Nurses' Perceptions of Caring at Work: Mixed-Methods Study, Quantitative Report.

OBJECTIVES: Study objectives were to explore nurses' perceptions of self-care, co-worker, and leader caring within healthcare work environments and assess reliability of 3 Watson Caritas Scores. BACKGROUND: Assessing caring in an organization where Watson's Theory of Human Caring guides nursing practice offers insight into the professional practice environment. METHOD: This study reports quantitative data from mixed-methods descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 1307 RNs at a large healthcare system. RESULTS: Mean scores were self = 5.46, co-worker = 5.39, and leader score = 5.53, and median scores were >5.6 (range, 1-7). All scales had a positive and significant correlation to likelihood to recommend the organization, with the largest being feeling cared for by leaders. Internal reliability of the 3 scales was ≥0.9. CONCLUSION: Nurse perceptions of caring may influence the organization's reputation. Assessing the perception of caring among nursing staff after the introduction and enculturation of this framework is needed. Results support psychometric value for 3 Watson Caritas Scores.

Growing Novice Nurses to Perianesthesia Care: Formation of a Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Fellowship.

PURPOSE: To provide a proof of concept of a structured, replicable perianesthesia fellowship program for nurses with less than 2 years of experience and new graduate nurses. DESIGN: An immersive learning experience was implemented as a pilot quality improvement project using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. METHODS: This 24-week fellowship program used blended learning approaches and the Tiered Skill Acquisition Model (TSAM) to develop foundational Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) skills. Nurse Fellows (4) acquired knowledge in stages, with each week in the program reinforcing and building upon the prior week's learnings. Settings included an initial 10 weeks in the ambulatory PACU, then the acute care PACU (weeks 11-20), and the final 4 weeks were spent in the primary unit where the Fellow would transition into a PACU Staff RN. Through each phase, the Professional Practice Department's Clinical Mentor Nurse promoted preceptor development, facilitated learning experiences and provided bimonthly evaluations of the Nurse Fellow's progress via our institution's clinical rounding tool. We used the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence Associated with Clinical Decision Making (NASC-CDM) scale to assess novice nurses' anxiety and self-confidence associated with making clinical decisions at designated intervals. FINDINGS: All Nurse Fellows completed the program and remained in PACU positions 2 years post-fellowship. They reported discomfort and increased stress transitioning to different PACUs; however, they later indicated reduced anxiety and greater confidence in clinical decision-making, as noted in subsequent evaluations of the NASC-CDM scale. CONCLUSIONS: Perianesthesia fellowship programs incorporating blended learning, skill reinforcement, and formal mentoring on a primary PACU unit build confidence and competence in the novice nurse, making this once-excluded population of nurses a viable option for recruitment directly into the PACU environment.

Selection of Screening Tool for Sleep-Disordered Breathing or Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pediatric Patients in the Perianesthesia Setting.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to select an appropriate tool to predict risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among pediatric patients in the preoperative setting. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective chart review and a survey of nursing staff to compare two tools that were determined to be valid in assessing risk of OSA and postanesthesia complications in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years was conducted. About 300 pediatric patients presenting for elective surgery were screened for OSA using STBUR (Snoring, Trouble Breathing during sleep, struggling to Breathe during Sleep, and waking UnRefreshed) and ST(1)OP-BANG (Snoring, Tonsillar hypertrophy, sleep Obstruction, BMI, Age, Neuromuscular disorders, and Genetic/congenital deformities) concurrently. Six preoperative nurses were then surveyed to compare ease of use and time to complete the screening tools. FINDINGS: The STBUR tool was found to predict complications in 37.5% patients versus 22.7% patients with the pediatric ST(1)OP-BANG. Nursing staff found that although both tools were quick and easy to use, the STBUR tool was easier for parents to answer. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a screening tool to help predict risk of OSA and postanesthetic complications also helps to dictate anesthesia technique, nursing staffing requirements, and plans of care for postoperative management of pediatric patients.