SARS-CoV-2 vs. human gametes, embryos and cryopreservation.

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is an unprecedented global situation, and all countries have adopted their own measurements to mitigate the spread of the virus in the first as well as in the subsequent waves of infection. All measures, especially in the first wave of the pandemic, were in combination with recommendations provided by professional and scientific organizations. Similar measures were applied to specific procedures, such as the management of infertility, including in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatments. Although there is no clear scientific evidence yet that the SARS-CoV-2 may exert negative effects on IVF outcome, especially at the early stages, several clinical reports indicate that the virus may impact male fertility through specific receptors presented at the somatic cells of the testis and used by the virus in order to gain entry to the respective cells. Nevertheless, it is not unreasonable to suspect that the virus may affect sperm function as well as oocyte performance directly through specific receptors or indirectly through other signaling pathways. Despite the good practice of IVF laboratory techniques, culture media may also be contaminated during equilibration when airborne virus's particles can contaminate culture media from an already infected embryology area or staff. Furthermore, although there is no clinical evidence, liquid nitrogen could be a route of infection for gametes and embryos when it has been contaminated during production or transportation. Therefore, cryopreservation of gametes and embryos must be virus-free. This communication aims to provide some aspects of the possible impact of the virus on gametes and embryos and how it may affect the cryopreservation procedures.Abbreviations: ACE2: angiotensin- converting enzyme 2; ART: assisted reproductive technology; ASRM: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; ESHRE: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; ET: embryo transfer; FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; IFFS: International Federation of Fertility Societies; IVF: in vitro fertilization; LH: luteinizing hormone; LN: liquid nitrogen; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; T: testosterone; WHO: World Health Organization.

The effect of a GnRH antagonist on follicle maturation in normal women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Ganirelix is a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist used for the prevention of premature LH surge during ovarian stimulation. What is the impact of ganirelix on follicle maturation in normal women? DESIGN: Ten normally cycling women were investigated during two menstrual cycles, i.e. cycle 1 (control) and cycle 2 (ganirelix). During both cycles, daily blood samples were taken from day 2, while transvaginal ultrasound scans were performed on cycle days 8 and 10 and daily thereafter. During cycle 2, all women were given 0.25 mg/day subcutaneous injections of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix from day 2 until the day of the endogenous LH surge onset in cycle 1. RESULTS: During treatment with ganirelix, serum FSH and oestradiol concentrations remained stable, while those of LH decreased significantly on days 3, 4, 7 and 9 (P < 0.05) compared with controls. Nevertheless, there was no significant within-cycle variation in LH concentrations. From day 10 onwards, no follicle maturation was observed in cycle 2, in contrast to cycle 1. Ovulation occurred in 9 of 10 women in cycle 1. In cycle 2, ovulation was delayed by at least 1 week in eight women. Follicle growth and ovulation occurred in only one woman while on ganirelix treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that in normal women dominant follicle selection failed during treatment with ganirelix. As there was a similar gonadotrophin profile in the two cycles, it is suggested that ganirelix interferes with the process of follicle selection by acting in the ovary.

Macroscopic Hematuria due to Placenta Percreta: Report of Two Cases and Short Review.

Herein we present two cases of pregnant women with placenta percreta and severe hematuria during the 24th and 35th weeks of pregnancy, respectively. A timely sonographic diagnosis was feasible in the first case and cesarean section was performed during the 29th week. During the operation, the placenta was invading the bladder wall and concomitant hysterectomy with cystotomy and bladder wall reconstruction was performed. The second case presented in our emergency department with vaginal bleeding during the 35th weeks of pregnancy. She underwent an emergency cesarean section with uterine preservation, cystotomy, and bladder reconstruction.