCO) was measured at three different times during the day. Stove type and location, as well as any respiratory, eye, or general symptoms reported were recorded. RESULTS: 122 patients were included. CO levels were much higher than would be expected in a non-smoking population, with an average level of 4.6 ± 2.3 percent. There was no significant correlation in CO level and stove type or in CO level and time of day. Reported frequency of respiratory and eye symptoms (dyspnea, p = 0.03; cough, p = 0.01; burning eyes, p = 0.001; and excessive tearing, p = 0.001) did vary significantly between improved and unimproved stove groups. CONCLUSION: This study found high average SpCO levels in all villagers. This suggests that some contributor other than cookstoves may be an additional driver of individual CO exposure in this area.