Comparative toxicity of acrylic acid to marine and freshwater microalgae and the significance for environmental effects assessments.

In this study, we compared the sensitivity of freshwater and marine organisms to two structurally similar substances, acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Reported acute toxicity data (L(E)C50-values) for freshwater organisms range from 0.1 to 222 mg/l and 85 to >130 mg/l for acrylic acid and methacrylic acid, respectively. The large variation in toxicity data for acrylic acid is due to a specific toxicity to certain species of freshwater microalgae, with algae EC50-values being two to three orders of magnitude lower than L(E)C50-values reported for fish and invertebrates. To evaluate the sensitivity of marine organisms, ecotoxicity data was generated for ten species of microalgae, one invertebrate species and one fish species. For methacrylic acid, we found a marine acute toxicity that ranged from 110 to >1260 mg/l, which is comparable to reported data on freshwater organisms. In strong contrast, the resulting L(E)C50-values for acrylic acid ranged from 50 to >1000 mg/l, and there was no specific sensitivity of marine algae when compared to marine invertebrates and fish. For acrylic acid, therefore, use of the available freshwater toxicity data for an effects assessment for the marine environment is likely to overestimate the hazard and risk from this substance. Overall, the results of the study suggest that ecotoxicity data generated on freshwater species may not always be appropriate for the effects assessments of organic chemicals in the marine environment, thus emphasising the importance of using ecologically relevant data to assess environmental risk.

Environmental risk assessment of acrylamide and methylolacrylamide from a grouting agent used in the tunnel construction of Romeriksporten, Norway.

Increased focus on the possible evironmental risk associated with large-scale use of grouting agents has revealed that leakage of chemicals from grouting activities may cause harm to the environment. Chemical grouting agents are used to reduce water leakages in e.g. tunnel constructions. The present study focuses on monitoring results and environmental risk caused by releases of non-polymerised monomers during use of the acrylamide-based grouting agent Rhoca-Gil (Siprogel). Drainage water from the tunnel Romeriksporten was monitored with respect to acrylamide and methylolacrylamide, as leakage of these substances was observed earlier in connection with similar constructions where Rhoca-Gil was used. Concentrations of acrylamide and methylolacrylamide in the draining water showed that these substances leaked out both in connection with the injection of Rhoca-Gil and in connection with after-injection using other grouting agents. Gel formation studies with Rhoca-Gil showed that a low degree of polymerisation (and hence, large leakages of monomers) can be expected if the product is diluted with water. Results from investigation of the environmental fate of methylolacrylamide showed that this substance is chemically transformed at the high-pH conditions of the tunnel. Ecotoxicological testing of the substances and an environmental effects assessment for the receiving water (River Alna and the Oslofjord) showed that the discharge of acrylamide and methylolacrylamide may have caused effects on the aquatic life in the river and in a limited area of the fjord.

Effects of eight polycyclic aromatic compounds on the survival and reproduction of the springtail Folsomia fimetaria L. (Collembola, isotomidae).

The effects of eight polycyclic aromatic compounds on the survival and reproduction of the collembolan Folsomia fimetaria L. were investigated in a well-characterized Danish agricultural soil. With the exception of acridine, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and neutral N-, S-, and O-monosubstituted analogues showed similar toxicities to soil collembolans when the results were expressed in relation to total soil concentrations (mg/kg). The estimated concentrations resulting in a 10% reduction of reproductive output (EC10 values) were based on measured initial concentrations and were for acridine 290 mg/kg, carbazole 10 mg/kg, dibenzofuran 19 mg/kg, dibenzothiophene 7.8 mg/kg, fluoranthene 37 mg/kg, fluorene 7.7 mg/kg, phenantrene 23 mg/kg, and pyrene 10 mg/kg. When the EC10 values were converted to soil pore-water concentrations, they showed a highly significant correlation (r2 = 0.71, p < 0.01) to no-observed-effect concentrations for the freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna, as estimated by a quantitative structure activity relation (QSAR) for baseline toxicity (nonpolar narcosis). Only carbazole and acridine were more than two times more toxic (4.9 and 3.1, respectively) than expected from the Daphnia QSAR data. The latter result indicates that the toxicity of the tested substances is close to that expected for compounds with nonpolar narcosis as the mode of action. However, the relatively large uncertainties in the extrapolation method prevent final conclusions from being drawn.

Effects of polycyclic aromatic compounds on the drought tolerance of Folsomia fimetaria (Collembola, Isotomidae).

Drought tolerance (survival at 98.2% relative humidity and 20 degress C) was investigated for adult individuals of the springtail Folsomia fimetaria after three weeks of exposure to different polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs). Seven PACs were investigated (acridine, dibenzofuran, carbazole, fluorene, dibenzothiophene, fluoranthene, and pyrene), with each substance used at several exposure concentrations. Sublethal concentrations of dibenzothiophene, fluorene, fluoranthene, and pyrene caused a dose-related decrease in drought tolerance in exposed adults, whereas no such relationship was found for acridine, dibenzofuran, and carbazole. The organisms used in the drought tolerance study were taken directly from standard ecotoxicity tests that had just been completed, hence the concentrations causing subsequent effects on drought tolerance and those affecting survival and reproduction in the ecotoxicity tests could be compared. Some of the tested substances significantly reduced the drought tolerance of F. fimetaria at concentrations that had little effect on survival, indicating a synergistic effect of the two stressors. However, drought tolerance was affected at concentrations below the threshold value for toxicity in standard tests (no-observed-effect concentration for reproduction) only for dibenzothiophene. In the field, soil organisms exposed to contaminants also face multiple environmental stressors such as drought and cold. Because the reduced drought tolerance is a side effect of chemical exposure, such effects should be considered when extrapolating from laboratory to field conditions.